Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 56, Issue 11, pp 5087–5096 | Cite as

Functional and antioxidant properties of cookies incorporated with foxtail millet and ginger powder

  • Natasha R. Marak
  • Chungkham C. Malemnganbi
  • Cassandra R. Marak
  • Lokesh K. MishraEmail author
Original Article


The functional, sensory, nutritive, phytochemical and antioxidant properties of flours derived from wheat, foxtail millet and ginger along with the cookies formulated from these ingredients was studied. The foxtail millet (20, 30 and 40%) and ginger powder (5, 10 and 15%) blended wheat flours were investigated and compared to control (100% wheat flour). The increase in substitution levels of both the alternatives improved the functional properties of the composite flour and cookies formulated. Sensory analysis revealed that cookies prepared from 30% foxtail millet and 10% ginger powder had comparable scores. These were further subjected to nutritive and phytochemical analyses. The results revealed that cookies formulated using both the alternatives had reasonable proximate composition comparable to control. The substituted cookies had higher total soluble phenolic content and antioxidant capacities in terms of DPPH and ABTS scavenging potential and a strongly positive correlation was observed between the total soluble phenolic content and antioxidant capacities in composite flour and the cookies formulated from the flours. Overall the addition of foxtail millet flour (30%) and ginger powder (10%) improved the nutritional and phenolic linked antioxidant potential which can lead to shelf life extension and enhanced health benefits.


Foxtail millet Ginger powder Cookies Functional properties Antioxidant capacities 



Authors would like to acknowledge the laboratory facilities provided by Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Community Science, Central Agricultural University, Tura, Meghalaya.

Author's contribution

NRM and LKM: Conceived and designed the experiments. LKM, NRM, CCM and CRM: Performed the experiments. LKM: Analyzed the data. NRM and LKM: Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. LKM, NRM: Manuscript preparation.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Anton AA, Ross KA, Lukow OM, Fulcher RG, Arntfield SD (2008) Influence of added bean flour (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) on some physical and nutritional properties of wheat flour tortillas. Food Chem 109(1):33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AOAC (2000) Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 17th edn. Official Methods of AnalysisGoogle Scholar
  3. Chandra S, Singh S, Kumari D (2015) Evaluation of functional properties of composite flours and sensorial attributes of composite flour biscuits. J Food Sci Technol 52(6):3681–3688PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chávez-Santoscoy RA, Gutiérrez-Uribe JA, Serna-Saldivar SO, Perez-Carrillo E (2016) Production of maize tortillas and cookies from nixtamalized flour enriched with anthocyanins, flavonoids and saponins extracted from black bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seed coats. Food Chem 192:90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chinma CE, Gernah DI (2007) Physicochemical and sensory properties of cookies produced from cassava/soyabean/mango composite flour. J Food Technol 5(3):256–260Google Scholar
  6. Devi PB, Vijayabharathi R, Sathyabama S, Malleshi NG, Priyadarisini VB (2014) Health benefits of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) polyphenols and dietary fiber: a review. J Food Sci Technol 51(6):1021–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elleuch M, Bedigian D, Roiseux O, Besbes S, Blecker C, Attia H (2011) Dietary fibre and fibre-rich by-products of food processing: characterisation, technological, functionality and commercial applications: a review. Food Chem 124:411–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Giarnetti M, Paradiso VM, Caponio F, Summo C, Pasqualone A (2015) Fat replacement in shortbread cookies using an emulsion filled gel based on inulin and extra virgin olive oil. LWT-Food Sci Technol 63(1):339–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goula AM, Adamopoulos KG, Kazakis NA (2004) Influence of spray drying conditions on tomato powder properties. Dry Technol 22(5):1129–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Joshi AU, Liu C, Sathe SK (2015) Functional properties of select seed flours. LWT Food Sci Technol 60:325–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kaur M, Singh KS, Arora AP, Sharma A (2014) A gluten free cookies prepared from buckwheat flour by incorporation of various gums: physicochemical and sensory properties. LWT Food Sci Technol. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaushal P, Kumar V, Sharma HK (2012) Comparative study of physico- chemical, functional, anti-nutritional and pasting properties of taro (Colocasia esculenta), rice (Oryza sativa), pegion pea (Cajanus cajan) flour and their blends. LWT-Food Sci Technol 48:59–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Klunklin, W (2018) Development of biscuits using purple rice flour, defatted green-lipped mussel powder and spices (Doctoral dissertation, Lincoln University)Google Scholar
  14. Kroon P, Williamson G (2005) Polyphenols: dietary components with established benefits to health? J Sci Food Agric 85(8):1239–1240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kwon YI, Vattem DA, Shetty K (2006) Evaluation of clonal herbs of Lamiaceae species for management of diabetes and hypertension. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 15:107–118PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Manley D (2000) Technology of biscuits, crackers and cookies, 3rd edn. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Cambridge, pp 21–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meilgaard M, Civille GV, Carr BT (1999) Sensory evaluation techniques, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mishra LK, Sangma D (2017) Quality attributes, phytochemical profile and storage stability studies of functional ready to serve (RTS) drink made from blend of Aloe vera, sweet lime, amla and ginger. J Food Sci Technol 54(3):761–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mohamed TK, Zhu K, Issoufou A, Fatmata T, Zhou H (2009) Functionality, in vitro digestibility and physicochemical properties of two varieties of defatted foxtail millet protein concentrates. Int J Mol Sci 10:522–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Okaka JC (2009) Handling, storage and processing of plant foods, 2nd edn. Academy Publishers, Enugu, p 132Google Scholar
  21. Okaka JC, Potter NN (1977) Functional and storage properties of cow pea–wheat flour blends in bread making. J Food Sci 42:828–833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pratima A, Yadava MC (2000) Effect of incorporation of liquid dairy by-products on chemical characteristics of soy-fortified biscuits. J Food Sci Technol 37(2):158–161Google Scholar
  23. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C (1999) Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Rad Biol Med 26(9):1231–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sharma P, Gujral HS (2014) Anti-staling effects of beta-glucan and barley flour in wheat flour chapatti. Food Chem 145:102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sharma S, Saxena DC, Riar CS (2016) Nutritional, sensory and in vitro antioxidant characteristics of gluten free cookies prepared from flour blends of minor millets. J Cereal Sci 72:153–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Shetty K, Curtis OF, Levin RE, Witkowsky R, Ang W (1995) Prevention of vitrification associated with in vitro shoot culture of oregano (Origanum vulgare) by Pseudomonas spp. J Plant Physiol 147:447–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sompong R, Siebenhandl-Ehn S, Linsberger-Martin G, Berghofer E (2011) Physicochemical and antioxidative properties of red and black rice varieties from Thailand, China and Sri Lanka. Food Chem 124:132–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sosulski FW, Garatt MO, Slinkard AE (1976) Functional properties of ten legume flours. Int J Food Sci Technol 9:66–69Google Scholar
  29. Sreerama YN, Sasikala VB, Pratape VM (2008) Nutritional implications and flour functionality of popped/expanded horse gram. Food Chem 108:891–899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stoilova I, Krastanov A, Stoyanova A, Denev P, Gargova S (2007) Antioxidant activity of a ginger extract (Zingiber officinale). Food Chem 102:764–770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Suresh C (2013) Assessment of functional properties of different flours. Afr J Agric Res 8(38):4849–4852Google Scholar
  32. Uthumporn U, Woo WL, Tajul AY, Fazilah A (2015) Physico-chemical and nutritional evaluation of cookies with different levels of eggplant flour substitution. CyTA-J Food 13(2):220–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Venkatachalam K, Nagarajan M (2017) Physicochemical and sensory properties of savory crackers incorporating green gram flour to partially or wholly replace wheat flour. Italian J Food Sci 29(4)Google Scholar
  34. Verma S, Srivastava S, Tiwari N (2015) Comparative study on nutritional and sensory quality of barnyard and foxtail millet food products with traditional rice products. J Food Sci Technol 52(8):5147–5155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wang S, Opassathavorn A, Zhu F (2015) Influence of quinoa flour on quality characteristics of cookie, bread and Chinese steamed bread. J Tex Stu 46(4):281–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. WHO/FAO (2003) Diet, nutrition & prevention of chronic diseases: Report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. January 28–February 1, (2002). WHO Technical Report Series 916, FAO/WHO, Geneva, Switzerland, pp 1–149Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Natasha R. Marak
    • 1
  • Chungkham C. Malemnganbi
    • 1
  • Cassandra R. Marak
    • 1
  • Lokesh K. Mishra
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Community ScienceCentral Agricultural UniversityTuraIndia
  2. 2.College of AgricultureCentral Agricultural UniversityImphalIndia

Personalised recommendations