Effect of Ternary Addition of Cobalt on Shape Memory Characteristics of Ni–Ti Alloys

  • S. Santosh
  • V. SampathEmail author
Technical Paper


Shape memory alloys (SMAs) are a class of metallic materials that exhibit two unique characteristics: shape memory effect and superelasticity. These alloys are capable of responding to stimuli like heat when they are subjected to thermo-mechanical treatment. Therefore, these alloys have proven their utility in many areas and are very common in applications such as sensors and actuators, various life-saving medical devices and stents. Ni–Ti alloys are in the forefront with respect to shape memory materials and have been employed in many practical applications. In recent times, there have been attempts to improve their shape memory characteristics, mechanical properties and corrosion resistance through alloying addition, thermo-mechanical processing, severe plastic deformation, etc. Among these methods, ternary alloying addition seems to have a greater effect in comparison with other methods. In this work, cobalt was added to a binary Ni–Ti alloy and its influence on transformation temperatures and microstructure was studied. Ternary NiTiCo alloys with varying cobalt contents (1, 2, 3 at.%) were prepared by vacuum induction melting, and the alloys were then hot-rolled and homogenized. Various characterization techniques such as differential scanning calorimetry, transmission electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction were employed to study the transformation temperatures, the microstructure and the phase structure of the ternary SMAs. It was seen that cobalt addition decreased the phase transformation temperatures and influenced the functional properties of the binary Ni–Ti alloy. Elaborate results have been discussed in this paper.


Shape memory alloys Ternary alloying NiTiCo Transformation temperatures 



  1. 1.
    Wayman C M, MRS Bull 18 (1993) 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Otsuka K, and Wayman C M (eds), Shape Memory Materials, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Humbeeck J V, Mater Sci Eng A-Struct 273–275 (1999) 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Otsuka K, and Ren X, Intermetallics 7 (1999) 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhang Z, Frenzel J, Neuking K, and Eggeler G, Mater Trans 47 (2006) 661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zarinejad M, and Liu Y, Adv Funct Mater 18 (2008) 2789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bozzolo G, Noebe R D, and Mosca H O, J Alloys Compd 389 (2005) 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fasching A, Norwich D, Geiser T, and Paul G W, J Mater Eng Perform 20 (2011) 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Manjeri R M, Norwich D, Sczerzenie F, Huang X, Long M, and Ehrlinspiel M, J Mater Eng Perform 25 (2016) 894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    El-Bagoury N, Met Mater Int 22 (2016) 468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Goryczka T, Mater Sci Eng A-Struct 481–482 (2008) 676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Isola L, Roca P L, Sobrero C, Fuster V, Vermaut P, and Malarría J, Mater Des 107 (2016) 511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Frenzel J, Zhang Z, Neuking K, and Eggeler G, J Alloys Compd 385 (2004) 214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Goryczka T, Ochin P, and Lelatko J, Mater Sci Forum 738–739 (2013) 348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Institute of Metals - IIM 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Metallurgical and Materials EngineeringIIT MadrasChennaiIndia

Personalised recommendations