Advertisement

Using Box–Behnken design approach to investigate benzo[a]anthracene formation in smoked cattle meat samples and its’ risk assessment

  • Olcay Kaplan Ince
  • Muharrem InceEmail author
Original Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

In present study, a novel approach was selected for benzo[a]anthracene determination from smoked cattle meat samples using solid phase extraction under various experimental conditions. To optimize experimental variables, a three factor, three-level Box–Behnken experimental design combining with response surface methodology and quadratic programming were employed to prevent excessive amount of benzo[a]anthracene formation in smoked meat based on different experimental parameters. The influence of some important process parameters including cooking time (10–30 min), fat ratio (5–25%) and distance to the cooking source (5–25 cm), which significantly affected the formation efficiency of benzo[a]anthracene were optimized. The analysis of variance was conducted for specifying the interactions of independent variables. The independent and the dependent variables interactions were investigated. The quadratic regression model and the response surface contour plots were used to determine optimum values for the selected variables. The results of study revealed that optimum cooking time of smoked cattle meat was determined as 24.9 min, fat ratio 7.9% and the distance to the cooking source 21.8 cm. Under optimum conditions, minimum benzo[a]anthracene was formed in meat and its amount was determined using high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrophotometer as qualitative and quantitative. The limit of detection and limit of quantitation values were calculated as 0.4 µg kg−1 and 1.1 µg kg−1, respectively.

Keywords

Benzo[a]anthracene Box–Behnken design Response surface methodology High performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrophotometer Smoked cattle meat 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest in the research.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Azmir J, Zaidul ISM, Rahman MM, Sharif KM, Sahena F, Jahurul MHA (2014) Optimization of oil yield of Phaleria macrocarpa seed using response surfacemethodology and its fatty acids constituents. Ind Crops Prod 52:405–412.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.11.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brum DM, Netto ADP (2009) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Tripuí River, Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil. J Hazard Mater 165:447–453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.10.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen J, Chen S (2005) Removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by low density polyethylene from liquid model and roasted meat. Food Chem 90:461–469.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.05.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen BH, Wang CY, Chiu CP (1996) Evaluation of analysis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in meat products by liquid chromatography. J Agric Food Chem 44:2244–2251.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jf9508211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Denissenko MF, Pao A, Tang MS, Pfeifer GP (1996) Preferential formation of benzo(a)pyrene adducts at lung cancer mutational hotspots in p53. Science 274:430–432.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.274.5286.430 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Essumang DK, Kowalski K, Sogaard EG (2011) Levels, distribution and source characterization of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in topsoils and roadside soils in Esbjerg, Denmark. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 86:438–443.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-011-0232-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Essumang DK, Dodoo DK, Adjei JK (2012) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contamination in smoke-cured fish products. Food Compost Anal 27:128–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2012.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Essumang DK, Dodoo DK, Adjei JK (2014) Effective reduction of PAH contamination in smoke cured fish products using charcoal filters in a modified traditional kiln. Food Control 35:85–93.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.06.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ferrer JLB, Beltrán JL, Guiteras J (1996) Use of cloud point extraction methodology for the determination of PAHs priority pollutants in water samples by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection and wavelength programming. J Anal Chim Acta 330:199–206.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2670(96)00176-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. IARC (2012) Agents classified by the IARC monographs, vol 1–103. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Classification/ClassificationsAlphaOrder.pdf. Accessed 12 Mar 2012
  11. Ince M, Ince OK, Yaman M (2017) Optimization of an analytical method for determination of pyrene in smoked meat products. Food Anal Method 10:2060–2067.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-016-0693-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Janoszka B, Warzecha L, Błaszczyk U, Bodzek D (2004) Organic compounds formed in thermally treated high-protein food. Part I: polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Acta Chromatogr 14:115–128Google Scholar
  13. Kazerouni N, Sinha R, Hsu CH, Greenberg A, Rothman N (2001) Analysis of 200 food items for benzo[a]pyrene and estimation of its intake in an epidemiologic study. Food Chem Toxicol 39:423–436.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-6915(00)00158-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lage Yusty MA, Cortizo Davina JL (2005) Supercritical fluid extraction and high-performance liquid chromatography–fluorescence detection method for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons investigation in vegetable oil. Food Control 16:59–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2003.11.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Le Man H, Behera SK, Park HS (2010) Optimization of operational parameters for ethanol production from Korean food waste leachate. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7(1):157–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li H-Z, Zhang Z-J, Hou T-Y, Li X-J, Chen T (2015) Optimization of ultrasound-assisted hexane extraction of perilla oil using response surface methodology. Ind Crops Prod 76:18–24.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.06.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lightfoot TJ, Coxhead JM, Cupid BC, Nicholson S, Garner RC (2000) Analysis of DNA adducts by accelerator mass spectrometry in human breast tissue after administration of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b] pyridine and benzo[a]pyrene. Mutat Res 472:119–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1383-5718(00)00134-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Luch A (2005) The carcinogenic effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Imperial College Press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martí-Cid R, Llobet JM, Castell V, Domingo JL (2008) Evolution of the dietary exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in Catalonia, Spain. Food Chem Toxicol 46:3163–3171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2008.07.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Moret S, Conte LS (2000) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in edible fats and oils: occurrence and analytical methods. J Chromatogr A 882:245–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00079-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Phillips DH, Grover PL (1994) Polycyclic hydrocarbon activation: bay regions and beyond. Drug Metab Rev 26:443–467.  https://doi.org/10.3109/03602539409029808 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Purcaro G, Moret S, Conte LS (2009) Optimisation of microwave assisted extraction (MAE) for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) determination in smoked meat. Meat Sci 81:275–280.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reinik M, Tamme T, Roasto M, Juhkam K, Tenno T, Kiis A (2007) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in meat products and estimated PAH intake by children and the general population in Estonia. Food Addit Contam Part A 24:429–437.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02652030601182862 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shen M, Chapman RS, Xingzhou H, Liu LZ, Lai H, Chen W, Lan Q (2008) Dietary factors, food contamination and lung cancer risk in Xuanwei, China. Lung Cancer 61:275–282.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2007.12.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Simon R, Palme S, Anklam E (2007) Validation (in-house and collaborative) of a method based on liquid chromatography for the quantitation of 15 European-priority polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in smoke flavourings: HPLC-method validation for 15 EU priority PAH in smoke condensates. Food Chem 104:876–887.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.10.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Stumpe-Viksna I, Bartkevics V, Kukare A, Morozovs A (2008) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in meat smoked with different types of wood. Food Chem 110:794–797.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Veyrand B, Brosseaud A, Sarcher L, Varlet V, Monteau F, Marchand P, Andre F, Le Bizec B (2007) Innovative method for determination of 19 polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food and oil samples using gas chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry based on an isotope dilution approach. J Chromatogr A 1149:333–344.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2007.03.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wenzl T, Simon R, Kleiner J, Anklam E (2006) Analytical methods for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in food and the environment needed for new food legislation in the European Union. Trends Anal Chem 25:716–725.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2006.05.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. WHO (2005) World Health Organization, summary and conclusions of the sixty-fourth meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Rome, pp 47Google Scholar
  30. Zanieri L, Galvan P, Checchini L, Cincinelli A, Lepri L, Donzelli GP, Del Bubbaet M (2007) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in human milk from Italian women: influence of cigarette smoking and residential area. Chemosphere 67:1265–1274.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.12.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringMunzur UniversityTunceliTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringMunzur UniversityTunceliTurkey

Personalised recommendations