The association of PRECISE-DAPT score with development of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention
- 82 Downloads
Given that parameters used in the calculation of the PRECISE-DAPT risk score are important contributors to contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) development, we hypothesized that the PRECISE-DAPT risk score would show good accuracy for predicting CIN in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, in this study, we aimed to determine the predictive value of the admission PRECISE-DAPT score for the occurrence of CIN in patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI. After evaluation regarding with exclusion criteria, 1280 patients were, respectively, enrolled in the study. The primary end-point was the incidence of CIN. The PRECISE-DAPT score of CIN group was higher than the non-CIN group [31 (24–41) vs. 14 (9–23), p < 0.001, respectively]. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, PRECISE-DAPT score was independently associated with the development of CIN [odds ratio (OR) 1.090, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.066–1.114, p < 0.001]. A receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was drawn to show the best cut-off value of the PRECISE-DAPT score to predict CIN was ≥ 21 with 81.3% sensitivity and 72.7% specificity [area under curve (AUC): 0.834; 95% CI 0.812–0.854; p = 0.017]. The PRECISE-DAPT score may be a significant independent predictor of CIN in patients with STEMI treated with primary PCI. Therefore, follow-up of patients with higher PRECISE-DAPT score should be performed more cautiously, and it should be noted that the development of CIN risk of these patients group is high.
KeywordsPRECISE-DAPT score ST-elevation myocardial infarction Contrast-induced nephropathy Primary percutaneous coronary intervention
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they do not have any conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.
The need for written informed consent was waived due to retrospective study design.
- 1.Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Blömstrom-Lundqvist C, Borger MA, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the task force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2569–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Costa F, van Klaveren D, James S, Heg D, Räber L, Feres F, et al. Derivation and validation of the predicting bleeding complications in patients undergoing stent implantation and subsequent dual antiplatelet therapy (PRECISE-DAPT) score: a pooled analysis of individual patient data sets from clinical trials. Lancet. 2017;389:1025–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, Stevens LA, Zhang YL, Hendriksen S, et al. Chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2006;145:247–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Böhm M, et al. ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of Arterial hypertension of the European society of hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2159–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, Cifkova R, Fagard R, Germano G, et al. Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the task force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens. 2007;25:1105–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Nutritional anemias. Report of a WHO scientific group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1968;405:5–37.Google Scholar
- 18.Bouzas-Mosquera A, Vázquez-Rodríguez JM, Calvino-Santos R, Peteiro-Vázquez J, Flores-Ríos X, Marzoa-Rivas R, et al. Contrast-induced nephropathy and acute renal failure following urgent cardiac catheterization: incidence, risk factors, and prognosis. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2007;60:1026–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Mehran R, Aymong ED, Nikolsky E, Lasic Z, Iakovou I, Fahy M, et al. A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1393–9.Google Scholar
- 25.Valgimigli M, BuenoH Byrne RA, Collet JP, Collet JP, Costa F, Jeppsson A, et al. ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: the task force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European association for cardio-thoracic surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2017;2018(39):213–60.Google Scholar
- 26.Chong E, Poh KK, Lu Q, Zhang JJ, Tan N, Hou XM, Ong HY, Azan A, Chen SL, Chen JY, Ali RM, Fang WY, Lau TW, Tan HC. Comparison of combination therapy of high-dose oral N-acetylcysteine and intravenous sodium bicarbonate hydration with individual therapies in the reduction of Contrast-induced Nephropathy during Cardiac Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (CONTRAST): a multi-center, randomized, controlled trial. Int J Cardiol. 2015;201:237–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar