Abstract
This study analyzes radiative effect of the higher clouds over the fog layer and presents the improvement of fog detection over the Korean peninsula, utilizing satellite data of the Multi-functional Transport SATellite (MTSAT)-1R and the MODerate resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and the Look-Up Table (LUT) based on Radiative Transfer Model (RTM) simulations. Fog detection utilizing the satellite data from visible (0.68 µm) and infrared (3.75 µm and 10.8 µm) channels has been evaluated in comparison with ground-based observations over 52 meteorological stations in the Korean Peninsula from March 2006 to February 2007. The threshold values for fog sensing have been derived from the difference (i.e., T3.7–11) in brightness temperature between 3.75 µm (T3.7) and 10.8 µm (T11) during day and night, and also from the reflectivity at 0.68 µm (R0.68) in the daytime. In the twilight, however, the difference between the temperature values at 10.8 µm and their maximum within previous 15 days (i.e., T11max-11) are used instead, because the 3.75 µm channel is inaccurate for the fog detection at dawn/dusk. The sensitivity of the T3.7–11 values with respect to the clouds is investigated based on the cloud variables such as its height, optical thickness, and amount. The values of T3.7–11 are the most sensitive to cloud height, followed by cloud optical thickness and effective radius, while R0.68 is insensitive to cloud height. The sensitivity is examined with various conditions of cloud phases and day/night. Sixteen cases among eighteen fog occurrences, which have been unable to be sensed by using only the conventional threshold values, are successfully detected with the additional LUT corrections, indicating a significant improvement. The method of fog detection in this study can be useful to the Communication, Ocean, and Meteorological Satellite (COMS) Meteorological Data Processing System (CMDPS) by reducing the cloud effect on fog sensing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Reference
Anthis, A. I., and A. P. Cracknell, 2004: Use of satellite images for fog detection (AVHRR) and forecast of fog dissipation (METEOSAT) over lowland Thessalia, Hellas. Int. J. Remote Sens., 20, 1107–1124.
Bendix, J., J. Cermak, and B. Thies, 2004: New perspectives in remote sensing of fog and low stratus-TERRA/AQUA-MODIS and MSG, Proc. 3rd International Conference on Fog, Cape Town ZA. G2.
____, B. Thies, T. Nauss, and J. Cermak, 2006: A feasibility study of daytime fog and low stratus detection with TERRA/AQUA MODIS over land. Meteor. Appl., 13, 111–125.
Cermak, J. and J. Bendix, 2005: A microphysics-based approach to fog/low stratus detection and discrimination using satellite data. COST 722 Midterm Workshop, Langen, Germany.
____, and _____, 2007: Dynamical nighttime fog/low stratus detection based on Meteosat SEVIRI data — a feasibility study. Pure Appl. Geophys., 164, 1179–1192.
Ellrod, G. P., 1995: Advances in the detection and analysis of fog at night using GOES multispectral infrared imagery. Wea. Forecasting, 10, 606–619.
Eyre, J. R., J. L. Brownscombe, and R. J. Allam, 1984: Detection of fog at night using Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) imagery. Meteorol. Mag., 113, 266–271.
Goodwin, L. C., 2002: Analysis of weather-related crashes on U.S. highways. Mitretek Systems, Washington, DC. [Available online at http://www.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/Weather/best_practices/CrashAnalysis2001.pdf.]
Gultepe, I., 2007: Fog and boundary layer clouds: Introduction. Pure Appl. Geophys., 164, 1115–1116. doi: 10.1007/s00024-007-0209-4
____, M. Pagowski, and J. Reid, 2007: A satellite-based fog detection scheme using screen air temperature. Wea. Forecasting, 22, 444–456.
Kudoh, J., and S. Noguchi, 1991: Identification of fog with NOAA AVHRR images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 29, 704–709.
MSG, 2003: Meteorological products extraction facility algorithm specification document, 62–78.
Ricchiazzi, P., S. Yang, C. Gautier, and D. Sowle, 1998: SBDART: A research and teaching software tool for plane-parallel radiative transfer in the earth’s atmosphere. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 79, 2101–2114.
Schmit, T. J., W. P. Menzel, J. Sieglaff, J. P. Nelson III, M. K. Griffin, and J. J. Gurka, 2003: Channel selection for the next generation geostationary Advanced Baseline Imagers. Proc. 12th Conference on Satellite Meteorology and Oceanography. [Available online at http://ams.confex.com/ams/annual2003/techprogram/paper_54285.htm.]
Schreiner, A. J., S. A. Ackerman, B. A. Baum, and A. K. Heidinger, 2007: Notes and corrrespondence; A multispectral technique for detecting low-level cloudiness near sunrise. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 24, 1800–1810.
Underwood, S. J., G. P. Ellrod, and A. L. Kuhnert, 2004: A multiple-case analysis of nocturnal radiation-fog development in the central valley of California utilizing the GOES nighttime fog product. J. Appl. Meteorol., 43, 297–310.
Yoo, J.-M., M.-J. Jeong, and M.-Y. Yun, 2005: Optical characteristics of fog in satellite observation (MODIS) and numerical simulation; Effect of upper clouds in nighttime fog detection. J. Korean Meteor. Soc., 41, 639–650 (in Korean with English abstract).
____, _____, and _____, 2006: Optical properties of fog from satellite observation (MODIS) and numerical simulation. J. Korean Meteor. Soc., 42, 291–305.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yoo, JM., Jeong, MJ., Hur, Y.M. et al. Improved fog detection from satellite in the presence of clouds. Asia-Pacific J Atmos Sci 46, 29–40 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-010-0004-5
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-010-0004-5