Advertisement

Influence of Sea Surface Temperature on Simulated Future Change in Extreme Rainfall in the Asia-Pacific

  • Ian G. WattersonEmail author
Original Article
  • 9 Downloads

Abstract

The changes in precipitation simulated by the 40-model CMIP5 ensemble for the Asia-Pacific region are assessed, focusing on the two periods 1986–2005 and 2080–2099 under the RCP8.5 scenario. The frequency distributions of both daily and monthly mean rain rates at model grid points in each of four seasons are considered. In spatial averages for the land domain and seven selected regions, there is both an increase in the frequency of dry days and a shift towards heavier rain. Three 20-year seasonal aggregate statistics, the mean, the top decile of monthly amounts, and top percentile of daily amounts are assessed. The percentage changes over land are on average 4% higher for monthly extremes than for the mean, and a further 10% higher for the daily extremes. Over Australia and central Indonesia in some seasons the mean decreases but daily extremes increase. In much of Asia the daily extremes increase by 30% or more. For these statistics, there is a range across the ensemble that can often be linked to a pattern of sea surface temperature change that is quantified by a Pacific-Indian Dipole (or difference, PID) index. Correlations with both mean and extreme rain are highly negative over Australia and Indonesia and moderately positive over parts of south and east Asia in some seasons. The mechanism for this is explored through additional simulations and links with water vapour path. The results provide some understanding of the range of projections of future rainfall change based on the CMIP5 results, with some potential for narrowing it.

Keywords

Regional rainfall extremes Climate change Sea surface warming Water vapour path 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Australian Government’s Australian Climate Change Science Program. The ACCESS1.3 simulations were performed in 2012 under the Program’s modelling projects, in particular by Ben Hu. Colleagues who provided support for the earlier work, in various ways, included Emma Howard, Zhi Weng Chua, Helen Geng, and Pandora Hope. Michael Grose provided helpful comments on the work and manuscript. Two anonymous reviewers provided very helpful advice. The author is grateful to all who contributed to the CMIP5 data sets used.

References

  1. Adler, R.F., and Coauthors.: The Version-2 global precipitation climatology project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979–present). J. Hydrometeorol. 4, 1147–1167 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. Brown, J.N., and Coauthors.: Implications of CMIP3 model biases and uncertainties for climate projections in the western tropical Pacific. Clim. Chang. 119, 147–161 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. Brown, J.R., Moise, A.F., Colman, R., Zhang, H.: Will a warmer world mean a wetter or drier Australian monsoon? J. Clim. 29, 4577–4596 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christensen, J. H., and Coauthors, 2013: Climate phenomena and their relevance for future regional climate change. In: Climate Change 2013. The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge Univ. press. 92pp.Google Scholar
  5. Collins, M., and Coauthors, 2013: Long-term climate change: projections, commitments and irreversibility. In: Climate Change 2013. The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge Univ. press. 108pp.Google Scholar
  6. CSIRO and Bureau of Meteorology, 2015: Climate Change in Australia, Technical Report, Melbourne, Australia. www.climatechangeinaustralia.gov.au
  7. Eyring, V., and Coauthors.: Taking climate model evaluation to the next level. Nat. Clim. Chang., 9, 102–110 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0355-y.
  8. Grose, M.R., Bhend, J., Narsey, S., Sen Gupta, A., Brown, J.R.: Can we constrain CMIP5 rainfall projections in the tropical Pacific based on surface warming patterns? J. Clim. 27, 9124–9138 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hall, A., Cox, P., Huntingford, C., Klein, S.: Progressing emergent constraints on future climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 9, 269–278 (2019).  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0436-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ham, Y.-G., Kug, J.-S.: Present-day constraint for tropical Pacific precipitation changes due to global warming in CMIP5 models. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. 52, 459–466 (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-016-0030-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. IPCC, 2012: Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation. A Special Report of Working Groups I and II of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, 582pp.Google Scholar
  12. Jung, C.-Y., Shin, H.-J., Jang, C.-J., Kim, H.-J.: Projected change in east Asian summer monsoon by dynamic downscaling: moisture budget analysis. Asia-Pacific J. Atmos. Sci. 51(1), 77–89 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-015-0061-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pendergrass, A.G., Hartmann, D.L.: Two modes of change of the distribution of rain. J. Clim. 27, 8357–8371 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pendergrass, A.G., Knutti, R., Lehner, F., Deser, C., Sanderson, B.M.: Precipitation variability increases in a warmer climate. Sci. Rep. 7, 17966 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-17966-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Riahi, K., Rao, S., Krey, V., Cho, C., Chirkov, V., Fischer, G., Kindermann, G., Nakicenovic, N., Rafaj, P.: RCP8.5 –a scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. Clim. Chang. 109, 33–57 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0149-y. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Taylor, K.E., Stouffer, R.J., Meehl, G.A.: An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 93, 485–498 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Thackeray, C.W., DeAngelis, A.M., Hall, A., Swain, D.L., Qu, X.: On the connection between global hydrologic sensitivity and regional wet extremes. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, 11343–11351 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL079698 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Watterson, I.G.: An analysis of the global water cycle of present and doubled CO2 climates simulated by the CSIRO general circulation model. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 23113–23129 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Watterson, I.G.: Understanding and partitioning future climates for Australian regions from CMIP3 using ocean warming indices. Clim. Chang. 111, 903–922 (2012).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0166-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Watterson, I.G.: Climate change simulated by full and mixed-layer ocean versions of CSIRO Mk3.5 and Mk3.0: the Asia-Pacific region. Asia-Pacific J. Atmos. Sci. 49(3), 287–300 (2013).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-013-0028-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Watterson, I.G.: Indices of climate change based on patterns from CMIP5 models, and the range of projections. In press. Clim. Dyn. 52, 2451–2466 (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-018-4260-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Watterson, I.G., Rafter, T.: The distribution of daily rainfall in Australia and simulated future changes. J. Southern Hemis. Earth Sys Sci. 67, 160–180 (2017)Google Scholar
  23. Watterson, I.G., Chua, Z.-W., Hope, P.K.: Extreme monthly rainfall over Australia in a changing climate. J. Southern Hemis. Earth Sys Sci. 66, 402–423 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Meteorological Society and Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Climate Science Centre, CSIRO Oceans and AtmosphereAspendaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations