Advertisement

Environmental Earth Sciences

, 78:114 | Cite as

Environmental assessment of red mud by determining natural radionuclides using neutron activation analysis

  • Banu OzdenEmail author
  • Colin Brennan
  • Sheldon Landsberger
Original Article
  • 23 Downloads

Abstract

Bauxite residues (red mud) produced by digestion of bauxite ore during the production of alumina contain naturally occurring radionuclides such as 238U, 232Th and 40K and toxic elements such as Al, Cr, Co, Mn and Ni. In this research, red mud collected from Eti Seydisehir Aluminium Plant in Turkey was studied to determine the concentration of natural radionuclides for evaluating their radiological effects. Short-term leaching tests of radionuclides were performed by Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP)-1311 method to assess in terms of their environmental impact. Furthermore, self-attenuation factors were experimentally determined using radioactive point sources with two different amounts to ascertain how gamma rays are attenuated in the residue depending on the energy and the volume of residue. The activity concentrations of 234,235,238U, 232Th and 40K in red mud and leachate samples were determined by neuron activation analysis and Compton suppression methods. The method was tested using NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) 1632d and 2709a reference materials. It can be concluded from the results of leaching tests that natural radionuclides may not easily be mobile under environmental conditions and the mobility of the radionuclides depends on the pH value of water and contact time with the water. The activity concentration index which is the most commonly used calculation method was applied to the samples and the results showed that the reuse of red mud as a secondary raw material may not be hazardous depending on the percentage of utilization of it.

Keywords

Red mud Natural radioactivity By-product Leaching Neutron activation analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to Eti Seydisehir Aluminium plant in Turkey for their co-operation in gathering samples and sharing technical data. We are grateful to the staff at Nuclear Engineering Teaching Lab for running the TRIGA reactor. The authors also thank the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) for supporting the postdoctoral fellowship (BIDEP-2219) of Dr. Banu Ozden, under which her work was carried out.

References

  1. Akinci A, Artir R (2008) Characterization of trace elements and radionuclides and their risk assessment in red mud. Mater Charact 59:417–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Masri MS, Hasan M, Al-Hamwi A, Amin Y, Doubal AW (2013) Mass attenuation coefficients of soil and sediment samples using gamma energies from 46.5 to 1332 keV. J Environ Radioact 116:28–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arslan S, Ucbeyiay H, Celikel B, Baygul M, Avcu S, Demir GK (2015) ETI Aluminium red mud characteristics and evaluation of dewatering performance. BR2015—Bauxite Residue Valorisation and Best Practices Conference, Leuven, 5–7 OctoberGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaugelin-Seiller K, Goulet R, Mihok S, Beresford NA (2016) Should we ignore U-235 series contribution to dose? J Environ Radioact 151:114–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bhaskar M, Akhtar S, Batham G (2014) Development of the Bricks from Red Mud by Industrial Waste (Red Mud). Int J Emerg Sci Eng 2(4):7–12Google Scholar
  6. Boshkova T (2003) Effective thickness of bulk samples in ‘‘close’’ measuring gamma-ray spectrometry. Appl Radiat Isot 59:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boshova T, Minev L (2001) Correction for self-attenuation in gamma-ray spectrometry of bulk samples. Appl Radiat Isot 54:777–783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Council of the European Union (2014) Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM, European Basic Safety Standards (BSS) for Protection against Ionising Radiation OJ of EU. L 13/1, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  9. Croymans T, Schroeyers W, Krivenko P, Kovalchuk O, Pasko A, Hult M, Marissens G, Lutter G, Schreurs S (2017) Radiological characterization and evaluation of high volume bauxite residue alkali activated concretes. J Environ Radioact 168:21–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cuccia V, de Oliveira AH, Rocha Z (2011) Radionuclides in bayer process residues: previous analysis for radiological protection. International Nuclear Atlantic Conference—INAC 2011, MG BrazilGoogle Scholar
  11. EPA US (1992) Method 1311- TCLP (Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure). https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-12/documents/1311.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2018
  12. European Commission (1999) Radiation Protection 112. Radiological Protection Principles Concerning the Natural Radioactivity of Building Materials. European Commission, LuxemburgGoogle Scholar
  13. European Commission. RedMud Project.Marie Skłodowska-Curie action (2014) http://redmud.org/
  14. European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST). NORM4Building; 2013. https://norm4building.org
  15. Hegedus M, Sas Z, Toth-Bodrogi E, Szanto T, Somlai J, Kovacs T (2016) Radiological characterization of clay mixed red mud in particular as regards its leaching features. J. Environ. Radioact 162–163, 1–7Google Scholar
  16. Hegedus M, Toth-Bodrogi E, Jonas J, Somlai J, Kovacs T (2018) Mobility of 232Th and 210Po in red mud. J. Environ. Radioact., 184–185, 71–76Google Scholar
  17. Hofmann J, Leicht R, Wingender HJ, Worner J (2000) Natural radionuclide concentrations in materials processed in the chemical industry and the related radiological impact, Report EUR 19264, Nuclear Safety and the Environment. European Commission, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  18. IAEA-TECDOC-1660 (2011) Exposure of the Public from Large Deposits of Mineral Residues. International Atomic Energy Agency, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  19. Jobbagy V, Somlai J, Kovacs J, Szeiler G, Kovacs T (2009) Dependence of radon emanation of red mud bauxite processing wastes on heat treatment. J Hazard Mater 172:1258–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Johnston M, Clark MW, McMahon P, Ward N (2010) Alkalinity conversion of bauxite refinery residues by neutralization. J Hazard Mater 182:710–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karagiannidi Th, Papaefthymiou H, Papatheodorou G (2009) Radioactive impact of a bauxite beneficiation plant in the Itea Gulf (Gulf of Corinth, Greece). J Radioanal Nucl Chem 279(3):923–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kovacs T, Sas Z, Somlai J, Jobbagy V, Szeiler G (2012) Radiological investigation of the effects of red mud disaster. Radiat Prot Dosim 152:76–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Landsberger S (1994) Compton suppression neutron activation methods in environmental analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 179:67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Landsberger S, Kapsimalis R (2013) Comparison of neutron activation analysis techniques for the determination of uranium concentrations in geological and environmental materials. J Environ Radioact 117:41–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Landsberger S, Cizek WD, Domagala P (1992) NADA: a versatile pc based program for neutron activation data analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 160(1):277–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Landsberger S, Cizek WD, Campbell RH (1994) NADA92: An automated, user-friendly program for neutron activation data analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 180(1):55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Landsberger S, Kapsimalis R, Dolloff J (2013) Measuring activity of 235, 238U, 232Th and 40K in geological materials using neutron activation analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 296:323–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Landsberger S, Sharp A, Wang S, Pontikes Y, Tkaczyk AH (2017) Characterization of bauxite residue (red mud) for 235U, 238U, 232Th and 40K using neutron activation analysis and the radiation dose levels as modeled by MCNP. J Environ Radioact 173:97–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu Z, Li H (2015) Metalluurgical process for valuable elements recovery from red mud- A review. Hydrometallurgy 155:29–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu X, Zhang N (2011) Utilization of red mud in cement production: a review. Waste Manag Res 29(10):1053–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Millsap DW, Landsberger S (2015) Self-attenuation as a function of gamma ray energy in naturally occurring radioactive material in the oil and gas industry. Appl Radiat Isot 97:21–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nuccetelli C, Pontikes Y, Leonardi F, Trevisi R (2015) New perspectives and issues arising from the introduction of (NORM) residues in building materials: a critical assessment on the radiological behaviour. Constr Build Mater 82:323–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Papatheodorou G, Papaefthymiou H, Maratou A, Ferentinos G (2005) Natural radionuclides in bauxitic tailings (red-mud) in the Gulf of Corinth. Greece Radioprotection 40:549–555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Patel S, Pal BK (2015) Current status of an industrial waste: red mud an overview. IJLTEMAS 4(8):1–16Google Scholar
  35. Petra M, Swift G, Landsberger S (1990) Design of a Ge-NaI(Tl) Compton suppression spectrometer and its use in neutron activation analysis. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res Sect A 299:85–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Quindos LS, Sainz C, Fuente I, Nicolas J, Quindos L, Arteche J (2006) Correction by self-attenuation in gamma-ray spectrometry for environmental samples. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 270(2):339–343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Robu E, Giovani C (2009) Gamma-ray self-attenuation corrections in environmental samples. Rom Rep Phys 61(2):295–300Google Scholar
  38. Rubinos DA, Barral MT (2013) Fractionation and mobility of metals in bauxite red mud. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:7787–7802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sas Z, Somlai J, Szeiler G, Kovacs T (2015) Usability of clay mixed red mud in Hungarian building material production industry. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 306:271–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. UNSCEAR (2000) Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly with Scientific Annexes. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  41. Verma AS, Suri NM, Kant S (2017) Applications of bauxite residue: A mini-review. Waste Manage Res 35(10):999–1012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. WHO (World Health Organization) (2017) Guidelines for Drinking–water Quality. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/drinking-water-quality-guidelines-4-including-1st-addendum/en/ Accessed 25 Oct 2018
  43. Xhixha G, Bezzon GP, Broggini C, Buso GP, Caciolli A, Callegari I, De Bianchi S, Fiorentini G, Guastaldi E, Kaçeli Xhixha M, Mantovani F, Massa G, Menegazzo R, Mou L, Pasquini A, Rossi Alvarez C, Shyti M (2013) The worldwide NORM production and a fully automated gamma-ray spectrometer for their characterization. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 295:445–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Banu Ozden
    • 1
    Email author
  • Colin Brennan
    • 2
  • Sheldon Landsberger
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of Nuclear SciencesEge UniversityBornovaTurkey
  2. 2.Nuclear Engineering Teaching LaboratoryThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations