Journal of Cancer Education

, Volume 34, Issue 6, pp 1190–1197 | Cite as

Increasing Awareness of Uterine Cancer Risks and Symptoms by Using Campaign Materials from Inside Knowledge: Get the Facts About Gynecologic Cancer

  • Daniel Novinson
  • Mary PuckettEmail author
  • Julie Townsend
  • Guillermo Tortolero-Luna
  • Jenny Rees Patterson
  • Cynthia A. Gelb
  • Sherri L. Stewart


Uterine cancer is the fourth most commonly diagnosed cancer among women in the USA. To increase knowledge among women and healthcare providers about uterine cancer, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program (NCCCP) partnered with the Inside Knowledge: Get The Facts About Gynecologic Cancer campaign to present facilitated discussions about uterine cancer with women and providers. After standardized training, local NCCCP grantees developed and led community-based, tailored, facilitated discussions for public participants and providers. Pre- and post-session surveys were administered to assess knowledge of risk factors, symptoms, testing, and diagnostic options for uterine cancer. Following the facilitated sessions, significantly, more public respondents identified uterine cancer risk factors (e.g., advanced age, post-menopausal status). However, they also equally identified factors not associated with uterine cancer (e.g., smoking, HPV). Non-OB/GYN provider knowledge increased, significantly for some risks and symptoms, and their confidence with relaying uterine cancer information to patients significantly increased from 51.4 to 91.0% (P < 0.0001). Relatively low proportions of OB/GYNs (19.3%), other primary care providers (46.2%), and public participants (51.8%) knew post-session that genetic testing for Lynch syndrome can help stratify women for uterine cancer risk. Participant knowledge significantly increased for some risk factors and symptoms following Inside Knowledge educational sessions; however, some knowledge gaps remained. Overall, the Inside Knowledge materials are effective for increasing uterine cancer awareness among providers and women. Additional provider education could include specific resources related to uterine cancer genetic associations, as advancements in genetic testing for all uterine cancers are currently being made.


Uterine cancer Health education Cancer prevention Comprehensive cancer control 


Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Financial Disclosure

No financial disclosures were reported by the authors of this paper.


  1. 1.
    Ajzen I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 50:179–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bandura A (1977) Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 84(2):191–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cooper CP, Polonec L, Gelb CA (2011) Women's knowledge and awareness of gynecologic cancer: a multisite qualitative study in the United States. J Women's Health (Larchmt) 20(4):517–524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dillon JL, Gonzalez JL, DeMars L, Bloch KJ, Tafe LJ (2017) Universal screening for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancers: frequency of germline mutations and identification of patients with Lynch-like syndrome. Hum Pathol 70:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goverde A, Spaander MC, van Doorn HC, Dubbink HJ, van den Ouweland AM, Tops CM, Kooi SG, de Waard J, Hoedemaeker RF, Bruno MJ, Hofstra RM, de Bekker-Grob EW, Dinjens WN, Steyerberg EW, Wagner A, L. s. group (2016) Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for Lynch syndrome in endometrial cancer patients up to 70years of age. Gynecol Oncol 143(3):453–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grady D, Gebretsadik T, Kerlikowske K, Ernster V, Petitti D (1995) Hormone replacement therapy and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 85(2):304–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hayden JA (2014) Introduction to health behavior theory. Jones and Bartlett Learning, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jemal A, Ward EM, Johnson CJ, Cronin KA, Ma J, Ryerson B, Mariotto A, Lake AJ, Wilson R, Sherman RL, Anderson RN, Henley SJ, Kohler BA, Penberthy L, Feuer EJ, Weir HK (2017) Annual report to the nation on the status of Cancer, 1975-2014, featuring survival. J Natl Cancer Inst 109(9)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Knowles MA (2005) The adult learner: the definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Elsevier, BurlingtonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Koldjeski D, Kirkpatrick MK, Everett L, Brown S, Swanson M (2004) Health seeking related to ovarian cancer. Cancer Nurs 27(5):370–378 quiz 379–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Leenen CH, Goverde A, de Bekker-Grob EW, Wagner A, van Lier MG, Spaander MC, Bruno MJ, Tops CM, van den Ouweland AM, Dubbink HJ, Kuipers EJ, Dinjens WN, van Leerdam ME, Steyerberg EW (2016) Cost-effectiveness of routine screening for Lynch syndrome in colorectal cancer patients up to 70 years of age. Genet Med 18(10):966–973CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mahdi H, Han X, Moulton L, Vargas R (2017) Trends in survival of patients with uterine serous carcinoma from 1988 to 2011: a population-based study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 27(6):1155–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Major A, Stewart SL (2009) Celebrating 10 years of the National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program, 1998 to 2008. Prev Chronic Dis 6(4):A133PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Merrill RM (2008) Hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 1997 through 2005. Med Sci Monit 14(1):CR24–CR31PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mills AM, Liou S, Ford JM, Berek JS, Pai RK, Longacre TA (2014) Lynch syndrome screening should be considered for all patients with newly diagnosed endometrial cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 38(11):1501–1509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Puckett M, Neri A, Underwood JM, Stewart SL (2016) Nutrition and physical activity strategies for cancer prevention in current National Comprehensive Cancer Control Program plans. J Community Health 41(5):1013–1020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Randall LM, Pothuri B (2016) The genetic prediction of risk for gynecologic cancers. Gynecol Oncol 141(1):10–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rim SH, Polonec L, Stewart SL, Gelb CA (2011) A national initiative for women and healthcare providers: CDC’s Inside Knowledge: Get the Facts About Gynecologic Cancer campaign. J Women's Health (Larchmt) 20(11):1579–1585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rochester PW, Townsend JS, Given L, Krebill H, Balderrama S, Vinson C (2010) Comprehensive cancer control: progress and accomplishments. Cancer Causes Control 21(12):1967–1977CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL, LaCroix AZ, Kooperberg C, Stefanick ML, Jackson RD, Beresford SA, Howard BV, Johnson KC, Kotchen JM, Ockene J, I. Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative (2002) Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288(3):321–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Schouten LJ, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA (2006) Anthropometry, physical activity, and endometrial cancer risk: results from the Netherlands cohort study. Int J Gynecol Cancer 16(Suppl 2):492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sheikh MA, Althouse AD, Freese KE, Soisson S, Edwards RP, Welburn S, Sukumvanich P, Comerci J, Kelley J, LaPorte RE, Linkov F (2014) USA endometrial cancer projections to 2030: should we be concerned? Future Oncol 10(16):2561–2568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A (2015) Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 65(1):5–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Steele CB, Thomas CC, Henley SJ, Massetti GM, Galuska DA, Agurs-Collins T, Puckett M, Richardson LC (2017) Vital signs: trends in incidence of cancers associated with overweight and obesity - United States, 2005-2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 66(39):1052–1058CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. Government work and its text is not subject to copyright protection in the United States; however, its text may be subject to foreign copyright protection 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health PromotionCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA
  2. 2.Division of Cancer Control and Population SciencesUniversity of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer CenterSan JuanPuerto Rico
  3. 3.SciMetrikaDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations