Advertisement

Acta Oceanologica Sinica

, Volume 37, Issue 12, pp 35–44 | Cite as

Zooplankton composition and distribution in the Lembeh Strait of North Sulawesi, Indonesia

  • Yanguo Wang
  • Xiaoyin Chen
  • Bingpeng Xing
  • Rouxin Sun
  • Nurul Fitria
  • Peng Xiang
  • Chunguang Wang
  • Mao LinEmail author
Article
  • 8 Downloads

Abstract

Based on oceanographic survey data in June 2012 in the Lembeh Strait, the zooplankton ecological characteristics such as species composition, individual abundance, dominant species and distribution were analyzed. The results showed that 183 species (including 4 sp.) had been recognized, most of them belonged to copepoda. Cnidaria followed with 43 species (including 1 sp.) were identified. The average abundance of zooplankton was (150.47±58.91) ind./m3. As to the horizontal distribution, the abundance of the zooplankton was higher in the southern waters than in the northern waters. The dominant species in the study area were Lensia subtiloides, Sagitta enflata, Lucifer intermedius, Oikopleura rufescens, Diphyes chamissoni, Creseis acicula, Subeucalanus subcrassus, Temora discaudata, Aglaura hemistoma, Doliolum denticulatum, Canthocalanus pauper, Oikopleura longicauda and Nanomia bijuga. Zooplankton biodiversity indexes were higher in study area than previous study in the other regions. The findings from this study provide important baseline information for future research and monitoring programs.

Key words

zooplankton species composition dominant species distribution Lembeh Strait 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to all the members of the cruise for their assistance during the sampling. The authors thank Hikmah Thoha from Research Center of Oceanography, Indonesian Institute of Sciences, Indonesia for providing the reference.

References

  1. Alcaraz M, Almeda R, Calbet A, et al. 2010. The role of arctic zooplankton in biogeochemical cycles: respiration and excretion of ammonia and phosphate during summer. Polar Biology, 33(12): 1719–1731, doi: 10.1007/s00300-010-0789-9Google Scholar
  2. Aldrian E, Susanto R D. 2003. Identification of three dominant rainfall regions within Indonesia and their relationship to sea surface temperature. International Journal of Climatology, 23(12): 1435–1452, doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Box G E P, Cox D R. 1964. An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, 26(2): 211–246Google Scholar
  4. Boxshall G A. 2004. An introduction to copepod diversity. In: Halsey S H, ed. Ray Society Series 166. London, UK: The Ray SocietyGoogle Scholar
  5. Chou C, Tseng L C, Ou C H, et al. 2012. Seasonal succession of planktonic copepods in bight environments of Northeastern Taiwan. Zoological Studies, 51(8): 1380–1396Google Scholar
  6. Coyle K O, Pinchuk A I. 2003. Annual cycle of zooplankton abundance, biomass and production on the Northern Gulf of Alaska Shelf, October 1997 through Octobe 2003. Annual cycle of zooplankton abundance, biomass and production on the Northern Gulf of Alaska Shelf, October 1997 through October 2000. Fisheries Oceanography, 12(4–5): 327–338Google Scholar
  7. Du Feiyan, Wang Xuehui, Lin Zhaojin. 2015. The characteristics of summer zooplankton community in the Meiji coral reef, Nansha Islands, South China Sea. Acta Ecologica Sinica (in Chinese), 35(4): 1014–1021Google Scholar
  8. Dufrêne M, Legendre P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs, 67: 145–366Google Scholar
  9. Dur G, Hwang J S, Souissi S, et al. 2007. An overview of the influence of hydrodynamics on the spatial and temporal patterns of calanoid copepod communities around Taiwan. Journal of Plankton Research, 29(S1): i97–i116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ferrier-Pagès C, Hoogenboom M, Houlbrèque F. 2011. The role of plankton in coral trophodynamics. In: Dubinsky Z, Stambler N, eds. Coral Reefs: An Ecosystem in Transition. Dordrecht: SpringerGoogle Scholar
  11. Fisk A T, Hobson K A, Norstrom R J. 2001. Influence of chemical and biological factors on trophic transfer of persistent organic pollutants in the northwater polynya marine food web. Environmental Science Technology, 35(4): 732–738, doi: 10.1021/es001459wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gordon A L, Sprintall J, Van Aken H M, et al. 2010. The indonesian throughflow during 2004–2006 as observed by the instant program. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, 50(2): 115–128, doi: 10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2009.12.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gray J S. 2002. Biomagnification in marine systems: the perspective of an ecologist. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 45(1–12): 46–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hammer Ø, Harper D A T, Ryan P D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1): 9. https://doi.org/palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm Google Scholar
  15. Heidelberg K B, Sebens K P, Purcell J E. 2004. Composition and sources of near reef zooplankton on a Jamaican forereef along with implications for coral feeding. Coral Reefs, 23(2): 263–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Houlbrèque F, Ferrier-Pagès C. 2009. Heterotrophy in tropical scleractinian corals. Biological Reviews, 84(1): 1–17, doi: 10.1111/brv. 2009.84.issue-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huys R, Boxshall G A. 1991. Copepod Evolution. London: The Ray Society, 468Google Scholar
  18. Hwang J S, Wong C K. 2005. The China Coastal Current as a driving force for transporting Calanus sinicus (Copepoda: Calanoida) from its population centers to waters off Taiwan and Hong Kong during the winter northeast monsoon period. Journal of Plankton Research, 27(2): 205–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mcintyre A D. 1982. Manual of methods in aquatic environmental research. part 8—ecological assessment of pollution effects: j. stirn (guidelines for the fao (gfcm)/unep joint coordinated project on pollution in the mediterranean) fao fish. tech. pap. (209), 70 pp. fao, rom. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 13(4): 143–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nagai T, Hibiya T. 2015. Internal tides and associated vertical mixing in the indonesian archipelago. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 120(5): 3373–3390, doi: 10.1002/2014JC010592Google Scholar
  21. Nakajima R, Toda T, Yoshida T, et al. 2006. Diel variation and trophic structure in coral-reef zooplankton of peninsular Malaysia. Coastal Marine Science, 30(1): 336–343Google Scholar
  22. Nakajima R, Yoshida T, Othman B H R, et al. 2008. Diel variation in abundance, biomass and size composition of zooplankton community over a coral-reef in Redang Island, Malaysia. Plankton and Benthos Research, 3(4): 216–226, doi: 10.3800/pbr. 3.216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Nakajima R, Yoshida T, Othman B H R, et al. 2009. Diel variation of zooplankton in the tropical coral-reef water of Tioman Island, Malaysia. Aquatic Ecology, 43(4): 965–975, doi: 10.1007/s10452-008-9208-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Palardy J E, Grottoli A G, Matthews K A. 2005. Effects of upwelling, depth, morphology and polyp size on feeding in three species of Panamanian corals. Marine Ecology Progress, 300: 79–89, doi: 10.3354/meps300079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Palardy J E, Grottoli A G, Matthews K A. 2006. Effect of naturally changing zooplankton concentrations on feeding rates of two coral species in the eastern pacific. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 331(1): 99–107, doi: 10.1016/j. jembe.2005.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Palardy J E, Rodrigues L J, Grottoli A G. 2008. The importance of zooplankton to the daily metabolic carbon requirements of healthy and bleached corals at two depths. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 367(2): 180–188, doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2008.09.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rumengan I F M. 2012. Zooplankton researches in Indonesian waters: A historical review. Coastal Marine Science, 35(1): 202–207Google Scholar
  28. Rumengan I F M, Akerina J, Rampengan M F, et al. 2011. Abundance and diversity of zooplankton in Lembeh Strait, Bitung, Indonesia. Marine Research in Indonesia, 36(1): 15–20Google Scholar
  29. Sammarco P W, Crenshaw H. 1984. Plankton community dynamics of the central Great Barrier Reef lagoon: analysis of data from Ikeda et al. Marine Biology, 82(2): 167–180, doi: 10.1007/BF00394100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sars G O. 1903. An account of the crustacea of norway, with short descriptions and figures of all the species: iv. copepoda calanoida. Compilation edition. Bergen: Bergens Museum, XIII, 171, Plates I-CIIGoogle Scholar
  31. Schiller A, Wijffels S E, Sprintall J, et al. 2010. Pathways of intraseasonal variability in the indonesian throughflow region. Dynamics of Atmospheres and Oceans, 50(2): 174–200, doi: 10.1016/j.dynatmoce.2010.02.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sun Rouxin, Wang Yanguo, Lian Guangshan, et al. 2014. Distribution and community characteristics of planktonic copepods in the northwest coastal waters off Hainan Island. Biodiversity Science, 22(3): 320–328, doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1003.2014.13137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tada K, Sakai K, Nakano Y, et al. 2003. Size-fractionated phytoplankton biomass in coral reef waters off Sesoko Island, Okinawa, Japan. Journal of Plankton Research, 25(8): 991–997, doi: 10.1093/plankt/25.8.991CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Towle E K, Enochs I C, Langdon C. 2014. Threatened Caribbean coral is able to mitigate the adverse effects of ocean acidification on calcification by increasing feeding rate. PLoS One, 10(4): e0123394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tseng L C, Kumar R, Chen Q C, et al. 2011. Faunal shift between two copepod congeners (Temora discaudata and T. turbinata) in the vicinity of two nuclear power plants in southern East China Sea: spatiotemporal patterns of population trajectories over a decade. Hydrobiologia, 666(1): 301–315, doi: 10.1007/s10750-011-0616-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wang Yanguo, Lin Jinghong, Wang Chunguang, et al. 2012. Species composition and distribution characteristics of pelagic copepods in the Northern Sea of Fujian During withdraw of Zhe-Min coastal current. Environmental Science (in Chinese), 33(6): 1839–1845Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Chinese Society of Oceanography and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yanguo Wang
    • 1
  • Xiaoyin Chen
    • 1
  • Bingpeng Xing
    • 1
  • Rouxin Sun
    • 1
  • Nurul Fitria
    • 2
  • Peng Xiang
    • 1
  • Chunguang Wang
    • 1
  • Mao Lin
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Third Institute of OceanographyMinistry of Natural ResourcesXiamenChina
  2. 2.Research Center for OceanographyIndonesian Institute of SciencesJakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations