Advertisement

Wetlands

pp 1–10 | Cite as

Methane Cycling Contributes to Distinct Patterns in Carbon Stable Isotopes of Wetland Detritus

  • Julia A. Hart
  • Carmella Vizza
  • William E. West
  • Dominic T. Chaloner
  • Stuart E. Jones
  • Gary A. Lamberti
General Wetland Science

Abstract

Increasing global temperatures are changing the balance between carbon sequestration and its microbial processing in wetlands, making the tracking of these processes important. We used detrital carbon stable isotopes (δ13C) to trace aerobic decomposition and CH4 production in two experiments conducted in Alaskan wetlands. In laboratory bottle incubations, larger decreases in detritus δ13C corresponded to higher net CH4 and CO2 production rates. Because net CH4 production was the stronger predictor and its effect was negative, we hypothesize that decreases in δ13C trace concurrent CH4 production and oxidation. In a field experiment, decreases in detritus δ13C were not correlated with aerobic decomposition rates, but were positively correlated with CH4 production potentials as estimated from bottle incubations. We hypothesize that the positive relationship reflects only CH4 production, rather than concurrent production and oxidation. Although CH4 production rates were correlated with changes in detrital δ13C in both experiments, the direction of this relationship differed between laboratory and field with important consequences for the scale of ecological experiments. Our study demonstrates that CH4 cycling can create distinct patterns in δ13C of wetland detritus. Future studies should conduct explicit mass balance experiments to clarify mechanisms and determine the importance of scale in shaping isotopic patterns.

Keywords

Methane Stable isotopes Wetlands Decomposition Food webs 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the Cordova Ranger District of the USDA Forest Service for providing instrumental field and logistical support. In particular, we thank Deyna Kuntzsch, Andrew Morin, Sean Meade, Luca Adelfio, and Ken Hodges for making fieldwork on the Copper River Delta possible. The UND Center for Environmental Science and Technology provided instrumentation and analytical assistance for chemical and stable isotope analysis. The UND Environmental Research Center provided instrumentation for gas chromatography. We would like to acknowledge Mike Brueseke for laboratory support. This study was made possible by the UND College of Science Summer Undergraduate Research Fellowship awarded to J.A. Hart and by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship awarded to C. Vizza. Additional funding and support was provided by the University of Notre Dame College of Science and the USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Bastviken D, Ejlertsson J, Sundh I, Tranvik L (2003) Methane as a source of carbon and energy for lake pelagic food webs. Ecology 84:969–981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastviken D, Cole J, Pace M, Tranvik L (2004) Methane emissions from lakes: dependence of lake characteristics, two regional assessments, and a global estimate Global Biogeochemical Cycles 18:12Google Scholar
  3. Bastviken D, Cole J, Pace M, Van de Bogert M (2008) Fates of methane from different lake habitats: connecting whole-lake budgets and CH4 emissions. J Geophys Res 113:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Benner R, Fogel ML, Sprague EK, Hodson RE (1987) Depletion of 13C in lignin and its implications for stable carbon isotope studies. Nature 329:708–710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bridgham SD, Megonigal JP, Keller JK, Bliss NB, Trettin C (2006) The carbon balance of north American wetlands. Wetlands 26:889–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bridgham SD, Cadillo-Quiroz J, Keller JK, Zhuang Q (2013) Methane emissions from wetlands: biogeochemical, microbial, and modeling perspectives from local to global scales. Glob Chang Biol 19:1325–1346CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bryant MD (1991) The Copper River delta pulse study: an interdisciplinary survey of the aquatic habitats. General Technical Report PNW–GTR–282Google Scholar
  8. Bunn SE, Boon PI (1993) What sources of organic carbon drive food webs in billabongs? A study based on stable isotope analysis. Oecologia 96:85–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multi-model inference: a practical information-theoretic approach, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Carpenter SR, Chisholm SW, Krebs CJ, Schindler DW, Wright RF (1995) Ecosystem experiments. Science New Series 269:324–327Google Scholar
  11. Conrad R (2005) Quantification of methanogenic pathways using stable carbon isotopic signatures: a review and a proposal. Organic Geochemistry 36:739–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Corbett JE, Tfaily MM, Burdige DJ, Cooper WT, Glaser PH, Chanton JP (2013) Partitioning pathways of CO2 production in peatlands with stable carbon isotopes. Biogeochemistry 114:327–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dai J, Sun MY, Culp RA, Noakes JE (2005) Changes in chemical and isotopic signatures of plant materials during degradation: implication for assessing various organic inputs in estuarine systems. Geophysical Research Letters 32:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DelVecchia AG, Stanford JA, Xu X (2016) Ancient and methane-derived carbon subsidizes contemporary food webs. Nature Communications 7:1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eller G, Deines P, Grey J, Richnow HH, Kruger M (2005) Methane cycling in lake sediments and its influence on chironomid larval δ13C. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 54:339–350CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Fellerhoff C, Voss M, Wantzen KM (2003) Stable carbon and nitrogen isotope signatures of decomposing tropical macrophytes. Aquatic Ecology 37:361–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gannes LZ, O’Brien DM, Martínez del Rio C (1997) Stable isotopes in animal ecology: assumptions, caveats, and a call for more laboratory experiments. Ecology 78:1271–1276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grey J (2016) The incredible lightness of being methane-fueled: stable isotopes reveal alternative energy pathways in aquatic ecosystems and beyond. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 4:8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Grey J, Kelly A, Jones RI (2004) High intraspecific variability in carbon and nitrogen stable isotope ratios of lake chironomid larvae. Limnology and Oceanography 49:239–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamilton SK, Lewis WM Jr, Sippel SJ (1992) Energy sources for aquatic animals in the Orinoco River floodplain: evidence from stable isotopes. Oecologia 89:324–330CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hershey AE, Northington RM, Hart-Smith J, Bostick M, Whalen SC (2015) Methane efflux and oxidation, and use of methane-derived carbon by larval chironomini, in arctic lake sediments. Limnology and Oceanography 60:276–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jones RI, Carter CE, Kelly A, Ward S, Kelly DJ, Grey J (2008) Widespread contribution of methane-cycle bacteria to the diets of lake profundal chironomid larvae. Ecology 89:857–864CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Junk WJ, Brown M, Campbell IC, Finlayson M, Gopal B, Ramberg L, Warner BG (2006) The comparative biodiversity of seven globally important wetlands: a synthesis. Aquatic Sciences 68:400–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kirschke S, Bousquet P, Ciais P, Saunois M, Canadell JG, Dlugokencky EJ et al (2013) Three decades of global methane sources and sinks. Nature Geoscience 6:813–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kohzu A, Kato C, Iwata T, Kishi D, Murakami M, Nakano S, Wada E (2004) Stream food web fueled by methane-derived carbon. Aquat Microb Ecol 36:189–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kwak TJ, Zedler JB (1997) Food web analysis of southern California coastal wetlands using multiple stable isotopes. Oecologia 110:262–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lehmann MF, Bernasconi SM, Barbieri AL, McKenzie JA (2002) Preservation of organic matter and alteration of its carbon and nitrogen isotope composition during simulated and in situ early sedimentary diagenesis. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 66:3573–3584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Matthews HD (2007) Implications for CO2 fertilization for future climate change in a coupled climate-carbon model. Global Change Biology 13:1068–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Melton JR, Wania R, Hodson EL, Poulter B, Ringeval B, Spahni R et al (2013) Present state of global wetland extent and wetland methane modelling: conclusions from a model inter-comparison project (WETCHIMP). Biogeosciences 10:753–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Myhre G, Shindell D, Breon FM, Collins W, Fuglestvedt J, Huang J et al (2013) Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing. In: Climate change 2013: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge and New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Peterson BJ (1999) Stable isotopes as tracers of organic matter input and transfer in benthic food webs: a review. Acta Oecologica 20:479–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. R Core Development Team (2015) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/
  33. Ringeval B, Friedlingstein P, Koven C, Ciais P, de Noblet-Ducoudre N, Decharme B, Cadule P (2011) Climate-CH4 feedback from wetlands and its interaction with the climate-CO2 feedback. Biogeosciences 8:2137–2157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rossi L, Costantini ML, Carlino P, di Lascio A, Rossi D (2010) Autochthonous and allochthonous plant contributions to coastal benthic detritus deposits: a dual-stable isotope study in a volcanic lake. Aquatic Sciences 72:227–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schindler DW (1998) Whole-ecosystem experiments: the need for ecosystem-scale experiments. Ecosystems 1:322–334Google Scholar
  36. Sierszen ME, Morrice JA, Moffett MF, West CW (2004) Benthic versus planktonic foundations of three Lake Superior coastal wetland food webs. Journal of Great Lakes Research 30:31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sierszen ME, Morrice JA, Trebitz AS, Hoffman JC (2012) A review of selected ecosystem services provided by coastal wetlands of the Laurentian Great Lakes. Aquatic Ecosystem Health and Management 15:92–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thilenius JF (1990) Woody plant succession on earthquake-uplifted coastal wetlands of the Copper River delta, Alaska. Forest Ecology and Management 33(34):439–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tiegs SD, Clapcott JE, Griffiths NA, Boulton AJ (2013) A standardized cotton-strip assay for measuring organic-matter decomposition in streams. Ecological Indicators 32:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Troxler TG, Richards JH (2009) δ13C, δ15N, carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus as indicators of plant ecophysiology and organic matter pathways in Everglades deep slough, Florida, USA. Aquatic Botany 91:157–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vander Zanden MJ, Rasmussen JB (1999) Primary consumer δ13C and δ15N and the trophic position of aquatic consumers. Ecology 80:1395–1404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vizza C, Zwart JA, Jones SE, Tiegs SD, Lamberti GA (2017a) Landscape patterns shape wetland pond ecosystem function from glacial headwaters to ocean. Limnology and Oceanography 62:S207–S221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vizza C, West WE, Jones SE, Hart JA, Lamberti GA (2017b) Regulators of coastal wetland methane production and responses to simulated global change. Biogeosciences 14:431–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vizza C, Hart JA, West WE, Jones SE, Lamberti GA (in review) Balancing CH4 budgets in Alaskan ponds: ebullition integrates alternate sources of CH4 productionGoogle Scholar
  45. Walther GR, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJC et al (2002) Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416:389–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wedin DA, Tieszen LL, Dewey B, Pastor J (1995) Carbon isotope dynamics during grass decomposition and soil organic matter formation. Ecology 76:1383–1392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. West WE, Coloso JJ, Jones SE (2012) Effects of algal and terrestrial carbon on methane production rates and methanogen community structure in a temperate lake sediment. Freshwater Biology 57:949–955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. West WE, Creamer KP, Jones SE (2016) Productivity and depth regulate lake contributions to atmospheric methane. Limnology and Oceanography 41:1–11Google Scholar
  49. Whalen SC (2005) Biogeochemistry of methane exchange between natural wetlands and the atmosphere. Environmental Engineering Science 22:73–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Whiting GJ, Chanton JP (2001) Greenhouse carbon balance of wetlands: methane emission versus carbon sequestration. Tellus 53B:521–528Google Scholar
  51. Wuebbles DJ, Hayhoe K (2002) Atmospheric methane and global change. Earth-Science Reviews 57:177–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zar JH (2010) Biostatistical analysis, 5th edition. Pearson, Upper Saddle Rivers, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society of Wetland Scientists 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameUSA
  2. 2.School of Aquatic & Fishery SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  3. 3.Kellogg Biological StationMichigan State UniversityHickory CornersUSA

Personalised recommendations