Advertisement

Mindfulness

pp 1–10 | Cite as

The Relationships of Dispositional Mindfulness with Sexual Prejudice and Internalized Sexual Stigma Among Heterosexual and Gay/Bisexual Men

  • Marco SalvatiEmail author
  • Carlo Chiorri
  • Roberto Baiocco
ORIGINAL PAPER
  • 24 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

A recently growing literature explored the effect of mindfulness on the reduction of stereotypes and prejudice. However, studies exploring the relationship between dispositional mindfulness and prejudice are very limited and contradictory. The current work focused on the associations of dispositional mindfulness with internalized sexual stigma and sexual prejudice in gay/bisexual men and heterosexual men, respectively.

Methods

Participants were 180 Italian men, both heterosexual (N = 91, 50.6%) and gay/bisexual (N = 89, 49.4%), ranging between 18 and 40 years old (M = 28.23, SD = 5.59) that completed a questionnaire which contained demographic information and measures of mindfulness, need for cognitive closure, and adherence to traditional and stereotypical gender roles. In order to test the predictive power of mindfulness’ dimensions on internalized sexual stigma and on sexual prejudice over and above the other predictors, we used dominance analysis.

Results

Analyses revealed that only the FFMQ-Nonjudging of inner experience explained a proportion of variance of internalized sexual stigma significantly larger than zero, whereas the variance of the score on the sexual prejudice was mostly accounted for by right-wing political orientation and FFMQ-Observing.

Conclusions

Having a mindful nonjudging attitude toward one’s inner experience would associate to less internalized sexual stigma in gay and bisexual men, whereas having a mindful observing disposition would help heterosexual men to have less sexual prejudice against gay men. Limitations and future directions are discussed.

Keywords

Dispositional mindfulness Sexual prejudice Gay men Internalized sexual stigma Dominance analysis 

Notes

Author Contributions

MS designed and executed the study, contributed to conduct data analyses, and wrote the paper.

CC collaborated with the design, conducted the main analyses, and wrote part of the results.

RB collaborated with the design and edited the final manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not refer to any studies with animals performed by any of the authors. The research received approval by Ethical Commitee of the Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, Sapienza University, Rome.

References

  1. Adler, N. E., Epel, E. S., Castellazzo, G., & Ickovics, J. R. (2000). Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychology, 19(6), 586–592.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.19.6.586.Google Scholar
  2. Akin, U., Akin, A., & Uğur, E. (2016). Mediating role of mindfulness on the associations of friendship quality and subjective vitality. Psychological Reports, 119(2), 516–526.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0033294116661273.Google Scholar
  3. Arias, A. J., Steinberg, K., Banga, A., & Trestman, R. L. (2006). Systematic review of the efficacy of meditation techniques as treatments for medical illness. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 12(8), 817–832.  https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2006.12.817.Google Scholar
  4. Azen, R., & Budescu, D. V. (2003). The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods, 8(2), 129–148.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.129.Google Scholar
  5. Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Lykins, E., Button, D., Krietemeyer, J., Sauer, S., … & Williams, J. M. G. (2008). Construct validity of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in meditating and nonmeditating samples. Assessment, 15(3), 329—342.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1073191107313003.
  6. Baiocco, R., Nardelli, N., Pezzuti, L., & Lingiardi, V. (2013). Attitudes of Italian heterosexual older adults towards lesbian and gay parenting. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 10(4), 285–292.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-013-0129-2.Google Scholar
  7. Barcaccia, B., Baiocco, R., Pozza, A., Pallini, S., Mancini, F., & Salvati, M. (2019). The more you judge the worse you feel. A judgemental attitude towards one’s inner experience predicts depression and anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 138, 33–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.09.012.Google Scholar
  8. Bargh, J. A., & Chartrand, T. L. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462–479.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462.Google Scholar
  9. Barnes, S., Brown, K. W., Krusemark, E., Campbell, W. K., & Rogge, R. D. (2007). The role of mindfulness in romantic relationship satisfaction and responses to relationship stress. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 33(4), 482–500.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2007.00033.x.Google Scholar
  10. Beach, M. C., Rosner, M. M., Cooper, L. A., Duggan, M. P. S., & Shatzer, J. (2007). Can patient-centered attitudes reduce racial and ethnic disparities in care? Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 82(2), 193–198.  https://doi.org/10.1097/2FACM.0b013e31802d94b2.Google Scholar
  11. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42(2), 155–162.  https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036215.Google Scholar
  12. Borders, A., Guillén, L. A., & Meyer, I. H. (2014). Rumination, sexual orientation uncertainty, and psychological distress in sexual minority university students. The Counseling Psychologist, 42(4), 497–523.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0011000014527002.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84, 822–848.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.Google Scholar
  14. Budescu, D. V. (1993). Dominance analysis: a new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 114(3), 542–551.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.542.Google Scholar
  15. Burgess, D. J., Beach, M. C., & Saha, S. (2017). Mindfulness practice: a promising approach to reducing the effects of clinician implicit bias on patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 100(2), 372–376.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2016.09.005.Google Scholar
  16. Burke, S. E., Dovidio, J. F., LaFrance, M., Przedworski, J. M., Perry, S. P., Phelan, S. M., … & van Ryn, M. (2017). Beyond generalized sexual prejudice: need for closure predicts negative attitudes toward bisexual people relative to gay/lesbian people. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 71, 145–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.02.003.
  17. Cardaciotto, L., Herbert, J. D., Forman, E. M., Moitra, E., & Farrow, V. (2008). The assessment of present-moment awareness and acceptance: the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale. Assessment, 15(2), 204–223.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1073191107311467.Google Scholar
  18. Chiesa, A., Calati, R., & Serretti, A. (2011). Does mindfulness training improve cognitive abilities? A systematic review of neuropsychological findings. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(3), 449–464.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.003.Google Scholar
  19. Djikic, M., Langer, E. J., & Stapleton, S. F. (2008). Reducing stereotyping through mindfulness: effects on automatic stereotype-activated behaviors. Journal of Adult Development, 15(2), 106–111.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-008-9040-0.Google Scholar
  20. Feldman, G., Hayes, A., Kumar, S., Greeson, J., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2007). Mindfulness and emotion regulation: the development and initial validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R). Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 29(3), 177.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-006-9035-8.Google Scholar
  21. Felver, J. C., Celis-de Hoyos, C. E., Tezanos, K., & Singh, N. N. (2016). A systematic review of mindfulness-based interventions for youth in school settings. Mindfulness, 7(1), 34–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0389-4.Google Scholar
  22. Galupo, M. P., & Bauerband, L. A. (2016). Sexual orientation reflection and rumination scale: development and psychometric evaluation. Stigma and Health, 1(1), 44–58.  https://doi.org/10.1037/sah0000017.Google Scholar
  23. Gervais, S. J., & Hoffman, L. (2013). Just think about it: mindfulness, sexism, and prejudice toward feminists. Sex Roles, 68(5–6), 283–295.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-012-0241-4.Google Scholar
  24. Glick, P., Gangl, C., Gibb, S., Klumpner, S., & Weinberg, E. (2007). Defensive reactions to masculinity threat: more negative affect toward effeminate (but not masculine) gay men. Sex Roles, 57(1–2), 55–59.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9195-3.Google Scholar
  25. Good, D. J., Lyddy, C. J., Glomb, T. M., Bono, J. E., Brown, K. W., Duffy, M. K., ... & Lazar, S. W. (2016). Contemplating mindfulness at work: an integrative review. Journal of Management, 42(1), 114—142.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0149206315617003.
  26. Goodnight, B. L., Cook, S. L., Parrott, D. J., & Peterson, J. L. (2014). Effects of masculinity, authoritarianism, and prejudice on antigay aggression: a path analysis of gender-role enforcement. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 15(4), 437–444.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034565.Google Scholar
  27. Grapes, K. (2006). Ignorant discrimination: how education levels affect attitudes toward homosexuality and gay rights. Sociological Viewpoints, 22, 51–59.Google Scholar
  28. Groemping, U. (2018). Package “relaimpo”. Relative importance of regressors in linear models. R package version 2.2–3. http://cran.r-project.org/package=relaimpo.
  29. Hayes, S. C. (2004). Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behavior Therapy, 35(4), 639–665.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(04)80013-3.Google Scholar
  30. Herek, G. M. (2009). Sexual stigma and sexual prejudice in the United States: a conceptual framework. In D. A. Hope (Ed.), Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities (pp. 65–111). New York: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09556-1.Google Scholar
  31. Herek, G. M., & McLemore, K. A. (2013). Sexual prejudice. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 309–333.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143826.Google Scholar
  32. Hofmann, S. G., Sawyer, A. T., Witt, A. A., & Oh, D. (2010). The effect of mindfulness-based therapy on anxiety and depression: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 78(2), 169–183.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018555.Google Scholar
  33. Jazaieri, H., McGonigal, K., Jinpa, T., Doty, J. R., Gross, J. J., & Goldin, P. R. (2014). A randomized controlled trial of compassion cultivation training: effects on mindfulness, affect, and emotion regulation. Motivation and Emotion, 38(1), 23–35.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-013-9368-z.Google Scholar
  34. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1982). An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation: theoretical considerations and preliminary results. General Hospital Psychiatry, 4(1), 33–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-8343(82)90026-3.Google Scholar
  35. Kachel, S., Steffens, M. C., & Niedlich, C. (2016). Traditional masculinity and femininity: validation of a new scale assessing gender roles. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 956.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00956.Google Scholar
  36. Kang, Y., Gruber, J., & Gray, J. R. (2013). Mindfulness and de-automatization. Emotion Review, 5(2), 192–201.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1754073912451629.Google Scholar
  37. Keng, S. L., Smoski, M. J., & Robins, C. J. (2011). Effects of mindfulness on psychological health: a review of empirical studies. Clinical Psychology Review, 31(6), 1041–1056.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2011.04.006.Google Scholar
  38. Kilpatrick, F. P., & Cantril, H. (1960). Self-anchoring scaling: a measure of individuals’ unique reality worlds. Journal of Individual Psychology, 16, 158–173.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.Google Scholar
  39. Lau, M. A., Bishop, S. R., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T., Anderson, N. D., Carlson, L., et al. (2006). The Toronto mindfulness scale: development and validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(12), 1445–1467.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20326.Google Scholar
  40. Lillis, J., & Hayes, S. C. (2007). Applying acceptance, mindfulness, and values to the reduction of prejudice: a pilot study. Behavior Modification, 31(4), 389–411.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0145445506298413.Google Scholar
  41. Lindeman, R. H., Merenda, P. F., & Gold, R. Z. (1980). Introduction to bivariate and multivariate analysis. Glenview: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
  42. Lingiardi, V., Falanga, S., & D’Augelli, A. R. (2005). The evaluation of homophobia in an Italian sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 34(1), 81–93.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-005-1002-z.Google Scholar
  43. Lingiardi, V., Baiocco, R., & Nardelli, N. (2012). Measure of internalized sexual stigma for lesbians and gay men: a new scale. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(8), 1191–1210.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2012.712850.Google Scholar
  44. Livingston, J. D., & Boyd, J. E. (2010). Correlates and consequences of internalized stigma for people living with mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Social Science and Medicine, 71(12), 2150–2161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.09.030.Google Scholar
  45. Lueke, A., & Gibson, B. (2015). Mindfulness meditation reduces implicit age and race bias: the role of reduced automaticity of responding. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(3), 284–291.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2F1948550614559651.Google Scholar
  46. Lueke, A., & Gibson, B. (2016). Brief mindfulness meditation reduces discrimination. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research and Practice, 3(1), 34–44.  https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000081.Google Scholar
  47. Malinowski, P., & Lim, H. J. (2015). Mindfulness at work: positive affect, hope, and optimism mediate the relationship between dispositional mindfulness, work engagement, and well-being. Mindfulness, 6(6), 1250–1262.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0388-5.Google Scholar
  48. Masuda, A., Hill, M. L., Morgan, J., & Cohen, L. L. (2012). A psychological flexibility-based intervention for modulating the impact of stigma and prejudice: a descriptive review of empirical evidence. Psychology, Society, and Education, 4(2), 211–223.  https://doi.org/10.25115/psye.v4i2.492.Google Scholar
  49. Meyer, I. H. (2003). Prejudice, social stress, and mental health in lesbian, gay, and bisexual populations: conceptual issues and research evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 129(5), 674–697.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.674.
  50. Moskowitz, G. B. (2010). On the control over stereotype activation and stereotype inhibition. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(2), 140–158.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00251.x.Google Scholar
  51. Nicol, A. A., & De France, K. (2018). Mindfulness: relations with prejudice, social dominance orientation, and right-wing authoritarianism. Mindfulness, 9(6), 1916–1930.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0938-8.Google Scholar
  52. Nilsson, H., & Kazemi, A. (2016). Reconciling and thematizing definitions of mindfulness: the big five of mindfulness. Review of General Psychology, 20(2), 183–193.  https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000074.Google Scholar
  53. Parks, S., Birtel, M. D., & Crisp, R. J. (2014). Evidence that a brief meditation exercise can reduce prejudice toward homeless people. Social Psychology, 45, 458–465.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000212.Google Scholar
  54. Poteat, V. P., & Mereish, E. H. (2012). (Dis) similarity between liberals and conservatives: predicting variability in group differences on abortion and same-sex marriage rights attitudes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34(1), 56–65.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2011.637852.Google Scholar
  55. R Core Team. (2018). R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R version 3.4.4 (2018-03-15). Vienna. http://www.r-project.org/.
  56. Raes, F., & Williams, J. M. G. (2010). The relationship between mindfulness and uncontrollability of ruminative thinking. Mindfulness, 1(4), 199–203.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-010-0021-6.Google Scholar
  57. Ripley, B. (2017). Package “boot”. Bootstrap functions. R package version 1.3–20. http://cran.r-project.org/package=boot.
  58. Roets, A., & Van Hiel, A. (2011). Item selection and validation of a brief, 15-item version of the Need for Closure Scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 90–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.09.004.Google Scholar
  59. Salvati, M., Ioverno, S., Giacomantonio, M., & Baiocco, R. (2016). Attitude toward gay men in an Italian sample: masculinity and sexual orientation make a difference. Sexuality Research & Social Policy, 13(2), 109–118.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-016-0218-0.Google Scholar
  60. Salvati, M., Pistella, J., & Baiocco, R. (2018). Gender roles and internalized sexual stigma in gay and lesbian persons: a quadratic relation. International Journal of Sexual Health, 30(1), 42–48.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19317611.2017.1404542.Google Scholar
  61. Salvati, M., Piumatti, G., Giacomantonio, M., & Baiocco, R. (2019). Gender stereotypes and contact with gay men and lesbians: the mediational role of sexism and homonegativity. Community and Applied Social Psychology. Advance online publication.Google Scholar
  62. Schimchowitsch, S., & Rohmer, O. (2016). Can we reduce our implicit prejudice toward persons with disability? The challenge of meditation. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 63(6), 641–650.  https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2016.1156656.Google Scholar
  63. Szymanski, D. M., Dunn, T. L., & Ikizler, A. S. (2014). Multiple minority stressors and psychological distress among sexual minority women: the roles of rumination and maladaptive coping. Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity, 1(4), 412–421.  https://doi.org/10.1037/sgd0000066.Google Scholar
  64. Tang, Y. Y., Hölzel, B. K., & Posner, M. I. (2015). The neuroscience of mindfulness meditation. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16(4), 213–225.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3916.Google Scholar
  65. Teper, R., Segal, Z. V., & Inzlicht, M. (2013). Inside the mindful mind: how mindfulness enhances emotion regulation through improvements in executive control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(6), 449–454.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2F0963721413495869.Google Scholar
  66. Todd, A. R., Galinsky, A. D., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012). Perspective taking undermines stereotype maintenance processes: evidence from social memory, behavior explanation, and information solicitation. Social Cognition, 30(1), 94–108.  https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2012.30.1.94.Google Scholar
  67. Tomlinson, E. R., Yousaf, O., Vittersø, A. D., & Jones, L. (2018). Dispositional mindfulness and psychological health: a systematic review. Mindfulness, 9(1), 23–43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0762-6.Google Scholar
  68. Tonidandel, S., LeBreton, J. M., & Johnson, J. W. (2009). Determining the statistical significance of relative weights. Psychological Methods, 14(4), 387–399.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017735.Google Scholar
  69. Webster, D. M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (1994). Individual differences in need for cognitive closure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(6), 1049–1062.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.6.1049.Google Scholar
  70. Yadavaia, J. E., & Hayes, S. C. (2012). Acceptance and commitment therapy for self-stigma around sexual orientation: a multiple baseline evaluation. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 19(4), 545–559.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2011.09.002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social and Developmental Psychology, Faculty of Medicine and PsychologySapienza UniversityRomeItaly
  2. 2.Department of Educational SciencesUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations