Cueing Implicit Commitment
- 1 Downloads
Despite the importance of commitment for distinctively human forms of sociality, it remains unclear how people prioritize and evaluate their own and others’ commitments - especially implicit commitments. Across two sets of online studies, we found evidence in support of the hypothesis that people’s judgments and attitudes about implicit commitments are governed by an implicit sense of commitment, which is modulated by cues to others’ expectations, and by cues to the costs others have invested on the basis of those expectations.
This work was supported by a Starting Grant from the European Research Council (nr 679092, SENSE OF COMMITMENT). We would like to thank Jinnie Ooi and Eszter Salamon for assistance with data collection, as well as Christophe Heintz, Thom Scott-Phillips and Barbora Siposova for helpful comments and discussion.
- Clark, H.H. 2006. Social actions, social commitments. In Roots of human sociality: Culture, cognition and interaction, ed. S.C. Levinson and N.J. Enfield, 126–150. New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
- Gilbert, M. (1990) Walking together: a paradigmatic social phenomenon. Midwest Studies In Philosophy, 15(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
- Guala, F. & Mittone, L. (2010) How history and conventions create norms: an experimental study. Journal of Economic Psychology 31, 749–756Google Scholar
- Heintz, C., J. Celse, F. Giardini, and S. Max. 2015. Facing expectations : Those that we prefer to fulfil and those that we disregard. Judgment and Decision making 10 (5): 442–455.Google Scholar
- Hume, D. 1978. A treatise of human nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press (Original work published in 1739–1740).Google Scholar
- Lewis, D. 1969. Convention: A philosophical study. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Michael, J., and E. Pacherie. 2015. On commitments and other uncertainty reduction tools in joint action. Journal of Social Ontology 1 (1). https://doi.org/10.1515/jso-2014-0021.
- Michael, J., N. Sebanz, and G. Knoblich. 2016. The sense of commitment: A minimal approach. Frontiers in Psychology 6 (1968). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01968.
- Scanlon, T.M. 1998. What we owe to each other. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar