Advertisement

Numerical Investigations of Stall Development in a Transonic Axial Compressor Stage

  • Murat Ozkara
  • Umran Ercetin
  • Nimeti DonerEmail author
  • Fatih SenEmail author
Article
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, stall development on a previously tested axial compressor stage called NASA stage 35 was investigated by computational fluid dynamics software for the purpose of overcoming computational difficulties resulting from the secondary flow and tip vortex, and the results were compared to experimental data and other relevant studies in the literature. In the computational model, the k-epsilon turbulence model and the high-resolution scheme were employed to cope with flow uncertainties and to spatial discretization of the nonlinear equations, respectively. The pressure and temperature distributions obtained from k-epsilon turbulence model were in good agreement with experimental results. However, the performance map of the compressor showed that the error values between predicted total pressure ratios and experimental results increased as the compressor reached stall due to shockwave unsteadiness.

Keywords

Axial compressors CFD k-epsilon turbulence model Stall Transonic flow 

Notes

References

  1. 1.
    Dahlby L.-M., 2016,. Investigation of aerodynamic performance predictions by CFD using transition models and comparison with test data, Master of Science in Engineering Technology, Space Engineering, Luleå University of Technology, Trollhättan.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Acharya R., 2016, Investigation of differences in Ansys solvers CFX and fluent, Master thesis in Fluid Dynamics, Mechanics Institution, Royal Institute of Technology, KTH Stockholm.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Abdelsalam, S. I., & Vafai, K. (2017). Particulate suspension effect on peristaltically induced unsteady pulsatile flow in a narrow artery: blood flow model. Mathematical Biosciences, 283, 91–105.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abdelsalam, S. I., & Bhatti, M. M. (2018). The impact of impinging TiO2 nanoparticles in Prandtl nanofluid along with endoscopic and variable magnetic field effects on peristaltic blood flow. Multidiscipline Modeling in Materials and Structures, 14(3), 530–548.  https://doi.org/10.1108/MMMS-08-2017-0094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmed, N., Shah, N. A., Ahmad, B., Shah, S. I. A., Ulhaq, S., & Rahimi-Gorji, M. (2018). Transient MHD convective flow of fractional nanofluid between vertical plates. Journal of Applied and Computational Mechanics.  https://doi.org/10.22055/JACM.2018.26947.1364.
  6. 6.
    Rahimi-Gorji, M., Gorji, T. B., & Gorji-Bandpy, M. (2016). Details of regional particle deposition and airflow structures in a realistic model of human tracheobronchial airways: two-phase flow simulation. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 74, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pourmehran, O., Rahimi-Gorji, M., Gorji-Bandpy, M., & Gorji, T. B. (2015). Simulation of magnetic drug targeting through tracheobronchial airways in the presence of an external non-uniform magnetic field using Lagrangian magnetic particle tracking. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 393, 380–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rahimi-Gorji, M., Pourmehran, O., Gorji-Bandpy, M., & Ganji, D. D. (2015). An analytical investigation on unsteady motion of vertically falling spherical particles in non-Newtonian fluid by collocation method. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 6(2), 531–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reid, L. and Moore, R. D., Design and overall performance of four highly-loaded, high speed inlet stages for an advanced, high pressure ratio core compressor, NASA TP-1337, 1978.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reid, L. and Moore, R. D., Performance of a single-stage axial-flow transonic compressor with rotor and stator aspect ratios of 1.19 and 1.26, respectively, and with design pressure ratio of 1.82, NASA TP-1338, 1978.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hale, A., & O’Brien, W. O. (1998). A three-dimensional turbine engine analysis compressor code (TEACC) for steady state inlet distortion, J. Turbomachinery, 120, 422–430.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2841733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hale, A., Davis, M., & Sirbaugh, J. (2004). A numerical simulation capability for analysis of aircraft inlet–engine compatibility, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2004, Power for land, sea, and air, June 14–17, Vienna, Austria, ASME Paper GT-2004-53473.  https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2004-53473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Longley, J. P. (1997). Calculating the flowfield of high-speed multi-stage compressors, International Gas Turbine & Aeroengine Congress & Exhibition, June 2-5, Orlando, Florida, ASME Paper 97-GT-468.  https://doi.org/10.1115/97-GT-468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Demargne, A. A. J., & Longley, J. P. (1997). Comparisons between measured and calculated stall development in four high-speed multi-stage compressors, International Gas Turbine & Aeroengine Congress & Exhibition, June 2-5, Orlando, Florida, ASME Paper 97-GT-467.  https://doi.org/10.1115/97-GT-467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lindau, J. W., & Owen, A. K. (1997). Nonlinear quasi-three dimensional modeling of rotating stall and surge, 33rd Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit Seattle, WA, U.S.A., AIAA Paper 97-2772.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1997-2772.
  16. 16.
    Chima, R. V. (2009). SWIFT code assessment for two similar transonic compressors, 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 5-8 January 2009, Orlando, Florida, AIAA 2009-1058.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-1058.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chima, R. V. (2006). A three-dimensional unsteady CFD model of compressor stability, Proceedings of GT2006, ASME Turbo Expo 2006:Power for Land, Sea, and Air, May 8-11, 2006, Barcelona, Spain, ASME paper, GT-2006-90040.  https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2006-90040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gong, Y., Tan, C. S., Gordon, K. A., & Greitzer, E. M. (1998). A computational model for short wavelength stall inception and development in multistage compressors, ASME Paper 98-GT-476. Journal of Turbomachinery, 121(4), 726–734.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2836726.
  19. 19.
    Gong, Y., 1998, A computational model for rotating stall inception and inlet distortions in multistage compressors, Ph. D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2836726
  20. 20.
    Takata, H., & Nagano, S. (1972). Nonlinear analysis of rotating stall. Journal of Engineering for Power, 279–293.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3445683.
  21. 21.
    Hsiao, E., Naimi, M., Lewis, J. P., Dalbey, K., Gong, Y., & Tan, C. (2001). Actuator duct model of turbomachinery components for powered-nacelle Navier-Stokes calculations. Journal of Propulsion and Power, 17(4), 919–927.  https://doi.org/10.2514/2.5825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Escuret, J. F., & Garnier, V. (1994). Numerical simulations of surge and rotating stall in multi-stage axial-flow compressors, 30th Joint Propulsion Conference and Exhibit Indianapolis, IN, U.S.A., AIAA Paper (pp. 94–3202).  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1994-3202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stewart, M. E. M. (1995). Axisymmetric aerodynamic numerical analysis of a turbofan engine, ASME 1995 International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition Volume 2: Aircraft Engine; Marine; Microturbines and Small Turbomachinery Houston, Texas, USA, June 5–8, 1995, ASME Paper 95-GT-338.  https://doi.org/10.1115/95-GT-338.
  24. 24.
    Herrick, G. P., Hathaway, M. D., & Chen, J. (2009). Unsteady full annulus simulations of a transonic axial compressor stage, 47th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting including The New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 5-8 January 2009, Orlando, Florida, NASA/TM—2009-215604.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2009-1059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zhu, J., & Shih, T. H. (1997). CMOTT turbulence module for NPARC, Tech. Rep. CR–204143. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Weigl, H. J., Paduano, J. D., Frechette, L. G., Epstein, A. H., Greitzer, E. M., Bright, M. M., & Strazisar, A. J. (1998). Active stabilization of rotating stall and surge in a transonic single stage axial compressor. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 120, 625–636.  https://doi.org/10.1115/97-GT-411. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yamada K., Furukawa M., Nakano T., Inoue M., Funazaki K. (2004). Unsteady three-dimensional flow phenomena due to breakdown of tip leakage vortex in a transonic axial compressor rotor, Proceedings of ASME Turbo Expo 2004, Power for land, sea, and air, June 14–17, Vienna, Austria, GT2004-53745, pp. 515–526.  https://doi.org/10.1115/GT2004-53745.
  28. 28.
    Gourdain, N., Burguburu, S., Leboeuf, F., & Michon, G. J. (2010). Simulation of rotating stall in a whole stage of an axial compressor. Computers & Fluids, 39(9), 1644–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tan, C. S., Day, I., Morris, S., & Wadia, A. (2010). Spike-type compressor stall inception, detection, and control. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 42, 275–300.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-121108-145603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cornelius, C., Biesinger, T., Galpin, P., & Braune, A. (2014). Experimental and computational analysis of a multistage axial compressor including stall prediction by steady and transient CFD methods. ASME Journal of Turbomachinery, 136, 061013.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4025583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xiang, J., Schlüter, J. U., & Duan, F. (2014). CFD validation and analysis of a single-stage axial compressor. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 629, 109–118.  https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.629.109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Niazi S., 2000, Numerical simulation of rotating stall and surge alleviation in axial compressors, Ph. D. Dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Abdelsalam, S. I., & Bhatti, M. M. (2018). The study of non-Newtonian nanofluid with hall and ion slip effects on peristaltically induced motion in a non-uniform channel. The Royal Society of Chemistry Advances, 8, 7904.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ra13188g.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Abdelsalam, S. I., & Vafai, K. (2017). Combined effects of magnetic field and rheological properties on the peristaltic flow of a compressible fluid in a microfluidic channel. European Journal of Mechanics - B/Fluids, 65, 398–411.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2017.02.002.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Menter, F. R. (1994). Two equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering application. AIAA Journal, 32(8), 1598–1605.  https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Harten, A. (1983). High resolution schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics, 49, 357–393.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(83)90136-5.MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ansys CFX-Solver Theory Guide / ANSYS Inc., Southpointe, 2006.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Barth, T. J., & Jesperson, D. C. (1989). The design and application of upwind schemes on unstructured meshes, 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting Reno, NV, U.S.A., AIAA Paper 89-0366.  https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1989-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mechanical Engineering DepartmentDumlupinar UniversityKutahyaTurkey
  2. 2.Biochemistry DepartmentDumlupinar UniversityKutahyaTurkey

Personalised recommendations