Advertisement

Influence of processing conditions on bioactive compound extraction from Vitis vinifera L. var. Alicante Bouschet grape skin

  • Yineth Ruíz-García
  • Carolina Beres
  • Davy W. H. Chávez
  • Erika F. Souza
  • Renata V. Tonon
  • Lourdes M. C. CabralEmail author
Short Communication
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of process conditions on the solid–liquid extraction of bioactive compounds from the Alicante Bouschet grape skin from the semi-arid region of Brazil. The influence of temperature (23–57 °C), ethanol concentration (16–84%) and citric acid concentration (0–4%) on the total phenolic content, monomeric anthocyanin content and on the antioxidant capacity of the extracts measured by oxygen radical absorbance capacity and cation radical scavenging activity (ABTS·+) methods was investigated. Ethanol concentration and temperature had a significant influence on total phenolic compounds extraction and antioxidant capacity while monomeric anthocyanins extraction was only affected by ethanol concentration. The conditions selected as the most adequate for the extraction were: temperature of 40 °C, 50% v/v ethanol and 2% m/v citric acid.

Keywords

Solid–liquid extraction Bioactive compounds Antioxidant capacity Grape skin Alicante Bouschet 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ) (Process Number E-26/203294/2016) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (Process Number 408330/2016-3) for the financial support. The work by Yineth Ruíz-García was supported by Programa Estudantes-Convênio de Pós-Graduação (PEC-PG) CAPES-Brazil (Process Number 88882.195654/2018-01). The authors would like to thank Agnelli Hollanda Oliveira for the assistance during the laboratory work and Rio Sol winery of the ViniBrasil group for kindly providing grape pomace.

References

  1. Brazinha C, Cadima M, Crespo JG (2014) Optimization of extraction of bioactive compounds from different types of grape pomace produced at wineries and distilleries. J Food Sci 79(6):1142–1149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cacace J, Mazza G (2003a) Optimization of extraction of anthocyanins from black currants with aqueous ethanol. J Food Sci 68(1):240–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cacace JE, Mazza G (2003b) Mass transfer process during extraction of phenolic compounds from milled berries. J Food Eng 59:379–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Caldas TW, Mazza KEL, Teles ASC, Mattos GN, Brígida AIS, Conte-Junior CA, Borguini RG, Godoy RLO, Cabral LMC, Tonon RV (2018) Phenolic compounds recovery from grape skin using conventional and non-conventional extraction methods. Ind Crops Prod 111:86–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Candioti LV, De Zan MM, Cámara MS, Goicoechea HC (2014) Experimental design and multiple response optimization. Using the desirability function in analytical methods development. Talanta 124:123–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Castillo-Muñoz N, Fernández-González M, Gómez-Alonso S, García-Romero E, Hermosín-Gutiérrez I (2009) Red-color related phenolic composition of Garnacha Tintorera (Vitis vinifera L.) grapes and red wines. J Agric Food Chem 57(17):7883–7891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ćujić N, Šavikin K, Janković T, Pljevljakušić D, Zdunić G, Ibrić S (2016) Optimization of polyphenols extraction from dried chokeberry using maceration as traditional technique. Food Chem 194:135–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fontana AR, Antoniolli A, Bottini RN (2013) Grape pomace as a sustainable source of bioactive compounds: extraction, characterization, and biotechnological applications of phenolics. J Agric Food Chem 61:8987–9003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Georgé S, Brat P, Alter P, Amiot MJ (2005) Rapid determination of polyphenols and vitamin C in plant-derived products. J Agric Food Chem 53:1370–1373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giusti MM, Wrolstad RE (2001) Characterization and measurement of anthocyanins by UV-visible spectroscopy. In: Giusti MM, Wrolstad RE (eds) Current protocols in food analytical chemistry. Wiley, Hoboken, pp F1.2.1–F1.2.13Google Scholar
  11. Giusti MM, Wrolstad RE (2003) Acylated anthocyanins from edible sources and their applications in food systems. Biochem Eng J 14:217–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kumar V, Chatli MK, Wagh RV, Mehta N, Kumar P (2015) Effect of the combination of natural antioxidants and packaging methods on quality of pork patties during storage. J Food Sci Technol 52(10):6230–6241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pinelo M, Rubilar M, Jerez M, Sineiro J, Núñez MJ (2005) Effect of solvent, temperature, and solvent-to-solid ratio on the total phenolic content and antiradical activity of extracts from different components of grape pomace. J Agric Food Chem 53:2111–2117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Re R, Pellegrini N, Proteggente A, Pannala A, Yang M, Rice-Evans C (1999) Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay. Free Radic Biol Med 26:1231–1237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rockenbach II, Rodrigues E, Gonzaga LV, Caliari V, Genovese MI, Gonçalves AESS, Fett R (2011) Phenolic compounds content and antioxidant activity in pomace from selected red grapes (Vitis vinifera L. and Vitis labrusca L.) widely produced in Brazil. Food Chem 127:174–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Singh B, Singh N, Thakur S, Kaur A (2017) Ultrasound assisted extraction of polyphenols and their distribution in whole mung bean, hull and cotyledon. J Food Sci Technol 54(4):921–932CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tournour HH, Segundo MA, Magalhães LM, Barreiros L, Queiroz J, Cunha LM (2015) Valorization of grape pomace: extraction of bioactive phenolics with antioxidant properties. Ind Crops Prod 74:397–406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yilmaz Y, Toledo RT (2006) Oxygen radical absorbance capacities of grape/wine industry byproducts and effect of solvent type on extraction of grape seed polyphenols. J Food Compost Anal 19:41–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zulueta A, Esteve MJ, Frígola A (2009) ORAC and TEAC assays comparison to measure the antioxidant capacity of food products. Food Chem 114:310–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Association of Food Scientists & Technologists (India) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yineth Ruíz-García
    • 1
  • Carolina Beres
    • 2
  • Davy W. H. Chávez
    • 1
    • 3
  • Erika F. Souza
    • 2
  • Renata V. Tonon
    • 2
  • Lourdes M. C. Cabral
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Tecnologia de AlimentosRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Embrapa Agroindústria de AlimentosRio de JaneiroBrazil
  3. 3.Centro Federal de Educação Tecnológica Celso Suckow da Fonseca, Campus Valença Rio de Janeiro – Brasil, CEFET/RJBairro Belo Horizonte, ValençaBrazil

Personalised recommendations