Advertisement

Effects of high pressure extraction on the extraction yield, phenolic compounds, antioxidant and anti-tyrosinase activity of Djulis hull

  • Hsiao-Wen Huang
  • Ming-Ching Cheng
  • Bang-Yuan Chen
  • Chung-Yi WangEmail author
Original Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

The hulls of Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum) are a type of agricultural waste. Using 70% ethanol as the extraction solvent, this study compared the extraction yields of high-pressure-assisted extraction (HPE) and conventional oscillation extraction (CE) for Djulis hulls (DH). The total phenolic and flavonoid contents, and antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and anti-tyrosinase activities were also compared. Our findings indicated that 600 MPa/5 min of HPE resulted in higher total phenolic (567–642 mg GAE/g) and flavonoid (47.2–57.2 mg QU/g) concentrations; gallic acid (44.5–53.2 μg/g) and rutin (26.8–34.2 μg/g) were the main phenolic and flavonoid compounds. When the extraction pressure was greater than 450 MPa, HPE extracts showed stronger antioxidant capacity and anti-tyrosinase activity than CE extracts. In a LPS-induced RAW 264.7 cell model of inflammation, HPE extracts had significant inhibitory effects on the cumulative concentrations of nitric oxide and prostaglandin E2. These results indicate that HPE had a better extraction yield, and required a shorter time for the extraction of functional ingredients from DH. Hence, DH could be a potential source for natural antioxidants for the food and biotechnology industries.

Keywords

High pressure extraction Djulis hull Antityrosinase Antioxidant Anti-inflammatory 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, MOST 107-2221-E-002-110-MY2, Taiwan, Republic of China.

References

  1. Adom KK, Liu RH (2002) Antioxidant activity of grains. J Agric Food Chem 50:6182–6187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnao MB, Cano A, Acosta M (2001) The hydrophilic and lipophilic contribution to total antioxidant activity. Food Chem 73:239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baba SA, Mlink SA (2015) Determination of total phenolic and flavonoid content, antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of a root extract of Arisaema jacquemontii Blume. J Taibah Univ Sci 9:449–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen HC (2015) Analyses of nutritional and functional components of Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum Koidz.). Master thesis, Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, National Chung Hsing UniversityGoogle Scholar
  5. Chio EH, Yang EC, Huang HT, Hsu EL, Chen CR, Huang CG, Huang RN (2013) Toxicity and repellence of Taiwanese indigenous Djulis, Chenopodium formosaneum, against Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) and Forcipomyia taiwana (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae). J Pest Sci 86:705–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chyau CC, Chu CC, Chen SY, Duh PD (2015) Effect of nanogrinding on the pigment and bioactivity of Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum Koidz.). J Funct Foods 18:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Corrales M, Toepfl S, Butz P, Knorr D, Tauscher B (2008) Extraction of anthocyanins from grape by-products assisted by ultrasonics, high hydrostatic pressure or pulsed electric fields: a comparison. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 9:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corrales M, García AF, Butz P, Tauscher B (2009) Extraction of anthocyanins from grape skins assisted by high hydrostatic pressure. J Food Engine 90:415–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craft BD, Kerrihard A, Amarowicz R, Pegg RB (2015) Phenol-based antioxidants and the in vitro methods used for their assessment. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 11:148–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Deng GF, Xu XR, Guo YJ, Xia EQ, Li S, Wu S, Chen F, Ling WH, Li HB (2012) Determination of antioxidant property and their lipophilic and hydrophilic phenolic contents in cereal grains. J Funct Food 4:906–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duh PD, Yen GC (1997) Antioxidative activity of three herbal water extracts. Food Chem 60:639–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Huang HW, Hsu CP, Yang BB, Wang CY (2013) Advances in the extraction of natural ingredients by high pressure extraction technology. Trends Food Sci Technol 33:54–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kubo I, Kinst-Hori I (1998) Tyrosinase Inhibitors from Cumin. J Agric Food Chem 46:5338–5341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Masisi KM, Beta T, Moghadasian MH (2016) Antioxidant properties of diverse cereal grains: a review on in vitro and in vivo studies. Food Chem 196:90–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mustafa A, Turner C (2011) Pressurized liquid extraction as a green approach in food and herbal plants extraction: a review. Anal Chim Acta 703:8–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Naghshineh M, Olsen K, Georgiou CA (2013) Sustainable production of pectin from lime peel by high hydrostatic pressure treatment. Food Chem 136:472–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Narkprasoma K, Wang SP, Hsiao SM, Tsai PJ (2012) Kinetics of color loss of Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum Koidz.) extracts during storage in different concentrations of alcohol and temperature. APCBEE Proc 2:32–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pillaiyar T, Manickam M, Namasivayam V (2017) Skin whitening agents: medicinal chemistry perspective of tyrosinase inhibitors. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 32:403–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pisoschi AM, Pop A (2015) The role of antioxidants in the chemistry of oxidative stress: a review. Eur J Med Chem 97(5):55–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Prasada NK, Yang B, Zhao M, Wei X, Jianga Y, Chen F (2009) High pressure extraction of corilagin from longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.) fruit pericarp. Sep Purif Technol 70:41–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shimada K, Fujikawa K, Yahara K, Nakamura T (1992) Antioxidative properties of xanthan on the anti-oxidation of soybean oil in cyclodextrin emulsion. J Agric Food Chem 40:945–948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Singh B, Singh N, Thakur S, Kaur A (2017) Ultrasound assisted extraction of polyphenols and their distribution in whole mung bean, hull and cotyledon. J Food Sci Technol 54:921–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsai PJ, Sheu CH, Wu PH, Sun YF (2010) Thermal and pH stability of betacyanin pigment of Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum) in Taiwan and their relation to antioxidant activity. J Agric Food Chem 52:1020–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tsai PJ, Chen YS, Sheu CH, Chen CY (2011a) Effect of nanogrinding on the pigment and bioactivity of Djulis (Chenopodium formosanum Koidz.). J Agric Food Chem 59:1814–1820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tsai PJ, Hsiao SM, Chaung HC, Hong CZ (2011b) The ldl-cholesterol-lowering effects of nano-particled Djulis grains. Int Conf Biosci Biochem Bioinf 5:218–221Google Scholar
  26. Velioglu YS, Mazza G, Gao L, Oomah BD (1998) Antioxidant activity and total phenolics in selected fruits and vegetables, and grain products. J Agric Food Chem 46:4113–4117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wu SJ, Chen YW, Wang CY, Shyu YT (2017) Anti-inflammatory properties of high pressure-assisted extracts of Grifola frondosa in lipopolysaccharide-activated RAW 264.7 macrophages. Int J Food Sci Technol 52:671–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xi J (2006) Effect of high pressure processing on the extraction of lycopene in tomato paste waste. Chem Eng Technol 29:736–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xi J (2013) High-pressure processing as emergent technology for the extraction of bioactive ingredients from plant materials. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 2013(53):837–852Google Scholar
  30. Yang B, Jiang Y, Wang R, Zhao M, Sun J (2009) Ultra-high pressure treatment effects on polysaccharides and lignins of longan fruit pericarp. Food Chem 112:428–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Žilić S, Šukalović VH, Dodiga D, Maksimovićb V, Maksimović M, Basić Z (2011) Antioxidant activity of small grain cereals caused by phenolics and lipid soluble antioxidants. J Cereal Sci 54:417–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Özkan G, Özcan MM (2014) Some phenolic compounds of extracts obtained from Origanum species growing in Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 186:4947–4957CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hsiao-Wen Huang
    • 1
  • Ming-Ching Cheng
    • 2
  • Bang-Yuan Chen
    • 3
  • Chung-Yi Wang
    • 4
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Animal Science and TechnologyNational Taiwan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Health FoodChung Chou University of Science and TechnologyYuanlinTaiwan
  3. 3.Department of Food ScienceFu Jen Catholic UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  4. 4.Department of BiotechnologyNational Formosa UniversityHuweiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations