Cross-Fertilizing Qualitative Perspectives on Effects of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention: An Empirical Comparison of Four Methodical Approaches
- 140 Downloads
Qualitative methods come along with specific methodological backgrounds and related empirical strengths and weaknesses. Research is lacking addressing the question of what it precisely means to study mindfulness practices from a particular methodological point of view. The aim of this paper is to shed light on what qualities of mindfulness different qualitative methods can elucidate.
Based on interviews stemming from participants of a consumer-focused mindfulness training (BiNKA), we undertook a comparison of four different analyses, namely content analysis (CA), grounded theory (GT), interpretative-phenomenological analysis (IPA), and discourse analysis (DA).
Independently applying the four methods on our data material led to the following findings: CA demonstrated that the training had effects on self-awareness, well-being, and the development of ethical qualities and influenced pre-consumptive stages of participants; GT revealed the complex set of conditions determining whether and how the mindfulness training influenced the attendees; IPA highlighted the subjectivity of the mindfulness experience, suggesting that (1) different training elements have varying effects on participants and (2) it is often not the meditation practice, but other course elements that cause the effects experienced by the attendees; DA demonstrated that the course experience was influenced by subjective theories held by the participants. In particular, they showed typical strategies of rationalizing their consumption.
A pluralistic qualitative research assists in identifying blind spots and limitations of a single method, increases the self-reflexivity, and helps to arrive at a more comprehensive understanding of mindfulness practice or other processes of covert lived experience.
KeywordsMindfulness Qualitative Pluralistic qualitative research Reflexive methodology Sustainable consumption
PF: designed and executed the study, coordinated and participated in the data analyses, and wrote the paper. LS: co-designed and co-executed the study, participated in the data analyses and wrote the sub-sections on qualitative content analysis, DF: co-designed the study and participated in writing the paper, KK: undertook the DA analysis, wrote the corresponding sub-sections and supported in formatting the manuscript, PG: supervised the execution the study and the data analysis and participated in writing the paper. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.
The present study has been made possible through funding received from the German Ministry for Education and Research (BMBF) in the project BiNKA (Education for Sustainable Consumption through Mindfulness Training) under grants 01UT1416 and 01UT1416B.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study before their inclusion in the study.
- Allen, M., Bromley, A., Kuyken, W. & Sonnenberg, S.J. (2009). Participants’ experiences of mindfulness based cognitive therapy: “It changed me in just about every way possible”. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 37, 413–430.Google Scholar
- Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2017). Reflexive methodology. New vistas for qualitative research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Bannirchelvam, B., Bell, K. L., & Costello, S. (2017). A qualitative exploration of primary school students’ experience and utilisation of mindfulness. Contemporary School Psychology, 21(4), 304–316.Google Scholar
- Bergomi, C., Tschacher, W., & Kupper, Z. (2013). The assessment of mindfulness with self-report measures: Existing scales and open issues. Mindfulness, 4(3), 191–202.Google Scholar
- Birrer, D., Röthlin, P., & Morgan, G. (2012). Mindfulness to enhance athletic performance: Theoretical considerations and possible impact mechanisms. Mindfulness, 3(3), 235–246.Google Scholar
- Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D. & Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: A Proposed Operational Definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230–241Google Scholar
- Bodhi, B. (2013). What does mindfulness really mean? A canonical perspective. In J. M. G. Williams & J. Kabat-Zinn (Eds.), Mindfulness. Diverse perspectives on its meaning, origins and applications (pp. 19–39). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Chatzidakis, A., Hibbert, S., & Smith, A. P. (2007). Why people don’t take their concerns about fair trade to the supermarket: The role of neutralisation. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(1), 89–100.Google Scholar
- Chavez, C. (2008). Conceptualizing from the inside: Advantages, complications, and demands on insider positionality. The Qualitative Report, 13(3), 474–494.Google Scholar
- Christopher, J. C., Chrisman, J. A., Trotter-Mathison, M. J., Schure, M. B., Dahlen, P., & Christopher, B. (2011). Perceptions of the long-term influence of mindfulness training on counselors and psychotherapists: A qualitative inquiry. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 51(3), 318–349.Google Scholar
- Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques to developing grounded theory (3rd Ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
- Deady, R. (2011). Reading with methodological perspective bias: A journey into classic grounded theory. Grounded Theory Review, 1(10).Google Scholar
- Didonna, F. (Ed.). (2009). Clinical handbook of mindfulness. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Eberth, J., & Sedlmeier, P. (2012). The effects of mindfulness meditation: A meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 3(3), 174–189.Google Scholar
- Fischer, D., Stanszus, L., Geiger, S., Grossman, P., & Schrader, U. (2017). Mindfulness and sustainable consumption: A systematic literature review of research approaches and findings. Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 544–558.Google Scholar
- Frank, P. (2017). Warum wir Tiere essen (obwohl wir sie mögen) – sozialpsychologische Erklärungsansätze für das Fleischparadox. In J. Straub, & P.S. Ruppel (Ed.), Kerosinfrei und vegan: das ökologische Selbst. Psychosozial, 40(2), 1–21.Google Scholar
- Fritzsche, J., Fischer, D., Böhme, T., & Grossman, P. (2018). Education for sustainable consumption through mindfulness. Images and objects - active methodology toolkit 9. Hedmark, PERL – Partnership for Education and Research about Responsible Living.Google Scholar
- Frost, N. (Ed.) (2011). Qualitative methods in psychology: Combining Core approaches. Open University Press. Google Scholar
- Frost, N. (2016). Practising research. Roulston: Palgrave.Google Scholar
- Geiger, S., Fischer, D., & Schrader, U. (2017). Measuring what matters in sustainable consumption: An integrative framework for the selection of relevant behaviors. Sustainable Development, 26(1), 18–33.Google Scholar
- Germer, C. K., Siegel, R. D., & Fulton, P. R. (Eds.). (2016). Mindfulness and psychotherapy (2nd Ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Goulding, C. (2005). Grounded theory, ethnography and phenomenology. A comparative analysis of three qualitative strategies for marketing research. European Journal of Marketing, 39(3/4), 294–308.Google Scholar
- Groeben, N., Wahl, D., Schlee, J., & Scheele, B. (1988). Das Forschungsprogramm Subjektive Theorien. Eine Einführung in die Psychologie des reflexiven Subjektes. Tübingen: Francke.Google Scholar
- Grossman, P. (2015). Mindfulness: Awareness informed by an embodied ethic. Mindfulness, 6(1), 17–22.Google Scholar
- Haydicky, J., Wiener, J., & Shecter, C. (2017). Mechanisms of action in concurrent parent-child mindfulness training: A qualitative exploration. Mindfulness, 8(4), 1018–1035.Google Scholar
- Herbrik, R., & Kanter, H. (2016). Nachhaltigkeit - eine mächtige, normative, soziale Fiktion. Swissfuture, 43(1), 12–13.Google Scholar
- Himmelstein, S., Hastings, A., Shapiro, S., & Heery, M. (2012). A qualitative investigation of the experience of a mindfulness-based intervention with incarcerated adolescents. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 17(4), 231–237.Google Scholar
- Hugh-Jones, S., Rose, S., Koutsopoulou, G.Z., & Simms-Ellis, R. (2017). How is stress reduced by a workplace mindfulness intervention? A qualitative study conceptualising experiences of change. Mindfulness, 474-487.Google Scholar
- Hyland, T. (2017). McDonaldizing spirituality: Mindfulness, education, and consumerism. Journal of Transfomative Education, 15(4), 334–356.Google Scholar
- Ie, A., Ngnoumen, C. T., & Langer, E. J. (2014). The Wiley Blackwell handbook of mindfulness. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Jha, A. P., Morrison, A. B., Dainer-Best, J., Parker, S., Rostrup, N., & Stanley, E. A. (2015). Minds “at attention”: Mindfulness training curbs attentional lapses in military cohorts. PLoS One, 10(2), 1–19.Google Scholar
- Kabat-Zinn, J. (1991). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain and illness. New York: Delta.Google Scholar
- Keller, R. (2011). The sociology of knowledge approach to discourse (SKAD). Human Studies, 34(1), 43–65.Google Scholar
- Keller, R., Hornidge, A.-K., & Schünemann, W. J. (Eds.). (2018). The sociology of knowledge approach to discourse: Investigating the politics of knowledge and meaning-making. London, New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.Google Scholar
- Klöckner, C. A., & Matthies, E. (2004). How habits interfere with norm-directed behaviour: A normative decision-making model for travel mode choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(3), 319–327.Google Scholar
- Kuckartz, U. (2014). Qualitative text analysis (1st Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Levesque, C., & Brown, K. W. (2007). Mindfulness as a moderator of the effect of implicit motivationalself-concept on day-to-day behavioral motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 31(4), 284–299.Google Scholar
- Malis, F. R., Meyer, T., & Gross, M. M. (2017). Effects of an antenatal mindfulness-based childbirth and parenting programme on the postpartum experiences of mothers: A qualitative interview study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 17(1), 57–68.Google Scholar
- Malpass, A., Carel, H., Ridd, M., Shaw, A., Kessler, D., Sharp, D., Bowden, M., & Wallond, J. (2011). Transforming the perceptual situation: A meta-ethnography of qualitative work reporting patients‘ experiences of mindfulness-based approaches. Mindfulness, 3(1), 60–75.Google Scholar
- Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research. 1(2).Google Scholar
- Mayring, P., Huber, G. L., Gürtler, L., & Kiegelmann, M. (2007). Mixed methodology in psychological research. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
- Mehra, B. (2002). Bias in qualitative research: Voices from online classroom. The Qualitative Report, 7(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
- Morse, J. M., & Chung, S. E. (2003). Toward holism: The significance of methodological pluralism. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3), 13–20.Google Scholar
- Nightingale, A. J. (2016). Adaptive scholarship and situated knowledges? Hybrid methodologies and plural epistemologies in climate change adaptation research. Area, 48(1), 41–47.Google Scholar
- Norris, N. (1997). Error, bias and validity in qualitative research. Educational Action Research, 5(1), 172–176.Google Scholar
- Nowogrodzki, A. (2016). Power of positive thinking skews mindfulness studies trials of mindfulness to improve mental health selectively report positive results. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.19776.
- Petticrew, M., Egan, M., Thomas, H., Hamilton, V., Kunkler, R., & Roberts, H. (2008). Publication bias in qualitative research: What becomes of qualitative research presented at conference? Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 62, 552–554.Google Scholar
- Pietkiewicz, I., & Smith, J. A. (2012). A practical guide to using interpretative phenomenological analysis in qualitative research psychology. Czasopismo Psychologiczne, 18(2), 361–369.Google Scholar
- Schellekens, M. P., Jansen, E. T., Willemse, H. H., van Laarhoven, H. W., Prins, J. B., & Speckens, A. E. (2016). A qualitative study on mindfulness-based stress reduction for breast cancer patients: How women experience participating with fellow patients. Supportive Care in Cancer, 24, 1813–1820.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Roeser, R. W. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of mindfulness in education. Integrating theory and research into practice. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Silverman, D. (2000). Doing qualitative research: A practical handbook. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 53–80). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Stanszus, L., Fischer, D., Böhme, T., Frank, P., Fritzsche, J., Geiger, S., Schrader, U. (2017). Education for sustainable consumption through mindfulness training: Development of a consumption-specific intervention. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 19(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1515/jtes-2017-0001.Google Scholar
- Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1997). Grounded theory in practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Sweeney, T.B. (2016). A convergent parallel mixed-methods investigation into the role of mindfulness in moderate to severe, persistent depression. PhD thesis. University of Nottingham.Google Scholar
- Vago, D. R. (2014). Mapping modalities of self-awareness in mindfulness practice: A potential mechanism for clarifying habits of mind. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1307, 28–42.Google Scholar
- Valerio, A. (2016). Owning mindfulness: A bibliometric analysis of mindfulness literature trends within and outside of buddhist contexts. Contemporary Buddhism, 17, 157–183.Google Scholar
- Van Dam, N., van Vugt, M., Vago, D. R., Schmalzl, L., Saron, C. D., Olendzki, A., Meissner, T., Lazar, S. W., Kerr, C. E., Gorchov, J., Fox, K. C., Field, B. A., Britton, W. B., Brefczynski-Lewis, J., & Meyer, D. E. (2018). Mind the hype: A critical evaluation and prescriptive agenda for research on mindfulness and meditation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(1), 36–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zenner, C., Herrnleben-Kurz, S., & Walach, H. (2014). Mindfulness-based interventions in schools - a systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(603), 1–12.Google Scholar