Advertisement

Creep Age Forming of Aluminum 7075 Tailor-Machined Blanks: Statistical Modeling, Sensitivity Analysis and Multi-objective Optimization

  • M. SafariEmail author
  • S. Hamidipour
  • S. H. Elahi
  • V. Tahmasbi
Technical Paper

Abstract

In this paper, creep age forming of aluminum 7075 tailor-machined blanks is experimentally studied. As there are two different thicknesses in a single tailor-machined blank, forming properties differ, e.g., spring-back in two sections with different thicknesses. Hence, creep age forming of this kind of blank is more difficult than monolithic plates. In the present work, the effect of two main creep forming process parameters, namely time and temperature, is investigated on spring-back of both thin and thick sections of a tailor-machined blank. First, a model was initiated and then a multi-objective optimization using response surface methodology was proposed considering time and temperature as input and spring-back as output parameters. Finally, a second-order linear regression for spring-back of thin and thick sections was introduced. Evaluation of the developed model and the role of considered parameters on spring-back were investigated using Sobol sensitivity analysis. The results showed that within the range of considered parameters with an increase in both time and temperature, spring-back for both thin and thick sections decreases. Based on the multi-objective optimization of the present work, the best time and temperature for creep age forming in a 7075 tailor-machined blank with minimum spring-back in both thin and thick sections are 19.6 h and 232 °C, respectively.

Keywords

Creep age forming process Al 7075 tailor-machined blank Response surface method Multi-objective optimization Sobol analysis 

Notes

Funding

The authors hereby announce that no part of this study was funded by any institutions and/or organizations.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors also acknowledge no conflict of interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Nguyen N T, Hariharan K, Chakraborti N, Barlat F, and Lee M G, Steel Res Int 86 (2015) 1391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lyu F, Li Y, Huang X, Shi Z, Zeng Y, and Lin J, J Manuf Processes 37 (2019) 232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Liu C, Liu Y, Li S, Ma L, Zhao X, and Wang Q, Mater Sci Eng A 725 (2018) 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Li Y, Shi Z, Lin J, Yang Y, Saillard P, and Said R, Int J Mach Tools Manuf 132 (2018) 113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li Y, Shi Z, Lin J, Yang Y, Saillard P, and Said R, Int J Mach Tools Manuf 140 (2018) 228.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Xu Y, Zhan L, Huang M, Shen R, Ma Z, Xu L, Wang K, and Wang X, J Mater Process Technol 255 (2018) 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yang Y, and Zhan L, Proc Manuf 15 (2018) 1000.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zimmermann F, Brosius A, Beyer R E, Standfuß J, Jahn A, and Banke D, Proc Manuf 15 (2018) 1008.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Yang Y, Zhan L, Shen R, Yin X, Li X, Li W, Huang M, and He D, Mater Sci Eng A 683 (2017) 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ershadi Khamneh M, Askari-Paykani M, Shahverdi H, Hadavi S M M, and Emami M, Measurement 88 (2016) 278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zhan L H, Tan S G, Yang Y L, Huang M H, Shen W Q, and Zhao X, Adv Mech Eng (2014) http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/707628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhan L H, Tan S G, Huang M H, and Xu H Y, Mater. Mech. Eng 01 (2013) 63.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang Y K, Wan M, Yang Z H, Huang X, and Zeng Y S, J Plast Eng 20 (2013) 83.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jia S F, Zhan L H, and Xu X L, J Plast Eng 20 (2013) 80.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhan L H, Xu X L, Jiao S F, and Yang L, Chin J Nonferrous Met 23 (2013) 2104.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang J, Deng Y L, Li S Y, Chen Z Y, and Zhang X M, Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 23 (2013) 1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhan L H, Tan S G, Huang M H, and Niu J, Adv Mater Res 457–458 (2012) 122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Li J C, Zeng L F, Liu D H, and Zuo J, J Plast Eng 19 (2012) 68.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jeshvaghani R A, Zohdi H, Shahverdi H R, Bozorg M, and Hadavi S, Mater Charact 73 (2012) 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Inforzato D J, Costa P R, Fernandez F F, Travessa D N, Mater Res 15 (2012) 596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lv Y, and Gang Z, China Met Form Equip Manuf Technol 01 (2011) 87.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tahmasbi V, Ghoreishi M, and Zolfaghari M, J Eng Med 231 (2017) 1012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Institute of Metals - IIM 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringArak University of TechnologyArākIran

Personalised recommendations