Acta Oceanologica Sinica

, Volume 38, Issue 9, pp 128–134 | Cite as

A multi-channel chemical sensor and its application in detecting hydrothermal vents

  • Zhen Cai
  • A J Mur Luis
  • Jiwan Han
  • Kui Wang
  • Huawei QinEmail author
  • Ying Ye


There are well-established chemical and turbidity anomalies in the plumes occurring vicinity of hydrothermal vents, which are used to indicate their existence and locations. We here develop a small, accurate multi-channel chemical sensor to detect such anomalies which can be used in deep-sea at depths of more than 4 000 m. The design allowed five all-solid-state electrodes to be mounted on it and each (apart from one reference electrode) could be changed according to chemicals to be measured. Two experiments were conducted using the chemical sensors. The first was a shallow-sea trial which included sample measurements and in situ monitoring. pH, Eh, CO 3 2− and SO 4 2− electrodes were utilized to demonstrate that the chemical sensor was accurate and stable outside the laboratory. In the second experiment, the chemical sensor was integrated with pH, Eh, CO 3 2− and H2S electrodes, and was used in 29 scans of the seabed along the Southwest Indian Ridge (SWIR) to detect hydrothermal vents, from which 27 sets of valid data were obtained. Hydrothermal vents were identified by analyzing the chemical anomalies, the primary judging criteria were decreasing voltages of Eh and H2S, matched by increasing voltages of pH and CO 3 2− . We proposed that simultaneous detection of changes in these parameters will indicate a hydrothermal vent. Amongst the 27 valid sets of data, five potential hydrothermal vents were targeted using the proposed method. We suggest that our sensors could be widely employed by marine scientists.

Key words

chemical sensor multi-channel hydrothermal vents detection chemical anomalies SWIR 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baker E T. 2017. Exploring the ocean for hydrothermal venting: New techniques, new discoveries, new insights. Ore Geology Reviews, 86: 55–69, doi: 10.1016/j.oregeorev.2017.02.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker E T, Lavelle J W, Massoth G J. 1985. Hydrothermal particle plumes over the southern Juan de Fuca Ridge. Nature, 316(6026): 342–344, doi: 10.1038/316342a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baker E T, Martinez F, Resing J A, et al. 2010. Hydrothermal cooling along the Eastern Lau Spreading Center: No evidence for discharge beyond the neovolcanic zone. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 11(8): Q08004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banerjee R, Dick J B H, Wolfgang B. 2001. Discovery of peridotitehos-ted hydrothermal deposits along the ultraslow-spreading Southwest Indian Ridge. In: Geological Society of America annual meeting. Boston, 800Google Scholar
  5. Breier J A, Toner B M, Fakra S C, et al. 2012. Sulfur, sulfides, oxides and organic matter aggregated in submarine hydrothermal plumes at 9 50’ N East Pacific Rise. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 88: 216–236, doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2012.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Colin-Garcia M, Heredia A, Cordero G, et al. 2016. Hydrothermal vents and prebiotic chemistry: a review. Boletin de la Sociedad Geologica Mexicana, 68(3): 599–620, doi: 10.18268/BSGM2016v68n3a13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ding Qian, Pan Yiwen, Huang Yuanfeng, et al. 2015. The optimization of Ag/Ag2S electrode using carrier electroplating of nano silver particles and its preliminary application to offshore Kueishan Tao, Taiwan. Continental Shelf Research, 111: 262–267, doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2015.08.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edmond J M, Von Damm K L, McDuff R E, et al. 1982. Chemistry of hot springs on the East Pacific Rise and their effluent dispersal. Nature, 297(5863): 187–191, doi: 10.1038/297187a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fujimoto H. 1999. First submersible investigations of mid-ocean ridges in the Indian Ocean. Inter Ridge News, 8: 22–24Google Scholar
  10. Gamo T, Sakai H, Ishibashi J, et al. 1993. Hydrothermal plumes in the eastern Manus Basin, Bismarck Sea: CH4, Mn, Al and pH anomalies. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 40(11-12): 2335–2349, doi: 10.1016/0967-0637(93)90108-FCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. German C R, Petersen S, Hannington M D. 2016. Hydrothermal exploration of mid-ocean ridges: where might the largest sulfide deposits be forming? Chemical Geology, 420: 114–126, doi: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2015.11.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gillespie L J. 1920. Reduction potentials of bacterial culture and of water-logged soils. Soil Science, 9(4): 199–216, doi: 10.1097/00010694-192004000-00001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goncalves M A, Gonzaga F B, Fraga I C S, et al. 2011. Evaluation study of different glass electrodes by an interlaboratory comparison for determining the pH of fuel ethanol. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical, 158(1): 327–332, doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2011.06.029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Han Chenhua, Pan Yiwen, Ye Ying. 2009. CO2 microelectrode based on Zn-AI-LDH-ion carrier and its characterization. Journal of Tropical Oceanography (in Chinese), 28(4): 35–41Google Scholar
  15. Haymon R M, Fornari D J, Edwards M H, et al. 1991. Hydrothermal vent distribution along the East Pacific Rise crest (909′-54′ N) and its relationship to magmatic and tectonic processes on fast-spreading mid-ocean ridges. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 104(2-4): 513–534, doi: 10.1016/0012-821X(91)90226-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kumagai H, Tsukioka S, Yamamoto H, et al. 2010. Hydrothermal plumes imaged by high-resolution side-scan sonar on a cruising AUV, Urashima. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 11(12): Q12013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Munch U, Lalou C, Halbach P, et al. 2001. Relict hydrothermal events along the super-slow Southwest Indian spreading ridge near 63° 56’ E-mineralogy, chemistry and chronology of sulfide samples. Chemical Geology, 177(3-4): 341–349, doi: 10.1016/S0009-2541(00)00418-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McDonagh C, Burke C S, MacCraith B D. 2008. Optical chemical sensors. Chemical Reviews, 108(2): 400–422, doi: 10.1021/cr068102gCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mottl M J, McConachy T F. 1990. Chemical processes in buoyant hydrothermal plumes on the East Pacific Rise near 21 N. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 54(7): 1911–1927, doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(90)90261-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nakamura K, Toki T, Mochizuki N, et al. 2013. Discovery of a new hydrothermal vent based on an underwater, high-resolution geophysical survey. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 74:1–10, doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2012.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nisbet E G, Sleep N H. 2001. The habitat and nature of early life. Nature, 409(6823): 1083–1091, doi: 10.1038/35059210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nuzzio D B, Taillefert M, Cary S C, et al. 2002. In situ voltammetry at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. In: Taillefert M, Rozan T F, eds. Environmental Electrochemistry. Washington, D C: American Chemical Society, 811: 40–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Okamura K, Kimoto H, Saeki K, et al. 2001. Development of a deep-sea in situ Mn analyzer and its application for hydrothermal plume observation. Marine Chemistry, 76(1-2): 17–26, doi: 10.1016/S0304-4203(01)00043-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pan Yiwen, Seyfried W E Jr. 2008. Experimental and theoretical constraints on pH measurements with an iridium oxide electrode in aqueous fluids from 25 to 175 C and 25 MPa. Journal of Solution Chemistry, 37(8): 1051–1062, doi: 10.1007/s10953-008-9293-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Provin C, Fukuba T, Okamura K, et al. 2013. An integrated microfluid-ic system for manganese anomaly detection based on chemilu-minescence: Description and practical use to discover hydro-thermal plumes near the Okinawa Trough. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 38(1): 178–185, doi: 10.1109/JOE.2012.2208849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ramondenc P, Germanovich L N, Von Damm K L, et al. 2006. The first measurements of hydrothermal heat output at 950’ N, East Pacific Rise. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 245(3-4): 487–497, doi: 10.1016/j.eps1.2006.03.023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ray D, Kamesh R K A, Baker E T, et al. 2012. Hydrothermal plumes over the Carlsberg Ridge, Indian Ocean. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems, 13(1): Q01009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rona P A, Klinkhammer G, Nelsen T A, et al. 1986. Black smokers, massive sulphides and vent biota at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Nature, 321(6065): 33–37, doi: 10.1038/321033a0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Tao Chunhui, Li Huaiming, Jin Xiaobing, et al. 2014. Seafloor hydro-thermal activity and polymetallic sulfide exploration on the southwest Indian ridge. Chinese Science Bulletin, 59(19): 2266–2276, doi: 10.1007/s11434-014-0182-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Thornton B, Takahashi T, Sato T, et al. 2015. Development of a deep-sea laser-induced breakdown spectrometer for in situ multielement chemical analysis. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers, 95: 20–36, doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2014.10.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Wakita N, Hirokawa K, Ichikawa T, et al. 2010. Development of Autonomous Underwater Vehicle (AUV) for exploring deep sea marine mineral resources. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Technical Review, 47(3): 73–80Google Scholar
  32. Walker S L, Baker E T, Resing J A, et al. 2007. A new tool for detecting hydrothermal plumes: An ORP Sensor for the PMEL MAPR. In: American Geophysical Union, Fall Meeting. Washington DC: American Geophysical UnionGoogle Scholar
  33. Williams D L, Green K, Van Andel T H, et al. 1979. The hydrothermal mounds of the Galapagos Rift: Observations with DSRVAlvin and detailed heat flow studies. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 84(B13): 7467–7484, doi: 10.1029/ JB084iB13p07467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Xing Liang, Kang Yating, Zhou Yifan, et al. 2017. Determination of sulfate in seawater by a novel all-solid-state sulfate sensor with H2SO4 doped polyaniline as sensitive membrane. International Journal of Electrochemical Science, 12(2): 1506–1520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ye Ying, Wu Daidai, Huang Xia, et al. 2003. Preparation and performance characterization of novel solid pH sensing electrodes. Journal of Transduction Technology (in Chinese), 16(4): 487–490Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Chinese Society for Oceanography and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zhen Cai
    • 1
  • A J Mur Luis
    • 2
  • Jiwan Han
    • 2
  • Kui Wang
    • 3
    • 4
  • Huawei Qin
    • 5
    Email author
  • Ying Ye
    • 1
  1. 1.Ocean CollegeZhejiang UniversityZhoushanChina
  2. 2.Environmental and Rural Sciences, Institute of BiologicalAberystwyth UniversityAberystwythUK
  3. 3.Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem and BiogeochemistryState Oceanic AdministrationHangzhouChina
  4. 4.Second Institute of OceanographyMinistry of Natural ResourcesHangzhouChina
  5. 5.Institute of Mechanical EngineeringHangzhou Dianzi UniversityHangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations