Advertisement

This ‘Rose’ Has no Thorns—Diagnostic Utility of ‘Rapid On-Site Evaluation’ (ROSE) in Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology

  • Kanchan Kothari
  • Santosh TummidiEmail author
  • Mona Agnihotri
  • Pragati Sathe
  • Leena Naik
Original Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology is a basic diagnostic technique used to investigate superficial and deep swellings. Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) using toluidine blue (TB) is easily available, cheap, cost-effective, can be used both for testing adequacy and giving provisional diagnosis. To evaluate the role of ROSE using toluidine blue staining in arriving at a diagnosis in comparison to routine stains. A total of 1500 cases of FNA of palpable swellings from sites like salivary gland, breast, thyroid, lymph node, and soft tissue lesions [non-image guided] during a 9-month period were studied. All the cases were evaluated by ROSE using toluidine blue stain and routine Giemsa/PAP staining. The results were compared in each case. Only 2% cases proved inadequate on TB, Giemsa and PAP combination, commonest site of inadequacy being lymph node. Adequate sample was obtained within two passes in 92.5% cases. The turn-around time (TAT) was 1 day in 96.4% of cases. The average time for making a provisional diagnosis on TB was 3 minutes. There was 99.2% concordance between TB and final cyto-diagnosis. Validity parameters: sensitivity 98%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, negative predictive value 99.8%, efficacy 99.2% and false negative 1.94%. ROSE using toluidine blue is a reliable means of demonstrating sample adequacy, for making a provisional diagnosis and guiding collection of diagnostic material for microbiology, immunocytochemistry (ICC), cell block and molecular testing etc. The technique is easy enough for general laboratories to incorporate into their routine practice. ROSE can be called as the "frozen section of cytology".

Keywords

Rapid on site evaluation Toluidine blue Fine needle aspiration Adequacy Cell block Cost effectiveness 

Notes

Consent for Publication

Written consent for publication and any additional related information was taken from all the patients involved in the study.

Availability of Data and Materials

All the data regarding the findings are available within the manuscript.

Authors’ Contributions

TS carried out concepts and design, literature search, participated in clinical study. KK carried out data acquisition, data analysis and manuscript preparation will stand as guarantor also. MA carried out concepts and design, literature search. PS carried out concepts and design, literature search. LN participated in clinical study and manuscript review. All the authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

References

  1. 1.
    Ammanagi AS, Dombale VD, Patil SS (2012) On-site toluidine blue staining and screening improves efficiency of fine-needle aspiration cytology reporting. Acta Cytol 56:347–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Joy MP, Venkateswaran KI, Manju A, Kusum K, Kusum V (2003) Rapid staining using toluidine blue: a reliable method for quick diagnosis in ultrasound-guided aspiration cytology. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 46(4):589–592Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wada H, Nakajima T, Yasufuku K, Fujiwara T, Yoshida S, Suzuki M, Shibuya K, Hiroshima K, Nakatani Y, Yoshino I (2010) Lymph node staging by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in patients with small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg 90:229–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schmidt RL, Witt BL, Matynia AP, Barraza G, Layfield LJ, Adler DG (2013) Rapid onsite evaluation increases endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration adequacy for pancreatic lesions. Dig Dis Sci 58:872–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robert LS, Kirsten H, Brian JH, Lester JL (2012) The comparative effectiveness of fine-needle aspiration cytology sampling policies a simulation study. Am J Clin Pathol 138:823–830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sumathy C, Suresh DJ, Swaminathan K, Vallimanalan S, Sithy AM (2012) Supravital stained rapid wet mount preparation of fine needle aspirates– a Cytomorphological study. Tirunelveli e-J Med Sci 3:62–66Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    da Gilda CS, Hyang MK, Mauro AS, William RG (2013) The petals and thorns of ROSE (rapid on-site evaluation). Cancer Cytopathol 4:4–8Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martin H, Ellis E (1930) Biopsy by needle puncture and aspiration. Ann Surg 92:169–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kanwal S, Shahida N, Mulazim HB, Sardar FI (2015) Use of supravital toluidine blue staining to improve the efficiency of fine-needle aspiration cytology reporting in comparison to Papanicolaou stain. Pak J Med Sci 31(5):1146–1151Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baram D, Garcia RB, Richman PS (2005) Impact of rapid on-site cytologic evaluation during transbronchial needle aspiration. Chest 128:869–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stewart CJ, Stewart IS (1996) Immediate assessment of fine needle aspiration cytology of lung. J Clin Pathol 49:839–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gupta N, Klein M, Chau K, Vadalia B, Khutti S, Gimenez C, Das K (2019) Adequate at rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE), but inadequate on final cytologic diagnosis: analysis of 606 cases of endobronchial ultrasound-guided trans bronchial needle aspirations (EBUS-TBNA). Diagn Cytopathol 47(5):367–373.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.24121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sehgal IS, Dhooria S, Aggarwal AN, Agarwal R (2018) Impact of rapid on-site cytological evaluation (ROSE) on the diagnostic yield of transbronchial needle aspiration during mediastinal lymph node sampling systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 153(4):929–938.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2017.11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Borget I, Vielh P, Leboulleux S, Allyn M, Iacobelli S, Schlumberger M, de Pouvourville G (2008) Assessment of the cost of fine-needle aspiration cytology as a diagnostic tool in patients with thyroid nodules. Am J Clin Pathol 129:763–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Choi SM, Lee AR, Choe JY, Nam JS, Chung DH, Lee J et al (2016) Adequacy criteria of rapid on-site evaluation for endobronchial ultrasound-guided Transbronchial needle aspiration: a simple algorithm to assess the adequacy of ROSE. Ann Thorac Surg 101:444–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schmidt RL, Walker BS, Cohen MB (2015) When is rapid on-site evaluation cost-effective for fine-needle aspiration biopsy? PLoS One 10(8):e0135466.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0135466 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ruth SE, Malay S (2013) Rapid on-site evaluation of EUS–FNA by Cytopathologist: an experience of a tertiary hospital. Diagn Cytopathol 41(12):1075–1080CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Fahad A (2009) S Girgis, GS Sandha. Does onsite cytotechnology evaluation improve the accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy? Can J Gastroenterol 23(1):26–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Agarwal P, Toi PC, Subramaniam H, Apoorva LS (2019) Prospective comparison of cytological specimen adequacy assessment y different rapid staining techniques for rapid on site evaluation in fine needle aspiration cytology and their cost effectiveness. Diagn Cytopathol 47(5):469–474.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.24139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ghofrani M, Danita B, David LR (2006) The value of onsite adequacy assessment of thyroid fine-needle aspirations is a function of operator experience. Cancer (Cancer Cytopathology) 108(2):110–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sumathi S, Mrinalini VR (2012) Supravital stained wet film study of fine needle aspirates: a reliable supplementary diagnostic procedure. Clin Cancer Investig J 1:135–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    O’Malley ME, Weir MM, Hahn PF, Misdraji J, Wood BJ, Mueller PR (2002) US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of thyroid nodules: adequacy of cytologic material and procedure time with and without immediate cytologic analysis. Radiology. 222:383–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Eedes CR, Wang HH (2004) Cost-effectiveness of immediate specimen adequacy assessment of thyroid fine-needle aspirations. Am J Clin Pathol 121:64–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jiang D, Zang Y, Jiang D, Zhang X, Zhao C (2019) Value of rapid on-site evaluation for ultrasound-guided thyroid fine needle aspiration. J Int Med Res 47(2):626–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Liew PL, Lui TJ, Hsieh MC, Lin HP, Lu CF, Yao MS, Chen CL (2011) Rapid staining and immediate interpretation of fine needle aspiration cytology for palpable breast lesions: diagnostic accuracy, mammographic, ultrasonographic and histopathological correlations. Acta Cytol 55(1):30–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Santosh T, Kanchan K, Roshni P, Shruti SS, Pooja K (2017) Incidental detection of two adult gravid filarial worms in breast: a case report. BMC Res Notes 10:412.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2709-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sarode V, Chau D, Duey M, Pena V, Wanzer D, Kirkpatrick J (2016) Rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE) of cytology smears performed by cytotechnologists for assessment of adequacy in deep-seated lesions: correlation with final interpretation. J Am Soc Cytopathol 5:s60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2016.07.137 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Burlingame OO, Kesse KO, Silverman SG, Cibas ES (2012) On-site adequacy evaluations performed by cytotechnologists: correlation with final interpretations of 5,241 image-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies. Cancer Cytopathol 120:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mehmood S, Jahan A, Loya A, Yusuf MA (2015) Onsite cytopathology evaluation and ancillary studies beneficial in EUS-FNA of pancreatic, mediastinal, intra-abdominal, and submucosal lesions. Diagn Cytopathol 43(4):278–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Pastorello RG, Destefain C, Pinto PH, Credido CH, Reis RX, Rodrigues TA et al (2018) The impact of rapid on-site evaluation on thyroid fine needle aspiration biopsy: a 2-year cancer center institutional experience. Cancer Cytopathol 126(10):846–852.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.22051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lin O, Rudomina D, Feratovic R, Sirintrapun SJ (2019) Rapid on-site evaluation using telecytology: a major cancer Centre experience. Diagn Cytopathol 47:15–19.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.23925 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hassan M (2016) Rapid on-site evaluation: what a microscope will add to the bronchoscopy unit? A concise review. Egypt J Bronchol 10:206–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Monaco SE, Koah AE, Xing J, Ahmed I, Cuda J, Cunningham J et al (2018) Telecytology implementation: deployment of telecytology for rapid on-site evaluations at an Academic Medical Center. Diagn Cytopathol:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.24077
  34. 34.
    Khurana KK, Xu W, Wang D, Swarnkar A (2015) Rapid on-site evaluation with dynamic telecytopathology for ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of head and neck nonthyroid lesions. J Pathol Inform 6:19CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pathology, Seth GSMC & KEMHMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical SciencesVijaywadaIndia
  3. 3.Department of Pathology, LTMMC & LTMGHMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations