Cancer genetic services are underutilized by high-risk clients in community-based health settings. To understand this disparity, 108 Planned Parenthood high-risk clients completed a utilization-focused survey. Clients expressed interest (78.8%) and intention (75.0%) in seeking genetic services. Personal/familial implications for cancer risk were the strongest motivators for seeking services (63.0–79.6%). Finances (39.6%) and worry (37.0%) were the biggest barriers. To reduce disparities in access to cancer genetics services, clinicians must understand clients’ concerns and tailor their recommendations.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Anderson B, McLosky J, Wasilevich E, Lyon-Callo S, Duquette D, Copeland G (2012) Barriers and facilitators for utilization of genetic counseling and risk assessment services in young female breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Epidemiol 2012
Armstrong K, Micco E, Carney A, Stopfer J (2014) Racial differences in the use of BRCA1/2 testing among women with a family history of breast and ovarian cancer. J Am Med Assoc 293(14):1729–1736
Bellcross C (2017) Identification and genetic counseling referral of women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer [webinar recording]. Retrieved from http://breeze.mdch.train.org/p1xh57abhms/?launcher=false&fcsContent=true&pbMode=normal
BRCA1 and BRCA2: Cancer Risk and Genetic Testing Fact Sheet - National Cancer Institute (n.d.) Retrieved May 22, 2017, from https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/genetics/brca-fact-sheet
Greenberg S, Yashar B, Pearlman M, Duquette D, Milliron K, Marvin M (2018) Evaluating and improving the implementation of a community-based hereditary cancer screening program. J Community Genet
Levy DE, Byfield SD, Comstock CB, Garber JE, Syngal S, Crown WH, Shields AE (2011) Underutilization of BRCA1/2 testing to guide breast cancer treatment: black and Hispanic women particularly at risk. Genet Med 13(4):349–355. https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182091ba4
NCCN Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/f_guidelines.asp
Planned Parenthood Federation of America (2016) The urgent need for planned parenthood health centers. Retrieved March 12, 2017, from https://www.plannedparenthood.org/files/4014/6773/0282/20160620_Defunding_fs_d1_4.pdf
Planned Parenthood Federation of America Inc. (2016) Planned parenthood by the number. Retrieved March 12, 2017, from https://www.plannedparenthood.org/files/7214/6833/9709/20160711_FS_PPNumbers_d1.pdf
Randall T, Armstrong K (2016) Health care disparities in hereditary ovarian cancer: are we reaching the underserved population? Curr Treat Options in Oncol 17(39)
Sheppard VB, Graves KD, Christopher J, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Talley C, Williams KP (2014) African American women’s limited knowledge and experiences with genetic counseling for hereditary breast cancer. J Genet Couns 23(3):311–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10897-013-9663-6
US Census Bureau, D. I. D (2010) Small area income and poverty estimates for 2010. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/did/www/saipe/data/statecounty/data/2010.html
Ward E, Jemal A, Cokkinides V, Singh GK, Cardinez C, Ghafoor A, Thun M (2004) Cancer disparities by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. CA Cancer J Clin 54(2):78–93. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.54.2.78
The authors on this paper would like to thank the Planned Parenthood Federation of America staff and Mary Kint Petit at Planned Parenthood of Michigan for their support of this research. Many thanks to Mark Pearlman, Debra Duquette, and Kara Milliron for their assistance in survey development.
Partial funding for this project was provided by the National Society of Genetic Counselors Education Special Interest Group and the University of Michigan Genetic Counseling Research Grant.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Studies with human subjects
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. The study was approved for exemption through University of Michigan IRB HUM00103068.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, I., Greenberg, S., Yashar, B.M. et al. Improving access to cancer genetic services: perspectives of high-risk clients in a community-based setting. J Community Genet 11, 119–123 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-019-00420-z
- Cancer genetic services
- Underserved population
- Screening tool