Journal of Cancer Education

, Volume 34, Issue 6, pp 1181–1189 | Cite as

Training the Twenty-First Century Cancer Epidemiologist

  • T. K. LamEmail author
  • J. A. Lavigne
  • X. Qadir
  • M. J. Khoury
  • S. D. Schully


To assess and advance training of twenty-first century cancer epidemiologists, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) sought to obtain a snapshot of the cancer epidemiology training landscape by conducting a survey across academic institutions and cancer centers, focusing on four key training areas driving current cancer epidemiology research (“drivers”): (1) collaboration, (2) novel methods/technologies, (3) multilevel analysis, and (4) knowledge integration. Complementary to the survey, we conducted a portfolio analysis of active NCI-funded training grants. In the present report, we provide our findings from this effort and contribute to the on-going conversation regarding the training of next-generation cancer epidemiologists. Analyses and insights gained from conversations with leaders/educators across 24 academic institutions/cancer centers and the portfolio analysis of training grants echoed contemporaneous conversation that cancer epidemiology training must adapt to meet the needs of the changing research environment. Currently, with the exception of novel methods/technologies, cancer epidemiology trainees receive the majority of their training in collaboration, multilevel approaches, and knowledge integration/translation either informally, ad hoc, or not at all; exposure to these identified drivers varied considerably by institution, mentor, and other external as well as internal factors.


Cancer epidemiology Training Education 



We are grateful for the dedication, thoughtfulness, and time that each surveyed educator/faculty member devoted to answering the survey questions. We are appreciative of their generosity and the insights they have shared during our conversation with them. We would like to acknowledge Dr. Margaret Spitz’s for her insights and time spent reviewing the materials.

Supplementary material

13187_2018_1426_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (161 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 161 kb)
13187_2018_1426_MOESM2_ESM.docx (13 kb)
ESM 2 (DOCX 13 kb)


  1. 1.
    Deppen SA, Aldrich MC, Hartge P, Berg CD, Colditz GA, Petitti DB, Hiatt RA (2012) Cancer screening: the journey from epidemiology to policy. Ann Epidemiol 22(6):439–445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Samet JM (2011) National Institute of Health's Robert Gordon lecture in epidemiology. Available from
  3. 3.
    Khoury MJ, Lam TK, Ioannidis JP, Hartge P, Spitz MR, Buring JE, Chanock SJ, Croyle R, Goddard KA, Ginsburg GS et al (2013) Transforming epidemiology for 21st century medicine and public health. In: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, vol 22, pp 508–516Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lam TK, Spitz M, Schully SD, Khoury MJ (2013) “Drivers” of translational cancer epidemiology in the 21st century: needs and opportunities. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 22(2):181–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brownson RC, Samet JM, Chavez GF, Davies MM, Galea S, Hiatt RA, Hornung CA, Khoury MJ, Koo D, Mays VM, Remington P, Yarber L (2015) Charting a future for epidemiologic training. Ann Epidemiol 25(6):458–465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Training CfC. Center for Cancer Training (2016) Funding for extramural cancer training. National Cancer InstituteGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Spitz MR, Lam TK, Schully SD, Khoury MJ (2014) The next generation of large-scale epidemiologic research: implications for training cancer epidemiologists. Am J Epidemiol 180(10):964–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Nelson DE, Faupel-Badger J, Phillips S, Belcher B, Chang S, Abrams DB, Kramer BS, White MC, O'Malley M, Varanasi AP, Fabian CJ, Wiest JS, Colditz GA, Hall K, Shields PG, Weitzel JN (2014) Future directions for postdoctoral training in cancer prevention: insights from a panel of experts. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 23(4):679–683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ioannidis JP, Schully SD, Lam TK, Khoury MJ (2013) Knowledge integration in cancer: current landscape and future prospects. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 22(1):3–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yates MS, Chang S, Lee HY, Faupel-Badger J, Cameron C (2016) Bringing cancer prevention research competencies to the classroom. J Cancer EducGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Negandhi P, Negandhi H, Tiwari R, Sharma K, Zodpey SP, Quazi Z, Gaidhane A, Jayalakshmi N, Gijare M, Yeravdekar R (2015) Building interdisciplinary leadership skills among health practitioners in the twenty-first century: an innovative training model. Front Public Health 3:221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Czabanowska K, Smith T, Konings KD, Sumskas L, Otok R, Bjegovic-Mikanovic V, Brand H (2014) In search for a public health leadership competency framework to support leadership curriculum-a consensus study. Eur J Pub Health 24(5):850–856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alberts B, Kirschner MW, Tilghman S, Varmus H (2014) Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(16):5773–5777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Keyes KM, Galea S (2016) Setting the agenda for a new discipline: population health science. Am J Public Health 106(4):633–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. Government work and its text is not subject to copyright protection in the United States; however, its text may be subject to foreign copyright protection 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer InstituteNational Institute of HealthRockvilleUSA
  2. 2.Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer InstituteNational Institute of HealthBethesdaUSA
  3. 3.Office of Public Health GenomicsCenters for Disease Control and PreventionAtlantaUSA
  4. 4.Office of Disease PreventionNational Institutes of HealthBethesdaUSA

Personalised recommendations