Advertisement

Characterization and comparison of mine wastes in Can Coal Basin, northwest Turkey: a case study

  • Deniz Sanliyuksel YucelEmail author
Original Article
  • 62 Downloads

Abstract

The Can Coal Basin is a major coal-producing site in northwest Turkey that has faced acid mine drainage problems since the 1980s. This study characterized and compared mine wastes from the Etili and Comakli open-pit coal mines in the Can Coal Basin physically, mineralogically, and geochemically for acid mine drainage potential and metal(loid) mobility. Mineralogical analysis determined pyrite to be the major sulfide mineral in the Etili and Comakli coal and mine wastes, while dolomite and calcite were abundant in the mine wastes from the Comakli site. Concentrations of Al, As, Mn, and Pb in these mine wastes are higher than in Turkish and world coals. The enrichment factor showed moderate enrichment of Pb and significant enrichment of As in the Etili and Comakli mine wastes, respectively. Static tests indicated acid generation potential in all Etili and some Comakli mine wastes. The modified synthetic precipitation leaching procedure revealed that greater concentrations of Al, Fe, Mn, Ni, Pb, and SO42− were released from pyrite-rich mine wastes. Physical, mineralogical, and geochemical factors affecting acid mine drainage were highly variable within and between sites. Increasing concern over significant environmental health effects of low-pH, metal(loid)-polluted mine wastes necessitates remediation of the mine sites.

Keywords

Acid mine drainage Metal(loid) contamination Mine waste Modified synthetic precipitation leaching procedure Static test 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was partly supported by the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University under FBA-2016-759 numbered project. The author thanks to Canakkale Onsekiz Mart University Science and Technology Application and Research Center for SEM-EDX analysis. The author is grateful to Assoc. Prof. Mehmet Ali Yucel for his help during field studies, Dr. Burcu Ileri for her assistance in laboratory work and Dr. Mehmet Karadeniz for his constructive comments. Furthermore, the author special thanks to the four anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions.

References

  1. Adam K, Kourtis A, Gazea B, Kontopoulos A (1997) Evaluation of static tests used to predict the potential for acid drainage generation at sulphide mine sites. Trans Inst Min Metall Sect A 106:A1–A8Google Scholar
  2. Baba A, Gurdal G, Sanliyuksel Yucel D (2016) Enrichment of trace element concentrations in coal and its combustion residues and their potential environmental and human health impact: Can Coal Basin, NW Turkey as a case study. Int J Environ Technol Manag 19(5–6):455–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balkis M, Yazici B (1996) General Directorate of Turkish Coal Enterprises Can coal report (unpublished)Google Scholar
  4. Bozcu M, Akgun F, Gurdal G, Kapan Yesilyurt S, Karaca O (2008) Sedimentologic, petrologic, geochemical and palinologic examination of Can Yenice Bayramic (Canakkale) lignite basin. Report of the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  5. Carbone C, Dinelli E, Marescotti P, Gasparotto G, Lucchetti G (2013) The role of AMD secondary minerals in controlling environmental pollution: indications from bulk leaching tests. J Geochem Explor 132:188–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Charles J, Barnes A, Declercq J, Warrender R, Brough C, Bowell R (2015) Difficulties of interpretation of NAG test results on net neutralizing mine wastes: initial observations of elevated pH conditions and theory of CO2 disequilibrium. In: 10th International conference on acid rock drainage, 21–24 April, Santiago, Chile, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  7. Chon H, Hwang J (2000) Geochemical characteristics of the acid mine drainage in the water system in the vicinity of the Dogye coal mine in Korea. Environ Geochem Health 22:155–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dai S, Ren D, Tang Y, Yue M, Hao L (2005) Concentration and distribution of elements in Late Permian coals from western Guizhou Province, China. Int J Coal Geol 61:119–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dai S, Zeng R, Sun Y (2006) Enrichment of arsenic, antimony, mercury, and thallium in a Late Permian anthracite from Xingren, Guizhou, southwest China. Int J Coal Geol 66:217–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dai S, Wang X, Seredin VV, Hower JC, Ward CR, O’Keefe JMK, Huangf W, Lia T, Lia X, Liua H, Xuea W, Zhaoaet L (2012) Petrology, mineralogy, and geochemistry of the Ge-rich coal from the Wulantuga Ge ore deposit, Inner Mongolia, China: new data and genetic implications. Int J Coal Geol 90–91:72–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dai S, Yang J, Ward CR, Hower JC, Liu H, Garrison TM, Frenchc D, O’Keefeeet JMK (2015) Geochemical and mineralogical evidence for a coal-hosted uranium deposit in the Yili Basin, Xinjiang, northwestern China. Ore Geol Rev 70:1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dold B (2017) Acid rock drainage prediction: a critical review. J Geochem Explor 172:120–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Eraslan C, Orgun Y (2017) Mineralogical and geochemical characterization of the Saray and Pinarhisar coals, Northwest Thrace Basin, Turkey. Int J Coal Geol 173:9–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ercan T, Satir M, Steinitz G, Dora A, Sarifakioglu E, Adis C, Walter HJ, Ozbayrak IH (1995) Characteristics of the Tertiary volcanism in the Biga Peninsula, Gokceada, Bozcaada and Tavsanadasi, NW Anatolia. MTA Bull 117:55–86 (in Turkish) Google Scholar
  15. Faiz Y, Tufail M, Javed MT, Chaudhry MM, Siddique N (2009) Road dust pollution of Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn along Islamabad expressway, Pakistan. Microchem J 92:186–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fashola MO, Ngole-Jeme VM, Babalola OO (2016) Heavy metal pollution from gold mines: environmental effects and bacterial strategies for resistance. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13:1047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Finkelman RB (1994) Modes of occurrence of potentially hazardous elements in coal: levels of confidence. Fuel Process Technol 39:21–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gopal V, Kalpana G, Nethaji S, Jayaprakash M (2016) Geochemical study of core sediments from Ennore Creek, North of Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India. Arab J Geosci 9:141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gurdal G (2011) Abundances and modes of occurrence of trace elements in the Can coals (Miocene), Canakkale-Turkey. Int J Coal Geol 87:157–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gurdal G, Bozcu M (2011) Petrographic characteristics and depositional environment of Miocene Çan coals, Çanakkale-Turkey. Int J Coal Geol 85:143–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hageman PL, Seal RR, Diehl SF, Piatak NM, Lowers HA (2015) Evaluation of selected static methods used to estimate element mobility, acid-generating and acid-neutralizing potentials associated with geologically diverse mining wastes. Appl Geochem 57:125–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hower JC, Campbell JL, Teesdale WJ, Nejedly Z, Robertson JD (2008) Scanning proton microprobe analysis of mercury and other trace elements in Fe sulfides from a Kentucky coal. Int J Coal Geol 75:88–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jamieson HE, Walker SR, Parsons MB (2015) Mineralogical characterization of mine waste. Appl Geochem 57:85–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karayigit AI, Bircan C, Mastalerz M, Oskay RG, Querol X, Lieberman NR, Turkmen I (2017) Coal characteristics, elemental composition and modes of occurrence of some elements in the Isaalan coal (Balikesir, NW Turkey). Int J Coal Geol 172:43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lapakko KA, Engstrom JN, Antonson DA (2006) Effects of particle size on drainage quality from three lithologies. In: Proceedings of 7th international conference on acid rock drainage (ICARD), 26–30 March, St. Louis, Missouri, USA, pp 1026–1050Google Scholar
  26. Lawrence RW, Wang Y (1997) Determination of neutralization potential in prediction of acid rock drainage. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on acid rock drainage, 31 May–6 June, Vancouver, Canada, pp 449–464Google Scholar
  27. Lee P, Chae B, Yu S, Choi J, Oh C, Ji S (2016) Assessment of the alteration and acid-generating potential of deep boreholes for geological disposal. Environ Earth Sci 75:572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindsay MBJ, Moncur MC, Bain JG, Jambor JL, Ptacek CJ, Blowes DW (2015) Geochemical and mineralogical aspects of sulfide mine tailings. Appl Geochem 57:157–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu WH, Zhao JZ, Ouyang ZY, Soderlund L, Liu GH (2005) Impacts of sewage irrigation on heavy metal distribution and contamination in Beijing, China. Environ Int 31(6):805–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lottermoser BG (2010) Mine wastes: characterization, treatment and environmental impacts. Springer, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mallo SJ (2011) The menace of acid mine drainage: an impending challenge in the mining of Lafia-Obi coal, Nigeria. Int J Eng Sci 6:46–54Google Scholar
  32. Marescotti P, Azzali E, Servida D, Carbone C, Grieco G, Capitani L, Lucchetti G (2010) Mineralogical and geochemical spatial analyses of a waste-rock dump at the Libiola Fe–Cu sulphide mine (Eastern Liguria, Italy). Environ Earth Sci 61:187–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Martin JM, Meybeck M (1979) Elemental mass balance of material carried by major world rivers. Mar Chem 7:173–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martín-Crespo T, Gómez-Ortiz D, Martín-Velázquez S, Esbrí JM, Ignacio-San José C, Sánchez-García MJ, Montoya-Montes I, Martín-González F (2015) Abandoned mine tailings in cultural itineraries: Don Quixote Route (Spain). Eng Geol 197:82–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Miller SD, Jeffery JJ, Wong JWC (1991) Use and misuse of the acid base account for “AMD” prediction. In: Proceedings of 2nd international conference on the abatement of acidic drainage, 16–18 September, Montreal, Canada, pp 489–506Google Scholar
  36. Miller S, Robertson A, Donohue T (1997) Advances in acid drainage prediction using the net acid generation (NAG) test. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on acid rock drainage, Vancouver, Canada, pp 535–549Google Scholar
  37. Muller G (1969) Index of geoaccumulation in sediments of the Rhine River. Geojournal 2:108–118Google Scholar
  38. Muller G (1981) Die Schwermetallbelastung der sedimente des Neckars und seiner Nebenflüsse: Eine Bestandsaufnahme. Chem Ztg 105:157–164Google Scholar
  39. Noble TL, Lottermoser BG, Parbhakar-Fox A (2016) Evaluation of pH testing methods for sulfidic mine waste. Mine Water Environ 35:318–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Obaidy AHMJ, Talib AH, Zaki SR (2014) Environmental assessment of heavy metal distribution in sediments of Tigris river within Baghdad city. Int J Adv Res 2(8):947–952Google Scholar
  41. Okay AI, Siyako M, Burkan KA (1990) Geology and tectonic evolution of the Biga Peninsula. Turk Assoc Pet Geol Bull 2(1):83–121Google Scholar
  42. Olds WE, Bird B, Pearce JI, Sinclair E, Orr M, Weber PA (2015) Geochemical classification of waste rock using process flow diagrams. In: Proceedings of the 2015 AusIMM New Zealand branch annual conference, Australian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Dunedin, pp 307–308Google Scholar
  43. Palmer CA, Tuncali E, Dennen KO, Coburn CT, Finkelman RB (2004) Characterization of Turkish coals: a nationwide perspective. Int J Coal Geol 60:85–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Parbhakar-Fox A, Lottermoser BG (2015) A critical review of acid rock drainage prediction methods and practices. Miner Eng 82:107–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pascaud G, Leveque T, Saubrand M, Boussen S, Joussein E, Dumat C (2014) Environmental and health risk assessment of Pb, Zn, As and Sb in soccer field soils and sediments from mine tailings: solid speciation and bioaccessibility. Environ Sci Pollut Res 21:4254–4264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Plumlee GS (1999) The environmental geology of mineral deposits. In: Plumlee GS, Logsdon MJ (eds) The environmental geochemistry of mineral deposits, Part A: processes, techniques, and health issues, reviews in economic geology, vol 6. Society of Economic Geologists Inc., Littleton, CO, pp 71–116Google Scholar
  47. Price WA, Morin K, Hutt N (1997) Guidelines for the prediction of acid-rock drainage and metal leaching for mines in British Columbia: part II recommended procedures for static and kinetic testing. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on acid rock drainage, 30 May–6 June, Vancouver, Canada, pp 15–30Google Scholar
  48. Querol X, Whateley MKG, Fernandez-Turiel JL, Tuncali E (1997) Geological controls on the mineralogy and geochemistry of the Beypazari lignite, central Anatolia, Turkey. Int J Coal Geol 33:255–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Querol X, Klika Z, Weiss Z, Finkelman RB, Alastuey A, Juan R, Lopez-Soler A, Plana F, Kolker A, Chenery SRN (2001) Determination of element affinities by density fractionation of bulk coal samples. Fuel 80:83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Qureshi A, Maurice C, Ohlander B (2016) Potential of coal mine waste rock for generating acid mine drainage. J Geochem Explor 160:44–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sahoo PK, Tripathy S, Pangrahi MK, Equeenuddin SkMd (2014) Geochemical characterization of coal and waste rocks from a high sulfur bearing coalfield, India: implication for acid and metal generation. J Geochem Explor 145:135–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sanliyuksel Yucel D, Baba A (2013) Geochemical characterization of acid mine lakes and their effect on the environment, NW of Turkey. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 64(3):357–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sanliyuksel Yucel D, Baba A (2016) Prediction of acid mine drainage generation potential of various lithologies using static tests: Etili coal mine (NW Turkey) as a case study. Environ Monit Assess 188:473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Sanliyuksel Yucel D, Baba A (2018) Determining water and sediment quality related to lead-zinc mining activity. Arch Environ Prot 44(3):19–30Google Scholar
  55. Sanliyuksel Yucel D, Ileri B (2018) Evaluation of ultrasound-assisted modified fly ash for treatment of acid mine drainage. In: Akinyemi SA, Gitari WM (eds) Coal fly ash beneficiation—treatment of acid mine drainage with coal fly ash. InTech, Rijeka, pp 53–77Google Scholar
  56. Sanliyuksel Yucel D, Yucel MA (2017) Determining hydrochemical characteristics of mine lakes from abandoned coal mines and 3D modelling of them using unmanned aerial vehicle. Pamukkale Univ J Eng Sci 23(6):780–791CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sanliyuksel Yucel D, Yucel MA, Baba A (2014) Change detection and visualization of acid mine lakes using time series satellite image data in geographic information systems (GIS): Can (Canakkale) County, NW Turkey. Environ Earth Sci 72(11):4311–4323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sanliyuksel Yucel D, Balci N, Baba A (2016) Generation of acid mine lakes associated with abandoned coal mines in NW Turkey. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 70(4):757–782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sanliyuksel Yucel D, Yucel MA, Ileri B (2017) Monitoring metal pollution levels in mine wastes around a coal mine site using GIS. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci IV(4/W4):335–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Shokri BJ, Ardejani FD, Ramazi H (2016) Environmental geochemistry and acid mine drainage evaluation of an abandoned coal waste pile at the Alborz-Sharghi coal washing plant, NE Iran. Nat Resour Res 25(3):347–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sinex S, Helz G (1981) Regional geochemistry of trace elements in Chesapeak bay sediments. Environ Geol 3:315–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Smart R, Skinner WM, Levay G, Gerson AR, Thomas JE, Sobieraj H, Schumann R, Weisener CG, Weber PA, Miller SD, Stewart WA (2002) ARD test handbook: project P387a prediction and kinetic control of acid mine drainage. AMIRA International Ltd, Ian Wark Research Institute, MelbourneGoogle Scholar
  63. Sobek AA, Schuller WA, Freeman JR, Smith RM (1978) Field and laboratory methods applicable to overburden and mine soils. EPA 600/2-78-054, p 203Google Scholar
  64. SRK (1989) Chap. 4: prediction of acid generation and acidic drainage. In: Robertson S, Kirsten BC (eds) Draft acid rock drainage technical guide: BCAMD task force. BiTech Publication, Richmond, pp 4–13Google Scholar
  65. Sutherland RA (2000) Bed sediment-associated trace metals in an urban stream, Oahu, Hawaii. Environ Geol 39:611–627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sverdrup HU (1990) The kinetics of base cation release due to chemical weathering. Lund University Press, LundGoogle Scholar
  67. Swaine DJ (1990) Trace elements in coal. Butterworths & Co. Ltd., LondonGoogle Scholar
  68. TS 329 ISO 157 (2000) Coal-determination of forms of sulfur. Turkish standardsGoogle Scholar
  69. Turkish Inland Water Quality Regulations (2015) By-law on water quality management. Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs, Official Gazette, No 29327Google Scholar
  70. Urrutia MM, Garcia-Rodeja E, Macias F (1992) Sulfide oxidation in coal-mine dumps: laboratory measurement of acidifying potential with H2O2 and its application to characterize spoil materials. J Environ Manag 16:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2004) Test methods for evaluating solid wastes, physical/chemical methods, (SW-846). https://www.epa.gov/hw-sw846/sw-846-compendium. Accessed 6 Apr 2018
  72. Villeneuve M, Bussiere B, Benzaazoua M, Aubertin M, Monroy M (2003) The influence of kinetic test type on the geochemical response of low acid generating potential tailings. In: Proceedings of tailings and mine waste’03, Sweets and Zeitlinger Vail CO., USA, 269–279Google Scholar
  73. Younger PL, Banwart SA, Hedin RS (2002) Mine water-hydrology, pollution, remediation. Kluwer Academic Press, NorwellGoogle Scholar
  74. Yudovich YE, Ketris MP (2005) Arsenic in coal: a review. Int J Coal Geol 61:141–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mining EngineeringCanakkale Onsekiz Mart UniversityCanakkaleTurkey

Personalised recommendations