Journal of Food Science and Technology

, Volume 56, Issue 4, pp 1785–1792 | Cite as

Ultrasound assisted extraction of antioxidative phenolics from cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) leaves

  • Lalita Chotphruethipong
  • Soottawat BenjakulEmail author
  • Kongkarn Kijroongrojana
Original Article


Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction (UAE) of antioxidative phenolics from the leaves of cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) was carried out by response surface methodology along with the central composite design. Two independent variables were considered: amplitude (30–77%) and time (7–31 min). The highest extraction yield was 23.61% when the optimal extraction condition (77% amplitude for 31 min) was implemented. The extract containing total phenolic content of 579.55 mg GAE/g dry extract possessed radical scavenging activities and reducing power. The experiment values were in line with the predicted counterparts. Extract contained gallic acid, isoquercetin, tannic acid, quercetin, catechin, apigenin, hydroquinin, eriodictyol, and rutin. The extract with increasing levels inhibited AAPH-induced DNA damage to a higher extent. Thus, UAE was demonstrated to potentially increase the extraction efficacy of phenolics from cashew leaves and the extract could be applied as a natural antioxidant.


Optimization Antioxidant activity Ultrasound-assisted extraction Cashew DNA damage 



The financial support from the graduate school, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand, was acknowledged.


  1. Alighourchi HR, Barzegar M, Sahari MA, Abbasi S (2013) Effect of sonication on anthocyanins, total phenolic content, and antioxidant capacity of pomegranate juices. Int Food Res J 20:1703–1709Google Scholar
  2. Arnao MB, Cano A, Acosta M (2001) The hydrophilic and lipophilic contribution to total antioxidant activity. Food Chem 73(2):239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avhad DN, Rathod VK (2015) Ultrasound assisted production of a fibrinolytic enzyme in a bioreactor. Ultrason Sonochem 22:257–264CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Benzie IFF, Strain JJ (1996) The ferric reducing ability of plasma (FRAP) as a measure of “antioxidant power”: the FRAP assay. Anal Biochem 239(1):70–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chotphruethipong L, Benjakul S, Kijroongrojana K (2017) Optimization of extraction of antioxidative phenolic compounds from cashew (Anacardium occidentale L.) leaves using response surface methodology. J Food Biochem 41:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ince AE, Sahin S, Sumnu G (2014) Comparison of microwave and ultrasound-assisted extraction techniques for leaching of phenolic compounds from nettle. J Food Sci Technol 51(10):2776–2782CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Kamath V, Rajini PS (2007) Altered glucose homeostasis and oxidative impairment in pancreas of rats subjected to dimethoate intoxication. Toxicology 231(2):137–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kudi AC, Umoh JU, Eduvie LO, Gefu J (1999) Screening of some Nigerian medicinal plants for antibacterial activity. J Ethnopharmacol 67(2):225–228CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Mason TJ, Paniwnyk L, Lorimer JP (1996) The uses of ultrasound in food technology. Ultrason Sonochem 3(3):S253–S260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Min K, Ebeler SE (2009) Quercetin inhibits hydrogen peroxide-induced DNA damage and enhances DNA repair in Caco-2 cells. Food Chem Toxicol 47(11):2716–2722CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mohadjerani M, Roodgar MV (2016) In-vitro evaluation of protective effects on DNA damage and antioxidative activities of Ilex Spinigera Loes. extracts. Iran J Pharm Res 15(1):283–292PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Pang YL, Abdullah AZ, Bhatia S (2011) Review on sonochemical methods in the presence of catalysts and chemical additives for treatment of organic pollutants in wastewater. Desalination 277(1):1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Sato M, Ramarathnam N, Suzuki Y, Ohkubo T, Takeuchi M, Ochi H (1996) Varietal differences in the phenolic content and superoxide radical scavenging potential of wines from different sources. J Agric Food Chem 44(1):37–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Sharmila G, Nikitha VS, Ilaiyarasi S, Dhivya K, Rajasekar V, Kumar NM, Muthukumaran C (2016) Ultrasound assisted extraction of total phenolics from Cassia auriculata leaves and evaluation of its antioxidant activities. Ind Crops Prod 84:13–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Shekarchizadeh H, Kadivar M, Ghaziaskar HS, Rezayat M (2009) Optimization of enzymatic synthesis of cocoa butter analog from camel hump fat in supercritical carbon dioxide by response surface method (RSM). J Supercrit Fluid 49(2):209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Shirsath SR, Sonawane SH, Gogate PR (2012) Intensification of extraction of natural products using ultrasonic irradiations—A review of current status. Chem Eng Process 53:10–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sindhi V, Gupta V, Sharma K, Bhatnagar S, Kumari R, Dhaka N (2013) Potential applications of antioxidants—a review. J Pharm Res 7(9):828–835Google Scholar
  18. Singh B, Singh N, Thakur S, Kaur A (2017) Ultrasound assisted extraction of polyphenols and their distribution in whole mung bean, hull and cotyledon. J Food Sci Technol 54(4):921–932CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Soria AC, Villamiel M (2010) Effect of ultrasound on the technological properties and bioactivity of food: a review. Trends Food Sci Technol 21(7):323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Strick TR, Allemand JF, Bensimon D, Croquette V (1998) Behavior of supercoiled DNA. Biophys J 74(4):2016–2028CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Tiwari BK, O’donnell CP, Patras A, Brunton N, Cullen PJ (2009) Stability of anthocyanins and ascorbic acid in sonicated strawberry juice during storage. Eur Food Res Technol 228(5):717–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Treml J, Šmejkal K (2016) Flavonoids as potent scavengers of hydroxyl radicals. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 15(4):720–738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Wang J, Zhao Y-M, Tian Y-T, Yan C-L, Guo C-Y (2013) Ultrasound-assisted extraction of total phenolic compounds from Inula helenium. Sci World J 2013:1–5Google Scholar
  24. Wu H-C, Chen H-M, Shiau C-Y (2003) Free amino acids and peptides as related to antioxidant properties in protein hydrolysates of mackerel (Scomber austriasicus). Food Res Inter 36(9):949–957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang J, Guo J, Yuan J (2008) In vitro antioxidant properties of rutin. LWT-Food Sci Technol 41(6):1060–1066CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yarnpakdee S, Benjakul S, Kristinsson HG, Bakken HE (2015) Preventive effect of Nile tilapia hydrolysate against oxidative damage of HepG2 cells and DNA mediated by H2O2 and AAPH. J Food Sci Technol 52(10):6194–6205CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Yingngam B, Supaka N, Rungseevijitprapa W (2015) Optimization of process parameters for phenolics extraction of Cratoxylum formosum ssp. formosum leaves by response surface methodology. J Food Sci Technol 52(1):129–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yoshioka Y, Li X, Zhang T, Mitani T, Yasuda M, Nanba F, Ashida H (2017) Black soybean seed coat polyphenols prevent AAPH-induced oxidative DNA-damage in HepG2 cells. J Clin Biochem Nutr 60(2):108–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhao L, Li S, Zhu Y, Hao T (2015) Antioxidant activities and major bioactive components of consecutive extracts from blue honeysuckle (Lonicera Caerulea L.) cultivated in China. J Food Biochem 39(6):653–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lalita Chotphruethipong
    • 1
  • Soottawat Benjakul
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kongkarn Kijroongrojana
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Food Technology, Faculty of Agro-IndustryPrince of Songkla UniversityHat YaiThailand

Personalised recommendations