Advertisement

Digitization and Knowledge Spillover Effectiveness—Evidence from the “German Mittelstand”

  • Till ProegerEmail author
  • Petrik Runst
Article
  • 2 Downloads

Abstract

The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship (KSTE) considers determinants of knowledge diffusion as well as their impact on entrepreneurial activities and growth. Extending the KSTE, the role of incumbent firms for the broad diffusion of new knowledge has been emphasized. For those firms, the barriers to an effective flow of information are considered using the concepts of knowledge filters and absorptive capacities. Both concepts enable the derivation of institutional measures to penetrate knowledge filters and systematically increase absorptive capacities. We interpret the process of digitization as a central process of knowledge spillover in recent years and determine digitization-related knowledge filters for particular domains of firm decision-making. Using a consultant-based in-depth evaluation of 200 small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) conducted in the context of a federal innovation program, structural drivers, firm clusters, and domain-specific knowledge filters for digitization are determined. We find little evidence for structural drivers of knowledge spillover effectiveness. However, as firms are clustered according to their digitization pattern, we show that firms realize high degrees of digitization in most domains or in none, leading us to argue that domain-specific knowledge filters are weak. Rather, knowledge spillover in digitization can be considered a process with initially strong general knowledge filter and—once this filter has been penetrated—weaker subsequent domain-specific knowledge filters. Policy and managerial implications for increasing digitization-related knowledge spillovers in SMEs are discussed.

Keywords

Digitization Knowledge filter Knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship Small and medium enterprises 

JEL Classification

D21 D82 H41 K23 L14 

Notes

Funding Information

The questionnaire and its application by consultants of the craft organizations are financed by the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy (BMWi).

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., & Plummer, L. A. (2005). Penetrating the ‘knowledge filter’ in regional economies. The Annals of Regional Science, 39(3), 439–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Braunerhjelm, P., & Carlsson, B. (2004). The missing link: the knowledge filter and endogenous growth (discussion paper). Stockholm: Center.Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009a). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Acs, Z. J., Plummer, L. A., & Sutter, R. (2009b). Penetrating the knowledge filter in “rust belt” economies. The Annals of Regional Science, 43(4), 989–1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 757–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2007). The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Journal of Management studies, 44(7), 1243–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2008). Resolving the knowledge paradox: knowledge-spillover entrepreneurship and economic growth. Research Policy, 37(10), 1697–1705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bharati, P., & Chaudhury, A. (2015). SMEs and competitiveness: The role of information systems. Bharati, P. and Chaudhury, A.(2009),“SMEs and Competitiveness: The Role of Information Systems”, International Journal of E-Business Research, 5(1).Google Scholar
  10. Braunerhjelm, P., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2010). The missing link: knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. Small Business Economics, 34(2), 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carlsson, B., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Braunerhjelm, P. (2009). Knowledge creation, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: a historical review. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1193–1229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cha, K. J., Hwang, T., & Gregor, S. (2015). An integrative model of IT‐enabled organizational transformation: A multiple case study. Management Decision, 53(8), 1755–1770.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. De Massis, A., Audretsch, D., Uhlaner, L., & Kammerlander, N. (2017). Innovation with limited resources: management lessons from the German Mittelstand. Journal of Product Innovation Management.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doherty, N. F., & King, M. (2005). From technical to socio‐technical change: Tackling the human and organizational aspects of systems development projects. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
  16. Feser, D., & Proeger, T. (2017). Asymmetric information as a barrier to knowledge spillovers in expert markets. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(1), 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghio, N., Guerini, M., Lehmann, E. E., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2015). The emergence of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 44(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2014). Academics’ start-up intentions and knowledge filters: an individual perspective of the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hinings, B., Gegenhuber, T. & Greenwood, R. (2018). Digital innovation and transformation: An institutional perspective. Information and Organization, 28(1), 52–61.Google Scholar
  20. Li, L., Su, F., Zhang, W., & Mao, J. Y. (2018). Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capability perspective. Information Systems Journal, 28(6), 1129–1157.Google Scholar
  21. Loebbecke, C., & Picot, A. (2015). Reflections on societal and business model transformation arising from digitization and big data analytics: a research agenda. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 24(3), 149–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Markus, M.L. (2004) Technochange Management: Using IT to Drive Organizational Change. Journal of Information Technology, 19(1): 4–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mueller, P. (2006). Exploring the knowledge filter: how entrepreneurship and university-industry relationships drive economic growth. Research Policy, 35(10), 1499–1508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Proeger, T. (2018). Knowledge spillovers and absorptive capacity - institutional evidence from the ‘German Mittelstand’. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–28.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-018-0539-8.
  25. Proeger, T. & Rupieper, L.K. (2019). Asymmetrische Information auf dem Handwerksmarkt – eine qualitative Analyse. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik, 68(2), 149–182.Google Scholar
  26. Qian, H., & Jung, H. (2017). Solving the knowledge filter puzzle: absorptive capacity, entrepreneurship and regional development. Small Business Economics, 1(48), 99–114.Google Scholar
  27. Romer, P. M. (1986). Retruns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Romer, P. M. (1994). The origins of endogenous growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Runst, P., Bartelt, K., Fredriksen, K., Meyer-Veltrup, L., Pirk, W. & Proeger, T. (2018). Der Digitalisierungsindex für das Handwerk. Eine ökonomische Analyse des Digitalisierungs-Checks des Kompetenzzentrums Digitales Handwerk. Göttinger Beiträge zur Handwerksforschung (Heft 24). Göttingen.Google Scholar
  30. Stenholm, P., Acs, Z. J., & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 176–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sussan, F., & Acs, Z. J. (2017). The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 55–73.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Small Business EconomicsGeorg-August University of GoettingenGoettingenGermany

Personalised recommendations