Advertisement

Sodium reduction in enrobed restructured chicken nuggets through replacement of NaCl with CaCl2

  • Julliane Carvalho BarrosEmail author
  • Taynara Saviani Gois
  • Manoela Alves Pires
  • Isabela Rodrigues
  • Marco Antonio Trindade
Original Article
  • 11 Downloads

Abstract

The present study aimed to reformulate chicken nuggets with reduced sodium content, replacing the NaCl with CaCl2 and assessing the physicochemical and sensory properties of the obtained products. Four treatments of chicken nuggets were processed: Control formulation (1.5 g NaCl/100 g) and three treatments containing CaCl2 substituting 25, 50 and 75% of the NaCl, considering an ionic strength equivalent to 1.5% NaCl. The four different chicken nuggets were similar (p > 0.05) for the variables oil absorption, lipid, protein and moisture contents, water activity, cooking yield, pick-up and texture profile analysis. However, a decrease in ash content (2.21–1.75 g/100 g) was observed. The replacement of 75% NaCl could reduce 34% sodium in chicken nuggets with a concomitant increase in the calcium content (10–130 mg/100 g). For objective colour, the brightness (L*) increased from 74.43 to 78.28 as CaCl2 contents increased in the chicken nuggets, but the a* and b*parameters did not show differences (p > 0.05) among all treatments. Sensory acceptance (texture, flavour and overall quality attributes) did not differ between Control and the 75% sodium reduction treatments (all values around 7.5 in the 9-point hedonic scale), despite the decrease in the salty taste observed in the just about right scale test. Thus, the maximum tested replacement of 75% NaCl by CaCl2 produced healthier chicken nuggets, for having provided a reduction in sodium content and increase in calcium content, besides maintaining sensory quality and most of the technological characteristics.

Keywords

Consumer study Healthiness Ionic strength Meat product Salt substitute Physicochemical analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior –Finance Code 001 (CAPES, Brazil) for the doctoral scholarship granted to the first author (J. C. Barros). Also to the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP, Brazil) for supporting the research (Process 2015/12429-7), and Kerry, New Max and Cori Ingredientes Company (Brazil) for their donations. The author M. A. Trindade is a member of the MARCARNE network, funded by CYTED (ref. 116RT0503).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. AOAC (1996) Potassium and/or sodium in plants. Official methods of analysis, 16th edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  2. AOAC (1998) In P. Cunniff (ed) Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 16th edn. AOAC International, ArlingtonGoogle Scholar
  3. Barros JC, Munekata PES, Pires MA, Rodrigues I, Andaloussi OS, Rodrigues CEC, Trindade MA (2018) Omega-3- and fibre-enriched chicken nuggets by replacement of chicken skin with chia (Salvia hispanica L.) flour. LWT Food Sci Technol 90:283–289.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2017.12.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bligh EG, Dyer WJ (1959) A rapid method of total lipid extraction and purification. Can J Biochem Phys 37:911–917.  https://doi.org/10.1139/y59-099 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brasil (2003) Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária Resolução RDC No. 359/2003. Regulamento Técnico de Porções de Alimentos Embalados para Fins de Rotulagem Nutricional. Diário Oficial da União; Poder Executivo, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  6. Brasil (2005) Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária Resolução RDC No. 269/2005. Regulamento técnico sobre ingestão diária recomendada (IDR) para proteína, vitaminas e mineraisGoogle Scholar
  7. Brasil (2012) Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada RDC No. 54/2012. Regulamento técnico MERCOSUL sobre informação nutricional complementar (Declarações de Propriedades Nutricionais)Google Scholar
  8. ABIA Cenário do consumo de sódio no Brasil (2013). http://www.abia.org.br/sodio/sodio2.pdf. Accessed 17 Dec 2017
  9. Brasil (2013) Termo de compromisso que firmam entre si a União, por intermédio do Ministério da Saúde, a Associação Brasileira das Indústrias de Alimentos—ABIA, Associação Brasileira das Indústrias de Queijo—ABIQ, Associação Brasileira da Indústria Produtora e Exportadora de Carne Suína—ABIPECS, Sindicato da Indústria de Carne e Derivados no Estado de São Paulo—SINDICARNES e União Brasileira de Avicultura—UBABEF. Estabelecimento de metas nacionais para a redução do teor de sódio em alimentos processados no Brasil. Diário Oficial da União, No. 242, BrasíliaGoogle Scholar
  10. Cáceres E, García ML, Selgas MD (2006) Design of a new cooked meat sausage enriched with calcium. Meat Sci 73:368–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Devatkal SK, Kadam DM, Naik PK, Sahoo J (2011) Quality characteristics of gluten-free chicken nuggets extended with sorghum flour. J Food Qual 34:88–92.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4557.2010.00367.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dos Santos BA, Bastianello Campagnol PC, da Cruz AG, Galvão MTEL, Monteiro RA, Wagner R, Pollonio MAR (2015a) Check all that apply and free listing to describe the sensory characteristics of low sodium dry fermented sausages: comparison with trained panel. Food Res Int 76:725–734.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.06.035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dos Santos BA, Campagnol PCB, da Cruz AG, Morgano MA, Wagner R, Pollonio MAR (2015b) Is there a potential consumer market for low-sodium fermented sausages? J Food Sci 80:S1093–S1099.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12847 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Doyle ME, Glass KA (2010) Sodium reduction and its effect on food safety, food quality, and human health. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 9:44–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. ESFA (2005) Opinion of the scientific panel on dietetic products, nutrition and allergies on a request from the commission related to the tolerable upper intake level of sodium. EFSA J 209:1–26Google Scholar
  16. Ferreira DF (2011) Sisvar: a computer statistical analysis system. Ciênc Agrotec 35:1039–1042.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-70542011000600001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. FSAI (2016) Salt and health: Review of the scientific evidence and recommendations for public policy in Ireland. Food Safety Authority of Ireland, DublinGoogle Scholar
  18. Galvão MTEL, Moura DB, Barretto ACS, Pollonio MAR (2014) Effects of micronized sodium chloride on the sensory profile and consumer acceptance of turkey ham with reduced sodium content. Food Sci Technol (Campinas) 34:189–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hamm R (1986) Functional properties of the myofibrillar system and their measurements. In: Bechtel PJ (ed) Muscle as food. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 135–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Horita CN, Morgano MA, Celeghini RMS, Pollonio MAR (2011) Physico-chemical and sensory properties of reduced-fat mortadella prepared with blends of calcium, magnesium and potassium chloride as partial substitutes for sodium chloride. Meat Sci 89:426–433.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.05.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Horita CN, Messias VC, Morgano MA, Hayakawa FM, Pollonio MAR (2014) Textural, microstructural and sensory properties of reduced sodium frankfurter sausages containing mechanically deboned poultry meat and blends of chloride salts. Food Res Int 66:29–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2014.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jiménez-Colmenero F, Carballo J, Cofrades S (2001) Healthier meat and meat products: their role as functional foods. Meat Sci 59:5–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lawless HT, Rapacki F, Horne J, Haye A, Wang G (2003) The taste of calcium chloride in mixtures with NaCl, sucrose and citric acid. Food Qual Prefer 15:83–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-3293(03)00099-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Maurer AJ (1983) Reduced sodium usage in poultry muscle foods. Food Technol 37:60–65Google Scholar
  25. Meullenet J-F, Xiong R, Findlay CJ (2007) Multivariate and probabilistic analyses of sensory science problems. IFT Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Petracci M, Rimini S, Mulder RWAW, Cavani C (2013) Quality characteristics of frozen broiler breast meat pretreated with increasing concentrations of sodium chloride. J Poult Sci 50:396–401.  https://doi.org/10.2141/jpsa.0120173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ruusunen M, Puolanne E (2005) Reducing sodium intake from meat products. Meat Sci 70:531–541.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.07.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. SACN (2003) Salt and health. TSO, NorwichGoogle Scholar
  29. Segel IH (1976) Biochemical calculations: how to solve mathematical problems in general biochemistry, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  30. Sindirações (2013) Métodos analíticos—Minerais por espectrometria de emissão atomic por plasma indutivamente acoplado (ICP-OES). Compêndio Brasileiro de alimentação animal, 4th edn. Sindirações, São Paulo, pp 175–180Google Scholar
  31. Verma AK, Banerjee R, Sharma BD (2012a) Quality of low fat chicken nuggets: effect of sodium chloride replacement and added chickpea (Cicerarietinun L.) hull flour. Asian-Aust J Anim Sci 25:291–298.  https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2011.11263 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Verma AK, Sharma BD, Banerjee R (2012b) Quality characteristics of low-fat chicken nuggets: effect of common salt replacement and added bottle gourd (Lagenariasiceraria L.). J Sci Food Agric 92:1848–1854.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5691 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vidal L, Tárrega A, Antúnez L, Ares G, Jaeger SR (2015) Comparison of correspondence analysis based on Hellinger and Chi square distances to obtain sensory spaces from check-all-that-apply (CATA) questions. Food Qual Prefer 43:106–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2015.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. WHO/FAO (2003) Diet, nutrition and the prevention of chronic diseases. Report of a Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series No. 916. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  35. Yogesh K, Ahmad T, Manpreet G, Mangesh K, Das P (2013) Characteristics of chicken nuggets as affected by added fat and variable salt contents. J Food Sci Technol 50:191–196.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-012-0617-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zanardi E, Ghidini S, Conter M, Ianieri A (2010) Mineral composition of Italian salami and effect of NaCl partial replacement on compositional, physico-chemical and sensory parameters. Meat Sci 86:742–747.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food EngineeringCollege of Animal Science and Food Engineering of University of São PauloPirassunungaBrazil

Personalised recommendations