Advertisement

Acta Oceanologica Sinica

, Volume 38, Issue 9, pp 113–119 | Cite as

Flammability risk assessment for oil spill response operations

  • Aurelien HospitalEmail author
  • Travis Miguez
  • James Stronach
Article

Abstract

Immediately following a spill at sea, released oil—ranging from diesel to light crude and diluted bitumen, will initially weather through evaporation, resulting in an elevated concentration of light hydrocarbons in the air. As part of oil spill response operations, first responders use hand-held devices to monitor airborne concentrations when approaching a spill. The feasibility of using numerical modelling as an additional tool to assess potential flammability and plan response operations in the spill area was explored in this study. The Lower Explosive Limit (LEL) is defined as the minimum concentration of a gas in air, in this case a mixture of evaporated hydrocarbons, which can produce a flash fire in the presence of an ignition source. This ignition source could be triggered by the vessel itself or by spill response operations. A framework was put into place, utilizing a threedimensional hydrodynamic model (H3D), an oil spill model (SPILLCALC), and an air dispersion model (CALPUFF) to assess the risk of possible ignition of the hydrocarbon vapour in the event of a spill. The study looked at a hypothetical credible worst case tanker spill (16 500 m3) of diluted bitumen (cold lake winter blend) occurring at Arachne Reef in Haro Strait, British Columbia, Canada. SPILLCALC provided one-minute averaged vapour fluxes from the water surface for each of 17 modelled pseudo-components which were used as inputs to CALPUFF. Using the predicted airborne concentrations of each pseudo-component, time-scaled to one-second averages, the flammability potential in the immediate spill area was determined at each grid point using Le Chatelier’s mixing equation. The approach describe here was developed as a proof of concept, and could be established as a real-time system, bringing valuable information in addition to hand-held devices during a spill response, or during a response exercise. This modelling study was conducted as part of Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion Project. There are a number of commercially available oil spill models but few if any are equipped with the ability to model air dispersion and forecast hazardous conditions as discussed in this paper.

Key words

oil spill response operations modelling Salish Sea 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. American Petroleum Industry (API). 2013. Pure Component Technical Data book—Petroleum RefiningGoogle Scholar
  2. Arakawa A, Lamb V R. 1977. Computational design of the basic dynamical processes of the UCLA general circulation model. Methods in Computational Physics: Advances in Research and Applications, 17: 173–263Google Scholar
  3. ATSDR. 1999. Toxicological profile for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH). Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesGoogle Scholar
  4. Backhaus J O, Maier-Reimer E. 1983. On seasonal circulation patterns in the North Sea. In: Sündermann J, Lenz W, eds. North Sea Dynamics. Heidelberg: Springerr-Verlag, 63–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Backhaus J O, Kämpf J. 1999. Simulations of sub-mesoscale oceanic convection and ice-ocean interactions in the Greenland Sea. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 46(6-7): 1427–1455, doi: 10.1016/S0967-0645(99)00029-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME). 2008. Canada-wide standard for petroleum hydrocarbons (PHC) in soil: scientific rationale. Supporting technical document. Ottawa, Ontario: CCMEGoogle Scholar
  7. Duwe K C, Hewer R R, Backhaus J O. 1983. Results of a semi-implicit two-step method for the simulation of markedly nonlinear flow in coastal seas. Continental Shelf Research, 2(4): 255–274, doi: 10.1016/0278-4343(82)90021-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. EBA, A Tetra Tech Company. 2013. Modelling the fate and behavior of marine oil spills for the trans mountain expansion project. ReportGoogle Scholar
  9. Hospital A, Stronach J A, Miguez T, et al. 2015. Diluted bitumen oil spill modelling in support of the environmental and socio-economic assessment (ESA) for the trans mountain expansion project. In: Proceedings of the Canadian Water Resources Association—BC Conference. Richmond, BCGoogle Scholar
  10. Kampf J, Backhaus J O. 1999. Ice-ocean interactions during shallow convection under conditions of steady winds: three-dimensional numerical studies. Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, 46(6-7): 1335–1355, doi: 10.1016/ S0967-0645(99)00026-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Saucier F J, Chassé J. 2000. Tidal circulation and buoyancy effects in the St. Lawrence Estuary. Atmosphere-Ocean, 38(4): 505–556, doi: 10.1080/07055900.2000.9649658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Schrama E J O, Ray R D. 1994. A preliminary tidal analysis of TOPEX/POSEIDON altimetry. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99(C12): 24799–24808, doi: 10.1029/94JC01432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Stronach J A, Backhaus J O, Murty T S. 1993. An update on the numerical simulation of oceanographic processes in the waters between Vancouver Island and the mainland: the GF8 model. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review, 31: 1–86Google Scholar
  14. Stronach J A, Hospital A. 2014. The implementation of molecular diffusion to simulate the fate and behaviour of a diluted bitumen oil spill and its application to stochastic modelling. In: Proceedings of the 37th AMOP Technical Seminar on Environmental Contamination and Response. Ottawa, ON: Environment Canada, 353–373Google Scholar
  15. Tetra Tech EBA Engineering Consultants. 2013. Stochastic and deterministic oil spill numerical modelling for the trans mountain expansion project. ReportGoogle Scholar
  16. Thibodeaux L J. 1979. Chemodynamics: Environmental Movement of Chemicals in Air, Water and Soil. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 501Google Scholar
  17. Zaremba L, Wang E, Stronach J. 2005. The physical limnology of Okanagan lake, water our limiting resource: towards sustainable water management in the Okanagan. In: Proceedings of Canadian Water Resources Association B. C. Branch Conference, Kelowna, B.C, ISBN 1-896513-28-XGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chinese Society for Oceanography and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aurelien Hospital
    • 1
    Email author
  • Travis Miguez
    • 1
  • James Stronach
    • 1
  1. 1.Air, Coastal and Lake Engineering DepartmentTetra Tech CanadaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations