pp 1–9 | Cite as

What Is the Role of Ecosystem Engineers in New England Salt Marshes? A Mesocosm Study of the Fiddler Crab and the Purple Marsh Crab

  • Alexandria MooreEmail author
General Wetland Science


The services and functions provided by coastal wetlands are numerous and influenced by factors ranging from climate and tidal regime to ecosystem engineers and anthropogenic modifications. In New England salt marshes, fiddler crabs and purple marsh crabs are cooccurring species that are among the most conspicuous burrowing macroinvertebrates in the region. Both are known to influence salt marsh ecosystem functions through their burrowing and feeding behavior, but the ways in which they regulate specific properties, individually and together, is unclear. Using an ex situ mesocosm study, I manipulated the presence of fiddler crabs and purple marsh crabs in order to evaluate their impact on several soil properties and aboveground biomass. Results show that, contrary to previous studies, the fiddler crab had little impact while the purple marsh crab altered soil quality with positive implications for plant growth. This suggests that the purple marsh crab, known to be a voracious consumer of marsh vegetation, may play a much more nuanced role in the maintenance of plant growth than previously thought. Additional ex situ studies should be done to further delineate the impact of these two species.


Fiddler crab Purple marsh crab Mesocosm Ecosystem functions Salt marsh 



I thank A. Andis, R. Buchkowski, M. Burak, and N. Moore for field assistance, O. Schmitz for advice on experimental design, R. Buchkowski and M. Lambert for guidance on statistical analyses, and M. Bradford, P. Raymond, and O. Schmitz for comments on the final manuscript. This research was supported through funding from the Yale Institute for Biospheric Studies (YIBS) and the Yale Natural Lands Fund.

Supplementary material

13157_2019_1123_MOESM1_ESM.csv (3 kb)
ESM 1 (CSV 3 kb)


  1. Altieri AH, Bertness MD, Coverdale TC, Herrmann NC, Angelini C (2012) A trophic cascade triggers collapse of a salt-marsh ecosystem with intensive recreational fishing. Ecology 93(6):1402–1410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1):1–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertness MD (1985) Fiddler crab regulation of Spartina alterniflora production on a New England salt marsh. Ecology 66(3):1042–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertness MD (1992) The ecology of a New England salt marsh. American Scientist 80:260–268Google Scholar
  5. Bertness MD, Brisson CP, Coverdale TC, Bevil MC, Crotty SM, Suglia ER (2014) Experimental predator removal causes rapid salt marsh die-off. Ecology Letters 17:830–835. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coverdale TC, Altieri AH, Bertness MD (2012) Belowground herbivory increases vulnerability of New England salt marshes to die-off. Ecology 93(9):2085–2094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coverdale TC, Axelman EE, Brisson CP, Young EW, Altieri AH, Bertness MD (2013) New England salt marsh recovery: opportunistic colonization of an invasive species and its non-consumptive effects. PLoS ONE 8(8):e73823. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coverdale TC, Brisson CP, Young EW, Yin SF, Donnelly JP, Bertness MD (2014) Indirect human impacts reverse centuries of carbon sequestration and salt marsh accretion. PLoS ONE 9(3):e93296. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crane J (1975) Fiddler crabs of the world. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  10. Daiber FC (1982) Animals of the tidal marsh. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Deegan LA, Johnson DS, Warren RS, Peterson BJ, Fleeger JW, Fagherazzi S, Wollheim WM (2012) Coastal eutrophication as a driver of salt marsh loss. Nature 490:388–394. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Erwin KL (2009) Wetlands and global climate change: the role of wetland restoration in a changing world. Wetlands Ecology and Management 17:71–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gribsholt B, Kristensen E (2002) Effects of bioturbation and plant roots on salt marsh biogeochemistry: a mesocosm study. Marine Ecology Progress Series 241:71–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. He Q, Silliman BR (2016) Consumer control as a common driver of coastal vegetation worldwide. Ecological Monographs 86(3):278–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hedges LV, Gurevitch J, Curtis PS (1999) The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology. Ecology 8:1150–1156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Holdredge C, Bertness MD, Altieri AH (2009) Role of crab herbivory in die-off of New England salt marshes. Conservation Biology 23:672–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hothorn T, Bretz F, Westfall P (2008) Simultaneous inference in general parametric models. Biometrical Journal 50(3):346–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ives RL (1942) The beaver-meadow complex. Journal of Geomorphology 5:191–203Google Scholar
  19. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1997) Positive and negative effects of organisms as physical ecosystem engineers. Ecology 78:1946–1957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kristensen R (2008) Mangrove crabs as ecosystem engineers; with emphasis on sediment processes. Journal of Sea Research 59:30–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff P, Christensen R (2016) lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 82(13):1–26. Google Scholar
  23. Lee SY (1997) Potential trophic importance of the faecal material of the mangrove sesarmine crab Sesarma messa. Marine Ecology Progress Series 159:275–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Miller DC (1961) The feeding mechanism of fiddler crabs, with ecological consideration of feeding adaptations. Zoologica 46:89–101Google Scholar
  25. Montague CL (1980) A natural history of temperate western Atlantic fiddler crabs with reference to their impact on salt marshes. Contributions in Marine Science 23:25–55Google Scholar
  26. Moore AC (2018) Context-dependent consumer control in New England tidal wetlands. PLoS ONE 13(5):e0197170. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Naiman RJ, Johnson CA, Kelley JC (1988) Alteration of north American streams by beaver. BioScience 38:753–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nelson D, Sommers L (1996) Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical Methods (SSSA Book). Soil Science Society of America and American Society of AgronomyGoogle Scholar
  29. Osenberg CW, Sarnelle O, Cooper SD (1997) Effect size in ecological experiments: the application of biological models in meta-analysis. The American Naturalist 150:798–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peer N, Miranda NAF, Perissinotto R (2015) A review of fiddler crabs (genus Uca leach, 1814) in South Africa. African Zoology 50(3):187–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Qian P, Schoenau JJ (1996) Ion exchange resin membrane (IERM): a new approach for in situ measurement of nutrient availability in soil. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Sciences 2:322–330Google Scholar
  32. Salo P, Banks PB, Dickman CR, Korpimaki E (2010) Predator manipulation experiments: impacts on populations of terrestrial vertebrate prey. Ecological Monographs 80(4):531–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Smith NF, Wilcox C, Lessmann JM (2009) Fiddler crab burrowing affects growth and production of the white mangrove (Laguncularia racemosa) in a restored Florida coastal marsh. Marine Biology 156:2255–2266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Szillery JE, Fernandez IJ, Norton SA, Rustad LE, White AS (2006) Using ion-exchange resins to study soil response to experimental watershed acidification. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 116:383–398CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Teal JM (1958) Distribution of fiddler crabs in Georgia salt marshes. Ecology 39:185–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Terwilliger J, Pastor J (1999) Small mammals, ectomycorrhizae, and conifer succession in beaver meadows. Oikos 85:83–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Thongtham N, Kristensen E (2005) Carbon and nitrogen balance of leaf-eating sesarmid crabs (Neoepisesarma versicolor) offered different food sources. Estuaries and Coastal Shelf Science 65:213–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Townsend I, Fletcher C, Knappen M, Rossington K (2011) A review of salt marsh dynamics. Water Environment Journal 25:477–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vu HD, Pennings SC (2018) Predators mediate above- vs. belowground herbivory in a salt marsh crab. Ecosphere 9(2):e02107. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang JQ, Zhang XD, Jiang LF, Bertness MD, Fang CM, Chen JK, Hara T, Li B (2010) Bioturbation of burrowing crabs promotes sediment turnover and carbon and nitrogen movements in an estuarine salt marsh. Ecosystems 13:586–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wright JP, Jones CG, Flecker AS (2002) An ecosystem engineer, the beaver, increases species richness at the landscape scale. Oecologia 132:96–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zhang X, Jia X, Chen Y, Shao J, Wu X, Shang L, Li B (2013) Crabs mediate interactions between native and invasive salt marsh plants: a mesocosm study. PLoS ONE 8(9):e74095. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Forestry and Environmental StudiesYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations