Advertisement

Hydrochemical characteristics and karst carbon sink estimation under the influence of allogenic water

  • Xiaojing Shan
  • Pengyu Liu
  • Liankai ZhangEmail author
  • Xiaoqun Qin
  • Jianhua Cao
  • Deshuang Yu
  • Xin Yao
  • Wen Liu
Original Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

The water originating from non-karst area, i.e., allogenic water (AW), has low pH and low calcite saturation. After entering the karst area, the chemical weathering of carbonate rocks would be accelerated and the karst carbon sink flux would be increased. Yufuhe River Basin, located in Ji’nan, Northern China, was selected to clarify the mechanism of the karst carbon sink and its flux under the influence of AW; both the surface water and groundwater were detected in situ and their hydrochemical characteristics were analyzed in the laboratory. To estimate the influence of AW on the karst carbon sink exactly, a modified Galy model was adopted. The results showed that the hydrochemical type of Yufuhe River Basin is HCO3·SO4–Ca, and its ions were derived mainly from carbonate rock and less from silicate rock. Water saturation model demonstrated that AW became saturated after they mixed with the karst water (KW) as indicated by dolomite saturation index (SId) and calcite saturation index (SIc). The dissolution capacity of KW and karst carbon sink flux was then enhanced. The estimation showed that the weathering rate of silicate rocks is 8.06 mm/ka, and the weathering rate of carbonate rocks is 18.51 mm/ka. When AW mixed with KW, the dissolution rate of carbonate erosion rate increased to 20.12 mm/ka. There was also a significant promoting effect of AW on the karst carbon sink. The CO2 sink rate of metamorphic rock (gneiss-dominated area) in the upper reaches of the basin is 3.87 t/km2a. In the karst area, the average CO2 sink rate of the KW is 7.51 t/km2a, while the value became 13.03 t/km2a when it mixed with AW, nearly doubled compared with KW. Based on the above analysis, the annual CO2 consumption of Yufuhe River Basin is 5500 t, contributing to an important approach of the regional CO2 sink.

Keywords

Allogenic water Karst water Karst carbon sink CO2 consumption 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41571203), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2017YFC0406104), the Geological exploration project of Shandong province (2016-79), and the China Geological Survey (DD20160305). Our great thanks to two anonymous peer reviewers for their constructive suggestions that improved the manuscript.

Author contributions

LZ, PL, JC and XQ conceived and designed the field investigation; PL, XS and XY performed the investigation; XS, WL and LZ analyzed the data; PL, DY and XY contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; XS, PL and LZ wrote the paper.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bögli A (1980) Karst hydrology and physical speleology. Springer, Berlin, pp 100–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cao JH, Yuan DX, Zhang C et al (2004) Karst ecosystem constrained by geological conditions in southwest China. Earth Environ 32:1–8Google Scholar
  3. Galy A, France LC (1999) Weathering processes in the Ganges–Brahmaputra basin and the riverine alkalinity budget. Chem Geol 159:31–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Gibbs RJ (1970) Mechanisms controlling world water chemistry. Science 170:1088–1090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. He RX, Sun PA, He SY et al (2017) Dynamic change of inorganic carbon flux in the middle and lower reaches of Lijiang River basin and its influencing factors. Carsologica Sinica 36:109–118Google Scholar
  6. Helena B, Vega M, Barrado E et al (2000) Temporal evolution of groundwater composition in an alluvial aquifer (Pisuerga River, Spain) by principal component analysis. Water Res 34:807–816CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Huang F, Tang W, Wang JL et al (2011) The influence of allogenic water on karst carbon sink: a case study in the Maocun Subterranean River in Guilin, China. Carsologica Sinica 30:417–421Google Scholar
  8. Huang QB, Qin XQ, Liu PY et al (2015) Applicability of karst carbon sinks calculation methods in semi-arid climate environment. J Jilin Univ (Earth Science Edition) 1:240–246Google Scholar
  9. Jia ZX, Zang HF, Zeng XQ (2015) To explore Liulin spring karst water stagnation zone heat source and the source of Na+, Cl. Carsologica Sinica 34:570–576Google Scholar
  10. Lang YC, Liu CQ, Zhao ZQ et al (2005) Chemical composition of surface water and groundwater in Guiyang: characteristics of water-rock reaction and pollution in karst hydrological system. Adv Water Sci 16:826–832Google Scholar
  11. Li DT, Luo Y (1983) Measurement of carbonate distribution area in China. Carsologica Sinica 2:147Google Scholar
  12. Li SY, Cheng XL, Gu S et al (2008) Hydro-chemical Characteristics in the Danjiangkou Reservoir (water source area of the middle route of the south to north water transfer project), China. Environ Sci 29:2111–2116Google Scholar
  13. Li XD, Liu CQ, Harue M et al (2010) The use of environmental isotopic (C, Sr, S) and hydrochemical tracers to characterize anthropogenic effects on karst groundwater quality: a case study of the Shuicheng Basin, SW China. Appl Geochem 25:1924–1936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Li BX, Qin DJ, Guo Y et al (2017) Effect of YuFu River on chemical process of karst groundwater in Ji’nan, Shandong Province. J Eng Geol 25:190–198Google Scholar
  15. Liu ZH (2001) Catalytic action of carbonic anhydrase on dissolution of carbonate and its significance in atmospheric CO2 sedimentation. Acta Geosci Sin 22:432Google Scholar
  16. Liu ZH, Dreybrodt W, Wang HJ (2007) A potentially important CO2 from the global water cycle. China Sci Bull 52:2418–2422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Liu ZH, Dreybrodt W, Wang HJ (2010) A new direction in effective accounting for the atmospheric CO2 budget: considering the combined action of carbonate dissolution, the global water cycle and photosynthetic uptake of DIC by aquatic organisms. Earth Sci Rev. 99:162–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meybeck M (2003) Global occurrence of major elements in rivers. Treatise Geochem 5:207–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pedley M, Andrews J, Ordonez S et al (1996) Does climate control the morphological fabric of freshwater carbonates? A comparative study of Holocene barrage tufas from Spain and Britain. Palaeogeogr Palaeocl 121:239–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Qin XQ, Liu PY, Huang QB et al (2013) Estimation of Atmospheric/Soil CO2 Consumption by Rock Weathering in the Pearl River Valley. Acta Geosci Sin 4:455–462Google Scholar
  21. Qin XQ, Jiang ZC, Zhang LK et al (2015) The difference of the weathering rate between carbonate rocks and silicate rocks and its effects on the atmospheric CO2 consumption in the Pearl River Basin. Geol Bull China 34:1749–1757Google Scholar
  22. Tang W, Cao JH, Yang H et al (2014) Research on carbonate rock corrosion rate by allogenic water as exemplified by the Maocun Subterranean River in Guilin. Earth Environ 42:207–212Google Scholar
  23. Xu SY, Jiang ZC (1997) A preliminary estimate of karstification and atmospheric greenhouse gas CO2 source sink of China. Chin Sci Bull 42:953–956CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yan ZW, Liu HL, Zhang ZW (2009) Influences of temperature and PCO2 on the solubility of calcite and dolomite. Carsologica Sinica 28:7–10Google Scholar
  25. Yang M, John G, Geng XM et al (2017) Carbon dioxide emissions from the littoral zone of a Chinese Reservoir, and a comparison with other greenhouse gases. Water 9:539–551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yuan DX (1993) Carbon cycle and global karst. Quat Sci 1:1–6Google Scholar
  27. Yuan DX (1997) Sensitivity of karst process to environmental change along the PEP-II transect. Quat Int 37:105–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Zhang LK, Qin XQ, Liu PY et al (2016) Chemical denudation rate and atmospheric CO2 consumption by H2CO3 and H2SO4 in the Yangtze River catchment. Acta Geosci Sin 90:1933–1943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhang LK, Liu PY, Qin XQ et al (2018) Migration and transformation of dissolved organic matter in karst water system and their influencing factors analysis. Environ Sci 5:2104–2116Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xiaojing Shan
    • 1
    • 2
  • Pengyu Liu
    • 2
    • 3
  • Liankai Zhang
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Xiaoqun Qin
    • 2
    • 3
  • Jianhua Cao
    • 3
  • Deshuang Yu
    • 1
  • Xin Yao
    • 4
  • Wen Liu
    • 5
  1. 1.School of Environmental Science and EngineeringQingdao UniversityQingdaoChina
  2. 2.Institute of Karst GeologyChinese Academy of Geological Sciences/Key Laboratory of Karst Ecosystem and Treatment of Rocky DesertificationGuilinChina
  3. 3.Ministry of Natural Resources and Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Institute of Karst Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological SciencesGuilinChina
  4. 4.School of Environmental and PlanningLiaocheng UniversityLiaochengChina
  5. 5.801 Institute of Hydrogeology and Engineering Geology, Shandong Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral ResourcesJinanChina

Personalised recommendations