Extreme learning machine-based prediction of daily water temperature for rivers
- 95 Downloads
Water temperature impacts many processes in rivers, and it is determined by various environmental factors. This study proposed an extreme learning machine (ELM)-based model to predict daily water temperature for rivers. Air temperature (Ta), discharge (Q) and the day of the year (DOY) were used as predictors. Three rivers characterized by different hydrological conditions were investigated to test the modeling performances and the model results were compared with multilayer perceptron neural network (MLPNN) and simple multiple linear regression (MLR) models. Results showed that inclusion of three inputs as predictors (Ta, Q and the DOY) yielded the best modeling accuracy for all the developed models. It was also found that Q played a minor role and Ta and DOY are the most important explanatory variables for river water temperature predictions. Additionally, sigmoidal and radial basis activation functions within the ELM model performed the best for river water temperature forecasting. ELM and MLPNN models outperformed MLR model, and ELM model with sigmoidal and radial basis activation functions performed comparably to MLPNN model. Overall, results indicated that the ELM model developed in this study can be effectively used for river water temperature predictions.
KeywordsRiver water temperature Air temperature Discharge Extreme learning machine Artificial neural network
This work was jointly funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC0407200), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M640499), and the research project from Nanjing Hydraulic Research Institute (Y118009).
- Deo RC, Ghorbani MA, Samadianfard S, Maraseni T, Bilgili M, Biazar M (2018) Multi-layer perceptron hybrid model integrated with the firefly optimizer algorithm for wind speed prediction of target site using a limited set of neighboring reference station data. Renew Energy 116:309–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.09.078 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Du X, Shrestha NK, Wang J (2019) Assessing climate change impacts on stream temperature in the Athabasca River Basin using SWAT equilibrium temperature model and its potential impacts on stream ecosystem. Sci Total Environ 650:1872–1881. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.344 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Gallice A, Schaefli B, Lehning M, Parlange MB, Huwald H (2015) Stream temperature prediction in ungauged basins: review of recent approaches and description of a new physics-derived statistical model. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 19:3727–3753. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-3727-2015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Haykin S (1999) Neural networks a comprehensive foundation. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- Šiljić Tomić A, Antanasijević D, Ristić M, Perić-Grujić A, Pocajt V (2018a) A linear and non-linear polynomial neural network modeling of dissolved oxygen content in surface water: inter- and extrapolation performance with inputs significance analysis. Sci Total Environ 610–611:1038–1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.192 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Šiljić Tomić A, Antanasijević D, Ristić M, Perić-Grujić A, Pocajt V (2018b) Application of experimental design for the optimization of artificial neural network-based water quality model: a case study of dissolved oxygen prediction. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:9360–9370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1246-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Zhu S, Heddam S, Nyarko EK, Hadzima-Nyarko M, Piccolroaz S, Wu S (2018b) Modeling daily water temperature for rivers: comparison between adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference systems and artificial neural networks models. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3650-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar