Advertisement

Quantification of macropores of Malan loess and the hydraulic significance on slope stability by X-ray computed tomography

  • Xin Li
  • Yudong LuEmail author
  • Xiaozhou Zhang
  • Wen Fan
  • Yangchun Lu
  • Wangsheng Pan
Original Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

The accurate identification and quantitative characterization of loess structural properties at the pore scale are important in the study of macroscopic permeability. To characterise the macropore structure of Malan loess systematically, a non-destructive detecting method, that is, X-ray computed tomography (CT), was adopted for scanning five undisturbed specimens. A series of processing steps, including image filtering by a novel compositing image filter, image segmentation with the effective combination of threshold and top hat method, and three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction and visualisation by marching cube algorithm and volume-rendering technique were finished in AVIZO® software to acquire the 3D pore network model and to extract the two-dimensional (2D) and 3D structural parameters, such as porosity, equal diameter, aspect ratio, shape factor (SF), node density, number of terminal and branching nodes, coordinate number, dip angle, dip direction angle and tortuosity. Results show that (1) Malan loess is a kind of porous geological material with strong verticality and spatial anisotropy reflected by the 2D parameters including porosity, equal diameters and aspect ratio as well as the 3D dip angle and 3D-visualised loess macropores; (2) Malan loess has higher permeability in the vertical direction than that in the horizontal direction so that prone to induce excessive infiltration and preferential flow, thereby threatening the loess slope stability; (3) SF is an effective parameter for pore classification in both 2D and 3D scales; (4) the macropores with a large diameter have a larger volume fraction, better connectivity (effective porosity) and greater contribution to water permeability; (5) the larger the coordinate number, the greater the hydraulic conductivity, nevertheless other than the aggregates for the water repellency caused by organic matter. In conclusion, the combination of CT and AVIZO® is excellent for quantifying the key macropore structural parameters (e.g., shape factor and tortuosity) and their hydraulic significance on slope stability.

Keywords

Malan loess Macropore X-ray computed tomography 3D structural model Shape factor Tortuosity Preferential flow 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant number: 41630634) and the Major Research Project for Creative Group of Guizhou Provincial Department of Education (Grant numbers QJH-KY [2016]054 and QJH-KY [2016]055).

References

  1. Artur D, Zbigniew K, Maciej M (2011) Hydraulic tortuosity in arbitrary porous media flow. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Softw Matter Phys 84:036319.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.84.036319 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beckers E, Plougonven E, Roisin C, Hapca S, Léonard A, Degré A (2014) X-ray microtomography: a porosity-based thresholding method to improve soil pore network characterization? Geoderma 219–220:145–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boudreau BP, Meysman FJR (2006) Predicted tortuosity of muds. Geology 34:693–696.  https://doi.org/10.1130/g22771.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Calistru AE, JităReanu G (2015) Applications of X-ray computed tomography for examining soil structure: a review. Bull Univ Agric Sci Vet Med Cluj-Napoca Agric 72:30–36.  https://doi.org/10.15835/buasvmcn-agr:11145 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carey GR, McBean EA, Feenstra S (2016) Estimating tortuosity coefficients based on hydraulic conductivity. Groundwater 54:476–487.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carmignato S, Dewulf W, Leach R (2018) Industrial X-ray computed tomography. Springer International Publishing, Cham.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59573-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen T, Xie Q, Xu H, Chen J, Ji J, Lu H, Balsam W (2010) Characteristics and formation mechanism of pedogenic hematite in Quaternary Chinese loess and paleosols. CATENA 81:217–225.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2010.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen G, Meng X, Qiao L, Zhang Y, Wang S (2018) Response of a loess landslide to rainfall: observations from a field artificial rainfall experiment in Bailong River Basin, China. Landslides 15:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-017-0924-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. China SAotPsRo (2008) Pore size distribution and porosity of solid materials by mercury porosimetry and gas adsorption—part 1: mercury porosimetry. Standards Press of China, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  10. Cnudde V, Boone MN (2013) High-resolution X-ray computed tomography in geosciences: a review of the current technology and applications. Earth Sci Rev 123:1–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cristiano E, Bogaard T, Barontini S (2016) Effects of anisotropy of preferential flow on the hydrology and stability of landslides. Proc Earth Planet Sci 16:204–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeps.2016.10.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deng J, Wang LM, Zhang ZZ, Bing H (2010) Microstructure characteristics and forming environment of late Quaternary Period loess in the Loess Plateau of China. Environ Earth Sci 59:1807–1817.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-009-0162-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elliot TR, Reynolds WD, Heck RJ (2010) Use of existing pore models and X-ray computed tomography to predict saturated soil hydraulic conductivity. Geoderma 156:133–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2010.02.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. FEI, Sas (2016) Avizo® 920 User’s Guide. FEI, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. Gao G (1980) Chinese loess microstructure. Chin Sci Bull 25:945–948.  https://doi.org/10.1360/csb1980-25-20-945 (in Chinese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gharedaghloo B, Price JS, Rezanezhad F, Quinton WL (2018) Evaluating the hydraulic and transport properties of peat soil using pore network modeling and X-ray micro computed tomography. J Hydrol 561:494–508.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.04.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldstein L, Prasher SO, Ghoshal S (2007) Three-dimensional visualization and quantification of non-aqueous phase liquid volumes in natural porous media using a medical X-ray Computed Tomography scanner. J Contam Hydrol 93:96–110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2007.01.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Guo P (2012) Dependency of tortuosity and permeability of porous media on directional distribution of pore voids. Transp Porous Media 95:285–303.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-012-0043-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ichikawa K, Kawashima H, Shimada M, Adachi T, Takata T (2019) A three-dimensional cross-directional bilateral filter for edge-preserving noise reduction of low-dose computed tomography images. Comput Biol Med.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ivanov AL, Shein EV, Skvortsova EB (2019) Tomography of soil pores: from morphological characteristics to structural-functional assessment of pore space. Eurasian Soil Sci 52:50–57.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S106422931901006X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jiang J, Wei X, Zhang X (2011) Research on mechanical parameters of intact sliding zone soils of Huangtupo landslide based on CT scanning and simulation tests. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 25:438–439 doi: http://www.rockmech.org/CN/Y2011/V30/I5/1025 (in Chinese)
  22. Jiang M, Zhang F, Hu H, Cui Y, Peng J (2014) Structural characterization of natural loess and remolded loess under triaxial tests. Eng Geol 181:249–260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2014.07.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jiang M, Sima J, Cui Y, Hu H, Zhou C, Lei H (2017) Experimental investigation of the deformation characteristics of natural loess under the stress paths in shield tunnel excavation. Int J Geomech 17:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000972 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karpyn ZT, Alajmi A, Radaelli F, Halleck PM, Grader AS (2009) X-ray CT and hydraulic evidence for a relationship between fracture conductivity and adjacent matrix porosity. Eng Geol 103:139–145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.06.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Koponen A, Kataja M, Timonen J (1996) Tortuous flow in porous media. Phys Rev E Stat Phys Plasmas Fluids Relat Interdiscip Top 54:406–410.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.54.406 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Landis EN, Keane DT (2010) X-ray microtomography. Mater Charact 61:1305–1316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lanfrey PY, Kuzeljevic ZV, Dudukovic MP (2010) Tortuosity model for fixed beds randomly packed with identical particles. Chem Eng Sci 65:1891–1896.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2009.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Latifi N, Eisazadeh A, Marto A, Meehan CL (2017a) Tropical residual soil stabilization: a powder form material for increasing soil strength. Constr Build Mater 147:827–836.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.115 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Latifi N, Vahedifard F, Ghazanfari E, Horpibulsuk S, Marto A, Williams J (2017b) Sustainable improvement of clays using low-carbon nontraditional additive. Int J Geomech 18:04017162.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001086 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Latifi N, Vahedifard F, Ghazanfari E, Rashid ASA (2018) Sustainable usage of calcium carbide residue for stabilization of clays. J Mater Civ Eng 30:04018099.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lei S, Tang W (2004) Analysis of Microstructure Change for Loess in the Process of Loading and Collapse with CT Scanning. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 23:4166–4169.  https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:1000-6915.2004.24.013 (in Chinese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leue M, Uteau-Puschmann D, Peth S, Nellesen J, Kodešová R, Gerke HH (2019) Separation of soil macropore types in three-dimensional X-ray computed tomography images based on pore geometry characteristics. Vadose Zone J.  https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2018.09.0170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li Y (1990) Quantitative analysis on Luochuan loess porosity using micropicture and microcomputer. Site Investig Sci Technol 8:6–9 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  34. Li XA, Li L (2017) Quantification of the pore structures of Malan loess and the effects on loess permeability and environmental significance, Shaanxi Province, China: an experimental study. Environ Earth Sci 76:522–535.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-017-6855-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li X, Zhang D (1999) Application of CT in analysis of structure of compacted soil. Rock Soil Mech 20:62–66.  https://doi.org/10.16285/j.rsm.1999.02.014 (in Chinese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li Y, Zhao J (2017) Loess and Loess Geohazards in China. CRC Press, London.  https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315177281 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li J, Chen Z, Huang X (2010) CT-triaxial test for collapsability of undisturbed Q3 loess. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 29:1288–1296. http://www.rockmech.org/CN/Y2010/V29/I06/1288 (in Chinese)
  38. Li TC, Shao MA, Jia YH (2016) Application of X-ray tomography to quantify macropore characteristics of loess soil under two perennial plants. Eur J Soil Sci 67:266–275.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.12330 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Li T, Ma Shao, Jia Y, Jia X, Huang L (2018a) Using the X-ray computed tomography method to predict the saturated hydraulic conductivity of the upper root zone in the Loess Plateau in China. Soil Sci Soc Am J.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.08.0268 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li X, Lu Y, Zhang X, Lu Y, Yang Y (2018b) Pore-fissure identification and characterization of paleosol based on X-ray computed tomography. Bull Soil Water Conserv 38:224–230.  https://doi.org/10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.20181024.001 (in Chinese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Li Y, He S, Deng X, Xu Y (2018c) Characterization of macropore structure of Malan loess in China based on 3D pipe models constructed by using computed tomography technology. J Asian Earth Sci 154:271–279.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.12.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Li Y, Zhang T, Zhang Y, Xu Q (2018d) Geometrical appearance and spatial arrangement of structural blocks of the Malan loess in NW China and the implications for the formation of loess columns. J Asian Earth Sci 158:18–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jseaes.2018.02.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Li P, Xie W, Pak RYS, Vanapalli SK (2019a) Microstructural evolution of loess soils from the Loess Plateau of China. CATENA 173:276–288.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.10.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Li X, Lu Y, Fan W, Pan W, Zhang X, Lu Y (2019b) Current status and prospects of research on mechanism of preferential flow-induced sliding in loess slope. Bull Soil Water Conserv 39:294–301+324.  https://doi.org/10.13961/j.cnki.stbctb.2019.01.046 (in Chinese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lipiec J, Turski M, Ma Hajnos, Wieboda R (2015) Pore structure, stability and water repellency of earthworm casts and natural aggregates in loess soil. Geoderma 243–244:124–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.12.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Liu Z et al (2015) Collapsibility, composition, and microstructure of loess in China. Can Geotech J 53:673–686.  https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2015-0285 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Liu XM, Mingming MA, Haibin WU, Zhou ZB (2017) Identification of aeolian loess deposits on the Indo-Gangetic Plain (India) and their significance. Sci China Earth Sci 60:428.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-016-5167-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Luo L, Lin H, Halleck P (2008) Quantifying soil structure and preferential flow in intact soil using X-ray computed tomography. Soil Sci Soc Am J 72:1058–1069.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2007.0179 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Luo L, Lin H, Li S (2010a) Quantification of 3-D soil macropore networks in different soil types and land uses using computed tomography. J Hydrol 393:53–64.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Luo LF, Lin H, Schmidt J (2010b) Quantitative relationships between soil macropore characteristics and preferential flow and transport. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:1929–1937.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2010.0062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Luo H, Wu F, Chang J, Xu J (2018) Microstructural constraints on geotechnical properties of Malan Loess: a case study from Zhaojiaan landslide in Shaanxi province, China. Eng Geol 236:60–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Maciej M, Arzhang K, Zbigniew K (2008) Tortuosity-porosity relation in porous media flow. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Softw Matter Phys 78:026306.  https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.78.026306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Manickam SS, Gelb J, McCutcheon JR (2014) Pore structure characterization of asymmetric membranes: non-destructive characterization of porosity and tortuosity. J Membr Sci 454:549–554.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2013.11.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Muhammad N, Siddiqua S, Latifi N (2018) Solidification of subgrade materials using magnesium alkalinization: a sustainable additive for construction. J Mater Civ Eng 30:04018260.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002484 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Olsen PA, Binley A, Henry-Poulter S, Tych W (2015) Characterizing solute transport in undisturbed soil cores using electrical and X-ray tomographic methods. Hydrol Process 13:211–221.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-1085(19990215)13:2%3c211:aid-hyp707%3e3.0.co;2-p CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pawlowski S, Nayak N, Meireles M, Portugal CAM, Velizarov S, Crespo JG (2018) CFD modelling of flow patterns, tortuosity and residence time distribution in monolithic porous columns reconstructed from X-ray tomography data. Chem Eng J 350:757–766.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2018.06.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pot V et al (2015) Three-dimensional distribution of water and air in soil pores: comparison of two-phase two-relaxation-times lattice-Boltzmann and morphological model outputs with synchrotron X-ray computed tomography data. Adv Water Resour 84:87–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.08.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Saboorian-Jooybari H, Ashoori S, Mowazi G (2012) Development of an analytical time-dependent matrix/fracture shape factor for countercurrent imbibition in simulation of fractured reservoirs. Transport Porous Media 92:10.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11242-011-9928-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Saravanathiiban DS, Kutay ME, Khire MV (2014) Effect of macropore tortuosity and morphology on preferential flow through saturated soil: a Lattice Boltzmann study. Comput Geotech 59:44–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schmitt M, Halisch M, Müller C, Fernandes CP (2016) Classification and quantification of pore shapes in sandstone reservoir rocks with 3-D X-ray micro-computed tomography. Solid Earth 7:285–300.  https://doi.org/10.5194/se-7-285-2016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shanti NO, Chan VWL, Stock SR, Carlo FD, Thornton K, Faber KT (2014) X-ray micro-computed tomography and tortuosity calculations of percolating pore networks. Acta Mater 71:126–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2014.03.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shao W (2017) Numerical modeling of the effect of preferential flow on hillslope hydrology and slope stability. Doctoral thesis, Delft University of Technology.  https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:6d192fe2-de18-4556-873a-d3cd56ab96a6
  63. Taina IA, Heck RJ, Elliot TR (2008) Application of x-ray computed tomography to soil science: a literature review. Can J Soil Sci 88:1–19.  https://doi.org/10.4141/CJSS06027 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wang ZY, Xu Q, Ni WK (2010) Study of undisturbed loess stress-strain relation during CT test. Rock Soil Mech 31:387–391 + 396.  https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-7598.2010.02.010 (in Chinese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wang J-D, Li P, Ma Y, Vanapalli SK (2019a) Evolution of pore-size distribution of intact loess and remolded loess due to consolidation. J Soils Sediments 19:1226–1238.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-2136-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Wang L, Yuan K, Luan X, Li Z, Feng G, Wu J (2019b) 3D characterizations of pores and damages in C/SiC composites by using X-Ray computed tomography. Appl Compos Mater 26:493–505.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10443-018-9712-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wei T, Fan W, Yuan W, Wei Y-n, Yu B (2019) Three-dimensional pore network characterization of loess and paleosol stratigraphy from South Jingyang Plateau, China. Environ Earth Sci 78:333.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8331-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Xu J, Li Y, Lan W, Wang S (2019) Shear strength and damage mechanism of saline intact loess after freeze-thaw cycling. Cold Reg Sci Technol 164:102779.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coldregions.2019.05.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Yan G, Wei C, Song Y, Zhang J, Yang H (2018a) Quantitative Characterization of Shale Pore Structure Based on Ar-SEM and PCAS. Earth Sci 43:1602–1610.  https://doi.org/10.3799/dqkx.2017.525 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yan K, Gu TF, Wang JD, Liu YM, Wang X, Wang CX (2018b) A study of the micro-configuration of loess based on micro-CT images. Hydrogeol Eng Geol 45:71–77.  https://doi.org/10.16030/j.cnki.issn.1000-3665.2018.03.09 (in Chinese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yao Z, Chen Z, Li J, Wei F, Liu J (2017) Meso-structure dynamic evolution characteristic of undisturbed loess based on CT technology. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 10:10.  https://doi.org/10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2017.13.018 (in Chinese) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yu B, Li J (2004) A geometry model for tortuosity of flow path in porous media. Chin Phys Lett 21:1569–1571.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0256-307X/21/8/044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yu X, Peng G, Lu S (2018a) Characterizing aggregate pore structure by X-ray micro-computed tomography and a network model. Soil Sci Soc Am J 82:744–756.  https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2017.11.0385 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yu Y-S et al (2018b) Three-dimensional localization of nanoscale battery reactions using soft X-ray tomography. Nat Commun 9:921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Zhang J-M, Ze-min F, Ru-ji H (2017) Quantification of 3D macropore networks in forest soils in Touzhai valley (Yunnan, China) using X-ray computed tomography and image analysis. J Mountain Sci 14:474–491.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-016-4150-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zhang X, Lu Y, Li X, Lu Y, Pan W (2019a) Microscopic structure changes of Malan loess after humidification in South Jingyang Plateau, China. Environ Earth Sci 78:287.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8290-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhang Z, Liu K, Zhou H, Lin H, Li D, Peng X (2019b) Linking saturated hydraulic conductivity and air permeability to the characteristics of biopores derived from X-ray computed tomography. J Hydrol 571:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.01.041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhao D, Xu M, Liu G, Ma L, Zhang S, Xiao T, Peng G (2017a) Effect of vegetation type on microstructure of soil aggregates on the Loess Plateau, China. Agric Ecosyst Environ 242:1–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.03.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zhao D et al (2017b) Quantification of soil aggregate microstructure on abandoned cropland during vegetative succession using synchrotron radiation-based micro-computed tomography. Soil Tillage Res 165:239–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2016.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zhong R, Xu M, Netto RV, Wille K (2016) Influence of pore tortuosity on hydraulic conductivity of pervious concrete: characterization and modeling. Constr Build Mater 125:1158–1168.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.08.060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zhu YQ, Chen ZH (2009) Experimental study on dynamic evolution of meso-structure of intact Q_3 loess during loading and collapse using CT and triaxial apparatus. Chin J Geotechn Eng 31:1219–1228 (in Chinese) Google Scholar
  82. Zong Y, Yu X, Zhu M, Lu S (2015) Characterizing soil pore structure using nitrogen adsorption, mercury intrusion porosimetry, and synchrotron-radiation-based X-ray computed microtomography techniques. J Soils Sediments 15:302–312.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-0995-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xin Li
    • 1
  • Yudong Lu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xiaozhou Zhang
    • 1
  • Wen Fan
    • 2
  • Yangchun Lu
    • 1
  • Wangsheng Pan
    • 3
  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Subsurface Hydrology and Ecological Effects in Arid Region, Ministry of Education, College of Environmental Science and EngineeringChang’an UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.School of Geological Engineering and SurveyingChang′an UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China
  3. 3.School of Tourism and Resources EnvironmentQiannan Normal University for NationalitiesDuyunPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations