Acta Oceanologica Sinica

, Volume 37, Issue 4, pp 58–68 | Cite as

Effects of nutrient limitations on three species of zooplankton

  • Lei Chen
  • Chaolun Li
  • Konglin Zhou
  • Yongqiang Shi
  • Mengtan Liu
Article

Abstract

Nutrient imbalance—a mismatch in nutrient ratios between the available food supply and the demands of consumers—has the potential to be transported up food chains, exposing zooplankton to nutrient limitations. In this study, the response of Calanus sinicus (copepod), Moina mongolica (cladocera), and Brachionus plicatilis (rotifer) to nutrient-limited (no-limited, P-limited, and N-limited) food were evaluated from the perspective of growth, reproduction, and stoichiometric homoeostasis. The results indicated that the growth of three species was suppressed under nutrient-limited (especially P-limited) conditions. However, the effect of nutrient limitations on their reproduction was species-specific. For C. sinicus, the dietary UFA (unsaturated fatty acid) as a major phospholipid component affected their egg production and total FA supporting energy promoted the hatchability of eggs. Furthermore, excess carbon in the diet promoted egg production but reduced hatching success. For M. mongolica, nutritional (P and UFA) and energy (total FA) support affected their fecundity. B. plicatilis fecundity exhibited the same pattern of growth (no-limited>N-limited>P-limited). In terms of stoichiometric homeostasis, B. plicatilis’s elemental compositions were less likely to be affected by nutrient limitations than M. mongolica. We suggest that the effects of nutrient imbalances could potentially become an evolutionary force affecting ecosystem structure and stability in eutrophic waters.

Keywords

zooplankton nutrient growth reproduction stoichiometric homoeostasis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the crew on R/V Beidou for their assistance in the field. We are grateful to Jin Xin and Ji Peng for their invaluable help during shipboard research activities.

References

  1. Arai M N. 2001. Pelagic coelenterates and eutrophication: a review. Hydrobiologia, 451(1-3): 69–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Augustin C B, Boersma M. 2006. Effects of nitrogen stressed algae on different Acartia species. Journal of Plankton Research, 28(4): 429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker C, Boersma M. 2005. Differential effects of phosphorus and fatty acids on Daphnia magna growth and reproduction. Limnology and Oceanography, 50(1): 388–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Boersma M, Becker C, Malzahn A M, et al. 2009. Food chain effects of nutrient limitation in primary producers. Marine and Freshwater Research, 60(10): 983–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapin III F S, Walker B H, Hobbs R J, et al. 1997. Biotic control over the functioning of ecosystems. Science, 277(5325): 500–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen Mianrui, Liu Hongbin, Chen Bingzhang. 2012. Effects of dietary essential fatty acids on reproduction rates of a subtropical calanoid copepod, Acartia erythraea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 455: 95–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen Xuehao, Wu Zhongqian. 2005. Effects of nutrition liquid containing Chlorella spp. on the growth and reproduction of rotifer Brachionus plicatilis. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences (in Chinese), 20: 21–24Google Scholar
  8. Dickman E M, Newell J M, González M J, et al. 2008. Light, nutrients, and food-chain length constrain planktonic energy transfer efficiency across multiple trophic levels. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(47): 18408–18412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Elser J J. 2002. Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems: ideas, plans, and realities. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 42: 1226Google Scholar
  10. Elser J J, Dobberfuhl D R, MacKay N A, et al. 1996. Organism size, life history, and N:P stoichiometry: toward a unified view of cellular and ecosystem processes. BioScience, 46(9): 674–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elser J J, Fagan W F, Denno R F, et al. 2000. Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs. Nature, 408(6812): 578–580CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elser J J, Hayakawa K, Urabe J. 2001. Nutrient limitation reduces food quality for zooplankton: Daphnia response to seston phosphorus enrichment. Ecology, 82(3): 898–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Færøvig P J, Hessen D O. 2003. Allocation strategies in crustacean stoichiometry: the potential role of phosphorus in the limitation of reproduction. Freshwater Biology, 48(10): 1782–1792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Goldman J C, McCarthy J J, Peavey D G. 1979. Growth rate influence on the chemical composition of phytoplankton in oceanic waters. Nature, 279(5710): 210–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Guillard R R, Ryther J H. 1962. Studies of marine planktonic diatoms: I. Cyclotella nana hustedt, and detonula confervacea (cleve) gran. Canadian Journal of Microbiology, 8(2): 229–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hall S R, Smith V H, Lytle D A, et al. 2005. Constraints on primary producer N:P stoichiometry along N:P supply ratio gradients. Ecology, 86(7): 1894–1904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Harrison K E. 1990. The role of nutrition in maturation, reproduction and embryonic development of decapod crustaceans: a review. Journal of Shellfish Research, 9: 1–28Google Scholar
  18. Helland S, Nejstgaard J C, Humlen R, et al. 2003. Effects of season and maternal food on Calanus finmarchicus reproduction, with emphasis on free amino acids. Marine Biology, 142(6): 1141–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hessen D O, Jensen T C, Kyle M, et al. 2007. RNA responses to Nand Plimitation; reciprocal regulation of stoichiometry and growth rate in Brachionus. Functional Ecology, 21(5): 956–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Howarth R W, Sharpley A, Walker D. 2002. Sources of nutrient pollution to coastal waters in the United States: implications for achieving coastal water quality goals. Estuaries, 25(4): 656–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jensen T C, Verschoor A M. 2004. Effects of food quality on life history of the rotifer Brachionus calyciflorus Pallas. Freshwater Biology, 49(9): 1138–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kattner G, Hagen W, Lee R F, et al. 2007. Perspectives on marine zooplankton lipids. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 64(11): 1628–1639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Klausmeier C A, Litchman E, Levin S A. 2004. Phytoplankton growth and stoichiometry under multiple nutrient limitation. Limnology and Oceanography, 49(4): 1463–1470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Knops J M H, Bradley K L, Wedin D A. 2002. Mechanisms of plant species impacts on ecosystem nitrogen cycling. Ecology Letters, 5(3): 454–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee R F, Hagen W, Kattner G. 2006. Lipid storage in marine zooplankton. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 307: 273–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Li Jie, Sun Song, Li Chaolun, et al. 2006. The effects of different diets on the survival and development of copepod nauplii. Marine Sciences (in Chinese), 30(12): 13–20Google Scholar
  27. Lin Yuanshao, Li Song. 1984. A preliminary study on the life cycle of Calanus sinicus (Brodsky) in Xiamen Harbour. Journal of Xiamen University (Natural science) (in Chinese), 23(1): 111–117Google Scholar
  28. Liu Mengtan, Li Chaolun, Sun Song. 2011. Seasonal variation in fatty acid composition of seston and the copepod Calanus sinicus (Brodsky, 1962) in Jiaozhou Bay and its trophic implications. Chinese Journal of Oceanology and Limnology, 29(6): 1164–1173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Malzahn A M, Boersma M. 2012. Effects of poor food quality on copepod growth are dose dependent and nonreversible. Oikos, 121(9): 1408–1416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Malzahn A M, Hantzsche F, Schoo K L, et al. 2010. Differential effects of nutrient-limited primary production on primary, secondary or tertiary consumers. Oecologia, 162(1): 35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Müller-Navarra D C. 1995. Biochemical versus mineral limitation in Daphnia. Limnology and Oceanography, 40(7): 1209–1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nixon S W. 1995. Coastal marine eutrophication: a definition, social causes, and future concerns. Ophelia, 41(1): 199–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Purcell J E, Uye S I, Lo W T. 2007. Anthropogenic causes of jellyfish blooms and their direct consequences for humans: a review. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 350: 153–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rhee G Y. 1978. Effects of N:P atomic ratios and nitrate limitation on algal growth, cell composition, and nitrate uptake. Limnology and Oceanography, 23(1): 10–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sargent J R, Falk-Petersen S. 1988. The lipid biochemistry of calanoid copepods. Hydrobiologia, 167(1): 101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schoo K L, Aberle N, Malzahn A M, et al. 2014. The reaction of European lobster larvae (Homarus gammarus) to different quality food: effects of ontogenetic shifts and prefeeding history. Oecologia, 174(2): 581–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sterner R W, Elser J J. 2002. Ecological Stoichiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  38. Sterner R W, Hessen D O. 1994. Algal nutrient limitation and the nutrition of aquatic herbivores. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 25: 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sterner R W, Schulz K L. 1998. Zooplankton nutrition: recent progress and a reality check. Aquatic Ecology, 32(4): 261–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Urabe J, Makino W, Hayakawa K, et al. 2002. Food quality determinants for Daphnia growth in Plimited lakes. In: Wetzel R G, ed. International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnology, Proceedings 28th Congress Vol 28, Pt 2. Melbourne: International Association of Theoretical and Applied Limnology-Proceedings, 1089–1094Google Scholar
  41. Van Nieuwerburgh L, Wänstrand I, Snoeijs P. 2004. Growth and C:N:P ratios in copepods grazing on N-or Si-limited phytoplankton blooms. Hydrobiologia, 514(1-3): 57–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ventura M, Catalan J. 2005. Reproduction as one of the main causes of temporal variability in the elemental composition of zooplankton. Limnology and Oceanography, 50(6): 2043–2056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Vrede T, Persson J, Aronsen G. 2002. The influence of food quality (P:C ratio) on RNA:DNA ratio and somatic growth rate of Daphnia. Limnology and Oceanography, 47(2): 487–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wang Bodong. 2006. Cultural eutrophication in the Changjiang (Yangtze River) plume: history and perspective. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 69(3-4): 471–477CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wang Yan, He Zhihui. 2001. Effect of temperature and salinity on intrinsic increasing rate of Moina mongolica Daddy (Cladocera: Moinidae) population. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology (in Chinese), 12(1): 91–94Google Scholar
  46. Weers P M M, Gulati R D. 1997. Growth and reproduction of Daphnia galeata in response to changes in fatty acids, phosphorus, and nitrogen in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Limnology and Oceanography, 42(7): 1584–1589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yang Chunwang, Ye Jiaheng. 2000. Studies on technique for indoor culture of brachionus plicatilis with nannocholopsis. Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine (in Chinese), 17(4): 9–10Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Chinese Society of Oceanography and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lei Chen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Chaolun Li
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  • Konglin Zhou
    • 5
  • Yongqiang Shi
    • 6
  • Mengtan Liu
    • 7
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Marine Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Institute of OceanologyChinese Academy of SciencesQingdaoChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Laboratory for Marine Ecology and Environmental ScienceQingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and TechnologyQingdaoChina
  4. 4.Center of Deep Sea Research, Institute of OceanologyChinese Academy of SciencesQingdaoChina
  5. 5.Key Laboratory of Marine Ecosystem and Biogeochemistry, Second Institute of OceanographyState Oceanic AdministrationHangzhouChina
  6. 6.Key Laboratory of Sustainable Development of Marine Fisheries of Ministry of Agriculture, Yellow Sea Fisheries Research InstituteChinese Academy of Fishery SciencesQingdaoChina
  7. 7.Jiaozhou Bay Marine Ecosystem Research StationChinese Ecosystem Research NetworkQingdaoChina

Personalised recommendations