Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, 78:543 | Cite as

Arsenic in the waters and sediments of the Humboldt River, North-Central Nevada, USA: hydrological and mineralogical investigation

  • Shahnewaz MohammadEmail author
  • Regina N. Tempel
Original Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

Arsenic (As) concentration in the Humboldt River (HR) water ranges from 0.012 to 0.06 mg/L, with an average of 0.032 mg/L. The river water is alkaline with pH 8.4–9.3 and oxic with average 12 mg/L of dissolved O2 and + 139 mV of oxidation–reduction potential (ORP). The river water contains an average specific electrical conductivity of 1000 µS/cm with elevated B (average 0.77 mg/L), Li (average 0.15 mg/L), Cl (average 158 mg/L), and SO4 (average 178 mg/L). Factor analysis of river water chemistry and sediment chemistry suggests several physical and geochemical processes operating in three sub-regions: upper, middle and lower reaches of the river. Oxidative dissolution of As-bearing sulfide minerals in the upstream is the primary source of As to the water. Groundwater–surface water interactions affect As concentrations in localized area between the middle and lower HR. Further enrichment of As occurs by evaporation in the lower reach and the terminal sink of the river. Results of sequential extraction analysis and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the riverbed sediments suggest that As distribution in the river sediments is controlled by partitioning to clay minerals and Fe-oxy-hydroxides.

Keywords

Arsenic Humboldt River Nevada Oxidation Ferrihydrite Clay minerals 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge the contribution of Dr. Simon Poulson at Nevada Stable Isotope Laboratory at the Mackay School of Earth Sciences and Engineering (MSESE) of University of Nevada, Reno (UNR) for his help with the stable isotope analysis. We acknowledge the contribution of Dr.Paul J Lechler at Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology for his help with the ICPMS analysis of total elements. We thank to the Department of Chemical and Metallurgical Engineering laboratory at UNR for EDS analysis of the sediments using SEM. We truly appreciate Dr. James W. LaMoreaux for editorial handling and reviewer’s comments to improve the manuscript.

Funding

Funding for the laboratory analysis was provided by the grant to the PI by the University of Nevada, Reno. Funding for fieldwork and sample collection was provided by the Geological Society of America Student grant.

Supplementary material

12665_2019_8552_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 19 kb)
12665_2019_8552_MOESM2_ESM.docx (41 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 41 kb)
12665_2019_8552_MOESM3_ESM.docx (704 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (DOCX 703 kb)
12665_2019_8552_MOESM4_ESM.docx (518 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (DOCX 517 kb)
12665_2019_8552_MOESM5_ESM.docx (44 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (DOCX 43 kb)

References

  1. Carmody RW, Plummer LN, Busenberg E, Coplen TB (1998) Methods for collection of dissolved sulfate and sulfide and analysis of their sulfur isotopic composition. US Geol Surv Open File Rep 97–234:91.  https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr97234 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Charlet L, Chakraborty S, Varma S, Tournassat C, Wolthers M, Chatterjee D, Roman Ross G (2005) Adsorption and heterogeneous reduction of arsenic at the phyllosilicate–water interface. In: Day O’, Peggy A, Vlassopoulos D, Meng X, Benning LG (eds) Advances in arsenic research. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, pp 41–59.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bk-2005-0915.ch004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clark I, Fritz P (1997) Environmental isotopes in hydrogeology. CRC Press, New York, p 328Google Scholar
  4. Curtin D (2002) Possible role of aluminum in stabilizing organic matter in particle size fractions of Chernozemic and Solonetizic soils. Can J Soil Sci 82(2):265–268.  https://doi.org/10.4141/S01-035 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davis JC (2002) Statistics and data analysis in geology, 3rd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Dongarrà G, Manno E, Sabatino G, Varrica D (2009) Geochemical characteristics of waters in mineralised area of Peloritani Mountains (Sicily, Italy). Appl Geochem 24:900–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Earman S, Hershey RL (2004) Water quality impacts from waste rock at a Carlin-type gold mine, Elko County, Nevada. Environ Geochem 45:1043–1053Google Scholar
  8. Epstein S, Mayeda T (1953) Variation of O18 content of waters from natural sources. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 4(5):213–224.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-7037(53)90051-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Folger HW (2000) Analytical results and sample locations of reanalyzed NURE stream-sediment and soil samples for the Humboldt River Basin mineral-environmental resource assessment, northern Nevada. USGS Open File Report 00-421, US Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2000/of00-421. Accessed 1 Mar 2019
  10. Herath I, Vithanage M, Bundschuh J, Maity JP, Bhattacharya P (2016) Natural arsenic in global groundwaters: distribution and geochemical triggers for mobilization. Curr Pollut Rep 2(1):68–89.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40726-016-0028-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. IBM Corp. Released 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
  12. Jang C-S (2010) Applying scores of multivariate statistical analyses to characterize relationships between hydrochemical properties and geological origins of springs in Taiwan. J Geochem Explor 105:11–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Johannesson KH, Lyons WB, Huey S, Doyle GA, Swanson EE, Hackett E (1997) Oxyanion concentrations in Eastern Sierra Nevada Rivers-2. Arsenic and Phosphate. Aquat Geochem 3:61–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krouse HR, Mayer B (2000) Sulphur and oxygen isotopes in sulfate. In: Cook PG, Herczeg AL (eds) Environmental tracers in subsurface hydrology. Kluwer, Boston, pp 195–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Li X, Coles BJ, Ramsey MH, Thornton I (1995) Sequential extraction of soils for multielement analysis by ICP-AES. Chem Geol 124:109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liu J, Li S, Zhong J, Zhu X, Guo Q, Lang Y, Han X (2017) Sulfate sources constrained by sulfur and oxygen isotopic compositions in the upper reaches of the Xijiang River, China. Acta Geochim 36(4):611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Morrison J, Brockwell T, Merren T, Fourel F, Phillips AM (2001) On-line high-precision stable hydrogen isotopic analyses on nanoliter water samples. Anal Chem 73:3570–3575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Munk L, Hynek S, Bradley DC, Boutt D, Labay KA, Jochens H (2016) Lithium brines: a global perspective. In: Verplanck PL, Hitzman MW (eds) Rare earth and critical elements in ore deposits, reviews in economic geology, vol 18, Society of Economic Geologists, Littleton, pp 339–365. https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70104988. Accessed 1 Mar 2019
  19. NCEI: National Center for Environmental Information (2019) National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/. Accessed 1 Mar 2019
  20. Prudic DE, Niswonger RG, Harrill JR, Wood JL (2007) Streambed infiltration and ground-water flow from the Trout Creek drainage, an intermittent tributary to the Humboldt River, north-central Nevada. In: Stonestrom DA, Constantz J, Ferre TPA, Leake SA (eds) Ground-water recharge in the arid and semiarid southwestern United States, US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1703-K, Reston, Virginia, pp 313–351. http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/pp1703/k. Accessed 1 Mar 2019
  21. Reyment RA, Joreskog K (1996) Applied Factor analysis in the natural sciences, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 383Google Scholar
  22. Saunders JA, Lee M-K, Uddin A, Mohammad S, Wilkin RT, Fayek M, Korte NE (2005) Natural arsenic contamination of Holocene alluvial aquifers by linked tectonic, weathering, and microbial processes. Geochem Geophys Geosyst 6(4):Q04006.  https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GC000803 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Seddique AA, Masuda H, Mitamura M, Shinoda K, Yamanaka T, Itai T, Maruoka T, Uesugi K, Ahmed KM, Biswas DK (2008) Arsenic release from biotite into a Holocene ground water aquifer in Bangladesh. Appl Geochem 23(8):2236–2248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shelton LR (1994) Field guide for collecting and processing stream-water samples for the national water-quality assessment program. US Geological Survey Open-File Report, pp 94–455. https://water.usgs.gov/nawqa/pnsp/pubs/ofr94-455/sw-t.html. Accessed 1 Mar 2019
  25. Smedley PL, Kinniburgh DG (2002) A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural water. Appl Geochem 17:517–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. SNDWR: State of Nevada Division of Water Resources (2019). http://water.nv.gov/EvapotranspirationBasinStation.aspx. Accessed 20 Aug 2019
  27. Sueker JK (2003) Isotope applications in environmental investigations part II: groundwater age dating and recharge processes, and provenance of sulfur and methane. Remediation 13:71–90.  https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.10065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tessier A, Campbell PGC, Bisson M (1979) Sequential extraction procedure for the speciation of particulate trace metals. Anal Chem 51(7):844–851.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac50043a017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Theodore TG, Kotlyar BB, Singer DA, Berger VI, Abbott EW, Foster AL (2003) Applied geochemistry, geology, and mineralogy of the northernmost Carlin Trend, Nevada. Econ Geol 98:287–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wallace A, Ludington S, Mihalasky MJ, Peters SG, Theodore TG, Ponce DA, John DA, Berger BR (2004) Assessment of metallic resources in the Humboldt River Basin, Northern Nevada with a section on platinum-group-element (PGE) potential of the Humboldt Mafic Complex. In: Zientek, Michael L, Sidder, Gary B, Zierenberg RA (eds) US Geological Survey Bulletin 2218, p 312. http://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/b2218/. Accessed 1 Mar 2019
  31. Wang S-W, Liu C-W, Jang C-S (2007) Factors responsible for high arsenic concentrations in two ground water catchments in Taiwan. Appl Geochem 22:460–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Web Based Hydrograph Analysis Tool (2019). https://engineering.purdue.edu/mapserve/WHAT/. Accessed 1 Mar 2019
  33. Welch AH, Westjohn DB, Helsel DR, Wanty RB (2000) Arsenic in ground water of the United States: occurrence and geochemistry. Ground Water 38:589–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Program of Hydrologic SciencesUniversity of NevadaRenoUSA
  2. 2.Department of Geological Sciences and EngineeringUniversity of NevadaRenoUSA

Personalised recommendations