Impact of Length of Distal Margin on Outcomes Following Sphincter Preserving Surgery for Middle and Lower Third Rectal Cancers
Outcomes of sphincter preserving surgery for distal rectal cancers improve with clear circumferential resection and distal resection margin. However, the extent of distal resection margin after a complete mesorectal excision is often a cause for debate. We evaluated the outcome of middle and lower third rectal cancer patients undergoing sphincter preservation with variable distal resection margin at our center. Patients with biopsy-proven rectal adenocarcinoma within 10 cm from anal verge undergoing sphincter preserving resections were included. Patients with positive circumferential resection margin were excluded. Patients were divided into three groups based on the extent of distal resection margin (< 6 mm, 6–10 mm, > 10 mm) and oncological outcomes were compared. The median age of 242 patients was 50 years and 44 (18.2%) were high-grade tumors. Preoperative chemoradiation was used in 185 (75.2%) patients. Median distal resection margin was 20 mm. Patients in < 10 mm group had a significantly higher proportion of lower third (68.3% vs 39.8%, p = 0.004) and chemoradiation-treated tumors (85.4 vs 74.6%, p = 0.001). A significantly higher percentage required an intersphincteric resection in the < 10 mm group (53.7% vs 14.4%, p = 0.0001). Significantly higher percentage tumors were pT3 in > 10 mm group (45.3% vs. 31.7%) (p = 0.05). The median follow-up was 23 months. There was no difference in the overall, loco-regional, and distant recurrence rates between the three groups. A subcentimeter distal resection margin does not influence loco-regional or distant recurrence rates following sphincter preserving surgery for middle and lower third rectal adenocarcinoma.
KeywordsAdenocarcinoma Rectum Margin Survival
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 5.Pachler J, Wille-Jørgensen P (2012) Quality of life after rectal resection for cancer, with or without permanent colostomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 12:CD004323Google Scholar
- 6.Russell MM, Ganz PA, Lopa S, Yothers G, Ko CY, Arora A, Atkins JN, Bahary N, Soori GS, Robertson JM, Eakle J, Marchello BT, Wozniak TF, Beart RW Jr, Wolmark N (2015) Comparative effectiveness of sphincter-sparing surgery versus abdominoperineal resection in rectal cancer: patient-reported outcomes in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project randomized trial R-04. Ann Surg 261:144–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Vernava AM III, Moran M, Rothenberger DA et al (1992) A prospective evaluation of distal margins in carcinoma of the rectum. Surg Gynecol Obstet 175:333–336Google Scholar
- 14.Kuvshinoff B, Maghfoor I, Miedema B et al (2001) Distal margin requirements after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for distal rectal carcinomas: are < or = 1 cm distal margins sufficient? Ann Surg Oncol 8:163–169Google Scholar
- 16.Rutkowski A, Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Chmielik E, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A, Wojnar A, On Behalf of the Polish Colorectal Study Group (2008) Polish Colorectal Study Group. Distal bowel surgical margin shorter than 1 cm after preoperative radiation for rectal cancer: is it safe? Ann Surg Oncol 15:3124–3131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Liu R, Bai X, Qiu J, Guo D, Yan L, Wang G, Li X, Wang X (2014) Clinicopathological study of safe resectional margin in mid and low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 17:561–564Google Scholar
- 23.Patel UB, Taylor F, Blomqvist L, George C, Evans H, Tekkis P, Quirke P, Sebag-Montefiore D, Moran B, Heald R, Guthrie A, Bees N, Swift I, Pennert K, Brown G (2011) Magnetic resonance imaging-detected tumor response for locally advanced rectal cancer predicts survival outcomes: MERCURY experience. J Clin Oncol 29:3753–3760CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Song JH, Kim SH, Lee JH, Cho HM, Kim DY, Kim TH, Kim SY, Baek JY, Oh JH, Nam TK, Yoon MS, Jeong JU, Kim K, Chie EK, Jang HS, Kim JS, Kim JH, Kang KM (2016) Significance of histologic tumor grade in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by curative surgery: a multi-institutional retrospective study. Radiother Oncol 118:387–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Kobayashi H, Mochizuki H, Sugihara K, Morita T, Kotake K, Teramoto T, Kameoka S, Saito Y, Takahashi K, Hase K, Oya M, Maeda K, Hirai T, Kameyama M, Shirouzu K, Muto T (2007) Characteristics of recurrence and surveillance tools after curative resection for colorectal cancer: a multicenter study. Surgery 141:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar