Exceedance probability of precipitation for the Shuhe to Futuan Water Transfer Project in China

  • Huihua Du
  • Yimin WangEmail author
  • Kelin Liu
  • Liang Cheng
Thematic Issue
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Climate Effects on Water Resources


Influenced by the uncertainties and differences of the variations of precipitation abundance, the water source area of a water transfer project is different from the water receiving area, which will lead to risks for the operation of the water transfer project. In this article, expressions for the exceedance probabilities of wet vs. dry conditions were constructed on the basis of the copula joint distribution function. The flood season, non-flood season, and annual precipitation data from the Jvxian and Rizhao stations of the Shuhe to Futuan Water Transfer Project (SFWTP) were used for the analysis of synchronous and asynchronous exceedance probabilities. The computed results demonstrate that synchronous exceedance probabilities were greater than asynchronous exceedance probabilities via the analysis of the flood season, non-flood season, and annual precipitation, and the favorable probability is largest during the flood season. In order to maximize the SFWTP benefit, it is essential to increase urban water supply in the non-flood season, and transport water in the flood season to Rizhao reservoir. To further analyze the impacts of climate change on exceedance probability, the precipitation data were divided into two sub-periods by Pettitt test. In last sub-period, favorable probabilities increased with the decrease of synchronous exceedance probability in all timescales, which suggests that there are positive impacts of climate change on the exceedance probabilities.


Exceedance probability Bivariate copula Shuhe to Futuan Water Transfer Project 



This research was supported by the National Key R & D Program (2016YFC0400906), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51409169) and Technology demonstration project of Ministry of Water Resources of China (SF-201803).


  1. Bacchi B, Becciu G, Kottegoda NT (1994) Bivariate exponential model applied to intensities and durations of extreme rainfall. J Hydrol 155:225–236. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beersma JJ, Buishand TA (2004) Joint probability of precipitation and discharge deficits in the Netherlands. Water Resour Res 40:87. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cheng K-S, Hou J-C, Liou J-J et al (2011) Stochastic simulation of bivariate gamma distribution: a frequency-factor based approach. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 25:107–122. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Córdova JR, Rodríguez-Iturbe I (1985) On the probabilistic structure of storm surface runoff. Water Resour Res 21:755–763. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Correia FN (1987) Multivariate partial duration series in flood risk analysis. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. De Michele C, Salvadori G (2003) A generalized Pareto intensity-duration model of storm rainfall exploiting 2-copulas. J Geophys Res 108:4067. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Michele C, Salvadori G, Canossi M et al (2005) Bivariate statistical approach to check adequacy of dam spillway. J Hydrol Eng 10:50–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fang H-B, Fang K-T, Kotz S (2002) The meta-elliptical distributions with given marginals. J Multivar Anal 82:1–16. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Favre A-C, El Adlouni S, Perreault L et al (2004) Multivariate hydrological frequency analysis using copulas. Water Resour Res. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goda K (2010) Statistical modeling of joint probability distribution using copula: application to peak and permanent displacement seismic demands. Struct Saf 32:112–123. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Grimaldi S, Serinaldi F, Napolitano F et al (2005) A 3-copula function application for design hyetograph analysis. In: International symposium on sustainable water management for large cities, held during the seventh scientific assembly of the international association of hydrological sciences, Foz do Iguaçu, 3–9 April 2005Google Scholar
  12. Gringorten II (1963) A plotting rule for extreme probability paper. J Geophys Res 68:813–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gumbel EJ, Mustafi CK (1967) Some analytical properties of bivariate extremal distributions. Publ Am Stat Assoc 62:569–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. He C, Bai Y Niu J (2011) Study on the synchronous-asynchronous encounter probability of annual runoff series in Luanhe river basin. In: 2011 international conference on electric technology and civil engineering (ICETCE). IEEE, pp 2680–2683Google Scholar
  15. He Y, Ye J, Yang X (2015) Analysis of the spatio-temporal patterns of dry and wet conditions in the Huai River Basin using the standardized precipitation index. Atmos Res 166:120–128. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hofert M (2008) Sampling Archimedean copulas. Comput Stat Data Anal 52:5163–5174. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hofert M (2011) Efficiently sampling nested Archimedean copulas. Comput Stat Data Anal 55:57–70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hosking J (1990) L-Moments: analysis and estimation of distributions using linear combinations of order statistics. J R Stat Soc Ser B. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hu S, Wang Z, Wang Y et al (2010) Encounter probability analysis of typhoon and plum rain in the Taihu Lake Basin. Sci China Technol Sci 53:3331–3340. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. IPCC (2013) Climate change 2013 - the physical science basis. In: Stocker TF, Qin D, Plattner G-K, Tignor MMB, Allen SK, Boschung J, Nauels A, Xia Y, Bex V (eds) Contrib. Work. Gr. I to Fifth Assess. Rep. Intergov. Panel Clim. Chang.Google Scholar
  21. Krstanovic PF, Singh VP (1987) A multivariate stochastic flood analysis using entropy. In: Hydrologic frequency modeling. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 515–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Liu C, Zheng H (2002) South-to-north water transfer schemes for China. Int J Water Resour Dev 18:453–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manshadi HRD, Niksokhan MH, Ardestani M (2013) Water allocation in inter-basin water transfer with the virtual water approach. In: World environmental and water resources congress 2013. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, pp 2510–2521Google Scholar
  24. Nelsen RB (2006) An introduction to copulas. Springer, New York. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pettitt AN (1979) A non-parametric approach to the change-point problem. Appl Stat 28:126. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Plackett RL (1965) A class of bivariate distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 60:516–522. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sancetta A, Satchell S (2004) The Bernstein copula and its applications to modeling and approximations of multivariate distributions. Econ Theory 20:535–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shaked M, Joe H (1998) Multivariate models and dependence concepts. J Am Stat Assoc 93:1237. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Singh K, Singh VP (1991) Derivation of bivariate probability density functions with exponential marginals. Stoch Hydrol Hydraul 5:55–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sklar A (1959) Fonctions de répartition à n dimensions et leurs marges. Publ Inst Stat Univ Paris. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sraj M, Bezak N, Brilly M (2015) Bivariate flood frequency analysis using the copula function: a case study of the Litija station on the Sava River. Hydrol Process 29:225–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wang B, Ping F, Ting Z (2011) Analysis on synchronous asynchronous encounter of rich poor precipitation based on mixed copulas function. In: 2011 international conference on electric technology and civil engineering (ICETCE). IEEE, pp 1978–1981Google Scholar
  33. Xie H, Wang K (2013) Joint-probability methods for precipitation and flood frequencies analysis. In: 2013 3rd international conference on intelligent system design and engineering applications. IEEE, pp 913–916Google Scholar
  34. Xu P, Wang D, Singh VP et al (2017) A two-phase copula entropy-based multiobjective optimization approach to hydrometeorological gauge network design. J Hydrol 555:228–241. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Yan B, Chen L (2013) Coincidence probability of precipitation for the middle route of South-to-North water transfer project in China. J Hydrol 499:19–26. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yue S (2000) Joint probability distribution of annual maximum storm peaks and amounts as represented by daily rainfalls. Hydrol Sci J 45:315–326. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhang S, Lu XX (2009) Hydrological responses to precipitation variation and diverse human activities in a mountainous tributary of the lower Xijiang, China. CATENA 77:130–142. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhang L, Singh VP (2006) Bivariate flood frequency analysis using the copula method. J Hydrol Eng 11:150–164. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhang L, Singh VP (2007a) Gumbel–Hougaard copula for trivariate rainfall frequency analysis. J Hydrol Eng 12:409–419. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang L, Singh VP (2007b) Trivariate flood frequency analysis using the Gumbel–Hougaard copula. J Hydrol Eng 12:431–439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang J, Zhao Y, Xiao W (2014) Study on Markov joint transition probability and encounter probability of rainfall and reference crop evapotranspiration in the irrigation district. Water Resour Manag 28:5543–5553. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zheng H, Liu C (2001) Asynchronism-synchronism of regional precipitation in south-to-north water transfer planned areas. J Geogr Sci 11:161–169. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Eco-hydraulics in Northwest Arid Region of ChinaXi’an University of TechnologyXi’anChina
  2. 2.State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic EngineeringNanjing Hydraulic Research InstituteNanjingChina

Personalised recommendations