Advertisement

Numerical Simulation of Sea Fog over the Yellow Sea: Comparison between UM + PAFOG and WRF + PAFOG Coupled Systems

  • Wonheung Kim
  • Seong Soo YumEmail author
  • Chang Ki Kim
Original Article

Abstract

Sea fogs over the Yellow Sea in the western coast of the Korean Peninsula were simulated by the coupled systems of 3D regional models (UM and WRF) and a 1D model (PAFOG) with fine vertical resolution. The coupling was conducted by generating meteorological fields with 3D regional model and providing them as the initial fields and boundary conditions (external forcings) of the 1D model. The accuracy of the cold sea fog (T – SST > 0) simulation improved through the proper treatment of turbulent cooling near the surface by the coupling. However, the accuracy of warm sea fog (T – SST < 0) was improved only slightly by the coupling, which is likely due to the inadequate estimation of the external forcing (advection) of heat and moisture below the upper inversion layer. It was found that the resolution of the 3D regional model did not significantly affect the initial fields of the 1D model but the performance of the 1D + 3D coupled systems were still affected by the resolution of the 3D regional model since it affected the external forcings on the 1D model in the coupled system. Surprisingly, the coupled system with coarse resolution 3D model produced generally better fog simulation than that with fine resolution 3D model, due to the high fluctuation of advection (external forcing) for fine resolution. Meanwhile, for the same resolution, the two 3D models (UM and WRF) produced significantly different initial fields and the overall performance seemed better for the UM coupled system than the WRF coupled system. In short, it was demonstrated that fog prediction could be improved by the coupling for cold sea fog cases over the Yellow Sea, but improvement from the coupling was small for warm sea fog cases, which indicates that more research is required to produce promising results for warm sea fogs.

Keywords

Fog prediction PAFOG UM WRF Coupled system 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is funded by the Korea Meteorological Administration Research and Development Program under Grant KMI2018–03511.

References

  1. Ballar, S.P., Golding, B.W., Smith, R.N.B.: Mesoscale model experimental forecasts of the haar of Northeast Scotland. Mon. Weather Rev. 119, 2107–2123 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bott, A., Trautmann, T.: PAFOG-a new efficient forecast model of radiation fog and low-level stratiform clouds. Atmos. Res. 64, 191–203 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bott, A., Sievers, U., Zdunkowski, W.: A radiation fog model with a detailed treatment of the interaction between radiative transfer and fog microphysics. J. Atmos. Sci. 47(18),2153–2166 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boutle, I., Finnenkoetter, A., Lock, A., Wells, H.: The London model: forecasting fog at 333 m resolution. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 142, 360–371 (2015).  https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.2656 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chaumerliac, N., Richard, E., Pinty, J.P., Nickerson, E.C.: Sulfur scavenging in a mesoscale model with quasi-spectral microphysics: two-dimensional results for continental and maritime clouds. J. Geophys. Res. 92, 3114–3126 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cho, Y.-K., Kim, M.-O., Kim, B.-C.: Sea fog around the Korean peninsula. J. Appl. Meteorol. 39, 2473–2479 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davies, T., Cullen, M.J.P., Malcolm, A.J., Mawson, M.H., Staniforth, A., White, A.A., Wood, N.: A new dynamical core for the met Office’s global and regional modelling of the atmosphere. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc. 131, 1759–1782 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fu, G., Guo, J.T., Xie, S.P., Duane, Y.H., Zhang, M.G.: Analysis and high-resolution modeling of a dense sea fog event over the Yellow Sea. Atmos. Res. 81, 293–303 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gultepe, I., Tardif, R., Michaelides, S.C., Cermak, J., Bott, A., Bendix, J., Muller, M.D., Pagowski, M., Hansen, B., Ellrod, G., Jacobs, W., Toth, G., Cober, S.G.: Fog research:a review of past achievements and future perspectives. Pure Appl. Geophys. 164, 1420–9136 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. Gultepe, I., Kuhn, T., Pavolonis, M., Calvert, C., Gurka, J., Heymsfield, A.J., Liu, P.S.K., Zhou, B., Ware, R., Ferrier, B., Milbrandt, J., Bernstein, B.: Ice fog in Arctic during FRAM–ice fog project: aviation and Nowcasting applications, Bulletin of Amer. Met. Soc. 95, 211–226 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. Kim, C.K., Yum, S.S.: Local meteorological and synoptic characteristics of fogs formed over Incheon international airport in the west coast of Korea. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 27, 761–776 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kim, C.K., Yum, S.S.: A numerical study of sea fog formation over cold sea surface using a one-dimensional turbulence model coupled with the weather research and forecasting model. Bound. Layer Meteor. 143, 481–505 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kim, C.K., Yum, S.S.: A study on the transition mechanism of stratus cloud in fog over warm sea surface using a single column model coupled with WRF. Asia-Pac. J. Atmos. Sci. 49, 245–257 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koracin, D., Businger, J., Dorman, C., Lewis, J.: Formation, evolution, and dissipation of coastal sea fog, Bound. Layer Meteor. 117, 447–478 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin, C.Y., Zhang, Z.F., Pu, Z.X., et al.: Numerical simulations of an advection fog event over Shanghai Pudong international airport with the WRF model. J. Meteor. Res. 31(5), 874–889 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mellor, G.L., Yamada, T.: A hierarchy of turbulence closure models for planetary boundary layers. J. Atmos. Sci. 31, 1791–1806 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Müller, M.D., Schmutz, C., Parlow, E.: A one-dimensional ensemble forecast and assimilation system for fog prediction. J. Pure Appl. Geophys. 164, 1241-1264 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nickerson, E.C., Richard, E., Rosset, R., Smith, D.R.: The numerical simulation of clouds, rain, and airflow over the Vosges and Black Forest mountains: a meso-h model with parameterized microphysics. Mon. Weather Rev. 114, 398–414 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pu, Z., Chachere, C., Hoch, S., Pardyjak, E., Gultepe, I.: Numerical prediction of cold season fog events over complex terrain: the performance of the WRF model during MATERHORN-fog and early evaluation. Pure Appl. Geophys. 173(2016), 3165–3186 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shi, C., Wang, L., Zhang, H., Zhang, S., Deng, X., Li, Y., Qiu, M.: Fog simulations based on multi-model system:a feasibility study. Pure Appl. Geophys. 169, 941–960 (2011).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-011-0340-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Siebert, J., Bott, A., Zdunkowski, W.: Influence of a vegetation-soil model on the simulation of radiation fog. Beitr. Phys. Atmos. 65, 93–106 (1992)Google Scholar
  22. Skamarock WC, Klemp J, Dudhia J, Gill DO, Barker DM, Wang W, Powers JG,. 2005: A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2. NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-468+STR. Mesoscale and Microscale Meteorology Division; National Center for Atmospheric Research, p. 113Google Scholar
  23. Sorli, B., Pascal-Delannoy, F., Giani, A., Foucaran, A., Boyer, A.: Fast humidity sensor for high range 80-95% RH. Sensors and Actuators A: Pysical. 100, 24–31 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Van der Velde, I.R., Steeneveld, G.J., Wichers Schreur, B.G.J., Holtslag, A.A.M.: Modeling and forecasting the onset and duration of severe radiation fog under frost conditions. Mon. Weather Rev. 138, 4237–4253 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Yang, D., Ritchie, H., Desjardins, S., Pearson, G., MacAfee, A.: High-resolution GEM-LAM application in marine fog prediction: evaluation and diagnosis. Weather Forecast. 25, 727–748 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zdunkowski, W.G., Panhans, W.-G., Welch, R.M., Korb, G.J.: A radiation scheme for circulation and climate models. Beitr. Phys. Atmos. 55, 215–238 (1982)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Meteorological Society and Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Atmospheric SciencesYonsei UniversitySeoulSouth Korea
  2. 2.New and Renewable Energy Resource & Policy CenterKorea Institute of Energy ResearchDaejeonSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations