Advertisement

Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology

, Volume 21, Issue 5, pp 459–467 | Cite as

Comparative Studies on the Role of Organic Biostimulant in Resistant and Susceptible Cultivars of Rice Grown under Saline Stress - Organic Biostimulant Alleviate Saline Stress in Tolerant and Susceptible Cultivars of Rice

  • Mohd Shahanbaj Khan
  • Manish K. Pandey
  • S. HemalathaEmail author
Research Article
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Plants are sessile organisms that experience various abiotic stresses during their lifespan and try to adapt to these environmental stresses by manipulating their physiological, biochemical, cellular, and molecular mechanisms. Salinity is one of the important abiotic stress that affects the metabolism and physiology of plant cells that leads to serious damage to crops and productivity. We investigated the response of two contrasting (salt susceptible and tolerant) cultivars during saline stress by modulating its effect with the application of an important natural biostimulant panchagavya (PG). The results showed that the salinity stress greatly influenced and negatively affects the plant growth, biochemical attributes, and induces the expression of various genes in both cultivars. Furthermore, we assessed the effect of PG alone and by amending with NaCl to alleviate the saline stress which showed a significant enhancement of biochemical and physiological characteristics in both cultivars. Furthermore, we assessed the response of seven autophagy associated gene (ATG1, ATG3, ATG4, ATG6, ATG7, ATG8, and ATG9), BAX Inhibitor -1 (BI-1), Mitogen activated Protein Kinase–1 (MAPK-1), WRKY53, Catalase -1 (CAT-1), Superoxide Dismutase (SOD), and Glutathione Peroxidase (GPX) genes in rice that displayed the differential expression pattern during saline stress in both cultivars. We concluded that saline stress can be manipulated by the application of PG and positively regulate the physiological, biochemical, and gene expression response in salt-susceptible and -tolerant rice cultivars. Furthermore, the current study also suggested that salinity is a mutifactorial and multigenic response. Autophagy and programmed cell death regulated along with salinity and was helpful in adapting the tolerance against the stress condition.

Key words

Autophagy PCD tolerant susceptible salinity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ameisen JC. 2002. On the origin, evolution, and nature of programmed cell death: a timeline of four billion years. Cell Death Differ. 9: 367–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ara H, Sinha AK. 2014. Conscientiousness of mitogen–qctivatedprotein kinases in acquiring tolerance for abiotic stresses in plants.Proc. Indian Nat. Sci. Acad. 80: 211–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Athavale A, Jirankalgikar N, Nariya P, De S. 2012. Evaluation of invitro antioxidant activity of panchagavya: a traditional ayurvedic preparation. IJPR. 3: 2543–2549Google Scholar
  4. Beauchamp CO, Fridovich I. 1971. Superoxide dismutase: improved assays and an assay applicable to acrylamide gels. Anal. Biochem. 44: 276–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bolduc N, Ouellet M, Pitre F, Brisson LF. 2003. Molecular characterization of two plant BI–1 homologues which suppress Bax–induced apoptosis in human 293 cells. Planta 216: 377–386Google Scholar
  6. Chandlee JM, Scandalios JG. 1984. Analysis of variants affecting the catalase development program in Maize scutellum. Theor Appl Genet. 69: 71–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chu X, Wang C, Chen X, Lu W, Li H, Wang X et al. 2015. The cotton WRKY gene GhWRKY41positively regulates salt and drought stress tolerance in transgenic Nicotianabenthamiana. PLoSOne10: e0143022. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chuan CL, Ching HK. 2000. Effect of NaCl stress on H2O2 metabolism in rice leaves.J. Plant Growth Regul. 30: 151–155Google Scholar
  9. Dai X, Wang Y, Zhang WH. 2016. OsWRKY74, a WRKY transcription factor, modulates tolerance to phosphate starvation in rice. J. Exp. Bot. 67: 947–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ding ZJ, Yan JY, Li CX, Li GX, Wu YR, Zheng SJ. 2015. Transcription factor WRKY46 modulates the development of Arabidopsis lateral roots in osmotic/salt stress conditions via regulation of ABA signaling and auxin homeostasis. Plant J. 84: 56–69, doi: 10.1111/tpj.12958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evelin H, Kapoor R, Giri B. 2009. Arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi in alleviation of salt stress: a review. Ann. Bot. 104: 1263–1280Google Scholar
  12. Flowers TJ, Yeo AR. 1981. Variability in the resistance of sodium chloride salinity within rice (Oryzasativa L.) varieties.New Phytol. 88: 363–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harding TM, Morano KA, Scott SV, Klionsky DJ. 1995. Isolation and characterization of yeast mutants in the cytoplasm to vacuole protein targeting pathway. J. Cell Biol. 131: 591–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hasegawa PM, Bressan RA, Zhu JK, Bhonert HJ. 2000. Plant cellular and molecular responses to high salinity. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 51: 463–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Idrees M, Naeem M, Aftab T, Khan MMA 2011. Salicylic acid mitigates salinity stress by improving antioxidant defence system and enhances vincristine and vinblastine alkaloids production in periwinkle Catharanthusroseus (L.) G. Don. ActaPhys. Plant. 33: 987–999Google Scholar
  16. Jiang W, Wu J, Zhang Y, Yin L, Lu J. 2015. Isolation of a WRKY30 gene from Muscadiniarotundifolia (Michx) and validation of its function under biotic and abiotic stresses. Protoplasma 252: 1361–1374, doi: 10.1007/s00709–015–0769–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jin C, Reed JC. 2002. Yeast and apoptosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 3: 453–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jonak C, Ligterink W, Hirt H. 1999. MAP kinases in plant signal transduction Cell Mol. Life Sci. 55: 204–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Joshi RK, Kar B, Nayak S. 2011. Characterization of mitogen activated protein kinases (MAPKs) in the Curcuma longa expressed sequence tag database. Bio in formation 7: 180–183Google Scholar
  20. Kametaka S, Okano T, Ohsumi M, Ohsumi Y. 1998. Apg14p and Apg6/Vps30p form a protein complex essential for autophagy in the yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 22284–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kawai–Yamada M, Ohmori Y, Uchimiya H. 2004. Dissection of Arabidopsis Bax inhibitor–1 suppressing Bax–, hydrogen peroxide–, and salicylic acid–induced cell death.Plant Cell 16: 21–32.Google Scholar
  22. Khan MA, Abdullah Z. 2003. Reproductive physiology of two wheat cultivars differing in salinity tolerance under dense saline–sodic soil. J. Food Ag. Environ. 1: 185–189Google Scholar
  23. Khan MS, Akther T, Hemalatha S. 2017. Impact of Panchagavya on Oryzasativa L. grown under saline stress J. Plant Growth Regul. doi: 10.1007/s00344–017–9674–xGoogle Scholar
  24. Klionsky DJ. 2007. Autophagy: from phenomenology to molecular understanding in less than a decade. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8: 931–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lacomme C, Cruz SS. 1999. Bax–induced cell death in tobacco is similar to the hypersensitive response. PNAS 96: 7956–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lam E. 2004. Controlled cell death, plant survival and development. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5: 305–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Laxmi A, Laju K, Paul E, Raychaudhuri A, Janny L, Peters Khurana JP. 2006. Arabidopsis cytokinin–resistant mutant, cnr1, displays altered auxin responses and sugar sensitivity. Plant. Mol. Biol. 62: 409–425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Livak JK, Schmittgen TD 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using Real–Time Quantitative PCR and the 2–ΔΔCT method. Methods 25: 402–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Li JB, Luan YS, Liu Z. 2015. Overexpression of SpWRKY1 promotes resistance to Phytophthoranicotianae and tolerance to salt and drought stress in transgenic tobacco. Physiol. Plant. 155: 248–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu T, Van SJ. 2000. Selection and characterization of sodium chloride–tolerant callus of Glycine max (L.) Merr cv. Acme. Plant Growth Regul. 31: 195–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu Y, Schiff M, Czymmek K, Talloczy Z, Levine B, Dinesh Kumar SP. 2005. Autophagy regulates programmed cell death during the plant innate immune response. Cell 121: 567–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu Y, Xiong Y, Bassham DC. 2009. Autophagy is required for tolerance of drought and salt stress in plants. Autophagy 5: 954–963. doi: 10.4161/auto.5.7.9290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. 1951. Protein measurement with the folinphenol reagent. J. Biol. Chem. 193: 265–275Google Scholar
  34. Mackinney G. 1941. Absorption of light by chlorophyll solutions. J. Biol. Chem. 40: 315–322Google Scholar
  35. Maclachlan S, Zalik S. 1963. Plastid structure, chlorophyll concentration, and free amino acid composition of a chlorophyll mutant of barley. Can. J. Bot. 41: 1053–1062CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Matile PH, Winkenbach F. 1971. Function of lysosomes and lysosomal enzymes in the senescing corolla of the morning glory. J. Exp. Bot. 2 //doi.org/10.1093/jxb/22.4.759Google Scholar
  37. Matsumura H, Nirasawa S, Kiba A, Urasaki N, Saitoh H, Ito M, Kawai–Yamada M, Uchimiya H. Terauchi R. 2003. Overexpression of Bax inhibitor suppresses the fungal elicitorinduced cell death in rice (Oryza sativa L.) cells. Plant J. 33: 425–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Miao Y, Laun T, Zimmermann P, Zentgraf U. 2004. Targets of the WRKY53 transcription factor and its role during leaf senescence in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 55: 853–867, doi: 10.1007/s11103–005–2142–1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mitsuhara I, Malik KA, Miura M, Ohashi Y. 1999. Animal cell–death suppressors Bcl–x(L) and Ced–9 inhibit cell death in tobacco plants. Curr. Biol. 9: 775–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mishra P, Bhoomika K. Dubey RS 2013. Differential responses of antioxidative defense system to prolonged salinity stress in salt tolerant and salt sensitive Indica rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. Protoplasma. 250: 3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Natarajan K. 2002. Panchagavya: A manual. Other India Press, Mapusa, Goa, India, pp. 33Google Scholar
  42. Obara K, Sekito T, Ohsumi Y. 2006. Assortment of phosphatidylinositol 3–kinase complexes–Atg14p directs association of complex I to the pre–autophagosomal structure in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell. 17: 1527–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pandit A, Rai V, Sharma TR, Sharma PC, Singh NK. 2011. Differentially expressed genes in sensitive and tolerant rice varieties in response to salt–stress. J. Plant Biochem. Biotechnol. 20: 149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Phukan UJ, Gajendra S, JeenaShukla, RK, Ujjal J. 2016. WRKY Transcription factors: molecular regulation and stress responses in plants. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00760Google Scholar
  45. Phukan UJ, Mishra S, Timbre K, Luqman S, Shukla RK. 2014. Menthaarvensis exhibit better adaptive characters in contrast to Menthapiperita when subjugated to sustained water loggings tress. Protoplasma 251: 603–614. doi: 10.1007/s00709–013–0561–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rajesh M, Kaliyamoorthy Jayakumar. 2013. Changes in morphological, biochemical and yield parameters of Abelmoschus esculents (L.) Moench due to panchagavyaspray. Int.J.Mod. Plant An. Sci. 1: 82–95Google Scholar
  47. Raina SK, Wankhede DP, Sinha AK. 2013. Catharanthusroseus mitogen–activated protein kinase 3 confers UV and heat tolerance to Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Plant Signal Behav. 8: 110.4161/psb.22716Google Scholar
  48. Raina SK, Wankhede DP, Jaggi M, Singh P, Jalmi SK, Raghiram B, Sheik AH, Sinha AK. 2012. CrMPK3, a mitogen activated protein kinase from Catharanthusroseus and its possible role in stress induced biosynthesis of monoterpenoidindole alkaloids BMC Plant Biol. 12: 34Google Scholar
  49. Rana RM, Dong S, Ali Z, Huang J, Zhang HS. 2012. Regulation of ATG6/Beclin–1 homologs by abiotic stresses and hormones in rice (Oryzasativa L.). Genet. Mol. Res. 11: 3676–3687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rao KP, Vani G, Kumar K, Wankhede DP, Mishra M, Gupta M, Sinha AK. 2011. Arsenic stress activates MAP kinase in rice roots and leaves Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 506: 73–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Samajova O, Plíhal O, Al–Yousif M, Hirt H, Samaj J. 2013. Improvement of stress tolerance in plants by genetic manipulation of mitogen–activated protein kinases. Biotechnol. Adv. 31: 118–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sanchez P, de Torres Zabala M, Grant M. 2000. AtBI–1, a plant homologue of Bax inhibitor–1, suppresses Bax–induced cell death in yeast and is rapidly upregulated during wounding and pathogen challenge. Plant J. 21: 393–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shin JH, Yoshimoto K, Ohsumi Y, Jeon JS. 2009. An G. OsATG10b, an autophagosome component, is needed for cell survival against oxidative stresses in rice. Mol. Cells 27: 67–74Google Scholar
  54. Thompson AR, Doelling JH, Suttangkakul A, Vierstra RD. 2005. Autophagic nutrient recycling in Arabidopsis directed by the ATG8 and ATG12 conjugation pathways. Plant Physiol. 138: 2097–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wang P, Sun X, Jia X, Wang N, Gong X, Ma F. 2016. Characterization of an autophagy related gene MdATG8i from apple. Front. Plant Sci. 7: 720.doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00720Google Scholar
  56. Xie Z, Klionsky DJ. 2007. Autophagosome formation: core machinery and adaptations. Nat. Cell Biol. 9: 1102–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Xiong Y, Contento AL, Nguyen PQ, Bassham DC. 2007. Degradation of oxidized proteins by autophagy during oxidative stress in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 143: 291–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Yoshimoto K, Hanaoka H, Sato S. Kato T, Tabata S, Noda T, et al. 2004. Processing of ATG8s, ubiquitin–like proteins, and their deconjugation by ATG4s are essential for plant autophagy. Plant Cell 16: 2967–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zentgraf U, Laun T, Miao Y. 2010. The complex regulation of WRKY53 during leaf senescence of Arabidopsis thaliana Eur. J. Cell Biol. 89: 133–137Google Scholar
  60. Zhao X, Wang W, Zhang F, Deng J, Li Z, Fu B. 2014. Comparative metabolite profiling of two rice genotypes with contrasting salt stress tolerance at the seedling stage. PLoS ONE 9(9): e108020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108020CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Crop Science (KSCS) and Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohd Shahanbaj Khan
    • 1
  • Manish K. Pandey
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Hemalatha
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.School of Life SciencesB. S. Abdur Rahman Crescent Institute of Science and TechnologyVandalur, ChennaiIndia
  2. 2.International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT)PatancheruIndia

Personalised recommendations