Advertisement

Does Quality of Life Among Modified Radical Mastectomy and Breast Conservation Surgery Patients Differ? A 5-Year Comparative Study

  • Vivek Bhat
  • A. P. Roshini
  • Rakesh RameshEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among females worldwide, of whom more than 80% survive for more than 5 years. Hence, ensuring a good quality of life (QOL) is essential to achieve holistic approach in treating patients. A cross-sectional study was conducted to compare the QOL in women who underwent modified radical mastectomy (MRM) and breast conservation surgery (BCS) for breast cancer in the last 5 years. QOL was evaluated based on the long-term quality of life–breast cancer (LTQOL–BC) questionnaire. A greater percentage of women who underwent MRM complained of difficulty in completing their house work compared with the BCS group (50% compared with 31%). Twenty-five percent (6) of the women who had undergone MRM reported feeling of being incomplete as women, along with a lack of femininity. However, more than 80% of the women in both groups said that they felt stronger as survivors and derived strength from their experience. There were significant differences in the quality of life of women from both groups in terms of physical function and body image, with the BCS group appearing to have a better QOL.

Keywords

Quality of life Breast cancer Modified radical mastectomy Breast conservation surgery 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Ethical Committee.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Murthy NS, Agarwal UK, Chaudhry K, Saxena S (2007) A study on time trends in incidence of breast cancer—Indian scenario. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 16:185–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yeole BB (2008) Trends in cancer incidence in female breast, cervix uteri, corpus uteri, and ovary in India. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 9:119–122Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Takiar R, Srivastav A (2008) Time trend in breast and cervix cancer of women in India—(1990-2003). Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 9:777–780Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dhillon PK, Yeole BB, Dikshit R, Kurkure AP, Bray F (2011) Trends in breast, ovarian and cervical cancer incidence in Mumbai, India over a 30-year period, 1976-2005: an age-period cohort analysis. Br J Cancer 105:723–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Malvia S, Bagadi SA, Dubey US, Saxena S (2017) Epidemiology of breast cancer in Indian women. Asia-Pac J Clin Oncol 13:289–295.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ajco.12661 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sun Y, Kim S-W, Heo CY, Kim D, Hwang Y, Yom CK, Kang E (2014) Comparison of quality of life based on surgical technique in patients with breast cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 44(1):22–27.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyt176 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    World Health Organization. Report of WHOQOL Focus Group Work. World Health Organization, 1993; GenevaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H, Brenner H (2008) Quality of life over 5 years in women with breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy: a population-based study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 134:1311–1318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kiebert GM, de Haes JC, van de Velde CJ (1991) The impact of breast-conserving treatment and mastectomy on the quality of life of early-stage breast cancer patients: a review. J Clin Oncol 9:1059–1070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ganz PA, Schag AC, Lee JJ, Polinsky ML, Tan SJ (1992) Breast conservation versus mastectomy. Is there a difference in psychological adjustment or quality of life in the year after surgery? Cancer 69:1729–1738CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    He ZY, Tong Q, Wu SG, Li FY, Lin HX, Guan XX (2012) A comparison of quality of life and satisfaction of women with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy vs. mastectomy in southern China. Support Care Cancer 20:2441–2449.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-011-1364-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Waljee JF, Hu ES, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Newman LA, Alderman AK (2008) Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life. J Clin Oncol 26:3331–3337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    de Haes JC, Curran D, Aaronson NK, Fentiman IS (2003) Quality of life in breast cancer patients aged over 70 years, participating in the EORTC 10850 randomised clinical trial. Eur J Cancer 39:945–951CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zanapalioglu Y, Atahan K, Gur S, Cokmez A, Tarcan E (2009) Effect of breast conserving surgery in quality of life in breast cancer patients. J Breast Health 5:152–156Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Acil H, Cavdar I (2014) Comparison of quality of life of Turkish breast cancer patients undergoing breast conserving surgery or modified radical mastecomy. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 15(13):5377–5381.  https://doi.org/10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.13.5377 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Demir SG (2008) Self-management of lymphedema in patients operated on for breast cancer. J Breast Health 4:62–69Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ozkan S, Alcalar N (2009) Psychological reactions to surgical treatment in breast cancer. J Breast Health 5:60–64Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Okanli A, Ekinci M (2008) The comparison of marital adjustment, emotional control level and life satisfaction of the patients with breast cancer and their husbands after and before mastectomy. New Symposium Journal 46:9–14Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Steinberg MD, Juliano MA, Wise L (1985) Psychological outcome of lumpectomy versus mastectomy in the treatment of breast cancer. Am J Psychiatry 142:34–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Akça M, Ata A, Nayır E, Erdoğdu S, Arıcan A (2014) Impact of surgery type on quality of life in breast cancer patients. The Journal of Breast Health 10(4):222–228.  https://doi.org/10.5152/tjbh.2014.1919 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    WHOQOL Group. Study protocol for the World Health Organization (1993) Project to develop a quality of life assessment instrument. Qual Life Res 2(2):153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Indian Association of Surgical Oncology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. John’s Medical College and HospitalBengaluruIndia
  2. 2.Department of Surgical OncologySt. John’s Medical College and HospitalBengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations