Advertisement

Ultrasonic microwave-assisted extraction coupled with macroporous resin chromatography for the purification of antioxidant phenolics from waste jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) peels

  • Zhiguo Jiang
  • Ruicheng Shi
  • Haiming Chen
  • Yanhua WangEmail author
Original Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

An efficient ultrasonic microwave-assisted extraction (UMAE) coupled with macroporous resin chromatography technique was successfully used for the extraction and purification of antioxidant phenolics from jackfruit by-products (peels). After optimization by single factor experiments and response surface methodology, the optimum extraction conditions for UMAE were: ethanol concentration 63%, solvent-to-solid ratio 34 mL/g, microwave power 160 W and irradiation time 20 min. Under the optimal condition, the phenolics extraction yield was 8.14 mg GAE/g DW. After the purification by macroporous resin AB-8, the purity of antioxidant phenolics from UMAE extracts improved from 13.59 to 49.07%. Furthermore, ABTS radical scavenging activities were also significantly increased from 35.95 ± 2.21 to 162.36 ± 10.26 mg TE/g. HPLC analysis revealed that gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, and catechin were three dominant antioxidant phenolics in jackfruit peels. All of the results demonstrated that waste jackfruit peels could be utilized as a good source of phenolics with strong antioxidant activities in food and pharmaceutical industry.

Keywords

Jackfruit peels Phenolics Antioxidant Ultrasonic microwave-assisted extraction Response surface methodology Macroporous resin 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province of China (318MS013), and Scientific Research Project of Hainan Provincial Universities of China (Hnky2015ZD-3).

References

  1. Ahmad J, Langrish T (2012) Optimisation of total phenolic acids extraction from mandarin peels using microwave energy: the importance of the Maillard reaction. J Food Eng 109:162–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altemimi A, Choudhary R, Watson DG, Lightfoot DA (2015) Effects of ultrasonic treatments on the polyphenol and antioxidant content of spinach extracts. Ultrason Sonochem 24:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alves MJ, Ferreira ICFR, Froufe HJC, Abreu RMV, Martins A, Pintado M (2013) Antimicrobial activity of phenolic compounds identified in wild mushrooms, SAR analysis and docking studies. J Appl Microbiol 115:346–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balasundram N, Sundram K, Samman S (2006) Phenolic compounds in plants and agri-industrial by-products: antioxidant activity, occurrence, and potential uses. Food Chem 99:191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dahmoune F, Nayak B, Moussi K, Remini H, Madani K (2015) Optimization of microwave-assited extraction of phenolics from Myrtuscommunis L. leaves. Food Chem 166:585–595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. de Faria AF, de Rosso VV, Mercadante AZ (2009) Carotenoid composition of jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus), determined by HPLC − PDA − MS/MS. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 64:108–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fan T, Hu J, Fu L, Zhang LJ (2015) Optimization of enzymolysis-ultrasonic assisted extraction of polysaccharides from Momordica charabtia L. by response surface methodology. Carbohydr Polym 115:701–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Feng S, Luo Z, Tao B, Chen C (2015) Ultrasonic-assisted extraction and purification of phenolic compounds from sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) rinds. LWT Food Sci Technol 60:970–976CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Firatligil-Durmus E, Evranuz O (2010) Response surface methodology for protein extraction optimization of red pepper seed (Capsicum frutescens). LWT Food Sci Technol 43:226–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. He ZY, Xia WS (2008) Preparative separation and purification of phenolic compounds from Canarium album L. by macroporous resins. J Sci Food Agric 88:493–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hsu CL, Fang SC, Yen GC (2013) Anti-inflammatory effects of phenolic compounds isolated from the flowers of Nymphaea mexicana Zucc. Food Funct 4:1216–1222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ji YB, Dong F, Ma DB, Miao J, Jin LN, Liu ZF, Zhang LW (2012) Optimizing the extraction of anti-tumor polysaccharides from the fruit of Capparis spionosa L. by response surface methodology. Moolecules 17:7323–7335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Karabegović IT, Stojičević SS, Veličković DT, Nikolić NČ, Lazić ML (2013) Optimization of microwave-assisted extraction and characterization of phenolic compounds in cherry laurel (Prunus laurocerasus) leaves. Sep Purif Technol 120:429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lin LZ, Zhao HF, Dong Y, Yang B, Zhao MM (2012) Macroporous resin purification behavior of phenolics and rosmarinic acid from Rabdosia serra (MAXIM.) HARA leaf. Food Chem 130:417–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Liu Y, Wei SL, Liao MC (2013) Optimization of ultrasonic extraction of phenolic compounds from Euryale ferox seed shells using response surface methodology. Ind Crops Prod 49:837–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu X, Hu Y, Wei DF (2014) Optimization of enzyme-based ultrasonic/microwave-assisted extraction and evaluation of antioxidant activity of orcinol glucoside from the rhizomes of Curculigo orchioides Gaertn. Med Chem Res 23:2360–2367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lou ZX, Wang HX, Zhu S, Chen SW, Zhang M, Wang ZP (2012) Ionic liquids based simultaneous ultrasonic and microwave assisted extraction of phenolic compounds from burdock leaves. Anal Chim Acta 716:28–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lu CX, Wang HX, Lv WP, Ma CY, Xu P, Zhu J, Xie J, Liu B, Zhou QL (2011) Ionic liquid-based ultrasonic/microwave-assisted extraction combined with UPLC for the determination of anthraquinones in Rhubarb. Chromatographia 74:139–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mocan A, Vlase L, Vodnar DC, Bischin C, Hanganu D, Gheldiu AM, Oprean R, Silaghi-Dumitrescu R, Crisan G (2014) Polyphenolic content, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of Lycium barbarum L. and Lycium chinense Mill. Leaves. Molecules 19:10056–10073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pongmalai P, Devahastin S, Chiewchan N, Soponronnarit S (2015) Enhancement of microwave-assisted extraction of bioactive compounds from cabbage outer leaves via the application of ultrasonic pretreatment. Sep Purif Technol 144:37–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Shyamalamma S, Chandra SBC, Hegde M, Naryanswamy P (2008) Evaluation of genetic diversity in jackfruit (Artocarpus heterophyllus Lam.) based on amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Genet Mol Res 7:645–656CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sun Y, Xu W, Zhang W, Hu Q, Zeng X (2011) Optimizing the extraction of phenolic antioxidants from kudingcha made from Ilex Kudingcha C. J. Tseng by using response surface methodology. Sep Purif Technol 78:311–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sun PC, Liu Y, Yi YT, Li HJ, Fan P, Xia CH (2015) Preliminary enrichment and separation of chlorogenic acid from Helianthus tuberosus L. leaves extract by macroporous resins. Food Chem 168:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Swami SB, Thakor NJ, Haldankar PM, Kalse SB (2012) Jackfruit and its many functional components as related to human health: a review. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 11:565–576CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang C, Shi L, Fan L, Ding Y, Zhao S, Liu Y, Ma C (2013) Optimization of extraction and enrichment of phenolics from pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) leaves. Ind Crops Prod 42:587–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wu DM, Gao TT, Yang HS, Du YZ, Li C, Wei LX, Zhou TY, Lu JM, Bi HT (2015) Simultaneous microwave/ultrasonic-assisted enzymatic extraction of antioxidant ingredients from Nitraria tangutorun Bobr. juice by-products. Ind Crops Prod 66:229–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xiao XH, Si XX, Tong X, Li GK (2012) Ultrasonic microwave-assisted extraction coupled with high-speed counter-current chromatography for the preparation of nigakinones from Picrasma quassioides (D. Don) Benn. Phytochem Anal 23:540–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang LF, Liu ZL (2008) Optimization and comparison of ultrasound/microwave assisted extraction (UMAE) and ultrasonic assisted extraction (UAE) of lycopene from tomatoes. Ultrason Sonochem 15:731–737CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zou YF, Chen XF, Yang WY, Liu S (2011) Response surface methodology for optimization of the ultrasonic extraction of polysaccharides from Codonopsis pilosula Nannf. Var. modesta L. T. Shen. Carbohydr Polym 84:503–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhiguo Jiang
    • 1
  • Ruicheng Shi
    • 1
  • Haiming Chen
    • 1
  • Yanhua Wang
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Food ScienceHainan UniversityHaikouChina
  2. 2.School of Information Science and TechnologyHainan UniversityHaikouChina

Personalised recommendations