Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, 78:550 | Cite as

How land use/land cover changes can affect water, flooding and sedimentation in a tropical watershed: a case study using distributed modeling in the Upper Citarum watershed, Indonesia

  • Shantosa Yudha SiswantoEmail author
  • Félix Francés
Original Article
  • 85 Downloads

Abstract

Human activity has produced severe LULC changes within the Upper Citarum watershed and these changes are predicted to continue in the future. With an increase in population parallel to a 141% increment in urban areas, a reduction of rice fields and the replacement of forests with cultivations have been found in the past. Accordingly, LCM model was used to forecast the LULC in 2029. A distributed model called TETIS was implemented in the Upper Citarum watershed to assess the impact of the different historical and future LULC scenarios on its water and sediment cycles. This model was calibrated and validated with different LULCs. For the implementation of the sediment sub-model, it was crucial to use the bathymetric information of the reservoir located at the catchment’s outlet. Deforestation and urbanization have been shown to be the most influential factors affecting the alteration of the hydrological and sedimentological processes in the Upper Citarum watershed. The change of LULC decreases evapotranspiration and as a direct consequence, the water yield increased by 15% and 40% during the periods 1994–2014 and 2014–2029, respectively. These increments are caused by the rise of three components in the runoff: overland flow, interflow and base flow. Apart from that, these changes in LULC increased the area of non-tolerable erosion from 412 km2 in 1994 to 499 km2 in 2029. The mean sediment yield increased from 3.1 Mton yr−1 in the 1994 LULC scenario to 6.7 Mton yr−1 in the 2029 LULC scenario. An increment of this magnitude will be catastrophic for the operation of the Saguling Dam.

Keywords

Citarum Land use change Distributed hydrological modeling Water Erosion 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was partially funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness through the research projects TETISMED (CGL2014-58,127-C3-3-R) and TETISCHANGE (RTI2018-093717-B-I00). The authors are also thankful to the Directorate General of Higher Education of Indonesia (DIKTI) for the Ph.D. funding of the first author.

References

  1. Agatona M, Setiawan Y, Effendi H (2016) Land use/land cover change detection in an urban watershed: a case study of upper Citarum Watershed, West Java Province, Indonesia. Procedia Environ Sci 33:654–660Google Scholar
  2. Agus F, Wahyunto Watung R L, Talaohu SH, Sutono S (2004) Land use changes and their effects on environmental functions of agriculture. Indonesian Soil Research Institute, BogorGoogle Scholar
  3. Alatorre LC, Beguería S, García-Ruiz JM (2010) Regional scale modeling of hill slope sediment delivery: a case study in the Barasona Reservoir watershed (Spain) using WATEM/SEDEM. J Hydrol 391:109–123Google Scholar
  4. Apip K, Takara K, Yamashiki Y, Ibrahim AB (2010) Distributed sediment budget and potential shallow landslide area for investment prioritization in sediment control of catchment : a case study on the Upper Citarum river, Indonesia. Annu Disaster Prev Rest 53:45–59Google Scholar
  5. Arsyad S (2000) Soil and water conservation. IPB pers, Bogor (in Indonesian) Google Scholar
  6. Ayuningtyas DW (2012) Impact analysis of rainfall amount on sedimentation in Upper Citarum watershed with RUSLE2 method. Thesis, Institut Teknologi Bandung (in Indonesian)Google Scholar
  7. Baker TJ, Miller SN (2013) Using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to assess land use impact on water resources in an East African watershed. J Hydrol 486:100–111Google Scholar
  8. Berti A, Tardivo G, Chiaudani A, Rech F, Borin M (2013) Assessing reference evapotranspiration by the Hargreaves method in North-Eastern Italy. Agric Water Manag 140:20–25Google Scholar
  9. Boongaling CGK, Faustino-Eslava DV, Lansigan FP (2018) Modeling land use change impacts on hydrology and the use of landscape metrics as tools for watershed management: the case of an ungauged catchment in the Philippines. Land Use Policy 72:116–128Google Scholar
  10. Bosmans JHC, Van Beek LPH, Sutanudjaja EH, Bierkens MFP (2017) Hydrological impacts of global land cover change and human water use. Earth Syst Sci 21:5603–5626Google Scholar
  11. Bruijnzeel LA (2004) Hydrological functions of tropical forests: not seeing the soil for the trees? Agric Ecosyst Environ 104:185–228Google Scholar
  12. Bussi G, Rodríguez-Lloveras X, Francés F, Benito G, Sánchez-Moya Y, Sopeña A (2013) Sediment yield model implementation based on check dam infill stratigraphy in a semiarid Mediterranean catchment. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 17(8):3339–3354Google Scholar
  13. Bussi G, Francés F, Horel E, López-Tarazón JA, Batalla R (2014a) Modelling the impact of climate change on sediment yield in a highly erodible Mediterranean catchment. J Soils Sediments 14(12):1921–1937Google Scholar
  14. Bussi G, Francés F, Montoya JJ, Julien P (2014b) Distributed sediment yield modelling: importance of initial sediment conditions. Environ Model Softw 58:58–70Google Scholar
  15. Calijuri ML, de Siqueira Castro J, Costa LS, Assemany PP, Alves JE (2015) Impact of land use/land cover changes on water quality and hydrological behavior of an agricultural subwatershed. Environ Earth Sci 74(6):5373–5382Google Scholar
  16. Carpenter TM, Gergakakos KP (2006) Intercomparison of lumped versus distributed hydrologic model ensemble simulations on operational forecast scales. J Hydrol 329(1–2):174–185Google Scholar
  17. Chaidar AN, Soekarno I, Wiyono A, Nugroho J (2017) Spatial analysis of erosion and land criticality of the upstream Citarum watershed. Int J GEOMATE 13(37):133–140Google Scholar
  18. Costa MH (2005) Large-scale hydrological impact of tropical forest conversion. In: Bonell M, Bruijnzeel LA (eds) Forests, water and people in the humid tropics: past, present and future. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 590–597Google Scholar
  19. Cunnane C (1986) Review of statistical models for flood estimation. In: Singh VD (ed) Hydrologic frequency modeling. D. Reidel Pub. Co., Louisiana State University, Baton RougeGoogle Scholar
  20. Dasanto DB, Boer R, Pramudya B, Suharnoto Y (2014) Simple method for assessing spread of flood prone areas under historical and future rainfall in the Upper Citarum watershed. Environ Asia 7(1):104–111Google Scholar
  21. De Graff JV, Sidle RC, Ahmad R, Scatena FN (2012) Recognizing the importance of tropical forests in limiting rainfall-induced debris flows. Environ Earth Sci 67(4):1225–1235Google Scholar
  22. Defra (2004) Making space for water developing a new government strategy for flood and coastal erosion risk management in England. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Dendy FE (1974) Sediment trap efficiency of small reservoirs. J Soil Water Conserv 39(4):278–280Google Scholar
  24. Dharma NGGY, Deguchi C, Yoshitake T (2011) Evaluation of land use plan in Citarum Hulu watershed considering environmental degradation of soil erosion. Miyazaki Univ 40:151–158Google Scholar
  25. Duan Q, Sorooshian S, Gupta VK (1994) Optimal use of the SCE-UA global optimization method for calibrating watershed models. J Hydrol 158(3–4):265–284Google Scholar
  26. Eastman JR (2016) TerrSet manual. Clark University, WorchesterGoogle Scholar
  27. Engelund F, Hansen E (1967) A monograph on sediment transport in alluvial streams. Denmark Tech University, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  28. Fenli Z, Keli T, Cheng-e Z, Xiubin H (2002) Vegetation destruction and restoration effects on soil erosion process on the loess plateau. ISCO conference, pp 208–213Google Scholar
  29. Fonseca R, Pinho C, Oliveira M (2016) The influence of particles recycling on the geochemistry of sediments in a large tropical dam lake in the Amazonian region, Brazil. J S Am Earth Sci 72:328–350Google Scholar
  30. Francés F, Benito J (1995) Floods distributed modeling with few parameters. Ingeniería del Agua 2(4):7–24 (in Spanish) Google Scholar
  31. Francés F, Vélez JI, Vélez JJ (2007) Split—parameter structure for the automatic calibration of distributed hydrological models. J Hydrol 332:226–240Google Scholar
  32. Francés F, Upegui JV, Múnera JC, Medici C, Bussi G et al (2017) Description of the distributed conceptual hydrological model TETIS V.8. Valencia, SpainGoogle Scholar
  33. Garg V, Aggarwal SP, Gupta PK, Nikam BR, Thakur PK, Srivastav SK, Senthil Kumar A (2017) Assessment of land use land cover change impact on hydrological regime of a basin. Environ Earth Sci 76:635Google Scholar
  34. Ghaffari G, Keesstra S, Ghodousi J, Ahmadi H (2010) SWAT-simulated hydrological impact of land-use change in the Zanjanrood basin, Northwest Iran. Hydrol Process 24(7):892–903Google Scholar
  35. Gupta A (2011) Tropical geomorphology. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  36. Gyamfi C, Ndambuki J, Salim R (2016) Hydrological responses to land use/cover changes in the Olifants basin, South Africa. Water 8(12):588Google Scholar
  37. Hammer WI (1981) Second soil conservation consultant report. Centre for Soil Research, BogorGoogle Scholar
  38. Happ M (2014) Impacts of land-cover change and high rainfall on soil erosion among three farms in Cerro Punta, Chiriquí, Panamá. College of Wooster, PanamaGoogle Scholar
  39. Harlan D, Wangsadipura M, Munajat CM (2009) Determination of daily discharge using rainfall runoff GR4 J model for hydrograph unit analysis in Upper Citarum watershed. Jurnal Teknik Sipil 16(1):1–12 (in Indonesian) Google Scholar
  40. Hidayat Y, Murtilaksono K, Wahjunie ED, Panuju DR (2013) The characteristics of river discharge of Citarum Hulu. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia 18(2):109–114 (in Indonesian) Google Scholar
  41. ICALRRD (1993) Optimisation of land usage in watershed report. Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Bogor (in Indonesian) Google Scholar
  42. Ilyas MA (2002) Sedimentation and its impact on Upper Citarum watershed. Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan 3(2):159–164 (in Indonesian) Google Scholar
  43. Julian MM, Fink M, Fischer C, Krause P, Flügel WA (2013) Implementation of J2000 hydrological model in the Western part of Java Island, Indonesia. J MacroTrends Appl Sci 1(1):1–25Google Scholar
  44. Julien PY (2010) Erosion and sedimentation. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  45. Julien P, Rojas R (2002) Upland erosion modeling with CASC2D-SED. Int J Sediment Res 17(4):265–274Google Scholar
  46. Kheereemangkla Y, Shrestha RP, Shrestha S, Jourdain D (2016) Modeling hydrologic responses to land management scenarios for the Chi river sub-basin part II, Northeast Thailand. Environ Earth Sci 75(9):793Google Scholar
  47. Kilinc M, Richardson E (1973) Mechanics of soil erosion from overland flow generated by simulated rainfall. Colorado State University, ColoradoGoogle Scholar
  48. Klemes V (1986) Operational testing of hydrological simulation models. Hydrol Sci J 31(1):13–24Google Scholar
  49. Kottegoda N, Rosso R (2008) Applied statistics for civil and environmental engineers. The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc, MilanGoogle Scholar
  50. Legesse D, Coulumb CV, Gasse F (2003) Hydrological response of a catchment to climate and land use changes in Tropical Africa: case study South Central Ethiopia. J Hydrol 275(1–2):67–85Google Scholar
  51. Leh M, Bajwa S, Chaubey I (2013) Impact of land use change on erosion risk: an integrated remote sensing, geographic information system and modeling methodology. Land Degrad Dev 24:409–421Google Scholar
  52. Loi NK (2010) Assessing the impacts of land use/land cover changes and practices on water discharge and sedimentation using SWAT: case study in Dong Nai watershed—Vietnam. International symposium on geoinformatics for spatial infrastructure development in earth and allied sciences, VietnamGoogle Scholar
  53. Marhaento H, Booij MJ, Hoekstra AY (2018) Hydrological response to future land-use change and climate change in a tropical catchment. Hydrol Sci J 63:1368–1385Google Scholar
  54. Mauliana P (2016) Flood prediction in Citarum using Fuzzy logic from particle Swarm optimization algorithm. Jurnal Informatika 3(2):269–276 (in Indonesian) Google Scholar
  55. Miller CR (1953) Determination of the unit weight of sediment for use in sediment volume computations. Bureau of Reclamation, DenverGoogle Scholar
  56. Ministry of Public Works (2011) TA 7189-INO: Institutional strengthening in the 6 ci’s river basin territory - package B for integrated water resources management (IWRM). Bandung, IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  57. Mir SI, Ismail BS, Tayeb MA (2016) Hydrology and sediment loading in a degrading natural lake system in Malaysia. Environ Earth Sci 75(3):231Google Scholar
  58. Mohammad AG, Adam MA (2010) The impact of vegetative cover type on runoff and soil erosion under different land uses. CATENA 81(2):97–103Google Scholar
  59. Molion LCB (1993) Amazonian rainfall and its variability. In: Bonell M, Hufschmidt MM, Gladwell JS (eds) Hydrology and water management in the humid tropics: hydrological research issues and strategies for water management. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 55–62Google Scholar
  60. Moriasi DN, Arnold JG, Van Liew MW, Bingner RL, Harmel RD, Veith TL (2007) Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Trans ASABE 50(3):885–900Google Scholar
  61. Mushtaq F, Lala MGN (2017) Assessment of hydrological response as a function of LULC change and climatic variability in the catchment of the Wular Lake, J&K, using geospatial technique. Environ Earth Sci 76(22):760Google Scholar
  62. Naabil E, Lamptey BL, Arnault J, Olufayo A, Kunstmann H (2017) Water resources management using the WRF-Hydro modelling system: case-study of the Tono dam in West Africa. J Hydrol Reg Stud 12:196–209Google Scholar
  63. Nagle GN, Fahey TJ, Lassoie JP (1999) Management of sedimentation in tropical watersheds. Environ Manag 23(4):441–452Google Scholar
  64. NASA (1976) U.S. Standard atmosphere, 1976. US Government Printing Office, Washington DC, United States of AmericaGoogle Scholar
  65. Nurliani, Rosada I (2016) Rice-field conversion and its impact on food availability. Agric Agric Sci Procedia 9:40–46Google Scholar
  66. Peña LE, Barrios M, Francés F (2016) Flood quantiles scaling with upper soil hydraulic properties for different land uses at catchment scale. J Hydrol 541:1258–1272Google Scholar
  67. Poerbandono P, Ward PJ, Julian MM (2009) Set up and calibration of a spatial tool for simulating river discharge of Western Java in recent decades: preliminary results and assessments. J Eng Technol Sci 41(1):50–64Google Scholar
  68. Price K (2011) Effects of watershed topography, soils, land use, and climate on baseflow hydrology in humid regions: a review. Phys Geogr 4:465–492Google Scholar
  69. Rogger M, Agnoletti M, Alaoui A, Bathurst JC, Bodner G, Borga M, Chaplot V, Gallart F, Glatzel G, Hall J, Holden J, Holko L, Horn R, Kiss A, Kohnová S, Leitinger G, Lennartz B, Parajka J, Perdigão R, Peth S, Plavcová L, Quinton JN, Robinson M, Salinas JL, Santoro A, Szolgay J, Tron S, van den Akker JJH, Viglione A, Blöschl G (2017) Land use change impacts on floods at the catchment scale: challenges and opportunities for future research. Water Resour Res 53(7):5209–5219Google Scholar
  70. Saxton KE, Rawls WJ (2006) Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1569–1578Google Scholar
  71. Sinha RK, Eldho TI (2018) Effects of historical and projected land use/cover change on runoff and sediment yield in the Netravati river basin, Western Ghats, India. Environ Earth Sci 77(3):1–19Google Scholar
  72. Siswanto SY (2010) Land degradation assessment in West Java Island, Indonesia. Thesis, Ghent UniversityGoogle Scholar
  73. Tarigan SD, Tukayo RK (2013) Impact of land use change and land management on irrigation water supply in Northern Java coast. J Trop Soils 18(2):169–176Google Scholar
  74. Tommi (2011) The impact of land use on hydrological charactersitic in Upper Citarum watershed. Thesis, Bogor Insitute of Agriculture (in Indonesia) Google Scholar
  75. Vaighan AA, Talebbeydokhti N, Bavani AM (2017) Assessing the impacts of climate and land use change on streamflow, water quality and suspended sediment in the Kor River Basin, Southwest of Iran. Environ Earth Sci 76(15):1–18Google Scholar
  76. Verstraeten G, Poesen J, de Vente J, Koninckx X (2003) Sediment yield variability in Spain: a quantitative and semiqualitative analysis using reservoir sedimentation rates. Geomorphology 50:327–348Google Scholar
  77. Wheater H, Evans E (2009) Land use, water management and future flood risk. Land Use Policy 26:251–264Google Scholar
  78. Wibowo M (2011) Statistical model of river discharge and sediment relation, study case in Citarum-Nanjung watershed. Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan 2(3):255–260 (in Indonesian) Google Scholar
  79. Wischmeier WH, Smith DD (1961) A universal equation for predicting rainfall-erosion losses: an aid to conservation farming in humid regions. Agricultural Research Service USDA, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  80. Wischmeier WH, Johnson CB, Cross BV (1971) A soil erodibility nomograph for farmland and construction sites. J Soil Water Conserv 26:189–193Google Scholar
  81. Wohl E, Barros A, Brunsell N, Chappell NA, Coe M, Giambelluca T, Goldsmith S, Harmon R, Hendrickx JMH, Juvik J, Mcdonnell J (2012) The hydrology of the humid tropics. Nat Clim Change 2:655–662Google Scholar
  82. Xu C (2002) Hydrologic models. Uppsala University, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  83. Yu B, Zhang G, Fu X (2015) Transport capacity of overland flow with high sediment concentration. J Hydrol Eng 20(6):1–10Google Scholar
  84. Zare M, Panagopoulos T, Loures L (2017) Simulating the impacts of future land use change on soil erosion in the Kasilian watershed, Iran. Land Use Policy 67:558–572Google Scholar
  85. Zhang L, Dawes WR, Walker GR (2001) Response of mean annual evapotranspiration to vegetation changes at catchment scale. Water Resour Res 37(3):701–708Google Scholar
  86. Zuazo VHD, Pleguezuelo CRR (2008) Soil-erosion and runoff prevention by plant covers. Agron Sustain Dev 28(1):65–86Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Institute of Water and Environmental Engineering (IIAMA)Universitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain
  2. 2.Soil and Water Conservation Laboratory, Department of Soil Science and Land Resource, Faculty of AgricultureUniversitas PadjadjaranSumedangIndonesia

Personalised recommendations