Advertisement

Comparative evaluation of maceration, microwave and ultrasonic-assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from propolis

  • Mircea OroianEmail author
  • Florina Dranca
  • Florin Ursachi
Original Article
  • 18 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare different techniques in order to achieve a high extraction of phenolic compounds from propolis. For this purpose, it was investigated the use of double maceration (24 h at room temperature with continuous agitation at 250 rpm), double microwave treatments (1 min at 140 W) and double ultrasound-assisted extraction (15 min at 20 kHz) using 70% ethanol. The extraction efficiency was measured based on extraction yield, total phenolic content, flavones and flavonol content, and flavanone and dihydroflavonol content. The ultrasonic extraction had an extraction yield higher than microwave extraction and maceration. The yield of the propolis ranged between samples and between the years of propolis harvesting. Of the twelve quantified phenolic compounds, p-coumaric acid was the most abundant (271.65 mg/g propolis).

Keywords

Propolis Maceration Microwave Ultrasound-assisted Extraction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project is co-funded by the Ministry of Research and Innovation through Program 1—Development of the National R&D System, Subprogram 1.2—Institutional Performance—Projects for Excellence Financing in RDI, Contract No.18PFE/2018 and by the Romania National Council for Higher Education Funding, CNFIS, project number CNFIS-FDI-2019-0600.

References

  1. Al-Ani I, Zimmermann S, Reichling J, Wink M (2018) Antimicrobial activities of european propolis collected from various geographic origins alone and in combination with antibiotics. Medicines 5(1):2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alm-Eldeen AA, Basyony MA, Elfiky NK, Ghalwash MM (2017) Effect of the Egyptian propolis on the hepatic antioxidant defense and pro-apoptotic p53 and antiapoptotic bcl2 expressions in aflatoxin B1 treated male mice. Biomed Pharmacother 87:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antolovich M, Prenzler P, Robards K, Ryan D (2000) Sample preparation in the determination of phenolic compounds in fruits. Analyst 125(5):989–1009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Biscaia D, Ferreira SR (2009) Propolis extracts obtained by low pressure methods and supercritical fluid extraction. J Supercrit Fluids 51(1):17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen YW, Ye SR, Ting C, Yu YH (2018) Antibacterial activity of propolins from Taiwanese green propolis. J Food Drug Anal 26(2):761–768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coneac G, Gafiţanu E, Hădărugă DI et al (2008) Flavonoid contents of propolis from the west side of Romania and correlation with the antioxidant activity. Chem Bull Politeh Uni Timis 53(67):56–60Google Scholar
  7. Cornara L, Biagi M, Xiao J, Burlando B (2017) Therapeutic properties of bioactive compounds from different honeybee products. Front Pharmacol 8:412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cottica SM, Sabik H, Antoine C et al (2015) Characterization of Canadian propolis fractions obtained from two-step sequential extraction. LWT Food Sci Technol 60(1):609–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cruz M, Antunes P, Paulo L et al (2016) Antioxidant and dual dose-dependent antigenotoxic and genotoxic properties of an ethanol extract of propolis. RSC Adv 6(55):49806–49816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Di Capua A, Bejarano A, Adami R, Reverchon E (2018) Preparation and characterization of Chilean propolis coprecipitates using supercritical assisted atomization. Chem Eng Res Des 136:776–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dranca F, Oroian M (2016) Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of total monomeric anthocyanin (TMA) and total phenolic content (TPC) from eggplant (Solanum melongena L.) peel. Ultrason Sonochem 31:637–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Escriche I, Juan-Borrás M (2018) Standardizing the analysis of phenolic profile in propolis. Food Res Int 106:834–841CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Falcão SI, Vilas-Boas M, Estevinho LM et al (2010) Phenolic characterization of Northeast Portuguese propolis: usual and unusual compounds. Anal Bioanal Chem 396(2):887–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Falcão SI, Vale N, Cos P et al (2014) In vitro evaluation of Portuguese propolis and floral sources for antiprotozoal, antibacterial and antifungal activity. Phytother Res 28(3):437–443CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freitas JA, Vanat N, Pinheiro JW et al (2011) The effects of propolis on antibody production by laying hens. Poult Sci 90(6):1227–1233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. González M, Guzmán B, Rudyk R et al (2003) Spectrophotometric determination of phenolic compounds in propolis. Acta Farm Bonaer 22(3):243–248Google Scholar
  17. Jug M, Končić MZ, Kosalec I (2014) Modulation of antioxidant, chelating and antimicrobial activity of poplar chemo-type propolis by extraction procures. LWT Food Sci Technol 57(2):530–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kumazawa S, Hamasaka T, Nakayama T (2004) Antioxidant activity of propolis of various geographic origins. Food Chem 84(3):329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Liu Z, Ding L, Zhang H, Hu X, Bu F (2006) Comparison of the different extraction methods of flavonoids in Epimedium Koreamum Nakai by HPLC–DAD–ESI–MSn. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol 29(5):719–731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Marcucci MC (1995) Propolis: chemical composition, biological properties and therapeutic activity. Apidologie 26(2):83–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Meimandi-Parizi A, Oryan A, Sayahi E, Bigham-Sadegh A (2018) Propolis extract a new reinforcement material in improving bone healing: an in vivo study. Int J Surg 56:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mokrani A, Madani K (2016) Effect of solvent, time and temperature on the extraction of phenolic compounds and antioxidant capacity of peach (Prunus persica L.) fruit. Sep Purif Technol 161:68–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moreira L, Dias LG, Pereira JA, Estevinho L (2008) Antioxidant properties, total phenols and pollen analysis of propolis samples from Portugal. Food Chem Toxicol 46(11):3482–3485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nna VU, Bakar ABA, Mohamed M (2018) Malaysian propolis, metformin and their combination, exert hepatoprotective effect in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Life Sci 211:40–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oliveira AV, Ferreira AL, Nunes S et al (2017) Antibacterial activity of propolis extracts from the south of Portugal. Pak J Pharm Sci 30(1):1–9Google Scholar
  26. Oroian M (2012) Physicochemical and rheological properties of Romanian honeys. Food Biophys 7(4):296–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oroian M, Ropciuc S (2017) Honey authentication based on physicochemical parameters and phenolic compounds. Comput Electron Agric 138:148–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ozdal T, Sari-Kaplan G, Mutlu-Altundag E et al (2018) Evaluation of Turkish propolis for its chemical composition, antioxidant capacity, anti-proliferative effect on several human breast cancer cell lines and proliferative effect on fibroblasts and mouse mesenchymal stem cell line. J Apic Res 57:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Popova MP, Bankova VS, Bogdanov S et al (2007) Chemical characteristics of poplar type propolis of different geographic origin. Apidologie 38(3):306–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Popova M, Trusheva B, Bankova V (2017) Content of biologically active compounds in Bulgarian propolis: a basis for its standardization. Bulg Chem Commun 49:115–120Google Scholar
  31. Roh J, Kim KR (2018) Antimicrobial activity of Korean propolis extracts on oral pathogenic microorganisms. J Dent Hyg Sci 18(1):18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sawaya ACHF, da Silva Cunha IB, Marcucci MC (2011) Analytical methods applied to diverse types of Brazilian propolis. Chem Cent J 5(1):27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sforcin JM (2016) Biological properties and therapeutic applications of propolis. Phytother Res 30(6):894–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sforci JM, Bankova V (2011) Propolis: is there a potential for the development of new drugs? J Ethnopharmacol 133(2):253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sheng J, Zhou J, Wang L et al (2007) Antioxidant activity of ethanol and petroleum ether extracts from Brazilian propolis. Eur Food Res Technol 225(2):249–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Silva-Carvalho R, Miranda-Gonçalves V, Ferreira AM et al (2014) Antitumoural and antiangiogenic activity of Portuguese propolis in in vitro and in vivo models. J Funct Foods 11:160–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Silva-Carvalho R, Baltazar F, Almeida-Aguiar C (2015) Propolis: a complex natural product with a plethora of biological activities that can be explored for drug development. Evid Based Complement Altern Med 2015:206439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stan L, Mărghitaş LA, Dezmirean D (2011) Quality criteria for propolis standardization. Sci Pap Anim Sci Biotechnol 44(2):137–140Google Scholar
  39. Thamnopoulos IAI, Michailidis GF, Fletouris DJ et al (2018) Inhibitory activity of propolis against Listeria monocytogenes in milk stored under refrigeration. Food Microbiol 73:168–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Trusheva B, Trunkova D, Bankova V (2007) Different extraction methods of biologically active components from propolis: a preliminary study. Chem Cent J 1(1):13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Veloz JJ, Saavedra N, Lillo A et al (2015) Antibiofilm activity of Chilean propolis on Streptococcus mutans is influenced by the year of collection. BioMed Res Int, Article ID 291351Google Scholar
  42. Yildirim A, Duran GG, Duran N et al (2016) Antiviral activity of hataypropolis against replication of herpes simplex virus type 1 and type 2. Med Sci Monit 22:422–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Food EngineeringStefan cel Mare University of SuceavaSuceavaRomania

Personalised recommendations