Advertisement

Journal of the Knowledge Economy

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 261–274 | Cite as

Viewing Publications Through an Anthropological Lens: Arab Publications on Educational Technology as a Case Study

  • Abdulrahman Essa Al LilyEmail author
Article
  • 48 Downloads

Abstract

This study asks the philosophical question: is the activity of academic authoring influenced by historical occasions and cultural norms? It uses Arab studies in the field of educational technology to examine this question. The study first generated a list of all the publications since the foundation of this field (i.e. a list of around 4000 academic writings). It then derived descriptive statistics from this list. It then interviewed 27 academics, who were asked to help interpret these statistics. The main finding was that the publishing activity was partially influenced by the wider Arab culture and its history. This suggests that publications (and, perhaps, any other forms of ‘achievement’) can be ‘read’ as records of wider social cultures and historical events, almost in the same way that archaeologists and geologists read landscapes and what remains of ancient societies. Publications should be analysed as ‘inscribed spaces’ on which a certain society ‘writes’ their presence, concerns and matters. Publications should be seen as having their own ‘biographies’ that detail the cultural, social, economic and political features of the milieu in which publications are written. Bearing this implication in mind, it is well worth unearthing the ‘archaeological’ and ‘geological’ dimensions of academic publications.

Keywords

History Information Knowledge Archaeology Anthropology Educational technology Publication 

References

  1. Abdulfatah, B. (2013). The Arab league and the Arab spring. Egypt: The League of Arab States.Google Scholar
  2. Al Lily, A.E.A. (2008). The importance of fostering a culture of critical reflection concerning information and communication technology among academics, Unpublished MA Dissertation, The University of Manchester.Google Scholar
  3. Al Lily, A.E.A. (2012). The role of educational technologies in linking Saudi male and female campuses, Unpublished Doctorate Thesis, The University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Al Saleehat, M. (2014). Eneqasat Thawerat Al Rabeea Al Arabi Ala Al Wae Al Seyassi Letalabat Al Jameaat Al Ordiniyah ‘The Influence of the Arab Srping on the Political Awareness of the University of Jordan’s Students’. Doctoral Thesis. Jordan: The University of Jordan.Google Scholar
  5. Alles, D.L. (2003). Central figures in the history and philosophy of science.Google Scholar
  6. Apple, M. (1986). Teachers and texts: a political economy of class and gender relations in education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Aseel, A. (2002). Mustaqebal Al Horiyat Al Aqadeemeyah fi Al Aalam Al Arabi ‘the future of academic freedom in the Arab world’. Ejgept: Dar Al Qalam.Google Scholar
  8. Caron, A., & Caronia, L. (2001). Active users and active objects: the mutual construction of families and communication technologies. Convergence, 7(3), 38–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chris, B. (2003). Cultural studies: theory and practice. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Corbyn, Z. (2009). Oasis in the desert. Times Higher Education. 5 November 2009.Google Scholar
  11. Dougherty, J., & Nawrotzki, K. (2013). Writing history in the digital age. USA: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dubos, R. (1970). So human an animal. New York: Scribners.Google Scholar
  13. Elayan, S. (2014). Anmat Al Thaqaa Al Saedah Lada Al Talabah fi Madeenat Al Ahsa ‘the patterns of intelligence prevailing among students in the City of Al Ahsa’. Riyadh: The Ministry of Labour.Google Scholar
  14. Feenberg, A. (2012). Questioning technology. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. USA: The University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Grosvenor, I., Lawn, M., & Rousmaniere, K. (2000). Imaging past schooling: the necessity for montage. The Review of Education/Pedagogy/Cultural Studies, 22(1), 71–85.Google Scholar
  17. Harzing, A. W. (2002). Are our referencing errors undermining our scholarship and credibility? The case of expatriate failure rates. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 23(1), 127–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hutchby, I. (2001). Technologies, texts and affordances. Sociology, 35(2), 441–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Johnson, D. G., & Wetmore, J. M. (2009). Technology and society: building our sociotechnical future. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Kelly, K. (1995). Out of control: the new biology of machines, social systems and the economic world. USA: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Kelly, K. (2010). What technology wants. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  22. Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Laurenza, S., & Putzolu, C. (2002). From stratigraphic unit to the mouse: a GIS based system for the excavation of historical complex. The case study of Pompeii. BAR International Series, 1016, 93–104.Google Scholar
  24. Low, S., & Lawrence-Zúñiga, D. (2002). The anthropology of space and place: locating culture. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  25. McCarthy, E. D. (1996). Knowledge as culture: the new sociology of knowledge. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Moon, J. A. (2000). Reflection in learning and professional development: theory and practice. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  27. Neill, U. S. (2008). Publish or perish, but at what cost? J Clin Investig, 118(7), 2368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Pellow, D. (2002). ‘The architecture of female seclusion in West Africa.’ In: S. Low and D. Lawrence (eds.) The Anthropology of Space and Place: Locating Culture. London: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  29. Pollock, N. (2005). When is a work-around? Conflict and negotiation in computer systems development. Science, Technology and Human Values, 30(4), 496–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rothbauer, P. M. (2008). Triangulation. The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, 2, 892–894.Google Scholar
  31. Sismondo, S. (2010). An introduction to science and technology studies (2nd ed.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  32. Star, S. L. (1999). The ethnography of infrastructure. The American Behavioural Scientist, 43(3), 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Whitworth, A. (2009). Information obesity. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational TechnologiesKing Faisal UniversityAl AhsaSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations