Advertisement

Transactions of the Indian Institute of Metals

, Volume 71, Issue 10, pp 2465–2478 | Cite as

Response Surface Methodology Based Modelling of Friction–Wear Behaviour of Al6061/9%Gr/WC MMCs and Its Optimization Using Fuzzy GRA

  • Gangadhara Rao Ponugoti
  • Gopala Krishna Alluru
  • Pandu R. Vundavilli
Technical Paper
  • 31 Downloads

Abstract

In the present paper an attempt is made to establish a response surface methodology based non-linear mathematical model for the friction–wear behaviour of as cast and heat-treated Al6061/9%Gr/WC (with WC at 1, 2 and 3 wt%) metal matrix composites (MMCs). During experimentation, the process parameters, namely percentage of WC, load, sliding distance and sliding velocity have been considered as inputs and wear loss (WL) and coefficient of friction (COF) have been treated as the responses. Results reveal that, for as-cast Al6061/9%Gr/WC hybrid composites, the WL decreases with increase in percentage of WC and increases with the increase in load, sliding distance and sliding velocity. Moreover, COF decreases with increase in percentage of WC and sliding velocity and increases with increase in the load and sliding distance. It has also been observed that the WL and COF of heat treated composites are found to be less than the as cast MMCs. Further, fuzzy grey relational analysis (GRA) has been used to perform the multi objective optimization of the said wear process. Finally, the evidence of wear phenomenon for the said composites have been examined with the help of scanning electron microscopy.

Keywords

Al6061 Tungsten carbide (WC) Wear loss Coefficient of friction Fuzzy GRA 

References

  1. 1.
    Chawla K K, Composite Materials Science and Engineering, Springer, New York (2013).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jones R M, Mechanics of Composite Materials, 2nd edn, Taylor & Francis, Inc., Boca Raton (1999).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Andreas M, and Javier L, Annu Rev Mater Res 40 (2010) 243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kaushik N, and Singhaal S, Int J Eng Technol 9 (2017) 3201.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Soni S, and Pandey A, Int J Adv Mech Eng 4 (2014) 767.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fogagnolo J B, Robert M H, and Torraba J M, Mater Sci Eng 426 (2006) 85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ghauri K M, Ali L, Ahmed A, Ahmed R, Din K M, Chaudhary I A, and Karim R A, Pak J Eng Appl Sci 12 (2013) 102.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vasanth Kumar R, Keshavamurthy R, and Perugu C S, in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol 149 (2016), p 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    Radhika N, and Raghu R, J Tribol 139 (2017) 041602-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shouvik G, Prasanth S, and Goutam S, J Miner Mater Charact Eng 11 (2012) 1085.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Basavarajappa S, Chandramohan G, Mahadevan A, Thangavelu M, Subramanian R, and Gopalakrishnan P, Wear 262 (2007) 1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prashanth D G, Karthick C M, Hasan A M, and Amarnath K C J, Int J Sci Eng Res 6 (2015) 740.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Umanath K, Palani Kumar K, and Selvamani S T, Compos Part B 53 (2013) 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kumar R, and Dhiman S, Mater Des 50 (2013) 351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singh G, Karla C S, and Singh H, Int J Technol Res Eng 2 (2015) 853.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Altimkok N, Ozsert I, and Findik F, Acta Phys Pol A, 124 (2013) 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramakoteswara Rao V, Ramanaiah N, and Sarkar M M M, J Mater Res Technol 5 (2016) 377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reddy P S, Kesavan R, and Ramnath B V, Silicon,  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12633-016-9479-8 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ganeshan V G, Def Technol XX (2015) 1.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Selvi S, and Rajasekar E, J Mech Sci Technol 29 (2015) 785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sharma P, Khanduja D, and Sharma S, J Mater Res Technol 5 (2016) 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Baradeswaran A, Vettivel S C, Perumal A E, Selvakumar N, and Issac R F, Mater Des 63 (2014) 620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hemanth Kumar T R, Swami R P, Shekar C, Indian J Eng Mater Sci 20 (2013) 329.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pradeep S, Dinesh K, and Sharma S, Mater Res Technol 5 (2016) 29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zitoun E, and Reddy A C, in 6th International Conference on Materials and Manufacturing Processes, Hyderabad, India (2008), p 115.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thandalam S K, Ramanathan S, and Sundarrajan S, J Mater Res Technol 4 (2015) 333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Canakci A, and Arslan F, Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63 (2012) 785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Pramanik A, Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 26 (2016) 348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Suresh P, Marimuthu K, Ranganathan S, and Rajmohan T, Trans Nonferrous Metals Soc China 24 (2014) 2805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rajmohan T, Palanikumar K, and Prakash S, Compos Part B Eng 50 (2013) 297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kumar V, and Ramanujam R, Int J Innov Sci Eng Technol 2 (2015) 288.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Raju R S S, and Rao G S, Tribol India 39 (2017) 364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Dewangan S, Gangopadhyay S, and Biswas C K, Eng Sci Technol Int J 18 (2015) 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Pratihar D K, Soft Computing: Fundamentals and Applications, Alpha Science International Limited, Oxford (2015).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Indian Institute of Metals - IIM 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringJNT UniversityKakinadaIndia
  2. 2.School of Mechanical SciencesIIT BhubaneswarBhubaneswarIndia

Personalised recommendations