Advertisement

Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 57, Issue 1, pp 41–51 | Cite as

Sensory, rheological and chemical characteristics during storage of set type full fat yoghurt fortified with barley β-glucan

  • Ramandeep Kaur
  • Charanjit S. RiarEmail author
Original Article
  • 76 Downloads

Abstract

β-Glucan, is a soluble dietary fiber and is obtained from number of sources including cereals. It possesses the nutraceutical characteristics and acts as functional bioactive ingredient in the fermented dairy product including yoghurt. In this concern, β-glucan isolated from barley having purity of (91.52%) was incorporated in different proportions (0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2%, w/v) during the full fat yoghurt preparation. The analysis of β-glucan carried out initially, indicated that the viscosity, water binding capacity, swelling power and solubility values were 92 Pa s, 3.17 g/g, 18.50 g/g and 3%, respectively, whereas, the total antioxidant activity obtained in terms of DPPH free radical scavenging activity was 27%. Based on these characteristics β-glucan extract had been considered as the choicest material for set type products like yoghurt. Thereafter, physiochemical, rheological and sensory characteristics of β-glucan incorporated yoghurt were evaluated during 1st, 7th and 14th days of refrigerated storage. Addition of β-glucan significantly (p ≤ 0.05) improved whey separation (syneresis), viscosity, texture profile and sensory characteristics during storage. The TPA characteristics such as hardness, cohesiveness and resilience of yoghurt samples improved significantly during storage with the incorporation of β-glucan whereas, β-glucan added yoghurt obtained higher consistency coefficient (K), thus, indicated a thicker and compact texture. Sensory analysis of stored yoghurt indicated that yoghurt samples in the present study containing even higher (1.5–2%) β-glucan level had obtained the higher average overall acceptability (8.1 to 8.3 on 9-point scale) score as compared to a low fat yoghurt containing lower β-glucan level (0.5%) reported in the literature.

Keywords

Yoghurt β-Glucan Texture profile analysis Sensory analysis Storage Antioxidant activity 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The ethical approval for this study has been taken from the departmental concern as per the set procedure followed through a committee comprising (HOD, FE&T)), Prof. & PG Coordinator (Dr. Sukhcharn Singh) and Dr. Kamlesh Prasad, (Professor, FE&T). The written consent from participants including staff and students of the FE&T Department as per requirements have been taken for carrying out the sensory analysis of the developed product and has been kept in record.

Supplementary material

13197_2019_4027_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 kb)
13197_2019_4027_MOESM2_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. AACC (2003) Method no. 32-23, 46-13, 08-01.44-16, 08-01 and 30-10. Approved methods of american association of cereal chemists. Inc., The American Association of Cereal Chemists, St PaulGoogle Scholar
  2. Aboushanab S, Vyrova D, Selezneva I (2018) Characterization of low- and non-fat yoghurt manufactured with addition of β-glucanas a dietary supplement, physics, technologies and innovation (PTI-2018). In: Proceedings of the V international young researchers’ conference.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5055076
  3. Ahmad A, Anjum FM, Zahoor T, Nawaz H, Din A (2009) Physicochemical and functional properties of barley β-glucan as affected by different extraction procedures. Int J Food Sci Technol 44:181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmad A, Anjum FM, Zahoor T, Nawaz H, Ahmed Z (2010) Extraction and characterization of β-D-glucan from oat for industrial utilization. Int J Biol Macromol 46(3):304–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Annuziata A, Vecchio R (2013) Consumer perception of functional foods: a conjoint analysis with probiotic. Food Qual Prefer 28:348–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babic A, Fincher GB, Stone BA (2009) Chemistry, biochemistry, and biology of (1-3)-β-glucans and related polysaccharides, 1st edn. Academic Press, AmesterdamGoogle Scholar
  7. Batista ALD, Silva R, Cappato LP, Almada CN, Garcia KA, Silva MC et al (2015) Quality parameters of probiotic yoghurt added of glucose oxidase compared to commercial products through microbiological, physical-chemical and metabolic activity analyses. Food Res Int 77(3):627–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhaskar D, Khatkar SK, Chawla R, Panwar H, Kapoor S (2017) Effect of β-glucan fortification on physico-chemical, rheological, textural, colour and organoleptic characteristics of low fat dahi. J Food Sci Technol 54(9):2684–2693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brand-Williams W, Cuvelier ME, Berset C (1995) Use of a free radical method to evaluate antioxidant activity. LWT-Food Sci Technol 28:25–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brennan CS, Cleary LJ (2005) The potential use of cereal (1-3), (1-4) -β-glucan as functional food ingredient. J Cereal Sci 42:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Christopher MD, Reddy VP, Venkateswarlu K (2009) Viability during storage of two Bifidobacterium bifidum strains in set and stirred flavoured yoghurts containing whey protein concentrates. Nat Prod Radiance 8:25–31Google Scholar
  12. Cruz AG, Cadena RSMB, Alvaro VB, Santana AS, Oliveira CAF (2013a) Assessing the use of different chemometric techniques to discriminate low-fat and full-fat yoghurts. LWT-Food Sci Technol 50:210–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cruz AG, Cadenaa WF, Castroc EA, Rodriguesa EB, Fariaa GAF, Freitasd FMQ et al (2013b) Consumer perception of probiotic yoghurt: performance of check all that apply (CATA), projective mapping, sorting and intensity scale. Food Res Int 54(1):601–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Esmerino EA, Filho ERT, Carr BT, Ferraz JP, Silva HLA, Pinto LPF, Freitas MQ, Cruz AG, Bolini HMA (2017) Consumer-based product characterization using pivot profile, projective mapping and check-all-that-apply (CATA): a comparative case with Greek yoghurt samples. Food Res Int 99(1):375–384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gee VLT, Vasanthan T, Temelli F (2007) Viscosity of model yogurt systems enriched with barley β-glucan as influenced by starter cultures. Int Dairy J 17(9):1083–1088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grausgruber H, Scheiblauer J, Schonlechner R, Ruckenbauer P, Berghofer E (2004) Variability in chemical composition and biologically active constituents of cereals. In: Vollmann J, Grausgruber H, Ruckenbauer P (eds) Genetic variation for plant breeding. Proceedings of the 17th EUCARPIA General Congress, Tulln, Austria, 8–11 Sept 2004. University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, pp 23–26. ISBN: 3900962561Google Scholar
  17. Guleria P, Kumari S, Dangi N (2015) β-glucan: health benefits and role in food industry—a review. Int J Enhanc Res Sci Technol Eng 4(8):2319–7463Google Scholar
  18. Guzel-Seydim ZB, Sezgin E, Seydim AC (2005) Influences of exo-polysaccharide producing cultures on the quality of plain set type yoghurt. Food Control 16:205–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamad MNF, El-Nemr MK (2015) Development of guava probiotic dairy beverages: application of mathematical modeling between consumer acceptance degree and whey ratio. Int J Sci Res Sci Technol 1(5):2395–6011Google Scholar
  20. Inglett GE, Chen D, Liu SX (2015) Pasting and rheological properties of quinoa-oat composites. Int J Food Sci Technol 50(4):878–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jirdehi S, Qajarbeygi Z, Khaksar P (2013) Effect of prebiotic β-glucan composite on physical, chemical, rheological and sensory properties of set-type low-fat Iranian yoghurt. Egypt J Basic Appl Sci 3(1):205–210Google Scholar
  22. Khoury DEL, Cuda C, Luhovy BL, Anderson GH (2012) β-glucan: health benefits in obesity and metabolic syndrome. J Nutr Metabol 2012:1–28Google Scholar
  23. Kofuji K, Aoki A, Tsubaki K, Konishi M, Isobe T, Musrata Y (2012) Antioxudant activity of β-glucan. Int Sch Res Netw.  https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/125864 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kogan G, Stasko A, Bauerov K, Polovka M, Soltes L, Brezov V (2005) Antioxidant properties of yeast (1/3)-β-D-glucan studied by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and its activity in the adjuvant arthritis. Carbohyr Polym 61:18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kruif CG, Tuinier R (2011) Polysaccharide protein interactions. Food Hydrocoll 15:555–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee YE, Osman EM (1991) Correlation of morphological changes of rice starch granules with rheological proper-ties during heating in excess water. J Korean Agric Chem Soc 34:379–385Google Scholar
  27. Lucey JA (2002) Formation and physical properties of milk protein gels. J Dairy Sci 85:281–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Meilgard M, Civille GV, Caar BT (1999) Sensory evaluation techniques, 3rd edn. CRC Publishers, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mudgil D, Barak S, Khatkar BS (2016) Development of functional yoghurt via soluble fiber fortification utilizing enzymatically hydrolyzed guar gum. Food Biosci 14:28–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nikoofar E, Hojjatoleslamy M, Shakerian A, Molavi H, Shariaty MA (2013) Surveying the effect of oat β-glucan as a fat replacer on rheological and physicochemical characteristics of non-fat set yoghrt. Int J Farm Allied Sci 2(20):790–796Google Scholar
  31. Panesar PS, Shinde C (2011) Effect of storage on syneresis, pH, Lactobacillus acidophilus count, Bifidobacterium bifidium count of aloe vera fortified probiotic yoghurt. Curr Res Dairy Sci 4(1):17–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Patel S, Majumder A, Goyal A (2012) Potential of exo-polysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria. Indian J Microbiol 52(1):3–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Singh S, Kaur M (2017) Steady and dynamic shear rheology of starches from different oat cultivars in relation to their physiochemical and structural properties. Int J Food Prop 20(12):3282–3294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Subaric D, Babic J, Lalic A, Ackar D, Kopjar M (2011) Isolation and characterization of starch from different barley and oat varieties. Czech J Food Sci 29(4):354–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Vanegas-Azuero AM, Gutiérrez LF (2018) Physicochemical and sensory properties of yogurts containing sacha inchi (Plukenetia volubilis L.) seeds and β-glucans from Ganoderma lucidum. J Dairy Sci 101:1020–1033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Vizhi VK, Many JN (2012) Study on estimation, extraction and analysis of barley β-glucan. Int J Sci Res 3(10):1480–1484Google Scholar
  37. Wong JMW, Souza RD, Kendall CWC, Emam A, Jenkins DA (2005) Colonic health: fermentation and short chain fatty acids. J Clin Gastroenterol 40(3):235–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhao CB, Wu F, Li YP, Liu XL (2014) Effects of β-glucans on properties of soya bean protein isolate thermal gels. Int J Food Sci Technol 50(2):347–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food Engineering and TechnologySant Longowal Institute of Engineering and TechnologyLongowalIndia

Personalised recommendations