The Relationships of Dispositional Mindfulness with Sexual Prejudice and Internalized Sexual Stigma Among Heterosexual and Gay/Bisexual Men
- 24 Downloads
A recently growing literature explored the effect of mindfulness on the reduction of stereotypes and prejudice. However, studies exploring the relationship between dispositional mindfulness and prejudice are very limited and contradictory. The current work focused on the associations of dispositional mindfulness with internalized sexual stigma and sexual prejudice in gay/bisexual men and heterosexual men, respectively.
Participants were 180 Italian men, both heterosexual (N = 91, 50.6%) and gay/bisexual (N = 89, 49.4%), ranging between 18 and 40 years old (M = 28.23, SD = 5.59) that completed a questionnaire which contained demographic information and measures of mindfulness, need for cognitive closure, and adherence to traditional and stereotypical gender roles. In order to test the predictive power of mindfulness’ dimensions on internalized sexual stigma and on sexual prejudice over and above the other predictors, we used dominance analysis.
Analyses revealed that only the FFMQ-Nonjudging of inner experience explained a proportion of variance of internalized sexual stigma significantly larger than zero, whereas the variance of the score on the sexual prejudice was mostly accounted for by right-wing political orientation and FFMQ-Observing.
Having a mindful nonjudging attitude toward one’s inner experience would associate to less internalized sexual stigma in gay and bisexual men, whereas having a mindful observing disposition would help heterosexual men to have less sexual prejudice against gay men. Limitations and future directions are discussed.
KeywordsDispositional mindfulness Sexual prejudice Gay men Internalized sexual stigma Dominance analysis
MS designed and executed the study, contributed to conduct data analyses, and wrote the paper.
CC collaborated with the design, conducted the main analyses, and wrote part of the results.
RB collaborated with the design and edited the final manuscript.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not refer to any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. The research received approval by Ethical Commitee of the Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome.
- Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-622.214.171.1246.Google Scholar
- Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., … & Williams, J. M. G. (2008). Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15(3), 329—342. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1073191107313003.
- Barcaccia, B., Baiocco, R., Pozza, A., Pallini, S., Mancini, F., & Salvati, M. (2019). The more you judge the worse you feel. A judgemental attitude towards one’s inner experience predicts depression and anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.012.Google Scholar
- Beach, M. C., Rosner, M. M., Cooper, L. A., Duggan, M. P. S., & Shatzer, J. (2007). Can patient-centered attitudes reduce racial and ethnic disparities in care? Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 82(2), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1097/2FACM.0b013e31802d94b2.Google Scholar
- Burke, S. E., Dovidio, J. F., LaFrance, M., Przedworski, J. M., Perry, S. P., Phelan, S. M., … & van Ryn, M. (2017). Beyond generalized sexual prejudice: need for closure predicts negative attitudes toward bisexual people relative to gay/lesbian people. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 71, 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.02.003.
- Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: the development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29(3), 177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-006-9035-8.Google Scholar
- Good, D. J., Lyddy, C. J., Glomb, T. M., Bono, J. E., Brown, K. W., Duffy, M. K., ... & Lazar, S. W. (2016). Contemplating mindfulness at work: an integrative review. Journal of Management, 42(1), 114—142. https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0149206315617003.
- Grapes, K. (2006). Ignorant discrimination: how education levels affect attitudes toward homosexuality and gay rights. Sociological Viewpoints, 22, 51–59.Google Scholar
- Groemping, U. (2018). Package “relaimpo”. Relative importance of regressors in linear models. R package version 2.2–3. http://cran.r-project.org/package=relaimpo.
- Herek, G. M., & McLemore, K. A. (2013). Sexual prejudice. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143826.Google Scholar
- Jazaieri, H., McGonigal, K., Jinpa, T., Doty, J. R., Gross, J. J., & Goldin, P. R. (2014). A randomized controlled trial of compassion cultivation training: effects on mindfulness, affect, and emotion regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9368-z.Google Scholar
- Lindeman, R. H., Merenda, P. F., & Gold, R. Z. (1980). Introduction to bivariate and multivariate analysis. Glenview: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
- Masuda, A., Hill, M. L., Morgan, J., & Cohen, L. L. (2012). A psychological flexibility-based intervention for modulating the impact of stigma and prejudice: a descriptive review of empirical evidence. Psychology, Society, and Education, 4(2), 211–223. https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v4i2.492.Google Scholar
- Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674.
- R Core Team. (2018). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R version 3.4.4 (2018-03-15). Vienna. http://www.r-project.org/.
- Ripley, B. (2017). Package “boot”. Bootstrap functions. R package version 1.3–20. http://cran.r-project.org/package=boot.
- Salvati, M., Piumatti, G., Giacomantonio, M., & Baiocco, R. (2019). Gender stereotypes and contact with gay men and lesbians: the mediational role of sexism and homonegativity. Community and Applied Social Psychology. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
- Szymanski, D. M., Dunn, T. L., & Ikizler, A. S. (2014). Multiple minority stressors and psychological distress among sexual minority women: the roles of rumination and maladaptive coping. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1(4), 412–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000066.Google Scholar