Advertisement

Journal of Crop Science and Biotechnology

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 309–319 | Cite as

Association of DREB Genes and Microsatellite Markers Linked to NAX2 with Salt Tolerance in CIMMYT-derived Triticale, Wheat and Rye Genotypes

  • Roghiyeh Feuj
  • Bahram HeidariEmail author
  • Ali Dadkhodaie
Research Article
  • 4 Downloads

Abstract

Twenty-eight genotypes including triticale, wheat and rye were grown in a greenhouse under control, 14 and 21 dS/m salinity (NaCl and CaCl2, 1:1 ratio) levels to assess variations in agronomic traits, and to assess association of dehydration responsive elements (DREB genes) and five microsatellite (SSR) markers with salt tolerance. The results of grain yield variation and principal component (PC) analysis for statistical indices revealed that the first PC under 14 and 21 dS/m salinity levels was associated with salt tolerance. Five microsatellite (Xgwm291, Xgwm312, Xgwm410, Xgwm2181 and Xgwm126) and two DREB (DREB1 and DREB2) markers were used for detection of polymorphism. In total, 35 alleles ranging from 130 to 850 bp in size were identified of which, 25 alleles were found for SSR markers and 10 belonged to DREB genes. The number of alleles ranged from 3 to 9 with an average of 5 per primer. The polymorphic information content (PIC) value ranged from 0.51 (Xgwm291) to 0.77 (DREB1) with an average of 0.68. The Xgwm291 primer amplified 3 bands (130, 160 and 185 bp) in triticale and wheat but neither were detected in rye. Remarkably, the 130 bp band was amplified in TRT826 which was categorized as salt tolerant on the basis of K+/Na+ ratio and grain yield variations. Accordingly, this band could be associated with salt tolerance and its isolation and sequencing could clarify its characteristics for possible use in marker assisted breeding (MAB) for salt tolerance in triticale and wheat.

Key words

K+/Na+ PCA SSR genetic variation triticale 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Supplementary material

12892_2017_24_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (721 kb)
Supplementary material, approximately 228 KB.

References

  1. Abdel–Hamid AM. 2014. Physiological and molecular markers for salt tolerance in four barley cultivars. Eur. Sci. J. ESJ. 2014 Jan 31: 10(3)Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal PK, Agrawal P, Reddy MK, Sopory SK. 2006. Role of DREB transcription factors in abiotic and biotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell Rep. 25: 1263–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agarwal P, Agarwal PK, Nair S, Sopory SK, Reddy MK. 2007. Stress–inducible DREB2A transcription factor from Pennisetum glaucum is a phosphoprotein and its phosphorylation negatively regulates its DNA–binding activity. Mol. Genet. Genomics 277: 189–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arzani A. 2008. Improving salinity tolerance in crop plants: a biotechnological view. In Vitro Cell Dev. Biol. Plant. 44: 373–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Badea C. 2012. Identification of dehydration tolerance in triticale (×Triticosecale Wittmack) seedlings. Ms.C thesis. Department of Agriculture, Food and Nutritional Science.Google Scholar
  6. Edmonton, Alberta–Batool N, Ilyas N, Shahzad A, Arshad M, Ul–Hassan F. 2016. Evaluation of Wheat genotypes on the basis of physiological indices under salt stress. Pure Appl. Biol. 5: 1183–1192Google Scholar
  7. Bhutta WM, Amjad M. 2015. Molecular characterization of salinity tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Archives Agron. Soil Sci. 16: 1641–1648Google Scholar
  8. Blum A. 2014. The abiotic stress response and adaptation of triticale–A Review. Cereal Res. Commun. 42: 359–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boyd CE. 1999. Water Quality: An Introduction. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers Group. ISBN. 0–7923–7853–9Google Scholar
  10. Bousba R, Baum M, Djekoune A, Labadidi S, Djighly A. 2012. Screening for drought tolerance using molecular markers and phenotypic diversity in durum wheat genotypes. World Appl. Sci. J. 16: 1219–1226Google Scholar
  11. Budak H, Hussain B, Khan Z, Ozturk NZ, Ullah N. 2015. From genetics to functional genomics: improvement in drought signaling and tolerance in wheat. Front. Plant Sci. 6: 1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Byrt CS, Platten JD, Spielmeyer W, James RA, Lagudah ES, Dennis ES, Tester M, Munns R. 2007. HKT1:5–like cations transporters linked to Na+ exclusion loci in wheat, NAX2 and Knak1[OA]. Plant Physiol. 143: 1918–1928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chen JQ, Meng XP, Zhang Y, Xia M, Wang XP. 2008. Overexpression of OsDREB genes lead to enhanced drought tolerance in rice. Biotechnol Lett. 30: 2191–2198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chinnusamy V, Schumaker K, Zhu J. 2004. Molecular genetic perspectives on cross–talk and specificity in abiotic stress signalling in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 55: 225–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diaz de Leonَ JL, Escoppinichi R, Geraldo N, Castellanos T, Mujeeb–Kazi A, Rodِer MS. 2011. Quantitative trait loci associated with salinity tolerance in field grown bread wheat. Euphytica 181: 371–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Egawa C, Kobayashi F, Ishibashi M, Nakamura T, Nakamura C, Takumi, S. 2006. Differential regulation of transcript accumulation and alternative splicing of a DREB2 homolog under abiotic stress conditions in common wheat. Genes Genet. Syst. 81: 77–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernandez GCJ. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance In: Adaptation of Food Crops to Temperature and Water Stress, CG Kuo (ed.), AVRDC. Shanhua. Taiwan 257–270Google Scholar
  18. Fioj Kordasht R, Heidari B, Dadkhodaie A. 2016. Investigation of triticale and wheat performance under dry land conditions on the basis of variations in agronomic and morphological traits. J. Adv. Biol. Biotechnol. 7: 1–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fischer RA, Maurer R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. Part 1: grain yield response. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 29: 897–912Google Scholar
  20. Frankenberger WT, Tabatabai MA, Adriano DC, Doner HE. 1996. Bromine, chlorine, and fluorine. 833–868Google Scholar
  21. Fujita Y, Fukuouka H, Yano H. 2009. Identification of wheat cultivars using EST–SSR markers. Breed. Sci. 59: 159–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gao F, Chen JM, Xiong AS, Peng RH, Liu JG, Cai B, Yao QH. 2009. Isolation and characterization of a novel AP2/EREBP–type transcription factor OsAP211 in Oryza sativa. Biol. Planta. 53: 643–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Genc Y, Oldach K, Verbyla AP, Lott G, Hassan M., Tester M, Wallwork H, McDonald G.K. 2010. Sodium exclusion QTL associated with improved seedling growth in bread wheat under salinity stress. Theor. Appl. Genet. 121: 877–894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Giunta F, Motzo R. 2004. Sowing rate and cultivar affect total biomass and grain yield of spring triticale (×Triticosecale Wittmack) grain in a Mediterranean–type environment. Field Crops Res. 87: 193–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gorham J, Wyn Jones RG, Bristol A. 1990. Partial characterization of the trait for enhanced K+–Na+ discrimination in the D genome of wheat. Planta. 180: 590–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gutha LR, Reddy AR. 2008. Rice DREB 1B promoter shows distinct stress–specific responses, and the overexpression of cDNA in tobacco confers improved abiotic and biotic stress tolerance. Plant Mol. Biol. 68: 533–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hasan A, Hafiz HR, Siddiqui N, Khatun M, Islam R, Al–Mamun A. 2015. Evaluation of wheat genotypes for salt tolerance based on some physiological traits. J. Crop Sci. Plant Breed. 18: 333–340Google Scholar
  28. Helmke PA, Sparks DL. 1996. Lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, and cesium. p. 551–574. In D. L. Sparks et al. (ed.) Methods of Soil Analysis. Part III. 3rd Ed. Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, WIGoogle Scholar
  29. Huang Sh, Spielmeyer W, Lagudah S, James RA, Platten JD, Dennis ES, Munns R. 2006. A sodium transporter (HKT7) is a candidate for NAX1, a gene for salt tolerance in durum wheat. Plant Physiol. 142: 1718–1727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hussain SS, Kayani MA, Amjad M. 2011. Transcription factors as tools to engineer enhanced drought tolerance in plants. Americ. Ins. Chem. Engin. 27: 297–306Google Scholar
  31. Imran QM, Kamran M, Ur Rehman S, Ghafoor A, Falak N, Kim K, Lee I, Yun BW, Jami M. 2016. GA Mediated OsZAT–12 Expression Improves Salt Resistance of Rice. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 18: 1814–9596Google Scholar
  32. James RA, Rivelli AR, Munns R, von Caemmerer S. 2002. Factors affecting CO2 assimilation, leaf injury and growth in salt–stressed durum wheat. Func. Plant Biol. 29: 1393–1403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. James RA, Davenport RJ, Munns R. 2006. Physiological characterization of two genes for Na+ exclusion in durum wheat: NAX1 and NAX2. Plant Physiol. 142: 1537–1547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Johnson RA, Wichern DW. 1982. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice Hall. New Jersey 07458. 794Google Scholar
  35. Kobayashi F, Ishibashi M, Takumi S. 2008. Transcriptional activation of COR/LEA genes and increase in abiotic stress tolerance through expression of a wheat DREB2 homolog in transgenic tobacco. Transgenic Res. 17: 755–767CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koebner RMD, Martin PK. 1996. High levels of salt tolerance revealed in triticale. Triticale: Today Tomorrow. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 429–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kuleung C, Baenziger PS, Dweikat I. 2004. Transferability of SSR markers among wheat, rye, and triticale. Theor. Appl. Genet. 108: 1147–1150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Larter EN. 2009. Triticale. The Canadian Encyclopedia.Google Scholar
  39. Lata C, Prasad M. 2011. Role of DREBs in regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants. J. Exp. Botany 62: 4731–4748Google Scholar
  40. Luo MC, Dubcovsky J, Goyal S, Dvorak J. 1996. Engineering of interstitial foreign chromosome segments containing the K+/Na+ selectivity gene Knal by sequential homoeologous recombination in durum wheat. Theor. Appl. Genet. 92: 1180–1184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Medina J, Catala R, Salinas J. 2011. The CBFs: three Arabidopsis transcription factors to cold acclimate. Plant Sci. 180: 3–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mondini L, Nachit MM, Porceddu E, Pagnotta M. 2011. HRM technology for the identification and characterization of INDEL and SNP mutations in genes involved in drought and salt tolerance of durum wheat. Plant Genet. Res.: Charact. Utiliz. 9: 166–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mondini L, Nachit MM, Pagnotta M. 2014. Allelic variants in durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. var. durum) DREB genes conferring tolerance to abiotic stresses. Mol. Genet. Genomics 290(2): 531–44. doi: 10.1007/s00438–014–0933–2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nakashima K, Ito Y, Yamaguchi–Shinozaki K. 2009. Transcriptional regulatory networks in response to abiotic stresses in arabidopsis and grasses. Plant Physiol. 149: 88–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nayak SN, Balaji J, Upadhyaya HD, Hash CT, Kishor PBK, Chattopadhyay D, Rodriquez LM., Blair MW, Baum M, McNally K, This D, Hoisington DA, Varshney RK. 2009. Isolation and sequence analysis of DREB2A homologues in three cereal and two legume species. Plant Sci. 177: 460–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nelson JC, Sorrells ME, Van–Deynze A.E, Lu YH, Atkinson M, Bernard M, Leroy P, Faris JD, Anderson JA. 1995. Molecular mapping of wheat: major genes and rearrangements in homoeologous groups 4, 5, and 7. Genetics 141: 721–731Google Scholar
  47. Pandey B, Sharma P, Saini M, Pandey DM, Sharma I. 2014. Isolation and characterization of dehydration–responsive element–binding factor 2 (DREB2) from Indian wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 8: 44–54Google Scholar
  48. Richards LA. (1954). Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkaline soils. U. S. Salinity Laboratory Staff. USDA. Hand book No. 60. Washington, D C. 160 ppGoogle Scholar
  49. Rohlf FJ. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55: 2143–2160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Röder MS, Plaschke J, Konig SU, Borner A, Sorrells ME, Tanksley SD, Ganal MW 1995. Abundance, variability and chromosomal location of microsatellites in wheat. Mol. Gen. Genet. 246: 327–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rosielle AA, Hamblin I. 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non–stress environments. Crop Sci. 21: 43–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Saghai–Maroof MA, Soliman KM, Jorgensen RA, Allard R W. 1984. Ribosomal DNA spacer–length polymorphism in barely: mendelian inheritance, chromosomal location, and population dynamics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of American. 81: 8014–8018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shalaby EE, Epstein E, Qualset CO. 1993. Variation in salt tolerance among some wheat and triticale genotypes. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 171: 298–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shi Y, Gao L, Wu Z, Zhang X, Wang M, Zhang C, Zhang F, Zhou Y, Li Z. 2017. Genome–wide association study of salt tolerance at the seed germination stage in rice. BMC Plant Biol. 17: 92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Swindell WR. 2006. The association among gene expression responses to nine abiotic stress treatments in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics. 174: 1811–1824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tahmasebi S, Heidari B, Pakniyat H, Jalal Kamali M. 2014. Independent and combined effects of heat and drought stress in the SeriM82/Babax bread wheat population. Plant Breed. 133: 702–711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tahmasebi S, Heidari B, Pakniyat H, Dadkhodaie A. 2015. Consequences of 1BL/1RS translocation on agronomic and physiological traits in wheat. Cereal Res. Commun. 43: 554–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tilley M. 2004. PCR amplification of wheat sequences from DNA extracted during milling and baking. Cereal Chem. 81: 44–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tondelli A, Francia E, Barabaschi D, Aprile A, Skinner JS, Stockinger EJ, Stanca AM, Pecchioni N. 2006. Mapping regulatory genes as candidates for cold and drought stress tolerance in barley. Theor. Appl. Genet. 112: 445–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. 2009. RNA–Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nature Rev. Genet. 10: 57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Watanabe FS, Olsen SR. 1965. Test of an ascorbic acid method for determining phosphorus in water and NaHCO3 extracts from soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 29: 677–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wei B, Jing R, Wang C, Chen, J, Mao X, Chang X, Jia J. 2009. DREB1 genes in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.): Development of functional markers and gene mapping based on SNPs. Mol. Breed. 23: 13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Xu ZS, Ni ZY, Liu L, Nie LN, Li LC, Chen M, Ma YZ. 2008b. Characterization of the TaAIDFa gene encoding a CRT/DRE–binding factor responsive to drought, high–salt, and cold stress in wheat. Mol. Genet. Genomics 280: 497–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yamaguchi–Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. 1993. Characterization of the expression of a desiccation–responsive rd29 gene of Arabidopsis thaliana and analysis of its promoter in transgenic plants. Mol. General Genet. 236: 331–340CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Korean Society of Crop Science (KSCS) and Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Crop Production and Plant Breeding, School of AgricultureShiraz UniversityShirazIran

Personalised recommendations