Hydrochemical and isotopic studies to understand quality problems in groundwater of the Niğde Province, Central Turkey

  • Abdurrahman LermiEmail author
  • Gökhan Ertan
Original Article


This study seeks to decipher the hydrochemistry, recharge sources, and the possible factors controlling the chemistry of groundwater in Niğde Province of central Turkey. This was done by conducting hydrochemical, multivariate statistical, and stable isotope analysis on 37 well and spring water samples collected in the wet and dry seasons of 2016. The major ion abundance in the groundwater is in the order Ca2+ > Na+ > Mg2+ > K+ and HCO3 > SO42− > Cl. This accounted for the dominance of Ca–SO4–HCO3 water type with other mixed water types, reflecting the geology of the area, which is predominated by carbonate lithologies. All the physico-chemical parameters generally comply with the WHO and Turkish national guideline values for drinking water except TDS, Ca2+, SO42−, NO3, and As. The elevated amounts of TDS, SO42−, and NO3 were largely from anthropogenic sources. The studied well and spring water samples are suitable for irrigation purposes in terms of their sodium hazard, but with regard to salinity hazard, the well water samples are not suitable for irrigation purposes due to their high salinity values. Three factors that explain 85.2% of the total variance of the data point to water–rock interaction and mixing with thermal waters as the principal factors controlling the chemistry of the groundwater. Metal pollution load was significantly higher in the wet season than in the dry season with arsenic as the key contaminant (0.69–391.14 µg/L and 0.29–43.6 µg/L in the wet and dry seasons, respectively). The tritium concentrations reveal that the well waters have longer residence time and water–rock interaction than the spring waters and are thus recharged from older groundwater sources.


Hydrochemistry Environmental isotopes Groundwater Arsenic Water–rock interaction Pollution sources Niğde Province 



This study was financially supported by the Scientific Research Office of Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University with the project no. FEB201/09. We thank Prof. Dr. İrfan Yolcubal for giving us the permission to use his geochemistry laboratory for hydrochemical analyses in this study. Prof. Dr. Mustafa Afşin, Prof. Dr. Emin Çiftçi and Mr. Emmanuel Daanoba SUNKARI are greatly acknowledged for their valuable contribution to this research. Finally, we thank the anonymous reviewers and Editor for their useful comments, which helped improve the manuscript.


  1. Afşin M, Canik B, Notsu K (2000) Hydrogeochemistry of thermal and mineral waters of different groundwater circulation system in Niğde, Central Anatolia, Turkey. Workshop Turk Assoc Pet Geol Spec Publ 5:149–160Google Scholar
  2. Afşin M, Allen DM, Kirste D, Durukan UG, Gurel A, Oruc O (2014) Mixing processes in hydrothermal spring systems and implications for interpreting geochemical data: a case study in the Cappadocia region of Turkey. Hydrogeol J 22(1):7–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahuja S (2008) Arsenic contamination of groundwater: mechanism, analysis, and remediation. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aitchison J, Greenacre M (2002) Biplots of compositional data. J R Stat Soc Ser C (Appl Stat) 51(4):375–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Akçay M (1994) Genesis of the stibnite-cinnabar-scheelite deposits of the Gumusler area, Nigde, central Turkey and implications on their gold potential (Unpublished PhD Thesis), Leicester University, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. Aksoy N, Simsek C, Gündüz O (2009) Groundwater contamination mechanisms in a geothermal field: a case study of Balcova, Turkey. J Contam Hydrol 103(1–2):13–28. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Atabay E (2005) Medical geology. TMMOB Chamber of Geological Engineers, Publication No: 88, Ankara, p 194 (in Turkish) Google Scholar
  8. Aydin F (2008) Contrasting complexities in the evolution of calc-alkaline and alkaline melts of the Nigde volcanic rocks, Turkey: textural, mineral chemical and geochemical evidence. Eur J Min 20(1):101–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Aydin F, Schmitt AK, Siebel W, Sönmez M, Ersoy Y, Lermi A, Dirik RK, Duncan R (2014) Quaternary bimodal volcanism in the Niğde Volcanic Complex (Cappadocia, Central Anatolia-Turkey): age, petrogenesis, and geodynamic implications. Contrib Mineral Petrol 168(5):1078. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baba A, Yuce G, Deniz O, Ugurluoglu YD (2009) Hydrochemical and isotopic composition of tuzla geothermal field (Canakkale-Turkey) and its environmental impacts. Environ Forensics 1010(2):144–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bageri BS, Mahmoud MA, Shawabkeh RA, Al-Mutairi SH, Abdulraheem A (2017) Toward a complete removal of barite (barium sulfate BaSO4) scale using chelating agents and catalysts. Arab J Sci Eng 42(4):1667–1674. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Benson LV, Spencer RJ (1983) A hydrochemical reconnaissance study of the walker River Basin, California and Nevada. United States Geological Survey, Denver, USGS Open File Rep, pp 83–740Google Scholar
  13. Berhe BA, Dokuz UE, Çelik M (2017) Assessment of hydrogeochemistry and environmental isotopes of surface and groundwaters in the Kütahya Plain, Turkey. J Afr Earth Sci 134:230–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Boztuğ D (2000) SIA-type intrusive associations: geodynamic significance of synchronism between metamorphism and magmatism in Central Anatolia, Turkey. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 173(1):441–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bundschuh J, Litter MI, Parvez F, Román-Ross G, Nicolli HB, Jean JS, Liu CW, López D, Armienta MA, Guilherme LR, Cuevas AG (2012) One century of arsenic exposure in Latin America: a review of history and occurrence from 14 countries. Sci Total Environ 429:2–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Çelik M, Afşin M (1998) The role of hydrogeology in solution-subsidence development and its environmental impacts; a case-study for Sazlıca (Niğde, Turkey). Environ Geol 36(3–4):335–342Google Scholar
  17. Choi BY, Yun ST, Yu SY, Lee PK, Park SS, Chae GT (2005) Hydrochemistry of urban groundwater in Seoul, South Korea: effect of land use and pollutant recharge. Environ Geol 48:979–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clark M, Robertson AHF (2002) The role of the Early Tertiary Ulukisla Basin, southern Turkey, in suturing of the Mesozoic Tethys ocean. J Geol Soc Lond 159:673–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Colak M, Gemici U, Tarcan G (2003) The effects of colemanite deposits on the arsenic consentration of soil and groundwater in Igdekoy-Emet, Kutahya, Turkey. Water Air Soil Pollut 149:127–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dansgaard W (1964) Stable isotopes in precipitation. Tellus 16(4):436–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Desbarats AJ, Pal T, Mukherjee PK, Beckie RD (2017) Geochemical evolution of groundwater flowing through arsenic source sediments in an aquifer system of West Bengal, India. Water Resour Res 53(11):8715–8735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dixit S, Hering JG (2003) Comparison of arsenic (V) and arsenic (III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility. Environ Sci Technol 37(18):4182–4189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dowling CB, Poreda RJ, Basu AR, Peters SL, Aggarwal PK (2002) Geochemical study of arsenic release mechanisms in the Bengal Basin groundwater. Water Resour Res 38(9):1173. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dowling CB, Poreda RJ, Basu AR (2003) The groundwater geochemistry of the Bengal Basin: weathering, chemsorption, and trace metal flux to the oceans. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 67(12):2117–2136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gemici U, Tarcan G (2007) Assessment of the pollutants in farming soils and waters around untreated abandoned Türkönü mercury mine (Turkey). Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 79:20. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gündüz O, Simsek C, Hasozbek A (2010) Arsenic pollution in the groundwater of Simav Plain, Turkey: its impact on water quality and human health. Water Air Soil Pollut 205(1–4):43. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gürel A, Lermi A (2010) Pleistocene-Holocene fills of the Bor-Ereğli plains (Central Anatolia): recent geoarchaeological contributions. In: d’Alfonso L, Balza-Clelia Mora ME (eds) Geo-archeological activities in Cappadocia (Turkey), Studia Mediterranea, vol 22. Italia University Press, Pavia, pp 55–69Google Scholar
  28. Han DM, Liang X, Jin MG, Currell MJ, Song XF, Liu CM (2010) Evaluation of groundwater hydrochemical characteristics and mixing behavior in the Daying and Qicun geothermal systems, Xinzhou Basin. J Volcanol Geoth Res 189(1–2):92–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hounslow A (1995) Water quality data: analysis and interpretation. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  30. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency) (2010) Global network of isotopes in precipitation. Accessed Sep 2017
  31. Imbrie J (1963) Factor and vector analysis programs for analyzing geologic data. Office Naval Research, Geography Branch, Technical Report 6 [ONR Task No. 389–135]Google Scholar
  32. Keesari T, Ramakumar KL, Chidambaram S, Pethperumal S, Thilagavathi R (2016) Understanding the hydrochemical behavior of groundwater and its suitability for drinking and agricultural purposes in Pondicherry area, South India–a step towards sustainable development. Groundwater Sustain Dev 2:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Keren R, Mayzel B, Lavy A, Polishchuk I, Levy D, Fakra SC, Pokroy B, Ilan M (2017) Sponge-associated bacteria mineralize arsenic and barium on intracellular vesicles. Nat Commun 8:14393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Keskin Ş (2012) Distribution and accumulation of heavy metals in the sediments of Akkaya Dam, Nigde, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 184(1):449–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Khan MA, Ho YS (2011) Arsenic in drinking water: a review on toxicological effects, mechanism of accumulation and remediation. Asian J Chem 23(5):1889Google Scholar
  36. Korkanç SY, Kayıkçı S, Korkanç M (2017) Evaluation of spatial and temporal water quality in the Akkaya dam watershed (Niğde, Turkey) and management implications. J Afr Earth Sci 129:481–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lermi A (2016) Pollution evaluation of heavy metals in sediments from the Çakıt Stream, Ulukışla (Niğde) Turkey. In: 16th international multidisciplinary scientific geoconference, SGEM 2016, Albena, Bulgaria, conference proceedings, vol 1, pp 491–498Google Scholar
  38. Li P, Wu J, Qian H (2016) Hydrochemical appraisal of groundwater quality for drinking and irrigation purposes and the major influencing factors: a case study in and around Hua County, China. Arab J Geosci 9(1):15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lucas L, Unterweger M (2000) Comprehensive review and critical evaluation of the half-life of tritium. J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 105:541–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Luo W, Taylor MC, Parker SR (2008) A comparison of spatial interpolation methods to estimate continuous wind speed surfaces using irregularly distributed data from England and Wales. Int J Climatol 28(7):947–959CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lyulko I, Ambalova T, Vasiljeva T (2001) To integrated water quality assessment in Latvia. MTM (Monitoring Tailor-Made) III, In: Proceedings of international workshop on information for sustainable water management, Netherlands, pp 449–452Google Scholar
  42. MacDonald AM, Calow RC (2009) Developing groundwater for secure rural water supplies in Africa. Desalination 248(1–3):546–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marghade D, Malpe DB, Zade AB (2012) Major ion chemistry of shallow groundwater of a fast growing city of Central India. Environ Monit Assess 184:2405–2418. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meffe R, de Bustamante I (2014) Emerging organic contaminants in surface water and groundwater: a first overview of the situation in Italy. Sci Total Environ 481:280–295. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mukherjee A, Sengupta MK, Hossain MA, Ahamed S, Das B, Nayak B, Lodh D, Rahman MM, Chakraborti D (2006) Arsenic contamination in groundwater: a global perspective with emphasis on the Asian scenario. J Health Popul Nutr 24(2):142–163Google Scholar
  46. Nath B, Jean J, Lee MK, Yang HJ, Liu CC (2008) Geochemistry of high arsenic groundwater in Chia-Nan Plain, southwestern Taiwan: possible sources and reactive transport of arsenic. J Contam Hydrol 99:85–96. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nickson RT, McArthur JM, Ravenscroft P, Burgess WG, Ahmed KM (2000) Mechanism of arsenic release to groundwater, Bangladesh and West Bengal. Appl Geochem 15(4):403–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nordstrom DK (2002) Worldwide occurrences of arsenic in groundwater. Science 296:2144–2145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nriagu JO, Bhattacharya P, Mukherjee AB, Bundschuh J, Zevenhoven R, Loeppert RH (2007) Arsenic in soil and groundwater: an overview. Trace Metals Other Contam Environ 9:3–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Olsen RL, Chappell RW, Loftis JC (2012) Water quality sample collection, data treatment and results presentation for principal components analysis—literature review and Illinois River watershed case study. Water Res 46(9):3110–3122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Parkhurst DL, Appelo CAJ (1999) User's guide to PHREEQC (Version 2): a computer program for speciation, batch-reaction, one-dimensional transport, and inverse geochemical calculations. Water Res Invest Rep 99(4259):312Google Scholar
  52. Pasvanoğlu S, Çelik M (2018) A conceptual model for groundwater flow and geochemical evolution of thermal fluids at the Kızılcahamam geothermal area, Galatian volcanic Province. Geothermics 71:88–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Pazand K, Khosravi D, Ghaderi MR, Rezvanianzadeh MR (2018) Identification of the hydrogeochemical processes and assessment of groundwater in a semi-arid region using major ion chemistry: a case study of Ardestan basin in Central Iran. Groundw Sustain Dev 6:245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Piper AM (1953) A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water analysis. US Geological Survey, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  55. Reza R, Singh G (2010) Heavy metal contamination and its indexing approach for river water. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7(4):785–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Richards LA (1954) Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agric. Handbook 60. USDA & IBH Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi, pp 98–99Google Scholar
  57. Richards LA, Magnone D, Boyce AJ, Casanueva-Marenco MJ, van Dongen BE, Ballentine CJ, Polya DA (2018) Delineating sources of groundwater recharge in an arsenic-affected Holocene aquifer in Cambodia using stable isotope-based mixing models. J Hydrol 557:321–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sako A, Yaro JM, Bamba O (2018) Impacts of hydrogeochemical processes and anthropogenic activities on groundwater quality in the Upper Precambrian sedimentary aquifer of northwestern Burkina Faso. Appl Water Sci 8(3):88. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Schoeller H (1967) Geochemistry of groundwater. An international guide for research and practice. UNESCO 15:1e18Google Scholar
  60. Şener MF, Şener M, Uysal IT (2017) The evolution of the Cappadocia Geothermal Province, Anatolia (Turkey): geochemical and geochronological evidence. Hydrogeol J 25(8):2323–2345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Shahid M, Niazi NK, Dumat C, Naidu R, Khalid S, Rahman MM, Bibi I (2018) A meta-analysis of the distribution, sources and health risks of arsenic-contaminated groundwater in Pakistan. Environ Pollut 242:307–319. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Simsek C (2005) Boron and arsenic contamination in Balcova Geothermal Field. Geothermal Energy. TMMOB Chamber of Mechanical Engineers Publication E/2005/393-2, pp 361–368 (in Turkish) Google Scholar
  63. Smedley PL, Edmunds WM, Pelig-Ba KB (1996) Mobility of arsenic in groundwater in the Obuasi gold-mining area of Ghana: some implications for human health. Geol Soc Lond Spec Publ 113(1):163–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Smedley PL, Knudsen J, Maiga D (2007) Arsenic in groundwater from mineralized Proterozoic basement rocks of Burkina Faso. Appl Geochem 22:1074–1092. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sunkari ED, Danladi IB (2016) Assessment of trace elements in selected bottled drinking water in Ghana: a case study of Accra metropolis. Int J Water Resour Environ Eng 8(10):137–142. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sunkari ED, Zango MS, Korboe HM (2018) Comparative analysis of fluoride concentrations in groundwaters in Northern and Southern Ghana: implications for the contaminant sources. Earth Syst Environ 2(1):103–117. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Todd DK (1960) Groundwater hydrology, 1st edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  68. TSE-266 (2005) Içme Suları Standardı. Türk Standartları Enstitüsü, Baskı TSE, TS, Ankara 266:1–25Google Scholar
  69. UNICEF (2008) Progress on drinking water and sanitation: special focus on sanitation. In: Progress on drinking water and sanitation: special focus on sanitation. WHO/JMPGoogle Scholar
  70. Uras Y, Uysal Y, Arikan TA, Kop A, Caliskan M (2015) Hydrogeochemistry of the drinking water sources of Derebogazi Village (Kahramanmaras) and their effects on human health. Environ Geochem Health 37(3):475–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Usero J, Gonzalez-Regalado E, Gracia I (1997) Trace metals in the bivalve mollusks Ruditapes decussates and Ruditapes phillippinarum from the Atlantic Coast of Southern Spain. Environ Int 23(3):291–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. van Geen A, Zheng Y, Versteeg R, Stute M, Horneman A, Dhar R, Steckler M, Gelman A, Small C, Ahsan H, Graziano JH (2003) Spatial variability of arsenic in 6000 tube wells in a 25 km2 area of Bangladesh. Water Resour Res. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Whaley-Martin KJ, Mailloux BJ, van Geen A, Bostick BC, Ahmed KM, Choudhury I, Slater GF (2017) Human and livestock waste as a reduced carbon source contributing to the release of arsenic to shallow Bangladesh groundwater. Sci Total Environ 595:63–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. WHO (2010) World health statistics 2010. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  75. WHO (2017) Guidelines for drinking-water quality: fourth edition incorporating the first addendum. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  76. Yalcin MG, Narin I, Soylak M (2007) Heavy metal contents of the Karasu creek sediments, Nigde, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 128(1–3):351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yang Q, Wang L, Ma H, Yu K, Martín JD (2016) Hydrochemical characterization and pollution sources identification of groundwater in Salawusu aquifer system of Ordos Basin, China. Environ Pollut 216:340–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yidana SM, Yidana A (2010) Assessing water quality using water quality index and multivariate analysis. Environ Earth Sci 59(7):1461–1473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yuce G (2007a) Spatial Distribution of Groundwater Pollution in the Porsuk River Basin (PRB), Turkey. Int J Environ Pollut 30(3–4):529–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yuce G (2007b) A geochemical study of the groundwater in the Misli Basin and environmental implications. Environ Geol 51(5):857–868CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Yuce G, Pinarbasi A, Ozcelik S, Ugurluoglu D (2005) Soil and water pollution derived from anthropogenic activities in the Porsuk River Basin, Turkey. Environ Geol 49(3):359–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Yuce G, Ugurluoglu D, Dilaver AT, Eser T, Sayin M, Donmez M, Ozcelik S, Aydin F (2009) The effects of lithology on water pollution: natural radioactivity and trace elements in water resources of Eskisehir Region (Turkey). J Water Air Soil Pollut 202(1–4):69–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Yüce G, Pinarbasi A, Ozcelik S, Ugurluoglu D (2004) The pollution of water resources in the Eskisehir region within the Porsuk River Basin, Turkey. Environ Eng Manag J 3(3):323–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zarei M, Sedehi F, Raeisi E (2014) Hydrogeochemical characterization of major factors affecting the quality of groundwater in southern Iran, Janah Plain. Chem Erde 74:671–680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zhu Y, Zhang X, Xie Q, Chen Y, Wang D, Liang Y, Lu J (2005) Solubility and stability of barium arsenate and barium hydrogen arsenate at 25 degrees C. J Hazard Mater 120:37–44. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Geological Engineering, Faculty of EngineeringNiğde Ömer Halisdemir UniversityNiğdeTurkey

Personalised recommendations