Hellenic Journal of Surgery

, Volume 90, Issue 5, pp 254–260 | Cite as

Initial Experience with a New Technique of Binding Pancreaticogastrostomy: A Prospective Study

  • D RouthEmail author
  • RP Singh
  • BM Sekhar
  • SK Sharma
  • D Kumar
Original Article



To study postoperative complications in patients undergoing binding pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in a tertiary hospital in India.


A prospective study was conducted of patients undergoing binding PG following PD over a 2-year period. The demographic and preoperative laboratory data of the patients, the type of procedure, complications, hospital mortality, duration of hospital stay, and postoperative interventional procedures or reoperations were recorded and examined for associations. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata 9.0 (College Station, Texas, USA).


Over 2 years, 47 patients, 29 men and 18 women, mean age 55.4 ± 11.6 years, who underwent binding PG following PD were included in the study. Postoperative complications were recorded in 23 patients and there were 2 deaths in the first 30 days following surgery. The most frequent complication was delayed gastric emptying (DGE), observed in 11 patients (23%), with a mean duration of 13.5 ± 2.6 days. Post-operative pancreatic leak, which was detected in 3 patients (6%), did not appear to be influenced by the pancreatic duct diameter or the softness of the pancreas, which are known independent factors responsible for pancreatic leak.


The technique of binding PG is simple, safe, easy to perform, and less traumatic to the pancreatic stump, with fewer complications, and it can be performed without significant adverse outcome, irrespective of pancreatic stump texture or pancreatic duct diameter.

Key words

Binding pancreaticogastrostomy pancreaticoduodenectomy pancreatic leak pancreatic anastomosis 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Sewpaul A, Farooque Y, Robinson S, et al. The effect of a pancreatic anastomosis leak on survival following pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary, distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. JOP Journal of the Pancreas. 2015;16.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Büchler MW, Friess H, Wagner M, et al. Pancreatic fistula after pancreatic head resection. Br J Surg 2000;87:883–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Büchler MW, Wagner M, Schmied BM, et al. Changes in morbidity after pancreatic resection: toward the end of completion pancreatectomy. Arch Surg 2003;138:1310–4. Discussion 1315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Castro SM, Busch OR, Gouma DJ. Management of bleeding and leakage after pancreatic surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2004;18:847–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Akamatsu N, Sugawara Y, Komagome M, et al. Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: The significance of the ratio of the main pancreatic duct to the pancreas body as a predictor of leakage. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2010;17:322–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bartsch DK, Langer P, Kanngiesser V, et al. A simple and safe anastomosis for pancreatogastrostomy using one binding purse-string and two transfixing mattress sutures. Int J Surg Oncol 2012:718637.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Williamsson C, Ansari D, Andersson R, et al. Postoperative pancreatic fistula-impact on outcome, hospital cost and effects of centralization. HPB 2017;19:436–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andrianello S, Pea A, Pulvirenti A, et al. Pancreaticojejunostomy after pancreaticoduodenectomy: Suture material and incidence of post-operative pancreatic fistula. Pancreatology 2016;16:138–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liu FB, Chen JM, Geng W, et al. Pancreaticogastrostomy is associated with significantly less pancreatic fistula than pancreaticojejunostomy reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: A meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials. HPB 2015;17:123–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sewpaul A, Farooque Y, Robinson SM, et al. The effect of a pancreatic anastomosis leak on long-term survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary cancers, distal cholangiocarcinomas and pancreatic ductal cancers. HPB 2016;18:e772–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang X, Dong X, Liu P, et al. Binding versus conventional pancreaticojejunostomy in preventing postoperative pancreatic fistula: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Digestive surgery 2017;34:265–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hellenic Surgical Society and Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • D Routh
    • 1
    Email author
  • RP Singh
    • 1
  • BM Sekhar
    • 1
  • SK Sharma
    • 1
  • D Kumar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryArmed Forces Medical CollegePuneIndia

Personalised recommendations