Environmental Earth Sciences

, 78:641 | Cite as

Identifying sedimentation processes in the Coata River, Altiplano of the Puno department, Peru, by the 210Pb method

  • Fanny R. M. Matamet
  • Daniel M. BonottoEmail author
Original Article


The rivers, lakes and dam sediment analyses are able to predict the back conditions of these ecosystems and determine how the environment changed as a result of anthropogenic activities. In this way they can be used as important management tools of water resources. The activity and distribution of the 210Pb in the sedimentary record resulted in a study that sought to evaluate the sedimentation rate chronology in three sedimentary profiles in the Coata River, Southern Peru, in order to follow historical changes in the past 100–150 years. Beside this, the geochemical distribution of the trace metals Ba, Zn, Cu, Cr, Ni and Co was evaluated in the sediments, allowing investigation of their potential contamination and impact over the river. The research involved the determination of some specific aspects of the sediments such as the main oxides, organic matter and granulometry, as well the physicochemical analysis of the surface waters, with the objective of assisting the interpretation of the results obtained in the sediments. The dating process was based on the 210Pb method and the Constant Flux: Constant Sedimentation Model—CF: CS was adequate. It allowed determination of distinct sedimentation rates in each profile, between 0.36 and 0.74 g/cm2 year, corresponding to linear sedimentation rates of 0.28–0.66 cm/year. The evaluation of the excess/unsupported 210Pb data permitted characterizing sediments with maximum ages between 36 and 96 years. This geochemical study showed that the recorded metals in the sediments may be a consequence of more recent anthropogenic activities in the environment and that the 210Pb is a useful method to evaluate the sedimentation history.


Sedimentation rate 210Pb dating Sediments Coata River 



The authors thank CAPES (Coordination for the Development of Graduate People) in Brazil for the scholarship to FRMM, as well UNESPetro for the infrastructure access.


  1. Adams JA, Gasparini P (1970) Gamma ray spectrometry of rocks. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. Agudo EG, Penteado AC, Batalha B-HL (1987) Guide for sampling and preservation of water samples. CETESB, São Paulo, p 150 (in Portuguese) Google Scholar
  3. Aiken GR, Mgnight D, Wershw RL, Marccarhy (1985) Humic substances in soil, sediment and water. Wiley, New York, p 691Google Scholar
  4. Álvarez-Iglesias P, Quintana B, Rubio B, Pérez-Arlucea M (2007) Sedimentation rates and trace metal input history in intertidal sediments from San Simón Bay (Ría de Vigo, NW Spain) derived from 210Pb and 137Cs chronology. J Environ Radioact 98:229–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arango CHL (2001) Watersheds: conceptual bases-characterization-planning-administration. Monograph, Tolima University, Ibagué, 359p (in Spanish) Google Scholar
  6. Apaza QH (2001) Juliaca’s historical themes. Cultural Historical Compendium. Juliaca: Author’s Edition. Accessed 20 Oct 2018 (in Spanish)
  7. Appleby PG (2001) Chronostratigraphic techniques in recent sediments. In: Last WM, Smol JP (eds) Tracking environmental change using lake sediments v. 1: basin analysis, coring and chronological techniques. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 171–201Google Scholar
  8. Appleby PG (2008) Three decades of dating recent sediments by fallout radionucleids: a review. Holocene 18:83–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Appleby PG, Oldfield F (1992) Applications of lead—210Pb to sedimentation studies. In: Ivanovich M, Harmon RS (eds) Uranium-series disequilibrium. Oxford Science, New York, pp 731–778Google Scholar
  10. Baptista-Neto JA, Gingele FX, Leipe T, Brehme I (2006) Spatial distribution of heavy metals in surficial sediments from Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Environ Geol 49:1051–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bengtsson L, Enell M (1986) Chemical analysis. In: Berglund BE (ed) Handbook of holocene paleoecology and paleohidrology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 423–451Google Scholar
  12. Bonotto DM, Garcia-Tenorio R (2014) A comparative evaluation of the CF: CS and CRS models in 210Pb chronological studies applied to hydrographic basins in Brazil. Appl Radiat Isot 92:58–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bonotto DM, Lima JLN (2006) 210Pb-derived chronology in sediment cores evidencing the anthropogenic occupation history at Corumbataí River basin, Brazil. Environ Geol 50(4):595–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burone LMM, Mahiques RCL, Figueira F, García-Rodríguez P, Sprechmann Y, Alvarez P, Muniz E, Brugnoli N, Venturini SHS, Centurion V (2011) Paleoenvironmental evolution of the Bay of Montevideo. In: García-Rodríguez F (ed) The Holocene in the coastal area of Uruguay. University of the Republic, Montevideo, pp 197–227 (in Spanish) Google Scholar
  15. Cearreta A, Irabien MJ, Arozamena JG (2018) Recent anthropogenic transformation of the Pasaia bay (Guipuzcoa, N. Spain): multiproxy analysis of its sedimentary record. Geogaceta 64:107–110Google Scholar
  16. Celis-Hernández O, Rosales-Hoz L, Cundy AB, Carranza-Edwards A, Croudace IW, Hernandez-Hernandez H (2018) Historical trace element accumulation in marine sediments from the Tamaulipas shelf, Gulf of Mexico: an assessment of natural vs anthropogenic inputs. Sci Total Environ 622–623:325–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chester R, Thomas A, Lin FJ, Basahan AS, Jacinto G (1988) The solid state speciation of copper in surface water particles and oceanic sediments. Mar Chem 24:261–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cochran JK, Hirschberg DJ, Wang J, Dere C (1998) Atmospheric deposition of metals to coastal waters (Long Island Sound, New York U.S.A.): evidence from saltmarsh deposits. Estuar Coast Shelf S 46(4):503–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cooper LW, Grebmeier JM, Larsen IL, Solis C, Olsen CR (1995) Evidence for redistribution of 137Cs in Alaskan tundra, lake, and marine sediments. Sci Total Environ 160–161:295–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dean WEJR (1974) Determination of carbonate and organic matter in calcareous sediments and sedimentary rocks by loss on ignition: comparison with other methods. J Sed Petrol 44:242–248Google Scholar
  21. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (1992) Standardized methods for the analysis of drinking water and wastewater. Díaz de Santos, Madrid. Accessed 15 May 2019 (in Spanish)
  22. González-Verdugo JA, Salcedo ERS, Espinoza JA, Martínez MM (2015) Recent sediment dating using radioactive isotopes in the Río Verde, in the state of Oaxaca, Mexico. Academic Magazine of the Faculty of Engineering, vol 19(3) Autonomous University of Yucatan, Yucatan, (in Spanish) Google Scholar
  23. GP (Planning Management) (2014) Provincial Municipality of San Roman. Institutional Development Plan SG PPCT. Accessed 20 Dec 2018 (in Spanish)
  24. Guerrero BC, Zavala BC (2006) Influence of the mining activity at Ramis River basin—Puno. In: Geological Society of Peru (ed) Proc. XIII Peruvian Geological Congress, Geological Society of Peru, Lima, pp 127–130 (in Spanish) Google Scholar
  25. Guzmán-Colis G, Ramírez-López EM, Thalasso F, Rodríguez-Narciso S, Guerrero-Barrera AL, Avelar-González FJ (2011) Evaluation of contaminants in water and sediments of the San Pedro River in the state of Aguascalientes. Univ Sci 27(1):17–32 (in Spanish) Google Scholar
  26. Heiri O, Lotter AF, Lemcke G (2001) Loss on ignition as a method for estimating organic and carbonate content in sediments: reproducibility of results. J Paleolimnol 25:101–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hülse P, Bentley SJ (2012) A 210Pb sediment budget and granulometric record of sediment fluxes in a subarctic deltaic system: the Great Whale River, Canada. Estuar Coast Shelf S 109:41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Humphries MS, Kindness A, Ellery WN, Hughes JC, Benitez-Nelson CR (2010) 137Cs and 210Pb derived sediment accumulation rates and their role in the long-term development of the Mkuze River floodplain, South Africa. Geomorphology 119:88–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ingemmet (2005) Geology of the Western Cordillera and Altiplano west of Lake Titicaca in southern Peru. Ingemmet, Lima, p 94 (in Spanish) Google Scholar
  30. INRENA (National Institute of Natural Resources) (2007) Evaluation of water resources in the cabanillas and lampa river basins. Inrena, Juliaca, 240p (in Spanish) Google Scholar
  31. Licht OAB (2001) Multielementary geochemistry in environmental management: identification and characterization of natural geochemical provinces, anthropic landscape changes, favorable areas for mineral prospecting and health risk regions in the state of Paraná. PhD Thesis, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, 236 pp (in Portuguese) Google Scholar
  32. Long ER, Macdonald DD, Smith SL, Calder FD (1995) Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentration in marine and estuarine sediments. Environ Manage 19:81–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Matamet FRM, Bonotto DM (2018) A 210Pb chronological study in sediments from Poços de Caldas Alkaline Massif (PCAM), Brazil. Appl Radiat Isot 137:108–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Matamet FRM, Bonotto DM (2019) Sedimentation rates at Ramis River, Peruvian Altiplano, South America. Environ Earth Sci 78:230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MINSA (Health Ministry) (2011) Water Quality Regulation for Human Consumption. Prepared by the General Directorate of Environmental Health of the Ministry of Health. Lima. Accessed 15 May 2019 (in Spanish)
  36. Montes Gil (2005) Hydrogeological Resources. Ingemmet, Lima, p 29 (in Spanish) Google Scholar
  37. Navfac (2000) Guide for incorporating bioavailability adjustments into human health and ecological risk assessment at US. Navy and Marine Corps Facilities—Part 1: overview of metals bioavailability. Naval Facilities Engineering Service Center. User’s Guide UG-2041-ENV, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  38. ONERN (National Office of Natural Resources Assessment) (1965) Program of inventory and evaluation of natural resources of the department of Puno. Lima, 225p (in Spanish) Google Scholar
  39. Piper AMA (1944) A grafic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water-analyses. Trans Amer Geophys Union 25:914–928CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pittauerová D, Hettwig B, Fischer HW (2011) Pb-210 sediment chronology: focused on supported lead. Radioprotection 46:277–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. SENAMHI (National Meteorology and Hydrology Service) (2016) Basic guide to general meteorology. The earth and its atmosphere, Lima (in Spanish) Google Scholar
  42. SMA (Environment Secretary) (2009) Environmental and health significance of water and sediment quality variables and analytical and sampling methodologies. SMA, São Paulo (in Portuguese) Google Scholar
  43. Sodré FF, Schnitzler DC, Scheffer EWO, Grassi MT (2012) Evaluating copper behavior in urban surface waters under anthropic influence: a case study from the Iguaçu River, Brazil. Aquat Geochem 18:389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spliethoff H, Hemond H (1996) History of toxic metal discharge to surface waters of the Aberjona watershed. Environ Sci Technol 30:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Terry JP, Lal R, Garimella S (2011) Assessing the utility of 210Pb geochronology for estimating sediment accumulation rates on river floodplains in Fiji. Singap J Trop Geogr 32:102–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Turekian KK, Wedepohl KH (1961) Distribution of the elements in some major units of the earth’s crust. Geol Soc Am Bull 72:175–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Walker M (2005) Quaternary dating methods. Wiley, Chichester, p 286Google Scholar
  48. Wei XU, Shijun NI, Ying GAO, Zeming SHI (2014) Reconstruction of the cadmium contamination history of a river floodplain from maoniuping mining area (China) by gamma ray spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Spectrosc Lett 48:542–552Google Scholar
  49. Xia P, Meng X, Feng A, Yin P, Wang X, Zhang J (2012) 210Pb chronology and trace meta geochemistry in the intertidal sediment of Qinjiang River estuary, China. Ocean Coast Sea Res 11(2):165–173Google Scholar
  50. Zal UWM, Yii MW (2012) Marine radioactivity concentration in the exclusive economic zone of Peninsular Malaysia: 226Ra, 228Ra and 228Ra/226Ra. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 292:183CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Geociências e Ciências Exatas-IGCEUniversidade Estadual Paulista-UNESPRio ClaroBrazil

Personalised recommendations