Effect of blends of camel chymosin and microbial rennet (Rhizomucor miehei) on chemical composition, proteolysis and residual coagulant activity in Iranian Ultrafiltered White cheese
- 19 Downloads
Iranian Ultrafiltered White cheese was produced by using different blends of coagulants (100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75 and 0:100; Rhizomucor miehei and camel chymosin, respectively) and ripened for 90 days. The effect of different combinations of these coagulants on chemical composition, proteolysis and residual coagulant activity of the cheeses were studied. The results showed that pH, fat-in-dry matter, salt-in-dry matter and protein contents of the cheeses were significantly influenced by type and concentration of the coagulants. The difference between proteolytic activities of the two coagulants resulted in different levels of proteolysis in the cheeses. A direct relationship was determined between using higher concentrations of R. miehei and increasing the hydrolysis of αs1-casein in the cheeses, during ripening. The residual coagulant activity was influenced by the type and concentration of the coagulant as well. In conclusion, R. miehei provided a higher level of proteolysis and residual coagulant activity compared with camel chymosin.
KeywordsUltrafiltered cheese Rhizomucor miehei Camel chymosin Residual coagulant activity Proteolysis
- UF cheese
Cheese produced using 100% of microbial rennet + 0% of camel chymosin
Cheese produced using 75% of microbial rennet + 25% of camel chymosin
Cheese produced using 50% of microbial rennet + 50% of camel chymosin
Cheese produced using 25% of microbial rennet + 75% of camel chemosin
Cheese produced using 0% of microbial rennet + 100% of camel chmosin
The authors thank the Damaneh Sahand dairy plant (Khosroshah, Tabriz, Iran) for providing raw materials and production equipment for cheese making. The study was partially supported by Inonu University (Malatya, Turkey) Scientific and Research Projects Unit (Project No: 2013/30).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors on this manuscript declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and animal rights
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Ardo Y, Polychroniadou Y (1999) Laboratory manual for chemical analysis of cheese. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
- Broome MC, Limsowtin GKY (1998) Milk coagulants. Austr J Dairy Technol 53:188–190Google Scholar
- Bylund G (1995) Dairy processing. Tetra pak processing systems AB. Lund University Publications, LundGoogle Scholar
- Fox PF, Law J, McSweeney PLH, Wallace J (1993) Biochemistry of cheese ripening. In: Fox PF (ed) Cheese: chemistry, physics and microbiology, vol 1, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 379–438Google Scholar
- Hayaloglu AA, Topcu A, Koca N (2011) Peynir analizleri [Cheese analysis]. In: Hayaloglu AA, Ozer B (eds) Peynir Biliminin Temelleri [Principles of Cheese Science]. Sidas, Izmir, pp 489–562Google Scholar
- IDF (1982) Determination of the total solid content (cheese and processed cheese). IDF Standard 4A, International Dairy Federation, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
- IDF (1993) Determination of the nitrogen (Kjeldahl method) and calculation of the crude protein content. IDF Standard 2B, International Dairy Federation, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
- Kandarakis I, Moschopoulou E, Anifantakis E (1999) Use of fermentation produced chymosin from E. coli in the manufacture of Feta cheese. Milchwissenschaft 54:24–26Google Scholar
- Kubis I, Sousa MJ, Walsh-O’Grady D, Kelly AL, McSweeney PLH (2001) Proteolysis in Cheddar-type cheese made from goat’s milk. Milchwissenschaft 56:557–560Google Scholar
- McSweeney PLH, Fox PF (1993) Methods of chemical analysis. In: Fox PF (ed) Cheese, chemistry, physics and microbiology. Chapman & Hall, New York, pp 389–438Google Scholar