Advertisement

Mindfulness

pp 1–16 | Cite as

Validation of the Spanish Version of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) with Samples of Spanish and Chilean Children and Adolescents

  • Carlos García-RubioEmail author
  • Raquel Rodríguez-Carvajal
  • Alvaro Ignacio Langer
  • David Paniagua
  • Philipp Steinebach
  • Catherine Iris Andreu
  • María Dolores Vara
  • Ausiás Cebolla
ORIGINAL PAPER

Abstract

Objectives

Interest in mindfulness practices aimed at children and adolescents in school and clinical contexts has increased. However, little research on the benefits of mindfulness in these age groups has been conducted. In Spanish-speaking countries, this lack of research may be due to the scarcity of reliable and valid instruments for assessing mindfulness in young people. The present study examined the psychometric properties of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) in native Spanish-speaking children and adolescents.

Methods

Two thousand one hundred thirteen children and adolescents from Spain (N = 490 children; N = 629 adolescents) and Chile (N = 307 children; N = 687 adolescents) were assessed. Factor structure, internal consistency, convergent validity, and measure invariance between countries were examined.

Results

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) validated a unidimensional structure (10 items) that fitted the data better than the bidimensional structure both for children and adolescents in both countries. However, the factor loadings of some items were very low in all samples. After eliminating these items, a new, 7-item version of the CAMM proved to be more valid and reliable. The new version correlated negatively with several mental health measures, thereby supporting its construct validity. Also, the measurement invariance test showed that it is comparable between Spain and Chile, which makes transcultural research possible.

Conclusion

This study shows that the Spanish version of the CAMM adequately assesses mindfulness in children and adolescents. The CAMM is the first mindfulness evaluation measure for children in Spanish.

Keywords

Mindfulness Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure CAMM Children and adolescents Assessment Spanish Acceptance 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Special appreciation is expressed to the children and adolescents who participated, as well as to their teachers and parents; all of whom made these studies possible.

Author Contributions

CGR designed the study, assisted with data analyses, wrote the paper, and edited the final manuscript. RRC designed the study, assisted with data analyses, and collaborated in writing and editing the final manuscript. AIL designed the study and collaborated in writing and editing the final manuscript. DP designed the study, performed the main data analyses, and wrote part of the final version of the paper. PS designed the study, assisted with sample collection, and wrote part of the draft version of the paper. CA, MDV, and AC assisted with sample collection and collaborated in the editing of the manuscript.

Funding Information

Part of these studies were supported by a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Education, Culture, and Sport (FPU13/01677) to CGR; in addition, part of this research was supported by the Chilean National Fund for Scientific and Technological Development, Project N° 8213005 and the Fund for Innovation and Competitiveness (FIC) of the Chilean Ministry of Economy, Development, and Tourism, through the Millennium Scientific Initiative, Grant N° IS130005 to AIL. All the other authors received no financial support for this research.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in these studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the two institutional research committees (Autonomous University of Madrid and Pontifical Catholic University of Chile) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the studies.

References

  1. Abad, J. (1998). Derivació empírica de síndromes de banda ampla i estreta mitjançant l’instrument diagnòstic Youth Self-Report [Empirical derivation of broad- and narrow-band syndromes using the diagnostic measure Youth Self-Report]. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Methodology of the Behavior Sciences, Faculty of Psychology, University of Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  2. Achenbach, T. M. (1991). Integrative guide for the 1991 CBCL/4–18, YSR and TRF profiles. Burlington, VT: University of Vermont, Department of Psychiatry.Google Scholar
  3. Achenbach, TM. Rescorla, LA. Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms and profiles: an integrated system of multi-informant assessment. Burlington, VT: Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families; 2001.Google Scholar
  4. Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., & Allen, K. B. (2004). Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment, 11(3), 191–206.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191104268029.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Baer, R. A., Smith, G. T., Hopkins, J., Krietemeyer, J., & Toney, L. (2006). Using self-report assessment methods to explore facets of mindfulness. Assessment, 13(1), 27–45.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105283504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Carbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: twenty-five years of evaluation. Clinical Psychology Review, 8(1), 77–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(88)90050-5.Google Scholar
  7. Beltrán, M. d. C., Freyre, M.-Á., & Hernández-Guzmán, L. (2012). El Inventario de Depresión de Beck: Su validez en población adolescente. Terapia psicológica, 30(1), 5–13.  https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-48082012000100001.Google Scholar
  8. Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1996). Statistics notes: measurement error. British Medical Journal, 313, 41–42.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7047.1654.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bluth, K., Gaylord, S. A., Campo, R. A., Mullarkey, M. C., & Hobbs, L. (2016). Making friends with yourself: a mixed methods pilot study of a mindful self-compassion program for adolescents. Mindfulness, 7(2), 479–492.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0476-6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Calvete, E., Sampedro, A. & Orue, I. (2014). Propiedades psicométricas de la versión española de la «escala de atención y conciencia plena para adolescentes» (Mindful Attention Awareness Scale Adolescents) (MAAS-A). Psicología Conductual, 22(2), 277–291.Google Scholar
  12. Cervantes Institute (2016). Yearbook of the Cervantes Institute. El español en el mundo. Madrid, Centro Virtual Instituto Cervantes. https://cvc.cervantes.es/Lengua/anuario/anuario_16/default.htm
  13. Chahin, N., Cosi, S., Lorenzo-Seva, U., & Vigil-Colet, A. (2010). Stability of the factor structure of Barratt’s Impulsivity Scales for children across cultures: a comparison of Spain and Colombia. Psicothema, 22(4), 983–989.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Chambers, R., Gullone, E., Hassed, C., Knight, W., Garvin, T., & Allen, N. (2015). Mindful emotion regulation predicts recovery in depressed youth. Mindfulness, 6(3), 523–534.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-014-0284-4.Google Scholar
  15. Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14(3), 464–504.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834.Google Scholar
  16. Chiesi, F., Dellagiulia, A., Lionetti, F., Bianchi, G., & Primi, C. (2017). Using item response theory to explore the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM). Mindfulness, 8(2), 351–360.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0604-y.Google Scholar
  17. Cosi, S., Vigil-Colet, A., Canals, J., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2008). Psychometric properties of the Spanish adaptation of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11-A for children. Psychological Reports, 103(2), 336–346.  https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.103.2.336-346.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297–334.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555.Google Scholar
  19. Cunha, M., Galhardo, A., & Pinto-Gouveia, J. (2013). Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM): Estudo das Caracteristicas Psicométricas da Versão Portuguesa = Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM): study of the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 26(3), 459–468.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-79722013000300005.Google Scholar
  20. de Bruin, E. I., Zijlstra, B. J., & Bögels, S. M. (2014). The meaning of mindfulness in children and adolescents: further validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) in two independent samples from the Netherlands. Mindfulness, 5(4), 422–430.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0196-8.Google Scholar
  21. De Vibe, M. F., Bjørndal, A., Fattah, S., Dyrdal, G. M., Halland, E., & Tanner-Smith, E. E. (2017). Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) for improving health, quality of life and social functioning in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 2017, 11.  https://doi.org/10.4073/csr.2017.11.Google Scholar
  22. Dimitrov, D. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(2), 121–149.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175610373459.Google Scholar
  23. Dion, J., Paquette, L., Daigneault, I., Godbout, N., & Hébert, M. (2018). Validation of the French version of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) among samples of French and indigenous youth. Mindfulness, 9(2), 645–653.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0807-x.Google Scholar
  24. Dunning, D. L., Griffiths, K., Kuyken, W., Crane, C., Foulkes, L., Parker, J., & Dalgleish, T. (2018). Research review: the effects of mindfulness-based interventions on cognition and mental health in children and adolescents–a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12980.
  25. Felver, J. C., Celis-de Hoyos, C. E., Tezanos, K., & Singh, N. N. (2016). A systematic review of mindfulness-based interventions for youth in school settings. Mindfulness, 7(1), 34–45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0389-4.Google Scholar
  26. Franco, C., Amutio, A., López-González, L., Oriol, X., & Martínez-Taboada, C. (2016). Effect of a mindfulness training program on the impulsivity and aggression levels of adolescents with behavioral problems in the classroom. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1385.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01385.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gadermann, A. M., Guhn, M., & Zumbo, B. D. (2012). Estimating ordinal reliability for Likert-type and ordinal item response data: a conceptual, empirical, and practical guide. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(3), 1–13.Google Scholar
  28. Galla, B., Tsukayama, E., Park, D., Yu, A., & Duckworth, A. (2018, September 28). The mindful adolescent: developmental changes during the transition to high school, and relations to stress and positive affect.  https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u3s8d
  29. Garcia-Campayo, J., Navarro-Gil, M., Andres, E., Montero-Marin, J., Lopez-Artal, L., & Demarzo, M. M. (2014). Validation of the Spanish versions of the long (26 items) and short (12 items) forms of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 12(1), 12–14.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-12-4.Google Scholar
  30. Goldberg, S. B., Tucker, R. P., Greene, P. A., Davidson, R. J., Wampold, B. E., Kearney, D. J., & Simpson, T. L. (2018). Mindfulness-based interventions for psychiatric disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 59, 52–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2017.10.011.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Gómez-Simón, I., Penelo, E., & de la Osa, N. (2014). Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Difficulties Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) in Spanish adolescents. Psicothema, 26(3), 401–408.  https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2013.324.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Goodman, M. S., Madni, L. A., & Semple, R. J. (2017). Measuring mindfulness in youth: review of current assessments, challenges, and future directions. Mindfulness, 8(6), 1409–1420.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0719-9.Google Scholar
  33. Gratz, K. L., & Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26(1), 41–54.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94.Google Scholar
  34. Greco, L. A., Baer, R. A., & Smith, G. T. (2011). Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: development and validation of the child and adolescent mindfulness measure (CAMM). Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 606.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022819.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ivanova, M. Y., Achenbach, T. M., Rescorla, L. A., Dumenci, L., Almqvist, F., Bilenberg, N., & Verhulst, F. C. (2007). The generalizability of the Youth Self-Report syndrome structure in 23 societies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(5), 729–738.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.75.5.729.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156.  https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg016.Google Scholar
  37. Kallapiran, K., Koo, S., Kirubakaran, R., & Hancock, K. (2015). Effectiveness of mindfulness in improving mental health symptoms of children and adolescents: a meta-analysis. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 20(4), 182–194.  https://doi.org/10.1111/camh.12113.Google Scholar
  38. Khoury, B., Sharma, M., Rush, S. E., & Fournier, C. (2015). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for healthy individuals: a meta-analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 78(6), 519–528.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.009.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kline, T. (2005). Psychological testing: a practical approach to design and evaluation. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  40. Klingbeil, D. A., Renshaw, T. L., Willenbrink, J. B., Copek, R. A., Chan, K. T., Haddock, A., & Clifton, J. (2017). Mindfulness-based interventions with youth: a comprehensive meta-analysis of group-design studies. Journal of School Psychology, 63, 77–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2017.03.006.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Kuby, A. K., McLean, N., & Allen, K. (2015). Validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM) with non-clinical adolescents. Mindfulness, 6(6), 1448–1455.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-015-0418-3.Google Scholar
  42. Laurent, J., Catanzaro, S. J., Joiner, T. E., Jr., Rudolph, K. D., Potter, K. I., Lambert, S., & Gathright, T. (1999). A measure of positive and negative affect for children: scale development and preliminary validation. Psychological Assessment, 11(3), 326–338.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.11.3.326.Google Scholar
  43. Lenroot, R. K., & Giedd, J. N. (2006). Brain development in children and adolescents: insights from anatomical magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(6), 718–729.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.06.001.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Li, C.-H. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Martínez-Loredo, V., Fernández-Hermida, J. R., Fernández-Artamendi, S., Carballo, J. L., & García-Rodríguez, O. (2015). Spanish adaptation and validation of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale for early adolescents (BIS-11-A). International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, 15(3), 274–282.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijchp.2015.07.002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Martínez-Monteagudo, M. C., Fernández, J. M. G., & Saura, C. J. I. (2013). Relaciones entre ansiedad escolar, ansiedad rasgo, ansiedad estado y depresión en una muestra de adolescentes españoles. International Journal of Psychology and Psychological Therapy, 13(1), 47–64.Google Scholar
  47. McDonald, R. P., & Krane, W. R. (1979). A Monte Carlo study of local identifiability and degrees of freedom in the asymptotic likelihood ratio test. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 32(1), 121–132.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1979.tb00757.x.Google Scholar
  48. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543.Google Scholar
  49. Meyers, L. S., Gamst, G., & Guarino, A. J. (2013). Applied multivariate research: design and interpretation (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
  50. Muñiz, J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1996). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests. Papeles del psicólogo, 66(1), 63–70.Google Scholar
  51. Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (2012). Mplus statistical modeling software: Release 7.0. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  52. Pallozzi, R., Wertheim, E., Paxton, S., & Ong, B. (2017). Trait mindfulness measures for use with adolescents: a systematic review. Mindfulness, 8(1), 110–125.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0567-z.Google Scholar
  53. Patton, J. H., Stanford, M. S., & Barratt, E. S. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt impulsiveness scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51(6), 768–774.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Pepping, C. A., Duvenage, M., Cronin, T. J., & Lyons, A. (2016). Adolescent mindfulness and psychopathology: the role of emotion regulation. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 302–307.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.089.Google Scholar
  55. Raes, F., Pommier, E., Neff, K. D., & Van Gucht, D. (2011). Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18(3), 250–255.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.702.Google Scholar
  56. Rindskopf, D. (1984). Structural equation models: empirical identification, Heywood cases, and related problems. Sociological Methods & Research, 13(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0049124184013001004.Google Scholar
  57. Royuela-Colomer, E., & Calvete, E. (2016). Mindfulness facets and depression in adolescents: rumination as a mediator. Mindfulness, 7(5), 1092–1102.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-016-0547-3.Google Scholar
  58. Saggino, A., Bartoccini, A., Sergi, M. R., Romanelli, R., Macchia, A., & Tommasi, M. (2017). Assessing mindfulness on samples of Italian children and adolescents: the validation of the Italian version of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure. Mindfulness, 8(5), 1364–1372.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-017-0712-3.Google Scholar
  59. Sandín, B. (2003). Escalas PANAS de afecto positivo y negativo para niños y adolescentes (PANASN). Revista de psicopatología y psicología clínica, 8(2), 173–182.  https://doi.org/10.5944/rppc.vol.8.num.2.2003.3953.Google Scholar
  60. Sauer, S., Walach, H., Schmidt, S., Hinterberger, T., Lynch, S., Büssing, A., & Kohls, N. (2013). Assessment of mindfulness: review on state of the art. Mindfulness, 4(1), 3–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-012-0122-5.Google Scholar
  61. Schneider, W. (2008). The development of metacognitive knowledge in children and adolescents: major trends and implications for education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 2(3), 114–121.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2008.00041.x.Google Scholar
  62. Schonert-Reichl, K. A., Oberle, E., Lawlor, M. S., Abbott, D., Thomson, K., Oberlander, T. F., & Diamond, A. (2015). Enhancing cognitive and social–emotional development through a simple-to-administer mindfulness-based school program for elementary school children: a randomized controlled trial. Developmental Psychology, 51(1), 52–66.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038454.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Seisdedos, N. (1990). Adaptación española del cuestionario: State-trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAIC). Madrid: TEA.Google Scholar
  64. Spielberger, C. D. (1973). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  65. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  66. Tan, L., & Martin, G. (2013). Taming the adolescent mind: preliminary report of a mindfulness-based psychological intervention for adolescents with clinical heterogeneous mental health diagnoses. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 18(2), 300–312.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104512455182.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Tan, L. B., & Martin, G. (2016). Mind full or mindful: a report on mindfulness and psychological health in healthy adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 21(1), 64–74.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2012.709174.Google Scholar
  68. Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Timmerman, M. E., & Lorenzo-Seva, U. (2011). Dimensionality assessment of ordered polytomous items with parallel analysis. Psychological Methods, 16(2), 209–220.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023353.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Van Dam, N. T., van Vugt, M. K., Vago, D. R., Schmalzl, L., Saron, C. D., Olendzki, A., & Gorchov, J. (2018). Mind the hype: a critical evaluation and prescriptive agenda for research on mindfulness and meditation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(1), 36–61.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617709589.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (1998). Affects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery. Psychological Methods, 3(2), 231–251.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.2.231.Google Scholar
  72. Viñas, F., Malo, S., González, M., Navarro, D., & Casas, F. (2015). Assessing mindfulness on a sample of Catalan-speaking Spanish adolescents: validation of the Catalan version of the child and adolescent mindfulness measure. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 18, E46.  https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2015.48.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Waters, L., Barsky, A., Ridd, A., & Allen, K. (2015). Contemplative education: a systematic, evidence-based review of the effect of meditation interventions in schools. Educational Psychology Review, 27(1), 103–134.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-014-9258-2.Google Scholar
  74. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Zoogman, S., Goldberg, S. B., Hoyt, W. T., & Miller, L. (2015). Mindfulness interventions with youth: a meta-analysis. Mindfulness, 6(2), 290–302.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0260-4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos García-Rubio
    • 1
    Email author
  • Raquel Rodríguez-Carvajal
    • 1
  • Alvaro Ignacio Langer
    • 2
    • 3
  • David Paniagua
    • 1
  • Philipp Steinebach
    • 4
  • Catherine Iris Andreu
    • 2
    • 5
  • María Dolores Vara
    • 5
  • Ausiás Cebolla
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Biological and Health Psychology, Faculty of PsychologyUniversidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain
  2. 2.Millennium Institute for Depression and Personality Research (MIDAP)SantiagoChile
  3. 3.School of Psychology, Faculty of MedicineUniversidad Austral de ChileValdiviaChile
  4. 4.School of Applied PsychologyZurich University of Applied SciencesWinterthurSwitzerland
  5. 5.Faculty of PsychologyUniversitat de ValènciaValénciaSpain

Personalised recommendations