Advertisement

Site characterization through combined analysis of seismic and electrical resistivity data at a site of Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India

  • Ravindra K. Gupta
  • Mohit AgrawalEmail author
  • Sanjit Kumar Pal
  • Rajwardhan Kumar
  • Saurabh Srivastava
Original Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

We present the seismic site characterization study using joint modelling of Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral-Ratio (HVSR) and Rayleigh wave-phase velocity-dispersion curves obtained from Multi-channel Simulation with One Receiver (MSOR) in a part of Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India. The joint analysis of these two different but complementary datasets puts stronger constraints on the model parameter search space than one dataset and may help us in finding more unique shear-wave velocity model. The microtremor data from 12 observation points were utilized to iteratively search 1D shear-wave velocity profiles in a predefined model search space. These 1D shear-wave velocity models were interpolated to generate a 2D shear-wave velocity profile of the site using the cubic spline method. Our results show that the high peak amplitude value of HVSR is associated with low peak-period values of HVSR at a distance of ~ 60 m from the southern end of the profile; which may indicate the presence of the Basin Edge Effect. We identified four layers based on significant changes in the shear wave velocities to a depth of ~ 60 m. The major impedance contrasts are located at average depths of ~ 13 m, ~ 40 m and ~ 55 m, respectively. These layers from the surface may indicate the presence of soil, highly weathered rock mass, moderately weathered rock and bedrock, respectively. The depth of engineering solid bedrock (Vs > 600 m/s) is found at the depth of 55 m in the south which gradually decreases to a depth of 40 m in the northern end of the profile. The shear-wave velocity (Vs 30) for this area varies between 293 and 357 m/s; which can be classified as “D-type site”. For validation and comparison of our results, the Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) data were also recorded along the same traverse using Wenner and Schlumberger configurations. Our results show a significant amount of correlation between the 2D shear-wave velocity and resistivity profiles obtained from joint analysis of tremor and ERT data.

Keywords

Site characterization HVSR MSOR Shear-wave velocity Electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Silvia Castellaro for the use of her GRILLA software, which formed the basis of our joint analysis of HVSR and dispersion curves obtained from MSOR techniques. We are also indebted to Editor-in-chief Olaf Kolditz and two anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments which helped in improving the quality of this manuscript. The support of Central Public Works Department of Dhanbad is also highly appreciated for providing the SPT borehole data of the survey area. This research was supported by Faculty Research Scheme grant (Project No. FRS (103)/2016–2017/AGP) from the Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines), Dhanbad, Jharkhand, India. Authors are also thankful to DST (SERB), Govt. of India for funding a project (SB/S4/ES-640/2012) on “Geotechnical characterization of Jharia coal field area using Geophysical techniques”.

References

  1. Akkaya I (2015) The application of HVSR microtremor survey method in Yuksekova (Hakkari) Region, Easter Turkey. J Afr Earth Sc 109:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albarello D, Lunedei E (2010) Alternative interpretations of horizontal to vertical spectral ratios of ambient vibrations: new insights from theoretical modeling. Bull Earthq Eng 8:519–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ansari MA, Khan PK (2014) Occurrences of damaging earthquakes between the Himachal and Darjeeling Himalayas: tectonic implications. Acta Geophys.  https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-013-0190-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arai H, Tokimatsu K (2005) S-wave velocity profiling by joint inversion of microtremor dispersion curve and horizontal-to-vertical (H/V) spectrum. Bull Seismol Soc Am 95(5):1766–1778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asten M, Boore D (2005) Microtremor methods applied to hazard site zonation in the Santa Clara Valley. Seismol Res Lett 76:257Google Scholar
  6. Babacan AE, Akin Ö (2018) The investigation of soil–structure resonance of historical buildings using seismic refraction and ambient vibrations HVSR measurements: a case study from Trabzon in Turkey. Acta Geophys.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-018-0208-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ball V (1881) A manual of the geology of India: Part 3, Economic geology, Geological Survey of India (Calcutta), p 313Google Scholar
  8. Bard PY (1998) Microtremor measurements: a tool for site effects estimations? Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the effects of Surface Geology on Seismic Motion, 3, pp. 1251–1279Google Scholar
  9. Bard PY, Irikura K, Kudo K, Okada H,Sasatani T (1999) Microtremor measurements: a tool for site effect estimation? In: The effects of surface geology on seismic motion 1999, pp 1251–1279Google Scholar
  10. Bishop AW, Henkel D (1962) The measurement of soil properties in the triaxial test, 2nd edn. Edward Arnold, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. Bonnefoy-Claudet S, Cornou C, Bard PY, Cotton F, Moczo P, Kristek J, Fah D (2006) H/V ratio: a tool for site evaluation. Results from 1-D noise simulations. Geophys J Int 167:827–837CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bonnefoy-Claudet S, Kohler A, Cornou C, Wathelet M, Bard PY (2008) Effects of Love waves on microtremor H/V ratio. Bull Seism Soc Am 98(1):288–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boore DM, Atkinson GM (2008) Ground–motion prediction equations for average horizontal component of pga, pgv and 5%-damped psa at spectral periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s. Earthq Spectra 24:99–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bora SS, Scherbaum F, Kuehn N, Stafford P (2014) Fourier spectral-and duration models for the generation of response spectra adjustable to different source, propagation, and site conditions. Bull Earthq Eng 12:467–493CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bora SS, Scherbaum F, Kuehn N, Stafford P, Edwards B (2015) Development of a response spectral ground motion prediction equation (gmpe) for seismichazard analysis from empirical fourier spectral and duration models. Bull Seismol Soc Am 105:2192–2218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Buyuksarac A, Bektaş O, Yılmaz H, Arısoy MO (2013) Preliminary seismic microzonation of Sivas city (Turkey) usingmicrotremorand refraction microtremor (ReMi) measurements. J Seismol 17:425–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Castellaro S, Mulargia F (2009) VS30 estimates using constrained H/V measurements. Bull Seismol Soc Am 99:761–773 No. 2ACrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Castellaro S, Raykova RB, Tsekov M (2016) Resonance frequencies of soil and buildings —some measurements in sofia and its vicinity. In: 3rd National Congress on physical sciences. Section: Physics of earth, atmosphere and spaceGoogle Scholar
  19. Cornou C, Ohrnberger M, Boore DM, Kudo K, Bard PY (2006) Derivation of structural models from ambient vibration arrays recordings: results from an international blind test. In: Third international symposium on the effects of surface geology on seismic motion, p 92, Grenoble, France, 30 August–1 September 2006Google Scholar
  20. Dahlin T, Loke MH (1998) Resolution of 2D Wenner resistivity imaging as assessed by numerical modelling. J Appl Geophys 38(4):237–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Di Stefano P, Luzio D, Renda P, Martorana R, Capizzi P, D’Alessandro A, Messina N, Napoli G, Todaro S, Zarcone G (2014) Integration of HVSR measurements and stratigraphic constraints for seismic microzonation studies: the case of Olivieri (ME). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 2:2597–2637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dikmen U, Mirzaoglu M (2005) The seismic microzonation map of Yenisehir-Bursa, NW of Turkey, by means of ambient noise measurements. J Balkan Geophys Soc 8:53–62Google Scholar
  23. Dobry R, Borcherdt RD, Crouse CB, Idriss IM, Joyner WB, Martin GR, Power MS, Rinne EE, Seed RB (2000) New site coefficients and site classification system used in recent building seismic code provisions. Earthq Spectra 16:41–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Endrun B (2011) Love wave contribution to the ambient vibration H/V amplitude peak observed with array measurements. J Seismol 15(3):443–472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eskisar T, Ozyalın S, Kuruoglu M, Yılmaz HR (2013) Microtremor measurements in the northern coast of Izmir Bay, Turkey to evaluate site-specific characteristics and fundamental periods by H/V spectral ratio method. J Earth Syst Sci 122(1):123–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fäh D, Kind F, Giardini D (2001) A theoretical investigation of average H/V ratios. Geophys J Int 145(2):535–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Field EH, Jacob KA (1995) Comparison and test of various site-response estimation techniques including three that are not reference-site dependent. Bull Seismol Soc Am 85:1127–1143Google Scholar
  28. Fox CS (1931) The Gondwana system and related formations. Mem Geol Surv India 58:1–241Google Scholar
  29. Gitterman Y, Zaslavsky Y, Shapira A, Shtivelman V (1996) Empirical site response evaluations: case studies in Israel. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 15(7):447–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harutoonian P, Leo CJ, Doanh T, Castellaro S, Zou JJ, Liyanapathirana DS, Wong H, Tokeshi K (2012) Microtremor measurements of rolling compacted ground. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 41:23–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harutoonian P, Leo Chin T, Ken, Doanh T, Castellaro S, Zou J, Liyanapathirana D, Wong H (2013) Investigation of dynamically compacted ground by HVSR-based approach. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 46:20–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hasal ME, Lyisan R (2012) Effect of edge slope on soil amplification at a two-dimensional basin model. In: 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, Lisbon PortugalGoogle Scholar
  33. Haskell NA (1953) Dispersion of Surface Waves on Multilayered Media. Bull Seism Soe Am 43:17–34Google Scholar
  34. IBC (2009) International Building Code. International Code Council, INCGoogle Scholar
  35. Kayal JR, Srivastava VK, Bhattacharya SN, Khan PK, Chatterjee R (2009) Source parameters and focal mechanisms of local earthquakes: single broadband observatory at ISM Dhanbad. J Geol Soc India 4:413–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Konno K, Ohmachi T (1998) Ground-motion characteristics estimated from spectral ratio between horizontal and vertical components of microtremor. Bull Seismol Soc Am 88:228–241Google Scholar
  37. Krishnaswamy VS (1962) Significance of the Moradabad Fault in the Indogangetic basin and other faults in the Sub-Himalaya in relation to the Ramganga River Project. In: Proc 2nd symp earthquake eng, Roorkee Univ, pp 411–422Google Scholar
  38. Kuo CH, Chen CT, Lin CM, Wen KL, Huang JY, Chang SC (2016) S-wave velocity structure and site effect parameters derived from microtremor arrays in the Western Plain of Taiwan. J Asian Earth Sci 128:(2016) 27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lachet C, Bard PY (1994) Numerical and theoretical investigations on the possibilities and limitations of Nakamura’s technique. J Phys Earth 42:377–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lermo J, Chavez Garcia FJ (1993) Site effect evaluation using spectral ratios with only one station. Bull Seismol Soc Am 83:1574–1594Google Scholar
  41. Lermo J, FJ Chávez García (1994) Are microtremors useful in site response evaluation? Bull Seism Soc Am 84:1350–1364Google Scholar
  42. Lin S, Ashlock JC (2011) A study on issues relating to testing of soils and pavements by surface wave methods. In: 38th annual review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation (QNDEm 2011), Burlington, VT, American Institute of Physics, Melville, pp 1532–1539Google Scholar
  43. Loke MH (2013) RES2DINV version 3.71. Geotom Software Sdn BsdGoogle Scholar
  44. Mainsant G, Jongmans D, Chambon G, Larosen E, Baillet L (2012) Shear-wave velocity as an indicator for rheological changes in clay materials: lessons from laboratory experiments. Geophys Res Lett 39:19301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mucciarelli M, Monachesi G (1998) A quik survey of local amplifications and their correlation with damage distribution observed during the Umbro-Marchesan (Italy) earthquake of September 26, 1977. J Earthq Eng 2:325–337Google Scholar
  46. Mundepi AK, Galiana Merino JJ, Kamal Lindholm C (2010) Soil characteristics and site effect assessment in the city of Delhi (India) using H/V and f–k methods. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 30:591–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nakamura Y (1989) A method for dynamic characteristics estimation of subsurface using microtremor on the ground surface. Q R RTRI 30:25–33Google Scholar
  48. NEHRP (2001) NEHRP recommended provisions for seismic regulations for new buildings and other structures (FEMA 368 and 369). 2000 Building Seismic Safety Council, National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  49. Nogoshi M, Igarashi T (1970) On the propagation characteristics of microtremors. J Seism Soc Japan 23:264–280 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  50. Nogoshi M, Igarashi T (1971) On the amplitude characteristics of microtremor (part 2). J Seismol Soc Japan 24:26–40 (in Japanese with English abstract)Google Scholar
  51. Ohrnberger M, Schissele E, Cornou C, Wathelet M, Savvaidis A, Scherbaum F, Jongmans D, Kind F (2004) Microtremor array measurements for site effect investigations: comparison of analysis methods for field data crosschecked by simulated. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering Vancouver, BC, Canada August 1–6, 2004 Paper No. 0940Google Scholar
  52. Olson LD, Miller PK (2010) Multiple impact surface waves (MISW)–Improved accuracy for pavement system thicknesses and moduli vs. spectral analysis of surface waves (SASW). In: GeoFlorida Conference 2010Google Scholar
  53. Över S, Büyüksarac A, Bekta Ö, Filazi A (2011) Assessment of potential seismic hazard and site effect in Antakya (Hatay Province), SE Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 62:313–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pandey MR, Molnar P (1988) The distribution of intensity of the BiharNepal earthquake of 15 January 1934 and bounds on the extent of the rupture zone. J Geol Soc Nepal 5:22–44Google Scholar
  55. Puglia R, Tokeshi KM, Picozzi EDA, Parolai S, Foti S (2011) Interpretation of microtremor 2D array data using Rayleigh and Love waves: the case study of Bevagna (central Italy). Near Surf Geophys 9(6):529–540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Ranjan SK, Pal SK, Singh KKK (2015) An approach to improve shallow surface investigation using joint analysis of Rayleigh and Love waves. Curr sci 109(7):1239–1242Google Scholar
  57. Renalier F, Endrun B (2009) Comparative analysis of classical measurements and newly developed methods. Delivrable D6:39 (2 Appendix. NERIES project)Google Scholar
  58. Rosa Cintas S, Galiana Merino JJ, Rosa Herranz J, Molina S, Martínez Esplá JJ (2012) Polarization analysis in the stationary wavelet packet domain: application to HVSR method Soil. Dyn Earthq Eng 42:246–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ryden N, Park CB (2006) Fast simulated annealing inversion of surface waves on pavement using phase-velocity spectra. Gophysics 71:49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ryden N, Ulriksen P, Park CB, Miller RD (2002) Portable seismic acquisition system (PSAS) for pavement MASW, Proceedings of SAGEEP 2002, Las Vegas, NV, 13IDA7Google Scholar
  61. Ryden N, Park CB, Ulriksen P, Miller RD (2004) Multimodal approach to seismic pavement testing. J Geotech Geoenviron 130:636–645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. SESAME (2004) Guidelines for the implementation of the H/V spectral ratio technique on ambient vibrations: measurements, processing and interpretation. User_Guidelines.pdf pp 62Google Scholar
  63. Sharma NK, Khan PK, Bhukta KK (2014) Nature of the Moho in the mid-eastern part of the Chotanagpur Plateau, India, from a receiver function perspective. J Geosci Arab.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1648-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Singh TBN (2013) Ground water information booklet Ranchi District, Jharkhand StateGoogle Scholar
  65. Souriau A, Roullé A, Ponsolles C (2007) Site effects in the city of Lourdes, France, from H/V measurements: implications for seismic-risk evaluation. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:2118–2136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Theodulidis N, Bard PY, Archuleta R, Bouchon M (1996) Horizontal to vertical spectral ratio and geological conditions: the case of garner valley down hole array in Southern California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 86:306–319Google Scholar
  67. Tokeshi K, Harutoonian P, Leo CJ, Liyanapathirana S (2013) Use of surface waves for geotechnical engineering applications in Western Sydney. Adv Geosci 35:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tokimatsu K, Shinzawa K, Kuwayama S (1992) Use of short-period microtremors for vs profiling. J Geophys Eng 118:1544–1558Google Scholar
  69. Verma RK, Bhuin NC, Mukhopadhyay M (1979) Geology, structure and tectonics of the Jharia coalfield, India-A three-dimensional model. Geoexploration 17:305–324.  https://doi.org/10.1016/00167142(79):90025-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zaslavsky Y, Sapira A, Arzi A (2000) Amplification effects from earthquakes and ambient noise in the Dead Sea rift (Israel). Soil Dyn Earthq Engg 20:187–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology (Indian School of Mines)DhanbadIndia

Personalised recommendations